
Work Here?
Work Here?
Work Here?
American Enterprise Institute is a public policy think tank that pursues ideas rooted in democracy, free enterprise, and American leadership to defend human dignity, expand individual opportunity, and build a freer and safer world. Its scholars conduct rigorous, data-driven research across economics, education, health care, poverty, foreign and defense studies, public opinion, politics, society, and culture, then present the practical and moral cases for expanding freedom and strengthening the free enterprise system. AEI operates independently of political parties, does not hold institutional positions, and aims to advance policy options that improve lives and global security. Its work emphasizes a pluralistic, entrepreneurial culture and engagement with ideas that may be ahead of current consensus.
Industries
Data & Analytics
Consulting
Company Size
501-1,000
Company Stage
N/A
Total Funding
N/A
Headquarters
Washington DC, District of Columbia
Founded
1938
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Wellness Program
Mental Health Support
Flexible Work Hours
Remote Work Options
Paid Vacation
Paid Sick Leave
Paid Holidays
401(k) Company Match
401(k) Retirement Plan
Conference Attendance Budget
Professional Development Budget
Family Planning Benefits
Fertility Treatment Support
Stock Options
Company Equity
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Vision Insurance
Life Insurance
Disability Insurance
Phone/ Internet Stipend
Home Office Stipend
Hybrid Work Options
Parental Leave
Adoption Assistance
Childcare Support
Elder Care Support
Relocation Assistance
Employee Discounts
Meal Benefits
Pet Insurance
Gym Membership
Commuter Benefits
Tuition Reimbursement
Professional Certification Support
Mentorship Program
Training Programs
Educational Assistance
Higher Education and the noah moment. August 31, 2026 The storm clouds hovering above public and private universities in the United States are neither divine judgement nor a day of reckoning. Rather, they signal a wave of uncharted policies and practices institutions must learn to navigate or risk being swept away by swelling tides. Especially during a season when Americans' confidence in higher education is swaying in the wind. Federal examples of the changing landscape include the Department of Education reshaping higher education through federal loan limits by narrowing the definition of a "professional degree." Another is a new Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) rule that caps the visa stay at four years for foreign students pursuing a graduate degree in the United States. For students pursuing a Ph.D., this could result in an estimated reduction of 112,000 international students and a $3.4 billion loss to the U.S. economy. At the state level, demographic trends are already reconfiguring college classrooms. These shifts include a declining population of 18-year-olds matriculating in college and a gender gap that now leaves women outnumbering men by 3.1 million in 2021. Closures of small colleges across the nation, and the layoffs from it, coupled with the closure or merger of 24 colleges in Massachusetts which is often regarded as the smartest state in the nation, reflects broader changes. AI remains an ongoing challenge for higher education. A 2026 Digital Education Council survey identified that only 17% of U.S. and Canadian students believe their professors can help them develop skills in this area. Even broader, many are questioning whether higher education can do AI well and are evaluating students' dependence on it. Add in broken state aid systems, or the "missing middle," those families earning $50,000-$125,000, which categorizes them as too rich for need-based aid, but not rich enough to pay the entire tuition without a financial burden. For students able to borrow money to pay for college, approximately 12 million struggle to replay their loan. Welcome or not, these socio-economic and political factors place new demands on college and university leaders. A perfect storm is upon American Enterprise Institute. Higher education has spent the last several years assessing the storm clouds, but the problem is not what American Enterprise Institute can see. Its problem is responding too slowly to the atmospheric pressure. Given the perfect storm, leadership and purposeful partnerships remain two essential strategies to navigate the troubled waters of uncertainty and societal mistrust that characterize these times. With these troubling factors in mind, American Enterprise Institute co-hosted a higher education policy summit in Washington, D.C. on July 29, 2026 through an innovative partnership between the American Enterprise Institute and Johns Hopkins University. American Enterprise Institute titled the event Leading Colleges and Universities in a "Back to the States" Era. Its goal was to foster organically diverse conversations regarding the condition of higher education in the United States. The compass for guiding its policy summit was Capitalizing on College: How Higher Education Went From Mission Driven to Margin Obsessed (Oxford University Press, 2025), which is authored by one of American Enterprise Institute. To help institutional leaders navigate this uncertain time, its bipartisan policy summit assembled voices from across the learning, government, employment, and philanthropy sectors. In attendance were partners from seven sectors: * President (mission driven), * Trustee board or governing body (margin obsessed), * Government (regulatorily addicted - federal, state, and local) * Employers (recruiter craze) * Investors (ROI focused), * Civil society (faith, civic, and educational non-school institutions), and * Students (consumer oriented). Findings from this event will appear in an AEI policy brief later this fall. None of the problems American Enterprise Institute identified at the summit are a single fix, nor are the proposed solutions easy. But they do encourage innovation, proactive actions, and cross-aisle collaborations. Here are a few high-level takeaways from the summit. * Survivors of this storm will be hailed as visionaries a decade from now because they found dry land. The colleges that sank will be remembered as the unfortunate ones. (Although this assessment is a bit too simplistic). * Innovators will combine mission and innovation in creative ways that challenge, but they will also be stigmatized for generating new pathways and products for students. * Winners will be those who adapted early to the importance of inviting stakeholders from seven diverse sectors in the shipbuilding process. The seven stakeholders cannot solve the higher education crises at once, or alone. No matter the perspective one holds regarding the future of higher education, stakeholders need to stop observing the storm clouds as merely a passing nuisance and use the clarity of mission-driven purpose as its guide.
Release: Gary Rosen, veteran editor, joins AEI as a senior fellow, and Luke Strange heads AEI media relations. Latest work. For Immediate Release: Washington, DC (July 1, 2026) - American Enterprise Institute (AEI) President Robert Doar and Director of Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies Yuval Levin announced today that Gary Rosen has joined AEI as a senior fellow. His work will focus on American politics and civil society, political philosophy, constitutionalism, higher education, and media. Doar also announced that AEI Vice President of Government Relations Luke Strange will take on a new role overseeing media relations as vice president of government relations and public affairs. "All of us at AEI are delighted to welcome Gary Rosen to our community of scholars. His distinguished career as a leading public intellectual on the right and high-quality work as founding editor of The Wall Street Journal Weekend Review make him an extraordinary addition to our institution. I am also pleased that Luke will be taking on leadership of AEI's media relations team. His many years of experience representing AEI before policymakers on Capitol Hill and in the executive branch equip him well for this new role leading AEI's public affairs," said President Doar. Dr. Levin added, "Gary brings a depth of experience and expertise that will make him an enormous asset to AEI's work on the health and integrity of core American institutions." Before joining AEI, Dr. Rosen launched The Wall Street Journal's Weekend Review, which he edited for over 15 years. He previously served as chief external affairs officer of the John Templeton Foundation, managing editor of Commentary, and senior editor of City Journal. Dr. Rosen remarked, "I've worked with so many outstanding AEI scholars over the course of my career. It's a real honor to be joining their ranks." Mr. Strange said, "I am grateful to Robert for the opportunity to continue serving this outstanding American institution and its scholars." Mr. Strange has been AEI's head of government relations since 2020 and, in that role, oversees AEI's engagement with members of Congress, their staffs, executive branch policymakers, and outside policy organizations and coalitions. For questions, interviews, or other media inquiries, please email [email protected] or call 202.862.5829. The American Enterprise Institute is a public policy think tank dedicated to defending human dignity, expanding human potential, and building a freer and safer world. The work of our scholars and staff advances ideas rooted in our belief in democracy, free enterprise, American strength and global leadership, solidarity with those at the periphery of our society, and a pluralistic, entrepreneurial culture.
New 'SOURCE' tracks private money to higher ed. A conservative think tank is making it easier to find information about how private money flows to colleges and universities. On Wednesday, the American Enterprise Institute launched SOURCE (Searchable Open University Records of Charitable Expenditures), an interactive tool that gives users access to a dataset of more than one million grants valued at $90 billion plus, which some 57,000 U.S. private foundations have given to nearly 5,300 higher education institutions since 2008. The database was built by extracting information from 15 years' worth of publicly available 990-PF forms, the annual return that private foundations file with the Internal Revenue Service. Researchers can search by institution, country, funding organization and grant tag - such as athletic, general or research. "This information is often difficult to navigate, difficult to read and to the best of my knowledge no one has put together something systematic like this specifically focused on higher education," Tao Tan, affiliate scholar at AEI's Center for the Future of the American University, said at a webinar debuting the portal he developed. "What led to [the creation of SOURCE] was three questions: Where is the money coming from and why? What is it funding? And what patterns can we find?" One of the trends Tan has identified is that both the top funders and the top grantees account for half the awards; the top 165 funders give out 50 percent of the total grants, while 54 of the grantees received 50 percent of the grant dollars. Harvard, Johns Hopkins and Stanford Universities are the top three recipients.
Pentagon seeks help from Ford and GM. By Farah Stockman, Neal E. Boudette and John Ismay / New York Times April 17, 2026 - Last updated 1:41 p.m. KENNY HOLSTON/THE NEW YORK TIMES An aerial view of the Pentagon in Arlington, Va., in October 2025. The Pentagon has met with senior executives of Ford Motor and General Motors to gauge whether the auto industry could help the military acquire vehicles, munitions or other hardware more quickly and at lower costs, according to three people familiar with the talks. The Pentagon has met with senior executives of Ford Motor and General Motors to gauge whether the auto industry could help the military acquire vehicles, munitions or other hardware more quickly and at lower costs, according to three people familiar with the talks. The conversations are in the very early stages and relate to the possible production of components by the companies, not entire weapons systems. No specific projects are currently being negotiated, the people said. The discussions with automakers underscore Trump administration efforts to revamp military procurement as the war in Iran and U.S. support for Ukraine in its war with Russia deplete supplies. The idea is reminiscent of World War II, when GM, Ford and other automakers supplied the military. "The Department of War is committed to rapidly expanding the defense industrial base by leveraging all available commercial solutions and technologies to ensure our war fighters maintain a decisive advantage," a Pentagon official said in a statement in response to questions about the meetings with automakers. "The department is aggressively pursuing and integrating the best of American innovation, wherever it resides, to deliver production at scale and drive resiliency across supply chains." The Wall Street Journal reported earlier on the talks between the Pentagon and the automakers. The Trump administration has complained for months that traditional defense contractors take too long to manufacture weapons systems and charge too much for them. In January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that aimed to punish defense contractors that failed to expand their manufacturing capacity. And in November, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth rolled out a strategy for military procurement that included buying more widely available off-the-shelf components to avoid the high costs and delays associated with the specialized systems that the military typically uses. Don't miss out on what's happening! The defense industrial base "is stagnant, building the world's best and most exquisite weapon systems at low volume while relying on obsolescent parts, outdated manufacturing processes and stale innovation," the strategy read. "In contrast, the commercial industry outpaces the D.I.B. in advancing cutting-edge technology." The issue has become more urgent because the war in Iran has depleted U.S. stockpiles of commonly used munitions, such as Patriot missile interceptors. By some estimates, it could take five years or more to replenish the munitions that have been used in the last 40 days. "We are on borrowed time," said John Ferrari, a retired Army major general who is now a nonresident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a research group in Washington. "The Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians, everybody knows that we don't have enough munitions." The Pentagon has turned to auto suppliers because U.S. officials remember how Ford and GM revamped production lines during the COVID-19 pandemic to make personal protective equipment and ventilators. During World War II, the U.S. government asked car companies based in and around Detroit to produce weapons, an industrial mobilization that became famous for building what President Franklin D. Roosevelt called the "arsenal of democracy." The Willow Run factory that Ford built near Ypsilanti, Michigan, churned out thousands of planes, producing about one B-24 Liberator bomber an hour at its peak. But that was possible only because military officials designed the planes to be built using machinery Ford already owned, Ferrari said. A big question today is whether the Pentagon will be able to adjust its specifications and requirements to fit the machinery that carmakers use. "Otherwise, it is not going to work," Ferrari said. "The commercial factories are not going to go out and buy new machines, and if they did, that would take years." While they gave up making bombers long ago, some automakers continue to work with the military. GM, for example, has a defense unit that makes vehicles for the Army. Foster Ferguson, vice president of industrial business at Stratasys, a company that manufactures 3D printers used by Ford, said machines that mass-produce parts for the auto industry could make components for military systems. The U.S. military has been exploring the use of 3D printers to make replacement parts for older systems, he said, but the devices could also be used to mass-produce other components. Last month, Stratasys was selected to participate in a military pilot program to accelerate the qualification and deployment of 3D-printed parts. "The Pentagon is bringing a sense of urgency to the modernization and scaling of defense manufacturing," said Ferguson, who served as an officer in the Marine Corps specializing in supply chain and maintenance operations. "The automotive industry can make a significant contribution due to their expertise in economies of scale, cost-down engineering and experience in consistently producing high-volume, quality parts that meet strict production requirements." But many weapon systems require components that cannot be 3D-printed or need rare-earth metals mined or processed in China. (C) 2026 The New York Times Company 13 Comments
Last July, AEI and EdTrust, right-and left-leaning think tanks, respectively, and the national nonprofit Attendance Works joined forces to launch The 50% Challenge.
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
Industries
Data & Analytics
Consulting
Company Size
501-1,000
Company Stage
N/A
Total Funding
N/A
Headquarters
Washington DC, District of Columbia
Founded
1938
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today