Ubuntu's Myna speech-to-text now available in tech preview. A few months ago Canonical announced Myna as a speech-to-text solution for Ubuntu 26.10 as part of their effort for building a context-aware desktop. Myna as of today is available in "tech preview" form not only for Ubuntu 26.10 but also the LTS releases. Ahead of the Ubuntu 26.10 official release on 15 October, Myna is now available in tech preview form. Myna is optional on Ubuntu 26.10 and can also be installed on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and Ubuntu 26.04 LTS via Snap. Before getting too excited, Myna is still in early stages of development: "Myna is still under active development, so you should expect some rough edges. The core experience is there: press a shortcut, speak, and Myna transcribes directly into the application you're using." Myna runs the speech-to-text model locally and requires no Internet use after downloading the initial model. Myna supports Parakeet, Whisper, and FunASR on the back-end.

Ubuntu websites suffer second major DDoS outage 2026. Canonical's public-facing Ubuntu web infrastructure was knocked offline this month by a sustained distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack, disrupting access to core sites including ubuntu.com and canonical.com for several hours on October 8, 2026[[1]] [[4]]. The incident marks the second major DDoS outage to hit Ubuntu's web services in 2026, following a prolonged attack in the spring that took down a broader swath of infrastructure[[3]] [[8]] [[10]]. In an announcement to the Ubuntu community, Canonical said its websites were under a "sustained distributed denial of service attack" and warned that some services would be "intermittently unavailable" while response teams worked to restore connectivity[[4]] [[9]]. Status messages and community reporting indicate that the main Ubuntu and Canonical domains, including the Ubuntu blog and developer portal, experienced outages of roughly four hours at their peak, with additional shorter disruptions around the same period[[1]] [[6]]. By contrast, core backend services such as personal package archives (PPAs), CD image servers, Launchpad, the Snap Store, and Ubuntu single sign-on remained largely operational during the October event[[1]]. Discover more Secure Networks Try Cloud Tools Audit Security For users, the most visible impact was the temporary loss of access to documentation, download links, and security notices, with some visitors seeing error pages or timeout messages instead of the usual content[[1]] [[3]] [[5]]. Reports from community forums and news aggregators described the Ubuntu website and related resources as "inoperable" during the height of the attack, affecting ISO image downloads and other web-delivered assets that administrators rely on for new installations and maintenance[[6]] [[9]] [[13]]. There is currently no indication that the DDoS campaign involved exploitation of a specific software vulnerability or resulted in compromise of Canonical's systems; rather, it appears to have been a volumetric attack designed to overwhelm network and application capacity, a pattern consistent with the company's public characterizations and media coverage[[4]] [[12]]. Compare Security The October outage comes just months after a more severe DDoS incident that began around April 30 and extended into early May, when Canonical confirmed that Ubuntu's web infrastructure was under a "sustained, cross-border" attack affecting more than a dozen domains[[10]] [[11]] [[15]]. During that earlier campaign, key endpoints such as security.ubuntu.com, archive.ubuntu.com, and various Canonical portals were unreachable, preventing many users from installing or updating Ubuntu and cutting off access to security APIs and notices[[12]] [[13]] [[14]]. Hacktivists using the name "The Islamic Cyber Resistance in Iraq 313 Team" claimed responsibility for the spring attack on social channels, but Canonical has not publicly validated that attribution, and the group's role in any subsequent activity remains unconfirmed[[12]] [[14]]. So far, Canonical has not named a perpetrator for the October DDoS, and no hacktivist or criminal group has credibly claimed the operation in open channels[[3]] [[4]]. Company updates emphasize that incident response teams moved quickly to mitigate the traffic flood and restore affected sites, with the Ubuntu status page now showing all components as operational following the disruptions earlier in the week[[4]] [[6]] [[9]]. The absence of publicly disclosed technical indicators or detailed postmortem information suggests Canonical is focusing on hardening its web front ends and upstream providers while keeping attribution and deeper analysis close hold. Discover more Protect Devices Compare VPNs The recurring outages underline the operational risk that DDoS campaigns pose even to mature, globally distributed infrastructure, and they offer a reminder for enterprise defenders who depend on Ubuntu services for builds, updates, and documentation. Organizations that mirror Ubuntu packages locally, maintain offline installation media, and cache critical documentation are less exposed to upstream web disruptions, while those without such contingencies can see patch workflows and deployment pipelines stall when central resources go dark. Beyond local resilience, security teams should review their own DDoS posture - ensuring layered protection across DNS, web application firewalls, and upstream transit providers - and consider how a similar volumetric attack against their own public services could impede incident response or customer communication at a critical moment. Compare Security