
Work Here?
Polymarket operates a decentralized prediction market where users trade crypto against outcomes of real-world events, from elections to sports. Bets are placed by buying and selling shares tied to event results; outcomes are resolved by decentralized oracles and rewards are paid in cryptocurrency. The platform blends a familiar trading interface with blockchain-based transparency and immutability, and it now operates in the U.S. through the acquisition of QCX, a CFTC-licensed exchange. Its goal is to offer hedging and speculative opportunities on real-world events while combining crowd-sourced forecasting with regulated crypto trading in the United States.
Industries
Data & Analytics
Fintech
Crypto & Web3
Financial Services
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Growth Equity (Venture Capital)
Total Funding
$2.9B
Headquarters
New York City, New York
Founded
2018
People at Polymarket who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Total Funding
$2.9B
Above
Industry Average
Funded Over
6 Rounds
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Vision Insurance
Unlimited Paid Time Off
401(k) Company Match
Polymarket users to receive refunds after major website heist. In a shocking turn of events, Polymarket has announced plans to refund its users after a devastating website exploit resulted in the theft of millions of dollars. The heist, which was carried out by scammers, has left many in the community reeling. According to reports, the exploit allowed the scammers to make off with a substantial sum of money, leaving users feeling frustrated and vulnerable. Polymarket has since taken steps to rectify the situation, confirming that it will reimburse affected users for their losses. The decision is a welcome relief for those who were impacted by the exploit, and serves as a testament to the company's commitment to protecting its users. An investigation into the incident is currently underway, with Polymarket working to identify the perpetrators and prevent similar exploits from occurring in the future. The company's swift response to the situation has been praised by many, who appreciate the effort to make things right. As the situation continues to unfold, one thing is clear: Polymarket is dedicated to regaining the trust of its users and ensuring the security of its platform. dArt Studio installs AI for local businesses in Broward & Palm Beach County, FL. dArt Studio reply within 1 business hour.
Kentucky targets Kalshi and Polymarket in illegal sportsbook lawsuits. Last updated: June 19, 2026 5:47 am 1 hour ago Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman has launched civil enforcement lawsuits against Kalshi, Polymarket and VGW, accusing the companies of operating illegal betting or gambling platforms in the state without proper licensing. The Kalshi and Polymarket suits focus on sports event contracts. Kentucky alleges the platforms allow users to place wagers on game winners, point spreads, player statistics and other sports outcomes while doing business in the state without a Kentucky gaming license or the consumer protections required under state law. The lawsuits were filed in Franklin Circuit Court on June 17. Kentucky's claims include alleged violations of consumer-protection laws, the state's loss recovery act and newer rules aimed at prediction-market activity. VGW, which operates social casino brands including Chumba Casino, Global Poker and LuckyLand Slots, was sued in a separate gambling case. Sports contracts sit at the center of the fight. The legal fight is another test of whether sports event contracts should be treated as federally regulated derivatives or state-regulated sports betting. Kalshi has long argued that its event contracts fall under Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversight, while states including Kentucky are trying to apply local gambling, sports-wagering and consumer-protection rules. Kentucky's complaint puts the sports side of prediction markets under direct pressure. The state is not only objecting to political, economic or entertainment markets. Its case targets contracts tied to sports outcomes, where the overlap with regulated sportsbooks is easiest for state officials to argue. The timing adds tension because Kentucky is already fighting the industry over money. A coalition including Kalshi, Crypto.com and Polymarket recently challenged Kentucky's 14.25% excise tax on prediction-market fees, arguing the levy is discriminatory and preempted by federal law. Kentucky is now fighting on two fronts: taxing prediction-market operators that serve state users, and suing platforms it says are offering unlicensed sports betting. State crackdown keeps spreading. Kentucky is not acting alone. State pressure on prediction markets has widened across the U.S. and Europe as regulators question whether platforms are using derivatives law to route around gaming licenses, tax rules and responsible-gambling controls. Wisconsin already moved against Kalshi and Polymarket in a sweeping prediction-market crackdown, while gaming industry groups pushed lawmakers to ban sports prediction markets in the CLARITY Act. The pressure has also moved into Congress, where a House Oversight probe into Kalshi and Polymarket raised questions about safeguards for users with access to non-public government information. Those cases are not identical, but they point to the same regulatory split. Prediction-market operators want a national framework built around event contracts. States and gaming groups want to preserve control over sports betting, gambling licenses, age limits, problem-gambling rules and tax revenue. Kentucky raises the stakes for U.S. Prediction markets. Kentucky's lawsuits arrive as prediction markets try to move from niche forecasting platforms into mainstream trading apps. Sports contracts have helped fuel that growth because they are simple, frequent and easy for users to understand. They also make the platforms look more like sportsbooks to state regulators. Kalshi's federal-regulation argument may still shape the case, especially where CFTC jurisdiction overlaps with state gaming law. Polymarket faces a different but related challenge because its crypto-native structure and U.S. expansion plans keep drawing scrutiny from both gambling regulators and market regulators. The Kentucky lawsuits sharpen the industry's core legal fight: whether sports event contracts can keep scaling under federal derivatives rules, or whether states can force them into the same licensing box as sportsbooks.
Kentucky sues Kalshi, Polymarket, joining prediction market legal battle. June 17, 2026 - By Cointelegraph - Original - Updated Kentucky has sued Kalshi and Polymarket over illegal sports betting, joining a wave of legal actions against prediction markets across the U.S. Confidence: 70% Horizon: medium-term Key numbers. * 25 billion * 17 * 14.25 Market drivers (micro). * Increased regulatory scrutiny on prediction markets. * Growing legal challenges from multiple states. * High trading volumes indicating strong market interest. Context (macro). * Ongoing national debate over the regulation of prediction markets. * Federal vs. state authority in regulating gambling and betting. Who wins / who loses. * Winners: Legal firms specializing in gambling and regulatory law. * Losers: Prediction market platforms facing operational restrictions. Scenarios. Base Kalshi and Polymarket may face increased restrictions if states succeed in their lawsuits. Alt Prediction markets could gain a favorable ruling that reinforces their federal regulatory framework. What to watch next. * Outcomes of ongoing lawsuits in other states. * Potential regulatory changes from the CFTC. * Responses from other prediction market platforms. Full analysis. Kentucky sues Kalshi and Polymarket in prediction market legal battle. Kentucky has taken a significant step in the ongoing legal battles surrounding prediction markets by filing lawsuits against Kalshi and Polymarket. The state alleges that these platforms, along with their partners Coinbase, Robinhood, and Webull, are operating illegal sports betting and gambling services within Kentucky. Background of the lawsuit. The lawsuits were filed in state court by Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman, who emphasized that these platforms are not licensed to conduct business in the state. Coleman stated, "These multi-billion dollar corporations and their legal fictions don't pass the sniff test." This legal action is part of a larger trend, with at least 17 other states also pursuing legal action against prediction market operators over similar concerns regarding sports event contracts. The legal landscape. Kalshi and Polymarket, which together recorded a staggering $25 billion in monthly trading volume in May, are now facing significant legal challenges. The core of the dispute revolves around whether their event contracts are classified as sports betting, which would require state-level licenses, or as swaps, which fall under federal commodities law. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has sided with the prediction markets, arguing that their contracts should be regulated federally. Implications for the industry. The outcome of these lawsuits could have far-reaching implications for the prediction market industry. If Kentucky and other states succeed in their legal actions, it could restrict access to some of the largest markets in the U.S. On the other hand, if Kalshi and Polymarket prevail, it may solidify their position and regulatory framework for operating in multiple states. Responses from the platforms. In response to the lawsuits, representatives from both Kalshi and Polymarket expressed confidence in their legal standing. A Polymarket spokesperson stated that Kentucky's actions contradict the CFTC's established framework for regulating prediction markets. Similarly, Kalshi's spokesperson emphasized that they are a federally regulated exchange and that the CFTC is their primary regulator, not the states. Conclusion. As the legal battles continue, the future of prediction markets remains uncertain. The involvement of multiple states and the CFTC indicates that this issue will likely escalate, drawing more attention from lawmakers and regulators. Stakeholders in the prediction market space should closely monitor these developments as they unfold.
Kalshi fires back at Rhode Island lawsuit while targeting "Kalshi Lies" campaign. Kalshi's legal fight expanded again after Rhode Island accused the company of offering unlicensed sports betting products. Prediction market operator Kalshi has escalated its legal fight with state regulators after filing suit against Rhode Island officials and sending a cease-and-desist letter to a group behind an anti-Kalshi advertising campaign. The company filed a federal complaint against Rhode Island authorities after state officials signaled potential enforcement action tied to Kalshi's sports event contracts. Hours later, Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha responded with a separate lawsuit accusing both Kalshi and Polymarket of operating unlicensed sports betting products through prediction markets. The dispute adds another chapter to Kalshi's growing legal battle across multiple US states, where regulators continue challenging the company's argument that its sports markets fall under federal commodities law rather than state gambling oversight. Rhode Island becomes the latest battleground. According to Kalshi's filing, Rhode Island officials allegedly refused to assure the company that enforcement action was not imminent during a meeting earlier this week. Kalshi argued that the threat alone justified federal intervention, claiming its event contracts are regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission rather than state gaming agencies. The state's lawsuit argues that Kalshi and Polymarket are effectively offering sports betting products without obtaining local licenses or complying with gambling regulations. The complaint specifically targets sports-related event contracts, which allow users to trade on game outcomes and player performances in a format regulators increasingly compare to traditional sportsbooks. That argument has surfaced repeatedly over the last several months. Regulators in Nevada, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Washington, Wisconsin and other states have either filed lawsuits, issued cease-and-desist orders or secured temporary restrictions against Kalshi's operations. Courts have delivered mixed rulings so far, leaving the broader legal question unresolved. Sports contracts have also become central to Kalshi's business. Reporting from earlier this month estimated that roughly 90% of activity on the platform now comes from sports-related markets, including esports events. "Kalshi Lies" campaign draws legal response. Alongside the Rhode Island filing, Kalshi also issued a cease-and-desist letter to FairPredicts, the group behind a recent advertising push using the slogan "Kalshi Lies." The campaign accuses Kalshi of misleading users about how its markets function, alleging the platform operates more like a sportsbook while relying heavily on internal market-making activity through Kalshi Trading and institutional participants. FairPredicts has not publicly disclosed its funding sources. Kalshi has denied the accusations and is now attempting to halt the campaign through legal pressure, arguing the advertisements contain false and misleading claims about the company's operations. The timing is notable given Kalshi's recent efforts to position itself closer to responsible gambling and consumer protection discussions despite continuing to reject the "gambling" label attached to its products. Just days before the Rhode Island dispute, Kalshi announced a $2 million partnership with the National Council on Problem Gambling, becoming the first member of the organization's newly created "Financial Services & Trading" category. The move drew immediate scrutiny across the gambling industry because Kalshi has consistently argued its platform is a federally regulated financial exchange rather than a sportsbook. Critics questioned why a company rejecting gambling classifications would simultaneously partner with one of the largest responsible gambling organizations in the US. Kalshi maintains the initiative is focused on "trader health and safety," not gambling addiction, though the distinction is becoming harder to separate as more states challenge the company's sports markets in court. Stay tuned to UMG Gaming for more updates on prediction markets, tribal gaming, and the evolving U.S. gaming landscape. 25 May 2026
Prediction markets could transform World Cup fan engagement. Updated: May 19, 2026 Fact Checker The rise of prediction markets is becoming one of the biggest emerging trends surrounding the 2026 FIFA World Cup, with platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket already seeing growing trading activity tied to tournament outcomes well before kickoff. As the World Cup approaches, analysts expect prediction markets to significantly increase fan engagement by offering an alternative to traditional sports betting. Rather than placing fixed wagers against sportsbooks, users on these platforms buy and sell event contracts whose values fluctuate based on market sentiment and real-world developments. The expanding influence of prediction markets received another major boost after FIFA announced a partnership involving prediction market technology tied to the upcoming tournament. FIFA recently announced the organization's first-ever prediction markets partner, ADI Predictstreet, ahead of the 2026 World Cup, signaling increasing acceptance of event-contract style trading around global sporting events. Industry observers believe prediction markets could attract a broader audience during the World Cup because they function more like financial exchanges than traditional sportsbooks. Traders can buy contracts early, sell positions later, and react to injuries, roster news, or tournament results in real time. Kalshi and Polymarket expand World Cup event contracts. Both Kalshi and Polymarket have already launched active markets related to the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Current offerings include contracts on which nation will win the tournament, whether certain teams will advance to later rounds, and projections involving top scorers and championship matchups. On Kalshi, Brazil, France, Argentina, Spain, and England currently rank among the leading favorites in World Cup winner markets based on implied probability trading. Polymarket has shown similar trends, with heavy trading volume centered around Europe and South America's traditional soccer powers. The ability to trade positions throughout the tournament could create significantly more engagement than traditional futures betting, particularly during the knockout stages when momentum and public sentiment shift rapidly. Prediction market activity surrounding sports has surged over the past year, particularly during major events such as the Super Bowl, March Madness, and the NBA Finals. World Cup markets are expected to become some of the largest sports-event trading contracts ever offered because of the tournament's global audience. Key dates and locations for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The 2026 FIFA World Cup will be the largest tournament in event history, expanding to 48 teams and taking place across three countries. Key World Cup information. * Opening Match: June 11, 2026 * Final: July 19, 2026 * Host Countries: United States, Canada, Mexico * Total Host Cities: 16 * Final Venue: MetLife Stadium Major host cities include New York City, Los Angeles, Dallas, Miami, Mexico City, Toronto, and Vancouver. The tournament is expected to break attendance, television, streaming, and betting records due to its expanded format and North American location. Prediction markets could change fan experience. Supporters of prediction markets argue that event-contract trading creates deeper engagement because users are constantly reacting to tournament developments instead of simply waiting for a bet to settle. Traders can build positions before the tournament, hedge during group play, or cash out during knockout rounds. Critics, however, continue debating whether prediction markets should be regulated similarly to sportsbooks. Legal questions surrounding sports-event contracts remain active in several jurisdictions, particularly as trading volumes continue rising. Still, many analysts believe the World Cup could become a defining moment for prediction markets in sports. FIFA's willingness to embrace the space through partnerships and growing fan interest suggests event-contract trading may become an increasingly important part of the global sports landscape moving forward. Bekah Wright is a journalist whose career has been filled with unique experiences, from fly-fishing and hot-air ballooning to herding sheep. After recently relocating from Los Angeles to Connecticut, she's added baby goat cuddling to her list of adventures. Whether she's exploring new places or working at her desk, Bekah has contributed her writing to a range of publications, including National Geographic Kids, Bon Appétit, TV Guide, the Los Angeles Times, and Los Angeles Magazine. Share page
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
Industries
Data & Analytics
Fintech
Crypto & Web3
Financial Services
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Growth Equity (Venture Capital)
Total Funding
$2.9B
Headquarters
New York City, New York
Founded
2018
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today