LASSO vs Motion: Revenue, Funding & Team size compared. LASSO generates $9.7M in revenue; Motion generates $10M. Motion and LASSO are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares LASSO and Motion on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters - every figure GetLatka has verified for each company. | Company | LASSOThis company | Motion | | Revenue | $9.7M | $10M | | Valuation | $67.8M | $550M | | Funding raised | $2.1M | $133.2M | | Customers | Not disclosed | 10K | | Team size | 234 | 50 | | Growth | Not disclosed | 2.4K% | | Cash flow | Not disclosed | $1 | | Founded | 2015 | 2019 | | HQ | Nashville, United States | San Francisco, California | Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews. LASSO at a glance. LASSO generates $9.7M in revenue with 234 employees, headquartered in Nashville, United States. * Revenue - $9.7M * Valuation - $67.8M * Funding - $2.1M * Team size - 234 * Founded - 2015 Developer of a workforce management software and crew marketplace designed to improve contingent workforce management. The company's platform and mobile application helps in hiring, organizing, scheduling, and communicating with their... Motion at a glance. Motion generates $10M in revenue with 50 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, California. * Revenue - $10M * Valuation - $550M * Funding - $133.2M * Customers - 10K * Team size - 50 * Founded - 2019 Motion is a project management software that Automatically prioritize tasks, schedule meetings, and resolve calendar conflicts. The motion's intelligent app allows to manage all tasks and meetings in one place. It is really easy to use and... Other LASSO alternatives. LASSO competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category. LASSO vs Motion: frequently asked questions. Is LASSO or Motion bigger? Motion is the bigger company by revenue, at $10M against $9.7M for LASSO. How much revenue does LASSO make? LASSO generates $9.7M in annual revenue with a team of 234. How much revenue does Motion make? Motion generates $10M in annual revenue with a team of 50. How much funding has LASSO raised? LASSO has raised $2.1M in total funding since it was founded in 2015. How much funding has Motion raised? Motion has raised $133.2M in total funding since it was founded in 2019.

Why the best AI scheduling apps are moving beyond full automation. May 18, 2026 The New York Times Wirecutter article "best AI scheduling apps" highlights a growing divide in productivity software: fully automated AI schedulers versus more "thoughtful" planning tools that keep humans in control. Although many AI scheduling apps promise to optimize calendars automatically, the best experiences often come from products that balance automation with intentional daily planning. Among the products evaluated, Sunsama emerged as a standout for its lighter-touch approach to AI. Rather than aggressively rearranging users' calendars, Sunsama focuses on guided daily planning, unified task management, and gentle AI assistance such as estimating task durations and suggesting schedule placement. Wirecutter reviewers noted that the platform "uses just a dash of AI" and praised its emphasis on helping users think deliberately about priorities rather than surrendering their schedules entirely to automation. The article contrasted Sunsama with more automation-heavy competitors such as Motion and Reclaim.ai. Motion was recognized for sophisticated automatic rescheduling and task optimization, but reviewers described the experience as complex and sometimes overwhelming in day-to-day use. Reclaim.ai earned praise for protecting focus time and automatically shifting calendar blocks as schedules change, making it especially attractive for hybrid work environments. A recurring theme is that users increasingly want AI scheduling systems that reduce friction without becoming intrusive. Community discussions and independent reviews repeatedly point to frustration with bloated interfaces, excessive automation, and tools that require too much manual correction after the AI makes scheduling decisions. Many users appear to prefer products that simplify workflows while still leaving room for human judgment. The broader takeaway for the scheduling software market is that "AI-powered" alone is no longer enough. The products gaining traction are those that combine automation with usability, flexibility, and trust - helping users feel more organized without making them feel managed by the software itself.