Figma Motion: can one new feature save a stock that crashed almost 90%? On June 24, 2026, Figma shipped Motion, a native timeline animation mode that drops the company straight into After Effects territory. It lands against a brutal backdrop: the stock is down roughly 87% from its post-IPO peak. So Go To Agency went to the primary sources, the Figma launch post, the SEC filings, the investor releases, and did the math. The twist nobody mentions: the business is accelerating while the share price collapsed. Here is the honest breakdown of whether Motion can re-rate Figma. By Robin Monteiro - June 24, 2026 - 9 min · 2 017 mots On June 24, 2026, at its Config 2026 conference, Figma shipped Figma Motion: a native, timeline-based animation mode that lives right inside the design canvas. Designers can now keyframe, ease, spring, and even prompt an AI agent to animate, then export video or production code, without ever leaving the file. In one move, Figma walked straight into territory long owned by Adobe After Effects, Rive and Jitter. The launch is impossible to read without the backdrop. Figma's stock is down roughly 87% from its post-IPO peak. So the question writing itself across design Twitter is blunt: is Figma Motion the feature that pulls the company out of its market-cap hole? Go To Agency did what Go To Agency always do before forming an opinion for a client. Go To Agency went to the primary sources, the Figma launch post, the investor releases and the SEC filings, and split everything into three buckets: verified facts, company claims, and its own analysis. The twist almost nobody is pricing in: the business is accelerating while the share price collapsed. What Figma Motion actually is. First, the precise framing, because the headlines blur it. Motion is not a separate app. It is a new mode on the Figma canvas, accessed by a toolbar toggle that sits next to Design, Draw and Dev. In Figma's own words, "motion is native to the same canvas where the rest of your designs live." It rolled out in open beta on June 24, 2026. Here is the verified spec sheet, straight from the launch post and the Help Center. | Figma Motion, verified spec sheet | Detail | | What it is | A native Motion mode inside Figma Design (toolbar toggle alongside Design / Draw / Dev), open beta from June 24, 2026 | | Animate | Keyframe position, scale, rotation and opacity independently; preset styles (fade, move, scale) | | Feel | Adjustable easing curves and spring animations; scrub the timeline to preview any moment | | AI assist | The Figma agent turns a natural-language prompt into a first pass of keyframes ("describe the motion you want") | | Media export | MP4, GIF, WEBM and Animated SVG, directly from the file | | Code export | CSS, JSON, framework-ready React and motion.dev, copied from a read-only timeline in Dev Mode (Lottie roadmapped, not at launch) | | Price | Included on all plans during beta; a Full seat on a paid plan is needed to publish animated components, use the agent, and export high-resolution video. Not on Figma for Government | The strategic point is the code export. The old workflow was: design in Figma, rebuild the animation in After Effects, convert it to Lottie, hand it to engineering. Motion collapses that into one file where the timing values, easing curves and keyframes are inspectable in Dev Mode and copy out as real CSS or React. That is the difference between a prototype and production, and it is the core of why this matters beyond a feature release. On the AI angle, keep one honest caveat in view. The Figma agent that writes your first keyframes runs on a model rented from OpenAI, Anthropic or Google, not one Figma built. It is free during the beta and will consume AI credits at general availability. Useful, genuinely, but not a proprietary moat in itself. The brutal part: the stock chart. Now the hook. Figma's IPO in mid-2025 was a blockbuster. It priced at $33.00 a share, listed on the NYSE under ticker FIG, and began trading on July 31, 2025. The first trade printed around $85, it closed day one near $115.50 (up about 250%), and touched an intraday high of $142.92, which remains the all-time peak. Then gravity. By late June 2026 the stock sits near $18.64, roughly 87% below that peak, with a 52-week low of $16.60 hit in spring 2026. Figma (FIG) share price, from IPO to now (USD) IPO price (Jul 2025) First trade Day-1 close Peak (all-time high) 52-week low (spring 2026) Now (~Jun 24, 2026) Sources: Figma IPO pricing release and CNBC (IPO/peak, verified); stockanalysis.com (52-week range and current price, June 2026, aggregator-grade). The current price moves daily; treat ~$18.64 and the ~87% drawdown as a late-June 2026 snapshot. One thing the round numbers hide: this is the same company whose $20 billion sale to Adobe collapsed in December 2023 under EU and UK regulatory pressure, with Adobe paying Figma a reported $1 billion termination fee. Figma walked away independent, IPO'd two years later at a far higher headline value, and has since watched the public market mark it down by nearly 90%. The drama is real. The question is whether it reflects the business. The twist: the business is accelerating. Here is what makes the Figma story genuinely interesting, and what most "doomed" takes skip. While the stock fell off a cliff, the fundamentals went the other way. In Q1 2026 (quarter ended March 31, 2026), Figma reported revenue of $333.4 million, up 46% year over year. That is not just growth, it is the second consecutive quarter of growth acceleration: 38% to 40% to 46% across three quarters. Net dollar retention reached 139%, the highest in over two years. Figma revenue growth, year over year (the stock crashed; this went up)

Framer vs. Squarespace for digital portfolios: which one is the best? The Framer vs. Squarespace debate often stems from one fundamental question: where should a designer build their portfolio? As the graphic design market heads toward a projected valuation of $84.8 billion by 2032, the pressure to stand out is higher than ever. To succeed in this high-growth landscape, designers must carefully evaluate which platform best showcases their unique skills and professional identity. Key Takeaways: * Framer gives designers advanced layout control, animations, and Figma integration, while Squarespace focuses on simplicity and polished templates. * Squarespace offers easier content management and stronger built-in business tools for selling products and services online. * Framer suits creative designers who want custom interactions, while Squarespace fits users who prefer a beginner-friendly workflow. Table of Contents Framer vs. Squarespace: key differences. Although both platforms can help designers build beautiful, professional websites, they take completely different approaches to helping you. Layout and design flexibility. In short, Framer operates like a web-based Figma and an "open" canvas. Here, designers can control every single layout decision from position and spacing to layering and scroll behavior. With Framer, you can build multi-directional layouts, pin elements to specific breakpoints, and create interactions that respond to cursor movement, all without coding. Furthermore, you can also integrate Framer with Figma to help you import design files and turn them into live pages. On the other hand, Squarespace approaches layout through a section-and-block system where preset modules snap together inside a defined grid. Squarespace also has 180+ templates that look professionally refined right out of the box. Not only that, Squarespace also has a drag-and-drop editor that can handle most layout needs with minimal friction. However, you need some custom CSS injection in Squarespace if you want to make structural changes beyond the template's capabilities. Typography management. Framer can let you control all aspects of the font size, weight, letter spacing, line height, and custom font uploads. Additionally, you can set the fonts differently in individual sections without any cascade or template-level override that can cause conflicts. Compared to Framer, Squarespace manages typography through a global style editor that applies consistent font settings across the entire site. Such an approach can enforce visual cohesion automatically, which helps non-designers maintain readable and harmonious layouts. Even so, do note that designers who want to break typography rules may find Squarespace more restrictive than Framer. Content control and CMS. Framer has a CMS that can support structured content collections. With this, you can build project galleries and different blog sections that update dynamically across pages from a single source. Even Framer's Basic plan supports one CMS collection with up to 30 pages, which is enough for most designers. Comparatively, Squarespace includes a more mature and feature-rich content management system. With this CMS, you can handle blog posts, events, products, and portfolio items within a single integrated interface. All in all, non-technical users usually find Squarespace's content management significantly easier to learn and maintain over time. Meanwhile, you can depend on Framer's more design-tool-native approach if you can handle the technical aspects. Unique features each platform offers. So, what are the unique features each platform has for you? Framer. In short, you can rely on Framer to have some native animations, interactive scroll effects, cursor tracking effects, and component-level logic. Framer also scores 90+ on Google PageSpeed Insights across both mobile and desktop without any optimization effort. With such a score, you'll find Framer reliable in improving SEO and user experience. Even better, you can also use a text prompt-based AI-powered site generation feature inside Framer. That means, you can prototype full portfolio structures from a single description. Squarespace. As for Squarespace, it includes features like built-in email marketing, appointment scheduling through Acuity, and 24/7 live chat support. Not just that, Squarespace also has a mature community forum and integrated e-commerce with inventory management and abandoned cart recovery. Another strong point is Squarespace's AI chatbot (added in 2025), which helps you resolve common issues instantly without human support. Who should choose which platform. Which platform is best for making portfolios of these two options? * Framer: UI and UX designers, motion designers, web designers, creative technologists, brand and graphic designers who want editorial-style layouts with full typographic control and animation. * Squarespace: Illustrators, photographers, brand designers, creative generalists, and designers who want to sell services, prints, or digital downloads from the same platform that hosts their work with a single tool. Quick Framer vs. Squarespace comparison table. Make the most convincing portfolio with suitable custom fonts. In the end, settling the Framer vs. Squarespace debate comes down to who you are and what you need. Regardless, you still must use the best fonts to make your resulting website comfortable to read and explore. Thankfully, you can visit StringLabs Creative to find custom fonts that many designers always use for different purposes! With custom fonts from blackletter to serif, you can use one of them to make the most convincing portfolio ever.