
Work Here?
Polygon provides blockchain scalability and infrastructure for developers and businesses building DeFi and dApps. It offers products like the Polygon PoS Chain for faster, cheaper transactions, bridging solutions to move assets and data between blockchains, and developer tools such as APIs and indexing services to build and manage apps. These tools let users run transactions on a sidechain or interoperable network while staying connected to main blockchain ecosystems, and they monetize via transaction fees and premium services. Polygon aims to give developers a single platform to build scalable, affordable blockchain apps with easy interoperability across multiple networks.
Industries
Data & Analytics
Fintech
Crypto & Web3
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Late Stage VC
Total Funding
$451.5M
Headquarters
George Town, Cayman Islands
Founded
2017
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Total Funding
$451.4M
Above
Industry Average
Funded Over
3 Rounds
Work from anywhere (Remote first)
Flexible working hours
Flexible vacation policy
Competitive Salary
Polygon revenue reaches $2.6 million in July amid surge in transaction volume. Polygon revenue hit $2.6 million in July, with daily network activity surging. Over 1.83 billion transactions processed on $MATIC network so far this year. More than $3 billion in stablecoins now circulate on Polygon for fast transfers. Polygon Labs expanded services with major acquisitions in wallets and crypto ATMs.
Polygon revenue tops $1.3 million as low fees drive network activity. Polygon revenue has surpassed $1.3 million over the past 30 days, driven by high transaction volumes, low fees, POL burns, and growing stablecoin activity. Polygon revenues have been over $1.3 million within the last 30 days, revealing the emergence of more economic activity within its proof-of-stake chain. Even though the amount is rather insignificant in comparison with the fees that are collected by Ethereum, Polygon's business strategy implies huge transaction processing at reduced user costs. Table of contents. Data collected by various blockchain data providers demonstrate even greater revenues from Polygon. DeFiLlama has been reporting approximately $2.15 million during a recent 30-day period, while Token Terminal has recorded $1.7 million of monthly revenue in August 2026 and $2.6 million in July. However, the disparity results from the way that each of these platforms measures the network revenue. But from the numbers, there is one pattern: Polygon is earning revenue through network activity. Polygon revenue grows through high transaction volume. Transactions processed by Polygon range from 5 million to 6 million daily transactions, implying that the number of transactions is one of the core parameters in Polygon's network model. Up to the beginning of September 2026, Polygon PoS processed over 1.83 billion transactions during the current year. Transactions produced about $24.7 million in fees. The main difference between Polygon and other blockchains lies in the fact that Polygon does not make money through expensive transactions but seeks to make money on many cheap transactions. POL burn adds another layer to Polygon's model. There is also an inherent connection between the network activities and the POL token by Polygon. All base transaction fees on the network are burned, which means that when people transfer stablecoins or mint NFTs and use DeFi applications, the base transaction fee of their transactions is burned away from the total supply of POL tokens. With about $24.7 million in fees earned this year, the burning mechanism of Polygon has become a significant factor for its tokenomics. The more transactions that take place on the network, the more money could be made due to the higher transaction costs and, at the same time, the lower number of available POL tokens. Polygon pushes further into crypto payments. Polygon Labs is also widening its scope from blockchain infrastructure to include payments and adoption into the mainstream. This company made acquisitions in the form of Coinme and Sequence, which cost around $250 million in total. Coinme has crypto ATMs and cash-to-crypto infrastructure, whereas Sequence offers wallet solutions and development tools that make blockchain applications easier. There are stablecoins, which are another key element of the ecosystem. The amount of stablecoins circulating on the platform has now exceeded three billion dollars. Stablecoins may be utilized for purposes such as remittance, payroll, international transfers, or online commerce. In light of their increasing use cases, Polygon could benefit from the fact that it is capable of handling large volumes of transactions at fairly low costs. In general, the Polygon revenue stream is consistent with a scale-based business model. The platform does not rely on large fees paid by users individually. It tries to use low transaction fees, activity, stablecoin utilization, and POL token burns to generate value over time. Zagham Abbas Zagham Abbas is a Blockchain Infrastructure Reporter at Tron Weekly with over five years of experience covering cryptocurrency markets, blockchain infrastructure, and digital asset regulation. His reporting focuses on core blockchain networks, protocol-level developments, decentralized finance ecosystems, and major assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and altcoins. Zagham covers network upgrades, protocol changes, scalability developments, security incidents, and ecosystem adoption across leading blockchain platforms. He also provides market analysis, explaining how infrastructure updates and regulatory actions impact digital asset markets. His work delivers clear, fact-based reporting for both beginners and experienced readers. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree and follows strict editorial and fact-checking standards at Tron Weekly.
Yield generation of Polygon: growth and token burning. Reading time: 2 min September 3, 2026 Polygon achieved $1M in revenue in 30 days and implemented innovations for sustainable growth. Table of contents The Polygon network has reported a significant financial achievement - generating more than $1 million in revenue over the past 30 days. This event serves as an important indicator of the ecosystem's success, demonstrating the network's steady growth in economic activity. Subheader (detailed technology analysis). Polygon, also known as Matic, is a leading project in the Layer 2 solutions sector for Ethereum, offering cheaper and faster transactions. Its technology is based on a multi-layer architecture that ensures scalability and high performance. Subheader (token burning mechanism). One of the key factors contributing to the current growth in value is the implementation of the token burning mechanism. Token burning is a process where tokens are permanently removed from circulation, thus reducing the total supply and potentially increasing the value of the remaining tokens. Subheader (market comparison). Against the backdrop of other Layer 2 solutions like Optimism and Arbitrum, Polygon stands out with its active ecosystem and diversity of opportunities for developers and users. While competitors also aim to reduce transaction costs, Polygon attracts attention with its diverse integrations with real-world projects. Long-term market implications. Polygon's success in revenue generation and implementation of the token burning mechanism can serve as an example for other blockchain projects striving for long-term growth and sustainability. Investors and developers may view Polygon as a model of successful tokenomics and innovation. Conclusion. Polygon's success underscores the potential of Layer 2 solutions for deploying economically efficient and sustainable blockchain systems. * Strengths: Successful innovation implementation, stable revenue growth. * Risks: Competition with other Layer 2 solutions, changing regulatory environment. * Opportunities: Expansion of infrastructure and integration with real sectors. * Threats: The unpredictability of the cryptocurrency market can affect token demand and value. No need to invent complex schemes and look for the "grail". Use the Resonance platform tools.
Nested protobuf fields let one cheap transaction force work on every Polygon validator. ByRanda Moses 2 mins read Published 2 hours ago * Polygon shipped two hard forks, Austin on Bor and Kyoto on Heimdall, before disclosing what they fixed. * The worst flaw let one cheap transaction force heavy decoding work on every validator. * Bor v2.10.0 and Heimdall v0.11.0 are mandatory, and older nodes have already left the canonical chain. Polygon Labs quietly released two hard forks that fixed a number of security issues in its proof-of-stake (POS) network. The layer-2 network finally shared the details in a forum post. All node operators have to upgrade or they will be kicked out of the network consensus. Austin fork stops nodes from sending the TxDependency field. The worst bug was in Heimdall, which is the software that coordinates Polygon validators. Heimdall bundles the contents of each transaction inside a wrapper called, google.protobuf.Any, according to a forum post by Parvez03. A wrapper can sit inside another, just like how boxes can be packed inside other boxes. However, in this analogy, there's no cap on how many layers deep wrappers could go. An attacker could create a single transaction stacked with those layers for almost no cost. This makes validators waste computing power to unpack it. Polygon described the flaw as "a permissionless way to force costly, correlated work across the whole validator set." The Kyoto hard fork upgraded the Heimdall software to v0.11.0. "Kyoto adds a byte-level pre-scan that rejects a transaction once its nesting passes a threshold, enforced identically at mempool admission (CheckTx) and on the consensus path (ProcessProposal)," the post said. Polygon checks two times: * When a transaction arrives. * When validators build the block. The second hard fork, named Austin, focused on Bor, Polygon's execution client. It patched two denial-of-service paths. One was state-sync events, the process that carries L1-to-L2 bridge deposits. Those events execute contract code and precompiles, just like a normal transaction would do. However, the amount of gas burned was not capped per block. The Austin fork adds a hard per-block limit on state-sync gas. Polygon never capped the size of the TxDependency field. A validator could load it with huge data to crash every node that read the block. There's nothing else about that block that looked wrong. Austin removes the field from the wire format entirely. Kyoto fork activated at Heimdall height 51,533,000. Polygon said that nobody exploited the bugs on the mainnet and that it fixed them all before the forks went live. The Austin fork was activated on mainnet at Bor block 91,949,700 and the Kyoto fork at Heimdall height 51,533,000. Every node requires Bor v2.10.0. Validators and full nodes also require Heimdall version 0.11.0. Nodes running older software have already forked from the canonical chain. The fixes are simple binary upgrades, with no state migration, genesis change, or full resyncs needed. POL traded at $0.09, down about 9.3% over the past 24 hours. The token is in the green zone, up 25.8% over the last 30 days, according to CoinGecko. In July, the Heimdall V2 mainnet went offline for about an hour, according to a past Cryptopolitan report. Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. Cryptopolitan strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions. Randa Moses is an editor and reporter at Cryptopolitan covering tech, AI, robotics, crypto, scams, and hacks. She has worked in the crypto space since 2017. She held roles at Forward Protocol, AmaZix, and Cryptosomniac. Randa holds a degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from the University of Bradford. TABLE OF CONTENT
Polygon patches serious network security flaws. Polygon has disclosed multiple security vulnerabilities in its proof-of-stake network's Bor and Heimdall clients, fixed quietly through the Austin and Kyoto hard forks before public disclosure. No mainnet exploitation was found. Polygon Labs has disclosed a series of security vulnerabilities that, if exploited, could have seriously disrupted its proof-of-stake network. The flaws were quietly patched through two hard forks before any details were made public, a deliberate sequencing intended to prevent bad actors from acting on the information before fixes were in place. What the vulnerabilities involved. The vulnerabilities affected Polygon's Bor and Heimdall clients and included denial-of-service risks, validator resource exhaustion, and flaws affecting checkpoint and milestone processing, according to a disclosure from Polygon Labs' Validators Support Team. The most severe issue involved Heimdall, where a specially crafted transaction could force validators to perform excessive processing work, potentially disrupting the network. On the Bor side, the problems were equally concerning. L1-to-L2 state-sync events were effectively un-metered, meaning they could consume block resources without the gas accounting that normally limits runaway computation. The Austin fork introduced per-block gas bounds to cap that exposure. A second issue involved unbounded TxDependency data, a structure Bor uses internally to track transaction ordering. Without limits on how large that structure could grow, a crafted input could stall block processing or crash connected peers entirely. How Polygon responded. Polygon Labs patched the vulnerabilities through two hard forks, Austin on its Bor client and Kyoto on Heimdall, rolled out privately and validated on testnet before mainnet activation. The fixes landed in the Austin and Kyoto upgrades, which activated on the Polygon proof-of-stake mainnet on August 29, with a community forum post describing the technical details following two days earlier. None of the vulnerabilities were observed being exploited on mainnet, according to Polygon, which said the fixes were deployed proactively before details were made public. The approach reflects a recognised best practice in blockchain security: disclosing vulnerabilities only after patches are live reduces the window during which attackers could act on public information. The hard forks carry an immediate practical requirement for node operators. Polygon PoS nodes must upgrade to Bor v2.10.0, while validators and full nodes must move to Heimdall v0.11.0. After the hard fork activation heights, nodes running older client versions will fall out of consensus and must upgrade to rejoin the canonical chain. (Advertisement)
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
Industries
Data & Analytics
Fintech
Crypto & Web3
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Late Stage VC
Total Funding
$451.5M
Headquarters
George Town, Cayman Islands
Founded
2017
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today