D

Drata

Automates security compliance and risk management.

Overview

Drata provides a trust management platform that automates security compliance and risk management so teams can demonstrate their security posture to customers. It works by connecting to a company’s cloud, identity, HR, and developer tools to collect evidence and continuously monitor controls, enabling audits across many frameworks (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR) or custom ones. Compared with competitors, it combines continuous monitoring, broad framework coverage, deep integrations, and a dedicated trust center, plus AI-assisted content generation and governance features, offering an end-to-end compliance solution. The goal is to help organizations stay audit-ready, reduce the time and effort of compliance, and clearly show their security posture to customers and partners.

Work here?Claim your company

About Drata

Simplify's Rating
Why Drata is rated
B+
Rated B on Competitive Edge
Rated A on Growth Potential
Rated B on Differentiation

Industries

Data & AnalyticsEnterprise SoftwareCybersecurityAI & Machine Learning

Company Size

501-1,000

Company Stage

Series C

Total Funding

$328.2M

Headquarters

San Francisco, CA

Founded

2020

Get referred to Drata

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's take

What believers are saying

  • Drata launched standalone agentic TPRM on September 17, 2026, broadening revenue beyond audits.
  • Limited Availability AI Agent Governance shipped August 4, 2026 with production customers already live.
  • Demand stays strong: Drata saw 30% AI-question growth and 8,500-plus organizations using it.

What critics are saying

  • Anthropic-first coverage in August 2026 leaves OpenAI, Vertex, and Bedrock incomplete.
  • Crowded AI governance markets from OWASP, CSA, and vendors commoditize Drata's differentiation.
  • If buyers standardize on native cloud controls, Drata's compliance layer gets squeezed out.

What makes Drata unique

  • Drata turns compliance into continuous monitoring, evidence collection, and audit-ready records daily.
  • Its Trust Graph processed 2.1 million security questions, giving product data others lack.
  • AI Agent Governance watches agents inline, mapping owners, permissions, and tool calls immediately.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Funding

Total Funding

$328.2M

Above

Industry Average

Funded Over

4 Rounds

Notable Investors:
Series C funding is usually for startups that are doing well and are looking for more money to fuel major growth, such as acquiring other companies, expanding into global markets, or launching new product lines. Investors typically include larger venture capital firms and private equity.
Series C Funding Comparison
Above Average

Industry standards

$50M
$50M
$62M
$100M
$200M

Benefits

  • Health benefits
  • Learning enrichment stipends
  • Flexible PTO
  • Work from home stipend
  • 401k
  • Parental leave

Growth & Insights and Company News

6 month growth

-12%

1 year growth

-14%

2 year growth

-14%
Data Centre Realty
Nov 7th, 2026
Why compliance evidence still needs human review.

Why compliance evidence still needs human review. Even when a five-person software startup and a multinational technology company both need SOC 2 compliance, and their obligations overlap, the tools they use don't have to be the same. When a small business is preparing for a first audit, the greatest difficulty may be getting policies organized, responsibilities assigned, and evidence collected. Understanding the difference between those needs can prevent an expensive software decision, since a larger organization might need automated monitoring across dozens of cloud services. Start by looking at what your team actually does. Before selecting a Drata alternative, examine how your company currently manages compliance. Consider whether access records are already maintained, security policies are documented, and evidence of software approvals or staff training can be retrieved. If these activities involve a manageable number of systems and employees, a straightforward compliance workspace may do the job. Whether automation solves a genuine operational problem or introduces complexity before your business needs it is the important distinction, though automated evidence collection can reduce repetitive administrative work for larger organizations. Look beyond the subscription price. Comparing Drata pricing with other compliance platforms can be difficult because Drata uses personalized quotes rather than publishing a standard subscription price. Drata requires businesses to contact its sales team for pricing, while CertAssist takes a different approach: an advertised launch price of US$225 per month against a regular US$375 monthly rate, plus an annual subscription at US$2,475. Software fees aren't the complete cost of compliance, even though published figures make preliminary budgeting easier; independent audits, penetration testing where needed, employee time, and outside consulting may need separate budgets. Understand what integrations actually involve. Numerous compliance automation platforms integrate directly with cloud environments, identity providers, and development tools. Such integrations can collect evidence continuously and help teams spot control gaps. They also call for organizations to look closely at third-party permissions, access management, and vendor security. Instead of live infrastructure access, CertAssist has users upload evidence directly. Integration setup and the standing system permissions that come with it are removed, although the security of uploaded documents remains the business's responsibility. Manual evidence collection requires more involvement, but it can be practical for smaller organizations. Compare platforms by their operating models. Vanta, Secureframe, Sprinto, and Thoropass are among the established Drata competitors on the market. These providers offer different combinations of automation, compliance management, and audit support. CertAssist is centered on organizing the underlying compliance work. The platform includes framework controls, editable policy templates, evidence storage, and read-only auditor access. An approach without extensive automated monitoring may be attractive to startups seeking a cheaper alternative to Drata, provided such monitoring isn't necessary. However, businesses with numerous cloud accounts or frequent infrastructure changes may be better served by an integration-based platform. Simplify the way you prepare for an audit. Compliance software should help teams understand what needs to be completed, who is responsible, and which evidence remains outstanding. CertAssist supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, and additional frameworks within one subscription. Users can adapt policy templates to their operations, upload supporting documentation, and allow auditors to review the relevant materials. The software does not replace an independent certification or attestation process. What it offers is a structured environment for preparing and organizing the work. Choose simplicity without sacrificing responsibility. An affordable platform is only useful if it supports your organization's real compliance requirements. Before subscribing, review your audit scope, available staff resources, evidence collection workload, and expected growth. Small teams that value transparent pricing, direct evidence management, and minimal setup will find CertAssist a practical option. For startups beginning their compliance journey, the most effective software isn't necessarily the platform with the most features. It's the one the team can use consistently as it builds security practices that hold up to independent review. It's possible for a five-person software startup and a multinational technology company to need SOC 2 compliance at the same time. Although their security obligations November 8, 2026 5:47 pm Even when a five-person software startup and a multinational technology company both need SOC 2 compliance, and their obligations overlap, the tools they use don't November 7, 2026 1:05 pm An unexpected meeting with your manager can change your working life in minutes. You might be handed a termination letter, asked to accept a reduced November 7, 2026 3:32 am The city may have a grand idea for a new park, but transforming that vision into reality, you need reliable project details. Before construction can November 6, 2026 4:12 am A pump station that is old doesn't need to stop functioning to be a problem. It may still move the water and wastewater daily however, November 6, 2026 4:07 am A promising enterprise deal reaches the final procurement stage. Pricing is agreed upon, implementation discussions are underway, and your customer likes the product. Then comes November 6, 2026 2:38 am

Glow
Nov 3rd, 2026
Glow appoints Alex Patman as Chief Revenue Officer.

Glow appoints Alex Patman as Chief Revenue Officer. November 3, 2026 Glow is excited to welcome Alex Patman as Chief Revenue Officer of Glow. Alex brings 10 years of experience building and scaling high-performing go-to-market organizations, with a track record of helping cybersecurity companies accelerate growth and build lasting customer relationships. As CRO, Alex will lead Glow's global go-to-market strategy, expanding its sales leadership and organization, developing strategic partnerships, and helping Glow deliver a world-class customer experience as Glow scale. His leadership will be instrumental in translating its early momentum into long-term growth. Prior to joining Glow, Alex served as Chief Revenue Officer at Drata, where he helped scale revenue beyond $100 million, expanded the company's international presence, and built a go-to-market organization of more than 250 people. Previously, he spent over a decade at Okta, rising through the sales leadership ranks and helping grow the business from $10 million to more than $1 billion in annual recurring revenue (ARR), ultimately serving as Vice President of Sales. Throughout his career, Alex has demonstrated a commitment to customer success and building strong teams. Glow is delighted to have Alex on board to help lead this next chapter. Welcome to Glow, Alex! Glow is continuing to expand its go-to-market team. If you're passionate about helping enterprises securely embrace AI, visit its Careers page for opportunities.

AiThority
Sep 17th, 2026
Drata debuts agentic Third-Party Risk Management to replace checkbox scoring with evidence-backed, defensible vendor risk decisions.

Drata debuts agentic Third-Party Risk Management to replace checkbox scoring with evidence-backed, defensible vendor risk decisions. Drata's standalone Third-Party Risk Management solution automates vendor review end-to-end, cutting assessment time to minutes and expanding coverage across the entire vendor portfolio. Sep 17, 2026 Prev Next 1 of 43,735 Drata, the leading Agentic Trust Management Platform, announced its Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) product is now available for the first time as an independent solution. Built around an agentic assessment engine, Drata TPRM is designed to replace static, point-in-time vendor scoring with continuous, evidence-backed risk decisions that hold up to scrutiny at any scale. Resolving the Visibility Gap Companies rely on third-party technology more than ever to scale - and AI accelerates that reliance exponentially. Yet most GRC programs struggle to thoroughly assess each vendor. According to the Drata State of GRC in the Age of AI Report, 75% of GRC leaders say the pace of AI adoption is outpacing their teams' ability to properly vet third parties. Thorough, manual vendor reviews consume hundreds of hours, stealing critical time and attention away from the security team. As a result, in-depth reviews are often reserved for just the 10-20% most critical vendors, leaving up to 90% of the average company's third-party portfolio assessed with far less rigor, accumulating unmeasured risk. Even worse, findings from an upcoming Drata report shows 76% of organizations re-assess their third-party partners and vendors no more often than once a year. With TPRM, Drata delivers: * Defensible decisions, at every stage. Every result - inherent and residual assessment - comes with the reasoning and evidence behind it, so when an auditor asks why, there's something specific to point to, not a black box score. * Consistent judgment, every vendor. Consistent standards are applied by the agent to vendor #1 and vendor #1,000, across the vendor lifecycle - removing the judgment drift that comes from different reviewers, or the same reviewer on a different day. * Hundreds of hours saved. The agent does the reading, mapping, and measuring first, so the reviewer's time goes to confirming a finished result instead of manually assessing information for every vendor in the portfolio. Priyanka Chaudhary, Head of GRC at Brex, shares: "Drata's TPRM Agent allows us to level up our security risk management program across the board by reducing manual work and letting us focus on the risks that matter." Allan Silva, Senior GRC Lead, adds it's made the team "a lot more productive while also improving the quality of our reviews." The Drata Difference Historically, third-party risk solutions reduce vendor risk to binary logic - yes/no questions to business owners or a checkbox for a questionnaire answer. This approach trades away the context needed for a holistic view into a vendor's risk profile. What sets Drata apart: * Natural-language judgment: Instead of forcing inherent risk into a dropdown or checklist, Drata's agent applies the customer's own natural-language standards, weighing multiple factors together in context, the way a practitioner actually assesses a vendor. * Evidence-backed, defensible results: Every assessment comes with the reasoning and evidence behind it, providing specific material to point to when a decision is questioned. * Validated residual risk vs. open-ended guesswork: Where other tools generate questionnaire answers with no baseline to check for accuracy, Drata's agent assesses all vendor evidence and questionnaire responses against customer-defined standards and returns evidence citations, assessment results, and a calculated risk score. * Consistent judgment at scale: The same rigor applies to vendor #1 and vendor #1,000, removing the drift that comes from different reviewers, or the same reviewer on a different day. * Infinite vendors: Drata doesn't price Agentic TPRM by vendor count. Every vendor gets a free inherent risk assessment, so customers can score their entire portfolio without limits, paying only when a vendor needs a full security review. "The pace of AI adoption today means organizations must abandon the antiquated notion of periodic check-ins, and quickly implement continuous judgment applied at scale," said Adam Markowitz, Cofounder and CEO of Drata. "Facing a colossal tech stack with insufficient hours or headcount for rigorous vetting, we built agentic TPRM to remove these trade-offs, giving every vendor the same depth of scrutiny without sacrificing rigor or accuracy."

Pine AI
Sep 15th, 2026
Pine AI partners with Drata to advance SOC 2 readiness.

Pine AI partners with Drata to advance SOC 2 readiness. Pine AI is working with Drata to advance SOC 2 readiness, organize security controls and evidence, and prepare for independent review. Pine AI has partnered with Drata to advance its SOC 2 readiness program. The engagement brings a platform for organizing audit evidence, monitoring controls, and managing policies to the security work behind Pine's AI assistants. When you ask Pine to resolve a billing issue, follow up with a service provider, or coordinate work for your business, you are trusting it with information and permission to act on your behalf. Its work with Drata supports a practical goal: making the processes behind that trust more consistent, documented, and ready for independent review. Why security matters for an assistant that takes action. Pine helps people get work done through calls, emails, and follow-ups. Each task creates decisions about information: what is needed, who should have access, which service needs to receive it, and what should be retained afterward. Take a request to resolve a bill. Identifying the issue, communicating with a provider, and recording the outcome are distinct steps. Each needs a clear purpose and appropriate boundaries around the information involved. These questions matter to individuals using Pine AI and teams exploring Pine for Business. As its assistants take on more work, its approach to access, documentation, and oversight needs to develop alongside them. Why Pine chose Drata. Drata's SOC 2 platform helps teams collect evidence, monitor controls, manage policies, and collaborate with auditors. It brings those activities into a shared workspace so a compliance program can be maintained over time. For Pine, the value is connecting security responsibilities to records that can be reviewed. An access policy, for example, needs an owner, a review process, and evidence that the reviews happened. Organizing those pieces together makes it easier to see what is in place and what still needs attention. Drata supports that preparation. The SOC 2 examination itself is performed by an independent auditor. Building trust with Drata. Its first steps toward SOC 2 readiness. Its team began Drata onboarding in August 2026, with account management support and enrollment in its Compliance Accelerator Program. Since then, Pine has: * Completed initial onboarding inputs: submitted its onboarding questionnaire and connected relevant third-party accounts to support readiness work. * Started kickoff and audit coordination: begun working through initial guidance and auditor selection for its first SOC 2 examination. The next phase focuses on clarifying the audit scope, reviewing controls and supporting evidence, addressing gaps, and preparing for the independent examination. Pine will share further milestones as the program progresses. What SOC 2 means for Pine's users. SOC 2 is an examination of a service organization's controls against the applicable AICPA Trust Services Criteria. Those criteria address security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy, with the examination covering the categories relevant to its scope. For Pine, the readiness process means assigning responsibility, documenting how controls work, and assembling evidence for independent review. For people considering an assistant for personal or business tasks, the aim is greater clarity about how the organization behind that assistant manages its responsibilities. The data governance principles guiding its work. Its security page describes Pine's commitment to data minimization and purpose limitation. Its readiness work builds on the practical questions those principles raise: * What information does the task require? A communication preference and a sensitive identifier serve different purposes. That difference should guide decisions about access, exposure, and retention. * Who needs access, and why? Access should support a defined role or task, with clear boundaries for people, systems, and service providers. * Who is responsible for checking the process? Policy ownership, access reviews, vendor oversight, and incident response need accountable owners and records of follow-through. * Can users understand the explanation? People should be able to understand what an assistant needs to do a job and how their information is handled. The compliance program gives Pine a structured way to examine these questions as Pine grows. Building trust through ongoing work. Its goal is to make Pine an assistant people feel comfortable relying on for meaningful tasks. That requires useful capabilities, careful information handling, and regular review of the practices behind the product. Working with Drata gives its team a more organized path toward independent assurance. Pine look forward to sharing what comes next. For security questions or to report a potential vulnerability, contact [email protected]. Visit Security at Pine for its responsible disclosure process. About Pine AI. Pine AI helps people and businesses delegate everyday work, including calls, emails, and follow-ups. Learn more at 19pine.ai or explore Pine for Business.

Pine AI
Sep 15th, 2026
Pine AI partners with Drata to advance SOC 2 readiness.

Pine AI partners with Drata to advance SOC 2 readiness. Pine AI is working with Drata to advance SOC 2 readiness, organize security controls and evidence, and prepare for independent review. Last edited on Sep 15, 2026 Pine AI has partnered with Drata to advance its SOC 2 readiness program. The engagement brings a platform for organizing audit evidence, monitoring controls, and managing policies to the security work behind Pine's AI assistants. When you ask Pine to resolve a billing issue, follow up with a service provider, or coordinate work for your business, you are trusting it with information and permission to act on your behalf. Its work with Drata supports a practical goal: making the processes behind that trust more consistent, documented, and ready for independent review. Why security matters for an assistant that takes action. Pine helps people get work done through calls, emails, and follow-ups. Each task creates decisions about information: what is needed, who should have access, which service needs to receive it, and what should be retained afterward. Take a request to resolve a bill. Identifying the issue, communicating with a provider, and recording the outcome are distinct steps. Each needs a clear purpose and appropriate boundaries around the information involved. These questions matter to individuals using Pine AI and teams exploring Pine for Business. As its assistants take on more work, its approach to access, documentation, and oversight needs to develop alongside them. Why 19Pine Pte. Ltd. chose Drata. Drata's SOC 2 platform helps teams collect evidence, monitor controls, manage policies, and collaborate with auditors. It brings those activities into a shared workspace so a compliance program can be maintained over time. For Pine, the value is connecting security responsibilities to records that can be reviewed. An access policy, for example, needs an owner, a review process, and evidence that the reviews happened. Organizing those pieces together makes it easier to see what is in place and what still needs attention. Drata supports that preparation. The SOC 2 examination itself is performed by an independent auditor. Building trust with Drata. Its first steps toward SOC 2 readiness. Its team began Drata onboarding in August 2026, with account management support and enrollment in its Compliance Accelerator Program. Since then, 19Pine Pte. Ltd. has: * Completed initial onboarding inputs: submitted its onboarding questionnaire and connected relevant third-party accounts to support readiness work. * Started kickoff and audit coordination: begun working through initial guidance and auditor selection for its first SOC 2 examination. The next phase focuses on clarifying the audit scope, reviewing controls and supporting evidence, addressing gaps, and preparing for the independent examination. 19Pine Pte. Ltd. will share further milestones as the program progresses. What SOC 2 means for Pine's users. SOC 2 is an examination of a service organization's controls against the applicable AICPA Trust Services Criteria. Those criteria address security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy, with the examination covering the categories relevant to its scope. For Pine, the readiness process means assigning responsibility, documenting how controls work, and assembling evidence for independent review. For people considering an assistant for personal or business tasks, the aim is greater clarity about how the organization behind that assistant manages its responsibilities. The data governance principles guiding its work. Its security page describes Pine's commitment to data minimization and purpose limitation. Its readiness work builds on the practical questions those principles raise: * What information does the task require? A communication preference and a sensitive identifier serve different purposes. That difference should guide decisions about access, exposure, and retention. * Who needs access, and why? Access should support a defined role or task, with clear boundaries for people, systems, and service providers. * Who is responsible for checking the process? Policy ownership, access reviews, vendor oversight, and incident response need accountable owners and records of follow-through. * Can users understand the explanation? People should be able to understand what an assistant needs to do a job and how their information is handled. The compliance program gives 19Pine Pte. Ltd. a structured way to examine these questions as Pine grows. Building trust through ongoing work. Its goal is to make Pine an assistant people feel comfortable relying on for meaningful tasks. That requires useful capabilities, careful information handling, and regular review of the practices behind the product. Working with Drata gives its team a more organized path toward independent assurance. 19Pine Pte. Ltd. look forward to sharing what comes next. For security questions or to report a potential vulnerability, contact [email protected]. Visit Security at Pine for its responsible disclosure process. About Pine AI. Pine AI helps people and businesses delegate everyday work, including calls, emails, and follow-ups. Learn more at 19pine.ai or explore Pine for Business. Calls, negotiations, filling forms and more - Pine takes care of work and life.

Recently Posted Jobs

Sign up to get curated job recommendations

Drata is Hiring for 22 Jobs on Simplify!

Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today

Don't see your dream role? Check out thousands of other roles on Simplify.Browse all jobs