N

National Laboratory of the Rockies

Renewable energy research and data services

Overview

NREL analyzes and develops renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies and provides energy data and research services to government agencies, private companies, and universities. Its offerings include research outputs, data products, and Web services through a developer network that gives clients access to renewable-energy data and information on alternative fuels. The work is funded mainly by government grants and partnerships, and NREL uses its findings to help clients create sustainable energy solutions and policy guidance. The organization differs from many peers by being a government-supported national lab with large, open data resources and a focus on practical deployment, standards, and collaboration across public and private sectors. Its goals include accelerating the adoption of clean energy, advancing energy efficiency, reducing carbon emissions, promoting circular economy practices and decarbonizing its own operations to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

Significant Headcount Growth

Work here?Claim your company

About National Laboratory of the Rockies

Simplify's Rating
Why National Laboratory of the Rockies is rated
B
Rated A on Competitive Edge
Rated B on Growth Potential
Rated C on Differentiation

Industries

Data & AnalyticsGovernment & Public SectorEnergy

Company Size

1,001-5,000

Company Stage

Grant

Total Funding

$14.6M

Headquarters

Golden, CO

Founded

1977

Get referred to National Laboratory of the Rockies

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's take

What believers are saying

  • BattMan launched October 28, 2026, positioning NLR inside battery manufacturing scale-up.
  • PacWave opened September 10, 2026, strengthening marine-energy commercialization and data leadership.
  • ExxonMobil-backed Innovation Center partnerships expanded in July 2026, bringing industry validation and revenue.

What critics are saying

  • Federal budget politics can freeze funding and disrupt multiyear programs by 2027.
  • The nrel.gov shutdown in May 2026 risks broken links, confusion, and weaker market visibility.
  • If DOE priorities shift, commercial partners leave BattMan and accelerator programs unfinished.

What makes National Laboratory of the Rockies unique

  • DOE's primary energy systems lab, now centered on critical minerals and energy security.
  • Unique testbeds like ARIES, SWEL, and PacWave accelerate real-world validation.
  • Deep convening power links universities, startups, utilities, and governments across energy markets.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Funding

Total Funding

$14.6M

Above

Industry Average

Funded Over

6 Rounds

Grant funding comparison data is currently unavailable. We're working to provide this information soon!
Grant Funding Comparison Coming Soon

Benefits

  • Health Insurance
  • Dental Insurance
  • Vision Insurance
  • Short\-term disability insurance
  • Long-term disability insurance
  • 403(b) Employee Savings Plan with employer match
  • Pension benefits
  • Personal time off (PTO)
  • Sick leave
  • Paid holidays
  • Tuition reimbursement

Growth & Insights and Company News

6 month growth

0%

1 year growth

9%

2 year growth

9%
National American Indian Housing Council
Nov 3rd, 2026
Webinar: department of Energy High-Efficiency Electric Home Rebate (HEEHR) Program.

Webinar: department of Energy High-Efficiency Electric Home Rebate (HEEHR) Program. The National American Indian Housing Council (NAIHC), in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy Home Energy Rebates Program and the National Laboratory of the Rockies, invites Tribal leaders, TDHEs, Tribal Housing Authorities, and housing professionals to a special Tribal High-Efficiency Electric Home Rebate (HEEHR) Information Session! Learn how your TDHE can access federal formula funding to improve housing conditions, reduce utility costs, and make homes more energy-efficient and affordable. Up to $14,000 in combined rebates per eligible dwelling unit. Learn about funding allocations, eligibility requirements, applications, and technical assistance. Webinar: Monday, November 9, 2026 Location: Virtual Federal Application Deadline: December 11, 2026 Don't miss this opportunity to bring valuable energy-efficiency investments to your Tribal community!

BW&CO
Nov 3rd, 2026
DOE's battery strategy: what battery startups should build toward next.

DOE's battery strategy: what battery startups should build toward next. On October 28, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a National Strategy for American Leadership in Batteries and launched a lab-led scale-up consortium called the Battery Manufacturing Accelerator (BattMan). Neither comes with a startup grant amount or a deadline. Both tell battery companies what DOE wants built in the United States, and that should shape the next project a startup takes on. What DOE announced. The strategy sets two goals: a continuous domestic battery value chain by 2030, and technology and manufacturing leadership by 2035. It names the middle of the supply chain (cathodes, anodes, electrolytes and separators) as underinvested, and it also prioritizes refining, recycling, equipment manufacturing and the pilot facilities needed to validate new technology. Read DOE's battery strategy. BattMan, launched by DOE's Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation (CMEI), is led by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) with Argonne, Oak Ridge and the National Laboratory of the Rockies. Its announced work includes real-time process monitoring, digital twins and closed-loop control, and it is now setting up industry and university partnerships. Read DOE's BattMan announcement. Which companies this is for. A domestic cell factory depends on the materials, equipment and data that feed it, so the strategy reaches well beyond cell developers. For each type of company, the useful question is what a manufacturer would need to see before buying. * Materials and component developers: show consistent specifications and compatibility with the customer's process, and know how much material the customer needs for qualification. A cathode precursor developer, for example, should show particle size distribution inside the customer's specification across consecutive batches. * Recycling and refining companies: connect feedstock variability to recovery economics and saleable output. A black-mass processor should show what happens to nickel recovery when the incoming scrap changes chemistry, and name the buyer who will take the output at that purity. * Equipment developers: compare the equipment with the incumbent line on throughput, energy use and scrap rate, and count installation downtime against it. An electrode drying system is a good example. * Software and metrology companies: measure the improvement against the manufacturer's current method, including the cost of integrating and maintaining the system. An inline inspection tool should show which defects it catches that end-of-line testing misses, and what the operator does when it flags a false positive. * Cell developers: tie performance results to manufacturing yield and cost at the scale of the next customer decision. A solid-state developer should state which steps run on existing roll-to-roll equipment and which need new tooling. The strategy itself acknowledges the low margins and massive scale that make midstream manufacturing hard. Strategic value does not replace a reason to buy: a competitive cost, a performance advantage in a specific application, or supply assurance that changes a purchasing decision. Look at what sits on either side of your innovation. The gap founders miss most often is upstream and downstream of their own technology. A company with a lower-energy process for separating a critical mineral will usually describe the process well and stop there. The questions that decide whether a funder or customer commits sit around it. Where does the feed come from, is that source domestic and under contract, and can it supply the volume the process needs? What does a kilogram cost by this route against the delivered price of the imported material, at commercial scale and current energy prices? Who buys the output, in what form and at what purity? Those answers depend on other organizations: a mine or recycler for feedstock, a toll processor for an intermediate step, an offtaker willing to commit in writing, a lab that can run the qualification analysis. Reviewers fund the version of the project that names those partners and what each one does. Set your own metrics. A notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) or request for proposals (RFP) sometimes fixes the thresholds an award must meet, such as a cost per kilowatt-hour or a cycle life at a stated temperature. When it does, those numbers are the specification. More often the solicitation describes an outcome and leaves the numbers to you. Reviewers then look for a measured baseline for the current method, the value the project will reach, how it will be measured and who will measure it. "Improved performance" without "improved from what, to what, and by how much" reads as a project that has not been planned. A credible target names a specific gap in current practice, uses a number someone outside the company could check (recovery yield, defect rate, cost per unit of output, batch-to-batch variation), and fits the proposed scope and budget. An overstated target hurts as much as a vague one: a reviewer who doubts the number discounts the rest of the plan, and an award won on a number you cannot hit becomes a reporting problem at the first milestone. Set the numbers first. The experiment, the equipment and the budget follow from them. BattMan may answer an expensive scale-up question. PNNL describes BattMan as a chemistry-agnostic platform for cost-focused research and manufacturing scale-up, with facilities and expertise open to its members. Explore BattMan's capabilities. For a startup, it may be a way to test a manufacturing question on lab equipment before paying for dedicated capacity. Before budgeting around it, confirm the equipment available, how projects are selected, what the company contributes, and the data rights and intellectual property terms. Early-stage chemistry teams do not need a pilot line yet, but they should design with manufacturing limits in mind. Defense is a second, separate case. The Department of War's Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment (IBAS) program lists batteries as an investment area, with the stated aim of boosting domestic manufacturing of batteries and their components and reducing reliance on foreign sources. Read the IBAS program description. That can give some companies a second funding rationale, but it needs its own case. A DOE project explains its contribution to an energy or manufacturing mission. A defense industrial-base project has to tie the work to a specific military battery requirement, the demand behind it and the domestic production gap. Lab results can inform a defense pursuit; they do not satisfy a defense customer's qualification requirements on their own. What to do this quarter. Write a one-page validation project. Name the target customer and the decision that customer needs to make. Describe the current production constraint, the evidence you already have, and an experiment with a pass/fail threshold against a stated baseline. Assign an owner and estimate the resources. Then check whether BattMan has the capability you need, whether a published DOE opportunity supports the work, and whether a separate defense case exists. Spend the next dollar on the evidence that would get a customer or funder to commit. "Complete a pilot" is not that milestone. "Repeatable batches meet a named customer's specification at a documented production cost" is. Battery founders: which has been harder to get in writing, a feedstock source or an offtaker? Send Bwcoconsulting your one-page validation project. BW&CO will tell you whether BattMan, a DOE opportunity or a defense industrial-base case fits it. Book a call Sameera Panchangam, Ph.D., is a Senior Grant Consultant at BW&CO, based in Holly Springs, North Carolina. A molecular biologist with a decade of laboratory research experience, she now writes and manages grant proposals for small businesses. Read Sameera's profile Program names are used for identification only. BW&CO is not affiliated with or endorsed by DOE, PNNL, the national laboratories or the Department of War.

Offshore Source
Nov 2nd, 2026
SURF-WEC completes first ocean deployment off Makai Research Pier in Hawai'i.

SURF-WEC completes first ocean deployment off Makai Research Pier in Hawai'i. Like a surfer, the Small Underwater Research Flap Wave Energy Converter, or SURF-WEC, rides the ocean's waves - but this system converts wave motion into electricity. The SURF-WEC recently made the leap from lab to ocean off Makai Research Pier in O'ahu, Hawai'i. A collaboration between researchers at the Hawai'i Natural Energy Institute (HNEI) in the University of Hawai'i (UH) at Mānoa School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST) and the National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR) enabled this milestone in marine energy device deployment and testing. "Projects like SURF-WEC work because different teams bring different expertise," said Pat Cross, Program Manager for Marine Energy at HNEI. "NLR led much of the power take-off engineering, while we helped ensure a robust anchoring and deployment approach and supported testing here in Hawai'i. We learn from each other - and that collaboration is what makes projects like this successful." Decades of theoretical and modeling research have advanced the field of marine energy. But open-water deployment and testing of marine energy devices have been limited, leading to gaps in data and knowledge needed for commercialization. The deployment of SURF-WEC can help close these gaps: The device is expected to generate critical data the industry can build on. "The marine energy community is so data-starved," said Bri Friedman, a NLR researcher on the project. "There's just so few deployments that have occurred. And on top of that, a lot of those deployments don't have accessible or shared data." To help fill that void, the researchers combined their expertise in wave modeling, controls, and ocean deployment to do something different: deploy a low-barrier, small-scale wave energy converter and provide open access to its design, data, and lessons learned. A techno-athlete, born to adapt. Born from earlier wave energy modeling work at NLR and an existing research flap developed by HNEI, the SURF-WEC turns wave motion into electricity. A buoyant flap anchored just offshore, roughly the size of a big-screen TV, oscillates back and forth with each passing wave - like a door swinging on its hinges. The movement of the flap from ocean waves drives a hydraulic system, which pumps fluid through a sealed system, building pressure over time. When a set pressure is reached, it is used to spin a motor connected to a generator, which produces electricity. What makes SURF-WEC unique is its ability to adapt. Researchers can remotely adjust how the system responds to waves, testing both passive and active modes to better understand how to capture energy more efficiently. Out of the lab, into the ocean. With NLR and UH Mānoa researchers coordinating between the Makai Pier, the UH Mānoa lab, and the water, the team installed the rest of the system just offshore, anchoring it to the seabed and connecting it back to the pier. "Just a small crew and a forklift - that's all it took to get everything in the water," said Kimball Millikan, a marine energy research engineer in HNEI who led the deployment from land to sea. Since the system was deployed months ago, insights are beginning to emerge. The team plans to keep SURF-WEC in the water for up to a year - collecting data to support future marine energy research and technology development. Anyone can follow along in real time through the system's live data feed. As SURF-WEC continues operating offshore, researchers at NLR are gathering the information needed to publish a final report, which will be publicly available. This work was funded by the Department of Energy's Hydropower and Hydrokinetic Office.

Mothership
Oct 29th, 2026
METI, EMA, & US Department of Energy call for greater cooperation for energy development.

METI, EMA, & US Department of Energy call for greater cooperation for energy development. The full report will be released in early 2027. October 29, 2026, 06:30 PM. Image via Canva Singapore's Ministry of Energy, Trade and Industry (METI), the Energy Market Authority of Singapore (EMA), and the United States Department of Energy (DOE) released the preliminary findings of the second phase of the joint Feasibility Study on Regional Energy Connectivity in Southeast Asia on Oct. 28. Key findings presented during SIEW. The Joint Feasibility Study was launched in April 2023, with the second phase being launched in October 2026. The study's key findings was presented on Oct. 28 by the National Laboratory of the Rockies and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, during the 19th Singapore International Energy Week. The final report will be completed by early 2027. The first phase of the study examined Southeast Asia's grid infrastructure, including subsea interconnections, and the socioeconomic benefits of regional energy interconnectivity. For the second phase, Singapore and the U.S. brought together policymakers, industry experts, and researchers from the region to exchange perspectives and best practices in cross-border electricity trading and regional grid development. Stronger regional governance and cooperation. Preliminary findings of this study highlight the need for stronger regional governance and cooperation. It also recommended greater alignment of legal and regulatory frameworks across Asean to support subsea interconnection development. The study also identifies approaches to financing meant to mobilise investment in subsea interconnection projects, including approaches to lessen project risks, as well as regional cost allocation methods to support wider investments as part of the wider Asean Power Grid. The findings will help provide further practical recommendations to support the development of the Asean power grid, including regional initiatives such as the Asean submarine power cable development framework. There is also hope that it will strengthen the Asean-US energy cooperation under the Asean Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation of 2026 to 2030. The METI press statement said that Singapore and the U.S. looked forward to deepening cooperation on regional interconnectivity, energy security, and energy technologies, especially as the two countries marked the 50th anniversary of the U.S.-Asean relationship in 2027.

AZoM
Oct 29th, 2026
Accelerating battery innovation through the new national BattMan manufacturing consortium.

Accelerating battery innovation through the new national BattMan manufacturing consortium. The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory is joining DOE's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR) in a new national consortium aimed at accelerating the transition of energy storage innovations from discovery to domestic manufacturing. Called the Battery Manufacturing (BattMan) Accelerator, the consortium will tackle key challenges in scaling emerging battery technologies, with a focus on lowering manufacturing costs, shortening development timelines and strengthening U.S. leadership in advanced energy storage. "Breakthroughs in battery science must be matched by our ability to manufacture them at scale. BattMan brings together the tools, data and partnerships needed to design manufacturable solutions from the start and accelerate their transition into industry," said Jie Xiao, Battelle Fellow at PNNL with a joint appointment as Boeing Martin professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Washington in Seattle. Pittcon Keynote speaker highlights ebook. Check out the top interviews from Pittcon's Keynote Speakers over the years. The four laboratories contribute complementary strengths to bridge gaps between lab discovery and commercial production. PNNL will apply manufacturing science to show that new materials and processes can scale. Argonne will expand this work by validating feasibility and increasing production using its pilot lines. Both labs will provide materials - such as powders and electrodes - to ORNL for smart coating process development. NLR will lead the integration of advanced characterization, physics-guided quality control and digital materials design for rapid feedback to project partners. "Argonne brings materials synthesis and process scale-up capabilities that can shorten the time required for new technologies to reach commercialization," said Jianlin Li, director of the Energy Storage and Conversion department at Argonne, who serves as the lab's lead on the project. "Demonstrating technical and economic feasibility at larger production volumes is essential for validating new technologies efficiently." BattMan will also strengthen critical mineral supply chains by advancing battery materials made from more abundant domestic elements. In addition to Argonne, PNNL, ORNL and NLR, the BattMan Accelerator includes the University of Washington, Binghamton University, University of Alabama, Arizona State University and University of Michigan-Dearborn as founding partners. The accelerator is actively establishing collaborations with companies across the battery and materials manufacturing sector. The laboratories will work closely with these university partners and industry to test and validate manufacturing processes at increasing scales and toward commercially viable production. "To advance the next generation of battery technologies, we must reduce the risks associated with scaling innovations from laboratory discovery to commercial production," said Claus Daniel, associate laboratory director for Argonne's Advanced Energy Technologies directorate. "Processes that work at small scale can behave very differently at larger volumes. Addressing those uncertainties earlier with better science, reliable data and rigorous validation gives companies greater confidence to invest." SI-Driven manufacturing. Super intelligence (SI) is expected to play a central role in the initiative. "SI-driven methods that use processing and manufacturing data have the potential to speed up discovery of new materials, improve efficiency of laboratory processes and support predictive, cost-effective design," Xiao said. "Beyond enabling high throughput, SI has the potential to optimize workflows to reduce cost and accelerate technology maturation," Li said. "The Argonne team will begin by applying SI to individual processes and later integrate SI models across full production line." As part of BattMan, Argonne will generate synthesis and scale-up data, train machine learning models and identify optimal processing conditions through active learning. Scientific goals. In the near term, BattMan will deploy high-throughput experimentation, automated synthesis and characterization, and digital manufacturing tools to improve data quality, reproducibility and process consistency across partner institutions. Longer term, the consortium aims to develop self-optimizing manufacturing systems using real-time data, digital twins and tight closed-loop control. BattMan will build on the autonomous laboratory concepts by advancing autonomous pilot lines designed to reduce scale-up time and costs, accelerate commercialization and reinforce domestic supply chains. BattMan is currently forming industry partnerships in battery and battery-materials manufacturing.

Recently Posted Jobs

Sign up to get curated job recommendations

National Laboratory of the Rockies is Hiring for 57 Jobs on Simplify!

Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today

Don't see your dream role? Check out thousands of other roles on Simplify.Browse all jobs