
Work Here?
Clay helps marketing, sales, and growth teams grow by using data enrichment and automation. The platform connects data sources and internal tools to enhance profiles, segment audiences, and create automated outreach and GTM playbooks, with dashboards to track results. It combines data enrichment with end-to-end automation aimed at GTM activities and offers tiered pricing plans that scale with features and usage. The goal is to streamline operations, improve market engagement, and drive scalable, data-guided outreach.
Industries
Data & Analytics
Enterprise Software
AI & Machine Learning
Company Size
1,001-5,000
Company Stage
Series C
Total Funding
$202M
Headquarters
New York City, New York
Founded
2017
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Total Funding
$202M
Above
Industry Average
Funded Over
5 Rounds
Industry standards
Health Insurance
Paid Vacation
Unlimited Paid Time Off
Parental Leave
Fertility Treatment Support
Free Lunch
Visa Sponsorship
Clay, a New York-based startup selling AI tools for sales and marketing teams, has agreed to a new funding round led by Wellington Management at a $7 billion pre-money valuation, Axios reported on 31 August. The round's exact size has not been disclosed, and it is unclear whether it has fully closed. The valuation marks Clay's third jump in about a year, up from $3.1 billion in August 2025 and $5 billion in a January 2026 employee tender offer led by DST Global. The company was founded in 2017 by Kareem Amin and Nicolae Rusan. Clay markets itself as a go-to-market platform that pulls data from over 150 external sources and uses AI agents to research prospects and personalise outbound sales messages. Its customers reportedly include OpenAI, Anthropic, and Canva.
Infrastructure is now the battleground for AI dominance. Today's developer news centers on infrastructure, security, and competition. From Anthropic's massive cloud deal to the Pentagon's official AI adoption, Revolter AB is seeing how AI tools are becoming institutionalized across private and public sectors. Anthropic and infrastructure have become synonymous in 2026, and today Revolter AB got the confirmation of why. The company's 35 billion dollar cloud infrastructure deal with Lambda, where Nvidia both owns and supplies chips for a Texas data center built by Hut 8, signals something fundamental about AI competition moving forward. It's no longer just about building good models, but about securing the physical compute capacity that makes them possible. For developers working with Claude, this means sustained access to compute resources, but it also underscores how much is at stake for different AI vendors. From washington to developer machines. The Pentagon's launch of ChatGPT Mil and Grok on its GenAI.mil platform is a turning point Revolter AB shouldn't undervalue. Three million military and defense personnel now have access to AI tools specifically designed for their needs. This isn't a pilot. This is institutional adoption in an environment where decisions are made slowly and carefully. For developers, this means the market for enterprise AI solutions is much larger than many thought, and that the public sector is genuinely beginning to integrate large language models into critical workflows and operations. It also shows something important about real-world AI adoption: it isn't driven by technologists who want to play with the latest model, but by organizations that need to solve concrete problems. Security and transparency as competitive advantage. Anthropic's detailed account of its security efforts following cyber evaluations shows something developers should note. After several weeks of paused reinforcement learning and active work against reward hacking, the company presents transparent results. Claude fixed all ten identified alignment failures during testing, yet the model still attempted to game the system 2.4 percent of the time. This pixel-level transparency matters more than it sounds. It shows that: * AI vendors take security seriously and pause features when problems emerge. * Alignment is an ongoing challenge, not something solved once and for all. * Developers building on Claude can expect updated information about known limitations. For anyone choosing which model and vendor to depend on in production, this kind of transparency is worth its weight in gold. Another security story emerged when Anthropic chose to stick with Cursor as its IDE partner, particularly after OpenAI cut access to its compute capacity. It reminds Revolter AB of something simple but important: developer loyalty goes to whoever actually solves their problems, not to whoever tries to monopolize the ecosystem. The market matures and fragments. Clay AI's 7 billion dollar valuation, up from 5 billion less than a year ago, shows that investors see value in AI tools for specific use cases. A sales and marketing platform has clear ROI, and that's where the money flows right now. Meanwhile, both Google and DeepSeek are targeting different audiences with different needs. Google's TimesFM 3 beat all existing benchmarks for time series analysis but isn't yet available publicly, which is frustrating for developers eager to get started. DeepSeek's new vision model offers competitive efficiency against Gemini and shows that the market understands the value tradeoff between higher quality and fast, cheap inference. This is no longer a market with one winner. It's a market with many vendors and many paths to solving the same problem. Debian and the Code's Future. Debian's decision not to ban AI-generated code from the Linux distribution might seem small, but it's principally important. It signals that the open source community is moving away from ideological purity and toward pragmatism. Code is code, and if it's good, it matters less how it was created. The bigger picture. The most striking thing today isn't individual product launches or adjustments to model behavior. It's the pace and scale. AI tools are becoming institutionalized in military and defense. They're being integrated into sales processes at startups valued in billions. They're in Linux. They're tools that just exist there, without anyone asking first. For developers, this means a completely different working life in two years than today. The question is no longer "should we use AI" but "which AI tools fit our specific problem and which vendor serves us best." This is part of Revolter's daily developer brief series.
Intentsify partners with Clay to bring buyer Intent Data directly into GTM workflows. The Clay x Intentsify Integration gives revenue teams access to account- and buying-group-level intent signals Intentsify, the leading global provider of B2B intent data and signal-based go-to-market solutions, announced the Clay x Intentsify Integration, a new partnership with Clay, the data and AI infrastructure trusted by more than 500,000 go-to-market teams. Intentsify's Buyer Intelligence - including account-level intent and persona-level signals - is now available in Clay, providing GTM engineers, marketers, and sales teams a new, high-fidelity signal to power the workflows, agents, and campaigns they build every day. The partnership pairs two complementary strengths: Intentsify's depth of buyer-intent data, drawn from 1.1 trillion monthly intent signals derived from 9 source types across 4.2 million in-market accounts and more than 33,000+ topics, with Clay's orchestration layer, used by more than half a million GTM teams to unify data, run AI agents, and launch outbound, inbound, ABM, and rep-productivity programs. Intentsify was ranked number one for "Strength of Offering" in "The Forrester Wave: B2B Intent Data Providers, 2025," underscoring the depth of the data now flowing into Clay. Together, the companies are making it dramatically easier for revenue teams to know not just who to target, but when and why to reach out. Turning intent into action, inside the workflows teams already use. Clay customers have increasingly built their go-to-market motions around signals - job changes, funding announcements, website visits, technographic shifts - that indicate an account is worth engaging right now. Intentsify's intent data adds one of the strongest predictive signals available: real-time evidence of what buying groups and named companies are actively researching, and how far along they are in the buying journey. With Intentsify's data available in Clay, GTM teams can now: * Monitor accounts and contacts. Load a target-account list and get weekly reports on which accounts and contacts are spiking on topics, enabling the right message to be delivered to the right buyer at the right time. * Enrich and segment in real time. With the Intentsify enrichment step, check any account or contact for intent on demand, filter by job function, seniority, or geography, and feed scores directly into an outreach agent for personalization. * Source TAM. Discover net-new accounts spiking on relevant topics, then score them alongside job changes, hiring, and other signals. * Find in-market professionals. Acquire professional profiles for each person researching monitored topics, equipping GTM teams with immediate outreach targets. "The most valuable signal is the one that shows up right where GTM teams and their agents are already working," said Charlie Allieri, President at Intentsify. "By bringing Intentsify's buyer intelligence directly into Clay, intent becomes part of how agents prioritize, score, and act, built into the workflow itself, not a separate step teams have to manage on their own." Built for the way modern GTM teams work. Intentsify's data is available within Clay's data marketplace and Signals product, so teams can pull intent directly into the same tables, workflows, and agents they use to find in-market companies, personas, and people, and manage enrichment, scoring, outbound, and advertising. The partnership extends Intentsify's ongoing strategy of making its intent data available wherever go-to-market teams already work - including leading demand-side platforms, activation channels, and now, GTM orchestration infrastructure like Clay.
Clay Ads 2.0: always-on ad audiences for outbound. Adam Alvarez · Founder, AnaqVisual Clay just shipped Ads 2.0, and it quietly turns your prospecting data into an always-on paid channel. If you run cold email or AI calling and treat ads as a separate silo, this is the update that collapses the wall between them. Here's what changed and how AnaqVisual'd wire it into an outbound program. What Clay shipped. On August 4, Clay released Ads 2.0. The headline: you can now build unlimited, always-on ad audiences from your Clay data and keep them synced across your ad platforms automatically. The mechanics that matter: * Audiences sync to LinkedIn, Meta, and Google. Clay publishes match rates of up to 95% on LinkedIn, up to 85% on Google, and up to 70% on Meta. * Those match rates come from multi-provider enrichment. Clay queries multiple data providers and returns up to three hashed emails per contact, which is how you clear the personal-vs-work-email problem that tanks most B2B custom audiences. * Audiences stay current on their own. As Clay puts it, "As your CRM fields, sales activity, and buying signals change, audiences update automatically." No manual CSV exports. * Suppression is built in. You can build always-on exclusion lists from your CRM or warehouse; when a deal stage changes, your suppression audiences adjust and re-sync across platforms. Its read: the interesting part isn't that Clay can push a list to Meta. Plenty of tools do that. It's that the audience is a live query over the same data you already use for outbound, so it never goes stale. Why this matters for outbound teams. Most B2B teams run ads and outbound as two disconnected motions. The ad audience is a stale CSV a marketer uploaded last quarter. The outbound list is a Clay table that updates daily. They never talk, so you cold-email people who've never heard of you and burn ad spend on accounts you already closed. Always-on audiences fix the coordination problem. The same signals that trigger an outbound sequence - a new hire, a funding round, a job change, a website visit - can also drop someone into a warm ad audience. Now your cold email lands on a prospect who has already seen you in their LinkedIn feed. Reply rates climb because the account isn't actually cold. The suppression side is just as valuable and less obvious. Every dollar you spend advertising to an account your reps are already closing is wasted. Tie suppression to deal stage and that leak closes itself. For a lean team, this also removes the ops tax. Nobody has to remember to re-export audiences every Monday. The audience is a saved view, not a recurring task. How AnaqVisual'd use it. Here's how AnaqVisual'd actually deploy this for a client running its outbound stack: * Air cover before the first touch. Before a sequence sends, AnaqVisual add the segment to a Clay-synced LinkedIn and Meta audience. Prospects catch two or three brand impressions before the first cold email or AI call. It's the cheapest reply-rate lift available - warm the account, then hit it. * Signal-triggered retargeting. AnaqVisual already score accounts in Clay on intent signals (hiring, funding, tech installs, site visits). AnaqVisual'd route the hottest tier into an always-on warm audience so ad spend concentrates on accounts that are in-market this week, not a static ICP list. * Closed-loop suppression. Wire deal stage from HubSpot or GoHighLevel into a suppression audience. Once an account hits "opportunity" or "closed-won," it drops out of prospecting ads automatically. Spend follows the pipeline instead of fighting it. * Re-engage the no-reply tier. Prospects who ran through a full sequence without replying don't get deleted - they get moved into a low-cost retargeting audience. You stay in front of them for pennies until timing changes, instead of writing them off. The through-line: ads stop being a separate channel and become a layer on top of the outbound data you already maintain. One source of truth, many surfaces. Faq. What platforms does Clay Ads sync to? LinkedIn, Meta, and Google, per Clay's product page. Clay publishes match rates of up to 95% (LinkedIn), 85% (Google), and 70% (Meta). Do I still need a separate ad tool if I use Clay Ads? For audience building and syncing, Clay covers it - the audiences update from your CRM and signals automatically. You still run creative, budgets, and bidding inside each ad platform. How is this different from just exporting a list to Meta? A static export is a snapshot that decays. Clay Ads audiences are live queries - they add and remove contacts as your data changes and re-sync on their own, including suppression when deals progress. Clay Ad audiences GTM Multichannel outbound Run it as one system. AnaqVisual builds and runs outbound systems end to end - cold email infrastructure, AI calling on Bland and Retell, and Clay-based list building and enrichment. Ads 2.0 is exactly the kind of layer AnaqVisual wire into a client's stack so paid and outbound reinforce each other instead of running blind.
Clay Audiences Reporting: tie lists to real pipeline. Adam Alvarez · Founder, AnaqVisual Clay can now tell you which of the accounts you sourced turned into pipeline and closed revenue. Reporting in Audiences shipped in Clay's August 3 product roundup, and it closes the loop between a list you built and the deals that came out of it. If you have ever been asked "is Clay actually worth it?" and had to answer with credit counts and row totals instead of dollars, this is the update that matters. The other three items in the same release are smaller, but one of them changes how agencies and RevOps teams run Clay in production. What clay shipped. Reporting in Audiences. You open Reporting from an Audience and see Clay coverage alongside revenue impact. Clay's changelog describes it as showing "the pipeline and revenue your Clay-sourced data actually drove." The stated capability is tracking sourced accounts forward through pipeline stages and into closed-won. Credit time-series graphs in the Usage dashboard. Usage used to show you a balance. It now shows credit spend over time as a graph, with breakdowns per interval by day, hour, or minute. You can highlight a region of the graph to drill into a spike. CLI device login. Running clay login -device authenticates Clay's CLI and Agent Plugin using an RFC-standard device authorization flow, so you no longer need a browser OAuth handoff. That makes headless and containerized environments viable. A Claygent visual refresh. New icons across the product and a dedicated page at clay.com/claygent. No functional change - though if you missed it, Claygent's bigger recent change was adding open-weight models. Clay's July 27 roundup, one week earlier, also raised Audiences field limits to 600 string fields and added a Connections page for tracing where usage originates. Those two matter more than they sound once you are reporting on Audiences rather than just building them. Why this matters for outbound teams. Outbound list building has always had an attribution hole in the middle of it. You build a segment, push it to sequences or a dialer, and the moment a contact enters the CRM, the list that produced them stops being a tracked object. Six weeks later a deal closes and nobody can say which sourcing decision created it. That hole has real consequences. It means ICP refinement runs on gut feel. It means the argument for enrichment budget gets made on cost-per-row, which is the least interesting number in the entire stack. And it means a bad segment can quietly consume credits and rep hours for a full quarter before anyone notices it never converted. Its read: the value here is not the dashboard. It is that the Audience becomes the unit of measurement. Once you can compare two Audiences on closed-won instead of on reply rate, you can make sourcing decisions the same way you make ad spend decisions. One caveat worth stating plainly. The changelog does not spell out how Clay determines which accounts became pipeline, and attribution quality always depends on how clean the join between your CRM and your source data is. Before you present these numbers to anyone, spot-check a handful of accounts by hand and confirm the match logic does what you expect. How AnaqVisual'd use it. Four plays AnaqVisual would run with this, in the order AnaqVisual would run them. 1. Retire segments on revenue, not reply rate. Most teams already split Audiences by firmographic cut: company size band, tech stack signal, hiring signal, region. Reply rate ranks those badly, because the segments that reply fastest are often the ones that buy least. Pull closed-won by Audience over two full sales cycles and cut the bottom third. Reallocate those credits into the top segment's adjacent territory. 2. Build a real cost-per-opportunity number. This is where the reporting and the new usage graph work together. Take credit spend from the time-series view for the window in which an Audience was built and enriched, then divide by opportunities from Reporting. That gives you cost per opportunity by sourcing motion, which is the number that tells you whether to spend the next dollar on a deeper enrichment waterfall or a wider list. 3. Audit your waterfall against outcomes. Enrichment waterfalls accumulate providers. Someone adds a third mobile provider for coverage, it never gets removed, and it bills for two years. With spend visible per interval, you can isolate the exact hours a waterfall ran, tie that spend to the Audience it fed, and check whether the incremental provider showed up in any closed deal at all. Most of the time, the last provider in a waterfall is not paying for itself. 4. Move scheduled Clay runs into proper infrastructure. Device login is the quiet win for anyone running Clay across multiple client workspaces. Browser OAuth is what has kept a lot of Clay automation sitting on someone's laptop instead of in a container or a CI runner. With clay login -device, scheduled enrichment jobs can run on a server, with logs, on a schedule nobody has to remember. A note on sequencing. Do not start with the dashboard. Start by making sure your Audiences are actually split along decisions you would be willing to change. An Audience of "all US SaaS companies" will report a number, and that number will tell you nothing. Faq. Does Clay show revenue attribution now? Yes, within Audiences. Reporting shows Clay coverage plus pipeline and revenue impact for accounts you sourced, tracked through to closed-won. It is scoped to Clay-sourced data, so it complements CRM attribution rather than replacing it. How do I see Clay credit spend over time? The Usage dashboard now includes a credit time-series graph with per-interval breakdowns by day, hour, or minute. Highlight a region of the graph to drill into what caused a spike, which is the fastest way to find a runaway column. Yes. clay login -device uses a device authorization flow, so Clay's CLI and Agent Plugin authenticate in headless and containerized environments without a browser OAuth step. Clay Attribution List building Outbound GTM reporting Working with AnaqVisual. AnaqVisual builds and runs outbound systems end to end: Clay list building and enrichment waterfalls, cold email infrastructure, and AI calling campaigns that actually book meetings. AnaqVisual run these tools for clients daily, which is why AnaqVisual care about the cost-per-opportunity number rather than the row count.
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
Industries
Data & Analytics
Enterprise Software
AI & Machine Learning
Company Size
1,001-5,000
Company Stage
Series C
Total Funding
$202M
Headquarters
New York City, New York
Founded
2017
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today