Kleiner Perkins

Kleiner Perkins

Early-stage venture capital with strategic guidance

Overview

Kleiner Perkins is a venture capital firm that provides financial capital and strategic guidance to early-stage startups with high growth potential. It partners with founders across diverse industries to help them move from inception to IPO and beyond. The firm earns returns by taking equity stakes in its portfolio companies and realizing value through exits such as IPOs or acquisitions. Its differentiators include a long history in venture investing, a global and multi-industry portfolio, and a hands-on approach that supports companies from early stages through growth, aligning with ambitious entrepreneurs to transform ideas into scalable businesses.

About Kleiner Perkins

Simplify's Rating
Why Kleiner Perkins is rated
B-
Rated B on Competitive Edge
Rated B on Growth Potential
Rated C on Differentiation

Industries

Venture Capital

Financial Services

Company Size

201-500

Company Stage

N/A

Total Funding

$60.6B

Headquarters

Menlo Park, California

Founded

1972

People at Kleiner Perkins

People at Kleiner Perkins who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • $3.5B fund enables outsized returns in AI super-cycle.
  • KP led $80M for Sail Research, a high-efficiency AI niche.
  • KP co-led $200M seed for Mirendil, securing elite AI talent.

What critics are saying

  • Overconcentration in no-exit AI growth firms risks $2.5B drawdown in 12–18 months.
  • a16z lead in Mirendil erodes KP early-stage dominance within 6–12 months.
  • Sail Research's cost-efficiency threatens KP portfolio valuations in 9–15 months.

What makes Kleiner Perkins unique

  • KP raised $3.5B in 2026, targeting AI from seed to IPO.
  • KP backs top AI firms like Anthropic, Together AI, Harvey.
  • KP operates a 48-person lean team with people-first strategy.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Funding

Total Funding

$60.6B

Above

Industry Average

Funded Over

0 Rounds

Company News

NYFTY Labs
Jun 27th, 2026
AI-Visibility tracking matures: Profound hits $1B valuation.

AI-Visibility tracking matures: Profound hits $1B valuation. Profound raised a $96M Series C at a $1 billion valuation, a signal that answer-engine analytics has become its own software category. Here is what brands are actually measuring across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude. NYFTY Labs · GEO · 2026-06-27 AEO GEO AI visibility answer engines A $1 billion bet on a roughly 18-month-old company. According to a February 2026 Fortune report, Profound announced a $96 million Series C led by Lightspeed Venture Partners that values the company at $1 billion. Sequoia Capital, Kleiner Perkins, and other firms also participated, bringing Profound's total funding to more than $155 million. The company was founded in 2024 and is based in New York, which makes the climb to unicorn status unusually fast for enterprise software. Lightspeed framed the thesis as a migration of consumer attention from search engines to answer engines. Real enterprise traction, not just hype. Profound reports more than 700 enterprise customers, including roughly 10% of the Fortune 500. Named clients cited in coverage include Target, Walmart, Ramp, MongoDB, U.S. Bank, and Figma. The product tracks how brands are mentioned across major answer engines, covering brand mentions, sentiment, and share of voice in AI-generated responses. Specific performance claims, such as large jumps in AI referral traffic, come from the vendor and individual clients, so treat them as illustrative rather than independently audited benchmarks. When measuring whether your brand appears in ChatGPT and Gemini answers becomes a standard marketing line item, a billion-dollar valuation isn't hype, it's the new search analytics taking shape. Profound is the most visible name, but it sits inside a fast-growing field of AI-visibility tools. Semrush has folded AI visibility into its platform, scanning ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity, and surfacing both linked citations and unlinked brand mentions. Mid-market and budget-focused competitors such as Peec AI and Otterly.ai round out the category at lower price points. The common job across these tools is the same: submit large volumes of prompts, then measure whether and how a brand shows up in the answers. What brands are actually measuring. The core metric is citation and mention frequency across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude, tracked prompt by prompt rather than by keyword rank. Teams also watch sentiment and the surrounding context of a mention, since how a brand is described matters as much as whether it appears. Each assistant pulls from its own sources and applies its own citation logic, so a brand's visibility can look completely different from one platform to the next, which is exactly why teams track them side by side rather than relying on a single engine. Many of these tools historically diagnosed visibility gaps but stopped short of fixing them, leaving content, schema, and authority work to the brand's own team. Profound has since moved beyond pure diagnostics: alongside its Series C it launched Profound Agents, autonomous workers that automate execution and content generation, though brands still own strategy and review. Why this matters for marketing teams now. ChatGPT reached roughly 800-900 million weekly users and Gemini's app passed 750 million monthly users by early 2026. As more buying research happens inside answer engines, being absent from AI responses carries a real cost that classic SEO dashboards do not capture. Funding at this scale signals that measuring AI visibility is becoming a standard line item, not an experiment. The practical takeaway is to start measuring presence across the major assistants before committing budget to changing it. Key takeaways. * Profound raised a $96M Series C led by Lightspeed at a $1 billion valuation, with more than $155M in total funding for a company founded in 2024. * It reports 700+ enterprise customers and about 10% of the Fortune 500, reportedly including Target, Walmart, Ramp, MongoDB, U.S. Bank, and Figma. * Answer-engine analytics is now a defined category, with Semrush's AI Toolkit, Peec AI, and Otterly.ai competing alongside Profound. * The shared metric is brand citation and mention frequency across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude, measured per prompt rather than by keyword rank. Related services. Questions, answered. Want this applied to your site?

DN.com
Jun 25th, 2026
Mirendil, an AI company that secured $200 million in seed funding, has already locked in dual-brand domain names.

Mirendil, an AI company that secured $200 million in seed funding, has already locked in dual-brand domain names. 25 Jun 2026 05:44:01 PM By:DN editor Recently, AI startup Mirendil announced the completion of a $200 million seed round of financing, co-led by a16z and Kleiner Perkins, with NVIDIA also participating. Recently, AI startup Mirendil announced the completion of a $200 million seed round of financing, co-led by a16z and Kleiner Perkins, with NVIDIA also participating. The team members are all from leading AI labs such as OpenAI, DeepMind, xAI, and Anthropic, boasting a highly prestigious roster. This company was registered in Delaware, USA, in December 2025. Early in its business, the team acquired the brand domain names Mirendil.com and Mirendil.ai. A search revealed that Mirendil.ai had no publicly auctioned sales records, indicating it was acquired privately by the founders at a premium. Within just six months, this startup secured substantial funding, and its domain name strategy preceded its funding rounds. This is a common tactic in Silicon Valley AI startups: a high-quality brand name with a .com domain and a .ai domain is a standard digital asset for VCs investing heavily in AI projects. For domain investors, most high-quality AI brand name .ai domains are now traded privately, with fewer good options available on the open market. Therefore, strategically investing in early-stage brand domains remains a sound investment strategy.

TheoryVC
Jun 25th, 2026
Building for long-horizon agents.

Building for long-horizon agents. Jun 25, 2026 The most important companies will soon be powered by long-running agents: AIs that work for minutes, hours, or days to complete tasks on behalf of people. Data already works this way. Data pipelines, ETL jobs, nightly batch runs, & scheduled workflows make up the bulk of compute inside any large organization. Agentic AI will follow the same path, but the infrastructure to support it still has to be built. Today Theory is announcing Theory Ventures' investment in Sail Research's Series A, alongside its friends at Kleiner Perkins, Redpoint, & Sequoia. Sail is building the inference platform for long-horizon agents, letting complex agents run and scale as they begin to power its most valuable work. As AI expands further into the workforce, agents will be multi-turn by default: systems that research, code, & reason across minutes and hours, orchestrating over many models and many steps. Today's inference stack provides the opposite: single-shot, latency-obsessed chat, with a human waiting on the other end. If you were to force a long-horizon agent through that stack, the costs and brittleness show up immediately. AI workloads can be mapped by how synchronous they are, whether a human is waiting on the other end, and how much repetition they contain (allowing them to take advantage of the cache). On this plane, they fall into two camps. In one corner, fully synchronous and totally unique: work where every second counts and nothing looks the same: chatbots, customer support, BI copilots. At the other, fully asynchronous work that follows a recipe: software factories, AI data-pipelines, overnight document processing. The semi-synchronous middle is work that needs an answer in seconds to minutes, not instantly nor overnight. It sits relatively empty. Not for lack of demand, but because running it on a real-time stack means paying real-time prices, so teams are forced to complete tasks async or never build it at all. If you make that middle section cheap to serve, it fills with deep-research agents, background coding, and agentic GTM workflows. Theory believe that Sail will enable this middle section to exist. Two years ago, almost all inference demand clustered in the first few seconds - someone typing, a chatbot answering. Each year since, the curve has flattened and spread to the right, as more work moves to agents. That's the semi-sync middle filling in. The market is aggressively starting to demand infrastructure to support this. As agents move into production, token consumption compounds: more turns, more context, more models, for every agent. Token spend is fast becoming one of the largest line items on the CFO's P&L. Companies want to be on the right side of that trade: getting more out of every token, instead of downgrading to weaker models or capping what their agents can do. And the models are ready too. Open weights like DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, & Nemotron are now good enough for the bulk of agentic work and the newest, like GLM, are built for long-horizon agents from the ground up. This open-source race will only accelerate with American labs like Reflection AI spending billions to ship open frontier models of their own. All of this further reduces total inference spend, so the bottleneck isn't the model anymore. It's the infrastructure: how do you get the most out of every dollar of model spend without giving up quality? Sail's answer is fleet-aware orchestration. Inference becomes a schedulable workload, distributed across models, providers, and hardware to keep utilization high and cost low. The result: up to 10x more tokens per dollar, delivered through drop-in OpenAI- & Anthropic-compatible APIs running the best open models. Because Sail sits at the orchestration layer, it can see something the layers below can't: when an agent is thinking versus acting. That's what makes long-horizon agents semi-synchronous, rather than batched or real-time. An agent works in bursts via a flurry of activity, then long, idle stretches waiting on a tool call, a model response, or its own reasoning. Today's sandboxes are built for the opposite. They compete on shaving milliseconds off cold-start, which does matter when a human is waiting on the other end, but less so for an agent running on its own for hours. This is why Sail built Sailboxes: cloud computers made for that bursty, semi-sync rhythm. A Sailbox stays alive as long as the agent needs, holding state across the entire task, but drops to near-zero cost the moment the agent goes idle and wakes the instant a trigger arrives. You pay only for active time - no start/stop APIs, no paying for idle. That's what makes it economical to run an agent for hours or days and to push far more work through Sail's core inference product along the way. The platform is already live, running production agent workloads for some of the most important AI companies in the world. Along the way, Sail won BrowseComp-Plus, the deep-research benchmark, and ran a four-agent swarm for 27 hours straight to build Redis in Rust. Neil Movva & Samir Menon have spent their careers on the hard parts of this problem. Neil chased GPU speed-of-light at NVIDIA, shipped some of the most efficient computer vision algorithms in the world at Apple, and helped build one of the fastest LLM inference stacks at Together AI. Samir comes out of Apple's security engineering team and a deep background in applied cryptography, including prior work running LLMs inside hardware enclaves at Blyss. This is exactly the foundation you want for secure, multi-tenant inference at scale. Theory believe agentic AI follows the same arc as every enterprise workload before it, and that async inference will become the largest and most widely used segment of AI compute. As agents grow up from chat assistants into background workers scanning codebases overnight, processing every document, enriching every row of the CRM, the vast majority of tokens become like an ETL job: high-volume, multi-turn, & nobody waiting on the other end. Theory is thrilled to partner with Neil, Samir, & the Sail Research team. The future runs in the background. If you're building agents for it, you can get started here.

Black News Daily
Jun 23rd, 2026
Allium raises $40M as crypto data sector consolidates.

Allium raises $40M as crypto data sector consolidates. Allium, a prominent blockchain analytics startup, raised $40 million in a Series B round led by Amplify Partners, with participation from Kleiner Perkins and Theory Ventures. What's the Scoop? * The Business: Allium cleans and structures blockchain data for institutional clients. Its data has been cited by Visa and the U.S. Federal Reserve, and its customers include a16z's crypto arm and Coinbase. The company even supplies data to perceived competitors, with DefiLlama sourcing some of its data from Allium. * The Consolidating Landscape: Crypto analytics has undergone immense restructuring in recent months. Dune Analytics, valued at $1 billion in 2022, laid off 25% of its staff in May. Blockworks acquired Messari last month for more than $10 million, a steep discount to Messari's roughly $300 million valuation in 2022. * The Agentic Thesis: Ethan Chan, co-founder of Allium, frames the company's edge around controlling the data source which inevitably determines model quality. They believe this will be an important area of growth for the team as agentic payments gain traction.

Vapi
May 12th, 2026
AGI is here. Why am I still on hold?

Read AGI is here. Why am I still on hold? on the Vapi blog

Recently Posted Jobs

Sign up to get curated job recommendations

There are no jobs for Kleiner Perkins right now.

Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today

We update Kleiner Perkins's jobs every few hours, so check again soon! Browse all jobs →