
Work Here?
Profound provides enterprise analytics to improve how brands appear in AI answer engines such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google SGE. It collects data on brand visibility and representation in AI-generated responses and offers real-time analytics and insights. The product helps clients optimize marketing, PR, content, and social strategies through recommended actions and benchmarking against competitors and industry averages. It operates on a customized enterprise pricing model with plans to launch a publicly accessible dashboard via monthly subscription. Currently in closed beta, Profound is available only to pre-approved brands. The company’s goal is to help brands monitor, benchmark, and improve their presence in AI-generated search and conversational results, differentiating itself through enterprise-focused analytics, competitor benchmarking, and an emphasis on AI answer engines.
Industries
Data & Analytics
Enterprise Software
AI & Machine Learning
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Series C
Total Funding
$154.5M
Headquarters
New York City, New York
Founded
2024
People at Profound who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Total Funding
$154.5M
Above
Industry Average
Funded Over
4 Rounds
Industry standards
401(k) Retirement Plan
401(k) Company Match
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Vision Insurance
Life Insurance
Disability Insurance
Unlimited Paid Time Off
Flexible Work Hours
Remote Work Options
Paid Vacation
Paid Holidays
Hybrid Work Options
Stock Options
Company Equity
Wellness Program
Mental Health Support
Gym Membership
Phone/Internet Stipend
Home Office Stipend
Professional Development Budget
Conference Attendance Budget
Training Programs
Tuition Reimbursement
Tuition Reimbursement
Stellarcast vs Profound: which AI visibility platform fits you? Both track whether AI engines name your brand. The difference is philosophy: Profound is the deepest way to measure AI visibility; Stellarcast is built to measure, fix and prove the lift. Here's an honest, side-by-side look. Stellarcast'll be straight about its bias - Stellarcast is its product. But this comparison is meant to be useful, so Stellarcast'll say plainly where Profound is the better choice. The two tools solve the same problem from different ends, and the right answer depends on what you actually need to walk away with. The core difference. Profound is analytics-first. Its centre of gravity is data: Conversation Explorer surfaces how often topics are asked across AI engines, Agent Analytics shows how AI crawlers hit your site, and its dashboards benchmark you across 10+ platforms. It is arguably the most complete measurement layer in the category. Stellarcast is loop-first. Measurement is the starting point, not the product. The system is Monitor | Diagnose | Execute | Prove: it finds where you're invisible, explains why a competitor wins that prompt, helps ship the remediation, and then ties the change to a verified lift in citations through a causal remediation ledger. The question it answers isn't only "where do we stand?" but "did what we did work?" Side by side. | / | Stellarcast | Profound | | Primary strength | Diagnose | fix | prove lift | Depth of measurement & data | | Engines tracked | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot (+ more) | 10+ AI systems | | Remediation | Built into the core loop | Reporting-focused; fixes largely on you | | Proof of impact | Causal remediation ledger | Trend dashboards | | Signature feature | Causal lift attribution | Conversation Explorer | | Best fit | Teams that want outcomes, agencies selling results | Enterprises & large agencies wanting the deepest data | | Pricing | Early access | Enterprise (~$499+/mo) | Details as of mid-2026; confirm current specifics with each vendor. Where Profound wins. If your priority is the richest possible view of AI search - topic-level demand data, crawler behaviour, the widest engine coverage - and you have the budget, Profound is hard to beat. Large enterprises and agencies that sell deep reporting as a deliverable will feel at home, and its market position and funding signal staying power. Where Stellarcast wins. If your frustration is that you can already see you're missing but can't reliably close the gap - or you need to show a CMO that a specific change caused a specific lift - Stellarcast is designed for exactly that. It's also a better fit for teams that want one system to carry them from problem to proven result without bolting on separate remediation and content workflows. How to decide. * Choose Profound if you're buying the deepest measurement and can fund enterprise pricing. * Choose Stellarcast if you're buying outcomes: diagnosis, remediation and provable lift in one loop. Many teams don't actually need more data - they need to act on the data they already have. If that's you, the loop matters more than the dashboard. See how AI describes you today. Stellarcast monitors whether your brand is named and cited across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot, diagnoses why competitors win the prompts you don't, helps you fix it - then proves the lift with a causal remediation ledger. Request a free audit and see exactly where you stand. Frequently asked questions. Is Stellarcast a Profound competitor? Yes. Both are AI visibility platforms that track whether engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini name and cite your brand. They differ in emphasis: Profound is analytics-first, Stellarcast is built around a closed diagnose-fix-prove loop. Which is cheaper, Stellarcast or Profound? Does Stellarcast track the same AI engines as Profound? Can agencies use Stellarcast like Profound?
AI-Visibility tracking matures: Profound hits $1B valuation. Profound raised a $96M Series C at a $1 billion valuation, a signal that answer-engine analytics has become its own software category. Here is what brands are actually measuring across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude. NYFTY Labs · GEO · 2026-06-27 AEO GEO AI visibility answer engines A $1 billion bet on a roughly 18-month-old company. According to a February 2026 Fortune report, Profound announced a $96 million Series C led by Lightspeed Venture Partners that values the company at $1 billion. Sequoia Capital, Kleiner Perkins, and other firms also participated, bringing Profound's total funding to more than $155 million. The company was founded in 2024 and is based in New York, which makes the climb to unicorn status unusually fast for enterprise software. Lightspeed framed the thesis as a migration of consumer attention from search engines to answer engines. Real enterprise traction, not just hype. Profound reports more than 700 enterprise customers, including roughly 10% of the Fortune 500. Named clients cited in coverage include Target, Walmart, Ramp, MongoDB, U.S. Bank, and Figma. The product tracks how brands are mentioned across major answer engines, covering brand mentions, sentiment, and share of voice in AI-generated responses. Specific performance claims, such as large jumps in AI referral traffic, come from the vendor and individual clients, so treat them as illustrative rather than independently audited benchmarks. When measuring whether your brand appears in ChatGPT and Gemini answers becomes a standard marketing line item, a billion-dollar valuation isn't hype, it's the new search analytics taking shape. Profound is the most visible name, but it sits inside a fast-growing field of AI-visibility tools. Semrush has folded AI visibility into its platform, scanning ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity, and surfacing both linked citations and unlinked brand mentions. Mid-market and budget-focused competitors such as Peec AI and Otterly.ai round out the category at lower price points. The common job across these tools is the same: submit large volumes of prompts, then measure whether and how a brand shows up in the answers. What brands are actually measuring. The core metric is citation and mention frequency across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude, tracked prompt by prompt rather than by keyword rank. Teams also watch sentiment and the surrounding context of a mention, since how a brand is described matters as much as whether it appears. Each assistant pulls from its own sources and applies its own citation logic, so a brand's visibility can look completely different from one platform to the next, which is exactly why teams track them side by side rather than relying on a single engine. Many of these tools historically diagnosed visibility gaps but stopped short of fixing them, leaving content, schema, and authority work to the brand's own team. Profound has since moved beyond pure diagnostics: alongside its Series C it launched Profound Agents, autonomous workers that automate execution and content generation, though brands still own strategy and review. Why this matters for marketing teams now. ChatGPT reached roughly 800-900 million weekly users and Gemini's app passed 750 million monthly users by early 2026. As more buying research happens inside answer engines, being absent from AI responses carries a real cost that classic SEO dashboards do not capture. Funding at this scale signals that measuring AI visibility is becoming a standard line item, not an experiment. The practical takeaway is to start measuring presence across the major assistants before committing budget to changing it. Key takeaways. * Profound raised a $96M Series C led by Lightspeed at a $1 billion valuation, with more than $155M in total funding for a company founded in 2024. * It reports 700+ enterprise customers and about 10% of the Fortune 500, reportedly including Target, Walmart, Ramp, MongoDB, U.S. Bank, and Figma. * Answer-engine analytics is now a defined category, with Semrush's AI Toolkit, Peec AI, and Otterly.ai competing alongside Profound. * The shared metric is brand citation and mention frequency across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude, measured per prompt rather than by keyword rank. Related services. Questions, answered. Want this applied to your site?
next-aeo: what Profound's new NPM package means for GEO practitioners. A new NPM package called next-aeo - released this week by Profound - puts Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) structured data directly into Next.js application code. For developers building GEO-optimized sites, this is a meaningful shift in how structured data gets deployed. Here's what it does, what it doesn't do, and what it means for GEO strategy. What is next-aeo? next-aeo is a Next.js-focused NPM package that generates AEO-structured JSON-LD schema markup directly from your application code. Instead of managing JSON-LD as static strings in your CMS or manually updating schema blocks when content changes, next-aeo lets developers define structured data as typed React components that stay synchronized with page content. The practical effect: when a developer adds an FAQ section to a Next.js page, the corresponding FAQPage schema gets generated automatically in the correct format. When a product description changes, the structured data updates with it. Schema stays current without a separate CMS workflow. Profound has also integrated next-aeo into the Vercel Marketplace, enabling one-click Agent Analytics setup for sites already deployed on Vercel. For teams already in that ecosystem, the barrier to deploying AEO schema drops significantly. Why this matters for GEO. The connection between structured data and AI citation is now well-documented. AI systems - including Google's AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity - preferentially cite content that includes explicit machine-readable signals: FAQPage schema, Article schema with proper author and publisher entities, BreadcrumbList for topical hierarchy, and HowTo or Q&A markup for process-based content. next-aeo lowers the technical barrier to deploying this schema at scale, especially for teams that: * Build and maintain multiple Next.js blog or content routes * Update content frequently, which creates schema drift when JSON-LD is managed manually * Are scaling programmatic SEO or programmatic GEO - generating hundreds or thousands of pages where manual schema management isn't feasible If schema stays current with content automatically, the citation signal stays consistent. Consistent, accurate structured data is one of the clearest factors in becoming a reliable AI citation source. The GEO stack is becoming developer infrastructure. The launch of next-aeo is part of a broader pattern: GEO tooling is moving from marketing workflows into developer infrastructure. This is significant. Historically, SEO tools lived in the marketing stack - keyword research platforms, content optimization dashboards, rank trackers. GEO is following a similar early adoption curve, but with one key difference: structured data, entity definitions, and schema markup are fundamentally code-level concerns. They live in the application layer, not in a content editor. The teams who will build durable GEO authority over the next 18 months are likely the ones who treat schema and entity optimization as first-class engineering concerns - not as a post-launch checklist item. Packages like next-aeo accelerate this shift. What next-aeo doesn't do. To be clear about scope: next-aeo handles structured data generation - the technical layer. It does not: * Track whether AI systems are citing your content. Generating correct schema is necessary but not sufficient. You still need a way to monitor which LLMs mention your brand, on which topics, and with what frequency. That's a separate measurement problem. * Optimize content strategy for GEO. Schema tells AI systems what your content is about. It doesn't determine whether the content itself is the best answer to the question. Content depth, authority signals, and topical cluster coverage still drive which pages get cited. * Handle non-Next.js environments. The package is explicitly a Next.js tool. WordPress, plain React, or other frameworks require different approaches. How MeetGEO approaches the Full GEO stack. MeetGEO's approach treats schema as one component of a complete GEO system: Layer 1 - Entity Definition: Every site needs a clear @graph that defines the Organization, its key people, its products, and its topical authority. This establishes the entity record AI systems pull from. Layer 2 - Content Architecture: Posts are structured to answer questions directly, with explicit FAQ sections and answer-first formatting. Each post targets a specific query pattern an AI might generate. Layer 3 - Schema Markup: Full @graph schema on every page - Article, FAQPage, BreadcrumbList, WebPage, Organization - ensures AI systems can accurately extract and attribute content. Layer 4 - Citation Monitoring: MeetGEO tracks which queries trigger AI mentions of a brand, where competitors are being cited instead, and how citation frequency changes over time. The next-aeo package is a useful tool for Layer 3 if you're building on Next.js. But GEO practitioners need all four layers working together to build and maintain AI search visibility. What to do this week. If you're a GEO practitioner evaluating next-aeo: * Audit your current schema coverage. Before adding a new tool, confirm which pages have no schema, partial schema, or outdated schema. A schema audit will tell you where the highest-impact gaps are. * Prioritize FAQ schema. FAQPage is the schema type most directly connected to AI citation patterns. If you're deploying schema selectively, start there. * Verify entity definitions. Check that your Organization, author, and product entities are correctly defined with @id references that create a consistent knowledge graph across your site. * Start tracking citations. Schema without citation monitoring is like publishing content without checking rankings. You need to know whether the structured data is working. The next-aeo package makes one part of this easier. The GEO strategy work - what to publish, how to structure it, and how to measure AI visibility - remains the same regardless of which technical tools you use. Frequently asked questions. What is next-aeo? next-aeo is an NPM package by Profound that generates AEO-compliant JSON-LD structured data directly from Next.js application code, keeping schema synchronized with page content automatically. What is AEO (Answer Engine Optimization)? AEO is the practice of optimizing content to be surfaced by AI-powered answer engines - including Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity. It focuses on structured data, direct answers, and content that AI systems can accurately extract and cite. Does next-aeo replace a GEO platform like MeetGEO? No. next-aeo handles structured data generation at the code level. A GEO platform like MeetGEO tracks AI citation frequency, identifies where competitors are being cited instead of your brand, and guides content strategy based on actual AI search behavior. Is structured data required to get cited by AI? Structured data significantly increases the likelihood of AI citation by providing explicit, machine-readable signals about your content. While not the only factor, it is consistently one of the highest-impact technical optimizations for GEO. How do I know if my schema is working for GEO? Schema validation tools can confirm technical correctness, but the real test is whether AI systems are citing your content. Citation tracking - monitoring how often your brand appears in AI-generated answers to target queries - is the metric that measures GEO schema effectiveness.
Profound CEO James Cadwallader argues that marketing is experiencing its biggest platform shift, as AI agents replace human consumers browsing the internet. The company, which serves 12% of the Fortune 500, helps marketers understand and improve how they appear in AI search results across ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Cadwallader explains that agents consume vastly more web content than humans—citing 65 webpages for a single showerhead query versus the traditional top four search results. Different AI platforms show distinct preferences: Gemini favours YouTube content, ChatGPT pulls from Reddit for consumer queries and LinkedIn for B2B, whilst Claude increasingly relies on real-time web information. The key shift isn't the interface, but who's using it. Marketers must now create content for "superintelligent agents with infinite bandwidth" rather than humans, requiring original insights that AI cannot derive from existing data.
Affiliate Roundup: AI shifts to recommendation, Brands scale customer reviews, Facebook prioritizes original content, & more. Affiliate News March 18, 2026 By Chrystal Roessler This week in FMTC's Affiliate Roundup: AI's value is shifting to recommendation, not checkout. Brands are racing to scale customer reviews for AI discovery. Facebook is prioritizing original content over reposts. - Industry reaction to ChatGPT's checkout reversal suggests AI's real value lies in product discovery and recommendation, not transactions. - Brands are racing to collect and distribute customer reviews across the web as AI increasingly uses them to power product recommendations. - Partnerize and Profound are teaming up to connect AI visibility to actual revenue and partner compensation, closing the attribution gap in zero-click, AI-driven commerce. - New Balance is expanding its resale platform to include apparel, betting on branded resale as a growth and customer acquisition channel beyond footwear. - Facebook is prioritizing original content with greater reach and monetization while cracking down on impersonators and reposts, including new tools to detect and report copycats. - Marketers are split on principal media after WPP's rebate controversy exposed transparency concerns, with debate over whether the model drives efficiency or hides agency profits.
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
Industries
Data & Analytics
Enterprise Software
AI & Machine Learning
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Series C
Total Funding
$154.5M
Headquarters
New York City, New York
Founded
2024
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today