Why Mxit failed: The rise and fall of South Africa's pioneer messaging app. FILE. Back in the early 2000s South Africa's pioneering messaging app Mxit grew to tens of millions of users, but it struggled to adapt to the smartphone era, and there was some key reasons behind its eventual collapse. Picture: STEPHANE DE SAKUTIN / AFP Image: STEPHANE DE SAKUTIN / AFP It's easy to point out in hindsight, but the reasons why WhatsApp remains the undisputed leader in global messaging while South Africa's Mxit rests in the tech scrapheap of yesteryear are clear to see. Long before WhatsApp arrived on the scene in 2009, Mxit was already operating as a global messaging platform, even if its base was predominantly concentrated in South Africa. Founded in 2003, the platform eventually reached a staggering 50 million users, with some estimates placing that figure closer to 100 million. By 2012, reports from MyBroadband indicated that Mxit was attracting an impressive 35,000 to 50,000 new users every single day. However, Mxit's downfall was intrinsically linked to the very foundation of its early success. The app was built for the pre-smartphone era, enabling users to send messages over feature phones with internet capabilities at a fraction of the cost of traditional SMS text messaging. Mxit's decline: failure to adapt in the face of competition and technological change. At the height of its popularity, Mxit's primary competition came from BlackBerry Messenger (BBM) and an emerging WhatsApp. While BBM would eventually suffer a similar fate, the battle for user dominance back then was fierce. When modern touch-screen smartphones began flooding the market, Mxit failed to pivot. Rather than redesigning its interface with smartphones in mind, the platform remained stubbornly focused on catering to traditional, aging feature phones. In an effort to retain interest, Mxit attempted to branch out by introducing extra features such as mobile games and public chat rooms. Unfortunately, this only rendered the interface cluttered, bloated, and clunky. As a result, millions of users were essentially pushed into the arms of cleaner, streamlined messaging apps that were eager to evolve alongside changing mobile technology. By 2015, Mxit's remarkable run officially came to an end as it was forced to shutter its commercial operations. It leaves behind an intriguing question: if Mxit had been willing to adapt and modernise with the times, could it have evolved into a global tech giant on par with WhatsApp today? You May Like Related Topics:

Research In Motion has agreed to acquire NewBay Software for about $100 million, AllThingsD reports. NewBay, based in Dublin, Ireland, sells LifeCache, a white-label cloud-based content management service. "LifeCache empowers customers to deliver user content services such as social networking, digital vault, photo and video albums, network address book, [...]

BlackBerry (BB): QNX is compounding, but Secure Communications just lost its momentum. BlackBerry's Q2 results highlight a widening gap between its two businesses, with improving QNX performance offering growth potential even as an in-line Q3 outlook weighs on investor sentiment. Published September 28, 2026 at 8:44 pm EDT BlackBerry Limited (NYSE:BB) fiscal second quarter shows two businesses moving in opposite directions at the same time, and the stock's roughly 3% slide on an in-line third-quarter guide indicates that the market is still weighing which one matters more heading into the back half of the year. BlackBerry's improving QNX performance also comes as investors place a higher premium on technology companies that can turn specialized platforms into sustained growth. In our recent story, Palo Alto Networks (PANW)'s AI Growth Faces a Higher Valuation Bar, we examined how strong operating momentum can raise expectations for cybersecurity and other technology companies as investors demand more from their growth stories. QNX is the clean growth story. Revenue rose 27% year-over-year to a record $80.3 million, gross margin hit a record 87%, and adjusted EBITDA jumped 41% to $29 million at a 36% margin, extending momentum from the first quarter's 26% QNX growth. The quarter's biggest single data point was Coretura, the Volvo Group and Daimler Truck joint venture, selecting BlackBerry Limited Alloy Kore platform for its next-generation commercial vehicles, the largest QNX contract in the company's history and one expected to add more than $100 million to the royalty backlog. Canaccord Hold, $9.50, down from $10.30, frames QNX as the core investment case now, arguing the record quarter and the Alloy Kore win more than offset weakness elsewhere. Management raised its full-year QNX revenue outlook for the second consecutive quarter, to $315 million to $325 million, and BlackBerry posted its sixth straight quarter of positive GAAP net income, ending the period with $447.1 million in cash. Secure Communications is where the story turns. That segment grew just 2% year-over-year to $60.9 million this quarter, a sharp deceleration from the first quarter's 24% growth to $73.6 million, and its adjusted EBITDA margin collapsed to 13% from 27% a year earlier on a heavier mix of lower-margin device revenue. What stands out is that management cut its full-year Secure Communications guidance to $260 million to $270 million preemptively, citing rising Canada-US trade tension risk given the segment's large U.S. federal footprint, while explicitly acknowledging it has not yet seen material impact or any pipeline slowdown outside North America. That is a defensive guidance cut made ahead of confirmed damage, not in response to it. Canaccord's own price target reduction, despite its enthusiasm for QNX, reflects exactly this tension: the firm's Hold rating persists because Secure Communications' softness is offsetting rather than being fully outweighed by QNX's strength, and it's the in-line third-quarter revenue guide of $143 million to $154 million, not the QNX beat, that actually drove the stock lower. What the smart money sees. Hedge fund ownership climbed to 31 funds from 19 in the second quarter of 2026, with D. E. Shaw increasing its stake 3,510% to 13.32 million shares worth $168.4 million and Citadel Investment Group adding 259% to reach $115.5 million. Renaissance Technologies raised its position 132% to $103.7 million, and Marshall Wace opened a new $57.7 million stake. Shares trade at 47.17 times forward earnings, below Okta's 54.35 but well under Palo Alto Networks' 94.34, and short interest sits at 6.42% of float, up modestly from 36.9 million to 37.63 million shares. Takeaway. BlackBerry Limited is now effectively two businesses trading as one stock: a QNX franchise compounding on real automotive design wins and margin expansion, and a Secure Communications unit whose own management is bracing for a geopolitical risk that has not materialized yet. Whether the stock re-rates further likely depends on whether Secure Communications stabilizes before QNX's growth alone is large enough to carry the whole company on its own.