
Work Here?
Loom provides a screen recording and video messaging platform that helps teams capture and share video messages to boost productivity and collaboration, especially in remote or async work settings. Users record screen-and-camera videos or just screen captures, then share links across apps and platforms for fast feedback and communication. The product works via a freemium model: a free basic screen recorder with paid premium features, plus enterprise security for organizations. It integrates with tools like Google Workspace and Slack, making Loom a versatile addition to digital workstreams. The company differentiates itself with a large, multi-industry user base (millions of users across tens of thousands of companies), ease of use, strong integration options, and a focus on scalable security. Loom’s goal is to simplify video-based communication to improve collaboration and productivity in modern, digital-first teams.
Industries
Consumer Software
Enterprise Software
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Acquired
Total Funding
$203.7M
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Founded
2016
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Total Funding
$203.7M
Above
Industry Average
Funded Over
8 Rounds
Competitive compensation and equity package
99% company paid medical, dental, and vision coverage for employees and dependents
Flexible Spending Account (FSA) and Dependent Care Flexible Spending Account (DCFSA)
Healthcare reimbursement (for International employees)
Life, AD&D, Short and Long Term Disability Insurance
401(k) with 4% company matching
Professional development reimbursement
Mental health and wellness reimbursement
Gym reimbursement
Unlimited PTO
Paid parental leave
Remote work opportunities
Home office & technology reimbursement
Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM), a leading provider of team collaboration and productivity software, today announced it has entered into a definitive ag...
Loom search not working? Why you can't find what was said in a recording. September 9, 2026 Loom is excellent at capturing async communication. You record a quick walkthrough, share the link in Slack, and your teammate watches it on their schedule. The problem shows up six months later when someone needs to find what was said in that recording and there is no way to search for it. This is not a bug. It is a fundamental limitation of how Loom works, and it affects every team that uses Loom heavily enough to accumulate a library of recordings. This guide explains why Loom search fails, what Loom AI transcripts do and don't solve, and what teams actually do when institutional knowledge is locked inside video recordings they cannot search. Why Loom search fails. The core problem: video content is not searchable text. Loom's search bar searches video titles and descriptions the text fields you fill in when saving a recording. It does not search the spoken words inside the video. If someone recorded a walkthrough titled "Q3 onboarding update" and spent 8 minutes explaining a specific process change, and you search "process change" or "onboarding workflow," Loom will not find that video unless those exact words are in the title or description. For most teams, video titles are whatever the recorder typed quickly before sharing: "quick update," "walkthrough," "FYI." The spoken content that has real information value is invisible to search. Loom AI transcripts help one video at a time, not across all videos. Loom added AI-powered transcripts to recordings on paid plans. When you open a specific recording, you can read the transcript, search within it, and jump to the relevant moment. This is genuinely useful for navigating a single video. What it does not do: provide a way to search across all your Loom recordings simultaneously. There is no global "search everything ever said in all our Loom videos" interface. You can search within a video once you've opened it. You cannot find which video to open by searching what was said inside it. This is the gap that frustrates teams with large Loom libraries. The transcript exists for each video. But finding the right video in the first place requires knowing the title or description, which brings you back to the original problem. Workspace search has the same title-based limitation. Loom's workspace search lets you filter by creator, date range, and tags. All of these filters still operate on the video metadata, not the spoken content. Tagging helps if your team has strong tagging discipline. Most teams don't. The broader knowledge problem. Even if Loom added perfect global transcript search tomorrow, it would solve one part of a larger problem. A typical team uses Loom alongside several other tools where context lives: * Slack: the message that shared the Loom link, plus the follow-up discussion about what was said * Notion or Confluence: the spec or doc that the Loom walkthrough was about * Jira or GitHub: the ticket or PR that was the subject of the recording * Google Drive: the slide deck someone referenced during the recording The decision or process explained in a Loom video did not originate in Loom. The reasoning lives in Slack threads. The implementation is tracked in Jira. The documentation may exist in Confluence. Loom was one channel for communicating about a topic, not the source of truth. When someone needs to reconstruct "what was decided about the new customer onboarding flow," the answer spans a Loom recording, a Slack thread, a Notion spec, and a Jira epic. No single tool searches all of those. What teams do about it. Keep Loom as communication, not documentation. The most important shift: Loom is for communicating, not for storing decisions. When a Loom recording contains something important, the follow-on action is writing it down somewhere searchable: a Notion page, a Confluence doc, a Jira comment. The recording becomes a reference. The written summary becomes the searchable record. This does not eliminate the problem of finding old recordings, but it means the institutional knowledge is in a tool that can surface it. Use strong title and description conventions. If your team records Looms that need to be findable later, the title and description are the only searchable fields. Investing in a naming convention pays off over time. A useful format: [Topic] [What changed or was decided] [Date]. Instead of "quick onboarding walkthrough," something like "Onboarding: new enterprise flow for SSO customers, Sep 2026." More effort up front, dramatically easier to find six months later. Tag systematically. Loom supports tags. If your team uses them consistently, tagging by product area, topic, or team, filters become a reasonable substitute for search. The overhead is real, but for teams with large Loom libraries and no other option, tagging is the most practical near-term fix. Add Loom links to your documentation. When you share a Loom in Slack, also drop the link into the relevant Notion page, Jira ticket, or Confluence doc. This creates a paper trail. When someone searches for the topic in your documentation tool, they find the doc and the Loom link is right there. Most teams do this inconsistently. The ones that do it consistently find their Looms later. The cross-tool search layer. For teams that have accumulated enough recorded knowledge that the above workarounds feel inadequate, the more durable solution is a search layer that spans all the tools where context lives. AskOro connects to Slack, Notion, Google Drive, Confluence, Jira, GitHub, and more, and makes all of them searchable from a single natural-language question in Slack. When someone asks "what was decided about the enterprise onboarding flow in Q3?" AskOro searches across all connected sources and returns an answer with citations to the Slack thread, the Jira epic, and the Notion spec. AskOro does not index Loom video transcripts directly. But it indexes the written context around Loom recordings: the Slack messages that shared them, the Notion docs that summarized them, the Jira tickets that tracked the implementation. For most knowledge recovery needs, the written context around a video is enough to surface the relevant information. Setup takes about 15 minutes per integration. $49/month flat for the entire workspace. What Loom gets right (and wrong) for team knowledge. | What you are trying to find | Loom search | Loom AI transcript | AskOro | | A recording you know the title of | Yes | Yes | Via Slack/Notion context | | A recording by date or creator | Yes (filters) | Yes (filters) | Via Slack/Notion context | | What was said inside a specific recording | No | Yes (within that video) | Via written summaries | | Which recording covers a specific topic | No | No | Via Slack/Notion context | | Context in Slack about the recording | No | No | Yes | | The Jira ticket the recording was about | No | No | Yes | | The Notion doc written after the recording | No | No | Yes | Related guides. Ready to search everything at once? AskOro connects your team's tools and answers questions across all of them. No more tab-switching.
Best Loom alternatives in 2026: why teams are switching. Loom pioneered async video for teams. The idea was simple: record your screen, share a link, skip the meeting. It worked, and millions of people adopted it. In 2026, Loom's value is harder to justify. Business seats run $15 per user per month billed annually ($18 monthly), and Business + AI runs $20 per user per month ($24 monthly). For a team of 20, that's $3,600 to $4,800 a year for what is still a fairly basic recording tool. The free Starter plan caps you at 25 videos of 5 minutes each. The bigger issue is quality. Loom has added AI zoom and manual spotlight tools, but the results are basic: cursor-following zoom that doesn't understand what you're interacting with, and shapes you draw yourself. Most Loom videos are shared internally, so there has been little pressure to go further. What you record is still mostly what you get. Recordio is the team behind Recordio, so Recordio is biased. But Recordio built it specifically to fix this: studio-quality recordings that are just as easy to share, at a lower price per seat. Here's why teams are switching. If you only want the feature table and a five-person price, go straight to Recordio vs Loom. The quality gap: why Loom videos look like Loom videos. You've seen it. Someone shares a Loom and it's a flat screen recording with a webcam bubble, visible browser clutter, and nothing telling the viewer where to look. It gets the job done internally. Send it to a prospect or a client, or drop it into documentation, and it falls flat. Recordio changes that. Every recording gets DOM-aware auto zoom (it reads your page's structure and zooms to the right element), auto spotlight that lifts the element you're interacting with off the page with a 3D effect, and a clean Chrome toolbar that hides your bookmarks and 47 open tabs. The result is a studio-quality video, produced automatically, with no manual editing. Here's what the difference looks like: The "before" is essentially what Loom gives you. The "after" is what Recordio produces from the same recording session with zero manual edits: auto zoom, auto spotlight, a device frame, a background, and a clean toolbar, all applied automatically. Recordio: Loom's shareability + studio quality. Recordio keeps the sharing workflow people like about Loom and adds the production quality Loom has never had. Here's what makes it a real alternative: Shareable Links, view analytics, and a Team Library. Just like Loom, you share a link and anyone with it can watch. Recordio also shows you how the video performed, with total views and average watch time, so you know whether people actually watched. Pro includes a shared team library with unlimited viewer seats: your teammates can browse and watch everything without each needing a paid seat. Studio-Quality output, zero effort. This is where Recordio pulls ahead of everything else. Because it runs as a Chrome extension, it reads the structure of the web app you're recording. It knows what you're clicking on, what you're hovering over, and what deserves the viewer's attention. That page awareness powers: * DOM-Aware Auto Zoom: Zooms to the exact UI element you're interacting with, so inputs and forms never get clipped. No jittery cursor-following, and every zoom is an editable keyframe. * Auto Spotlight (3D Card Elevation): When you hover over a card or interactive element, Recordio lifts it forward with a subtle glow while dimming the background. Completely automatic. * Clean Chrome Toolbar: Replaces your bookmarks, tabs, and extension icons with a minimal bar that shows just the page title. * Device Frame Wrapping: Wraps your recording in a MacBook Pro or MacBook Air frame so product demos look finished. Smart AutoCut. Loom recordings are full of dead air: the pauses where you're deciding what to say or navigating to the next screen. Recordio's AutoCut removes that silence automatically. It tracks both your voice and your interactions, so it won't cut footage where you're quietly typing or clicking through something important. More ways Recordio goes further. * AI Captions You Can Edit to Cut: OpenAI-powered captions timed to the word. Fix any mistake in place, or delete a caption line and that segment is cut from the video. * Overlays and Blur: Blur sensitive data before you share, or add text, arrows, and shapes to point at what matters. * Backgrounds and Music: A curated background library, custom gradients, brand image uploads, and a music library. * Smart Webcam Overlay: Customizable position and style, and it shrinks out of the way when a zoom kicks in. * 4K Exports on Pro: Download in 1080p on the free plan or 4K on Pro, alongside the shareable link. * Team Workspace: Invite teammates with roles, collaborate on projects, and keep every walkthrough in a shared team library on Pro. Viewer seats are unlimited and free. * Full-Page Screenshots: The same extension captures the visible area, the full page, or a region. Annotate it in the web app with text, arrows, shapes, and blur, then copy it, download a PNG or PDF, or share a link. * Cross-Platform: Works in Chrome, Edge, and Brave on Mac, Windows, Linux, and ChromeOS. Cost: lower per seat, free for viewers. Recordio Pro is $12 per seat per month billed annually, or $15 monthly. Loom Business is $15 per user annually, or $20 with AI. Only the people who record need a Recordio seat; viewers are unlimited and free. And the free plan isn't a trial: it includes auto zoom, auto spotlight, silence cutting, and 1080p downloads for up to 5 active projects, with no credit card. For team pricing, reach out to [email protected]. What about Screen Studio? Screen Studio is a macOS-only desktop app that produces polished recordings with cursor-based auto zoom and motion blur. It's a solid tool for making demos look good. But it's not a Loom replacement: there's no free plan, no shared video library, no view analytics, and no team features. It's a recording and editing tool, not an async communication platform, and it leaves out anyone on Windows or Linux. Recordio list eight options for those users in best Screen Studio alternatives. Leaving a different tool? The same honest format, with pricing checked on each vendor's own site, is available for the other recorders teams tend to outgrow: best Camtasia alternatives for demos without a timeline, best Bandicam alternatives for Mac and Linux users, and best Screencastify alternatives for schools and Chrome users. Every head-to-head lives on the compare page. Recordio vs Loom: feature comparison. | Feature | Recordio | Loom | | Shareable Links | Yes, with view analytics | Yes | | Auto Zoom | DOM-aware (reads page structure) | Cursor-based (AI) | | Auto Zoom Editable | Yes (keyframes) | No | | Auto Spotlight | Automatic, 3D elevation | Manual shapes (circles, arrows) | | Device Frames | Yes | No | | Smart AutoCut | Voice + interaction aware | Filler word removal (AI plan) | | Clean Toolbar | Yes | No | | AI Captions | Yes, word-level, edit to cut | Yes | | Overlays & Blur | Yes | Basic | | Custom Backgrounds | Yes | Yes | | Team Library | Yes (Pro) | Yes | | Viewer Seats | Unlimited, free | Free viewers | | Free Plan | 5 active projects, 1080p downloads | 25 videos, 5 min each | | Pro Price | $12/seat/mo annual · $15 monthly | $15/user/mo annual · $20 with AI | The bottom line. Loom set the standard for async video at work. But in 2026, "record your screen and share a link" is table stakes. What Loom hasn't done is make recordings look good, and that's where Recordio wins. You get the same shareable links and view analytics, but your videos come out looking like a design team produced them. Auto zoom that understands what you're showing, spotlight effects that guide the eye, a clean toolbar, device frames, and smart silence removal. All of it automatic, at a lower price per seat. If your team records web apps, documents processes, or creates product demos, Recordio is the Loom alternative worth trying. The free plan makes it risk-free to see the difference for yourself, and the full Recordio vs Loom comparison has the feature table. John Mikhail Founder of Recordio MIT grad · Previously at Google and Mixpanel · Tech and AI enthusiast
Textele publicate în categoria Subiectiv sunt responsabilitatea autorilor, fiind opinii asumate de aceștia. Dacă vrei să afli mai multe opinii ale specialiștilor, urmărește categoria Subiectiv.În lumea producției industriale, ultimii 50 de ani au fost dominați de globalizare. Am văzut o tranziție a producției către țări cu salarii mai mici, alături de optimizarea continuă a lanțului de aprovizionare. Dacă productivitatea nu putea fi crescută (suficient) printr-o tehnologie mai bună, Excel-ul era acolo pentru a ne salva.Dar lucrurile se schimbă, iar cele mai recente evoluții tehnologice, tendințele geopolitice și cultura Generației Z accelerează o transformare profundă a peisajului producției.Acest lucru are un impact important: producția este una dintre industriile cheie ale Uniunii Europene, cu o cifră de afaceri netă de 8,3 trilioane EUR și 28,7 milioane de oameni angajați în 2021 (conform Eurostat), reprezentând 23,6% din valoarea adăugată totală a economiei UE.Din punct de vedere tehnologic, cele mai recente dezvoltări ale IA permit creșteri semnificative ale gradului de automatizare și deci a productivității. Stai. Asta nu se întâmpla deja?! Nu am văzut cu toții acele linii robotizate în care mașinile sunt sudate împreună cu o implicare umană minimă?Da și nu
Vinay Hiremath, co-founder of Loom, expressed confusion after selling the startup to Atlassian for $975 million in 2023. Despite earning $300 million from the sale, Hiremath feels lost and unmotivated, struggling with career choices and personal insecurities. He considered starting a robotics company but realized he was more interested in emulating Elon Musk. Hiremath also apologized to his ex-girlfriend, attributing their breakup to his insecurities.
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
Industries
Consumer Software
Enterprise Software
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Acquired
Total Funding
$203.7M
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Founded
2016
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today