SPLC

SPLC

Non-profit civil rights legal advocacy organization

Overview

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is a non-profit civil rights legal advocacy organization that uses lawsuits and policy work to protect vulnerable communities. It conducts monitoring and reporting on hate groups and extremism and supports immigrant rights, LGBTQ rights, religious tolerance, and defendants’ rights. The organization combines lawsuits, amicus briefs, public education, and advocacy campaigns to influence law and public opinion. Its goal is to reduce hate and discrimination and promote equal protection under the law through legal action, education, and public outreach.

About SPLC

Simplify's Rating
Why SPLC is rated
C
Rated B on Competitive Edge
Rated C on Growth Potential
Rated D+ on Differentiation

Industries

Government & Public Sector

Social Impact

Legal

Company Size

201-500

Company Stage

Grant

Total Funding

$400K

Headquarters

Montgomery, Alabama

Founded

1971

Get referred to SPLC

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • We Decide: Alabama launched August 2026, targeting voter registration before midterms.
  • SPLC's motion to dismiss keeps First Amendment arguments alive through pretrial proceedings.
  • Haygood's hiring from New Jersey Institute for Social Justice can stabilize external credibility.

What critics are saying

  • The August 11, 2026 superseding indictment added Heidi Beirich and new fraud counts.
  • Trial is scheduled for October 5, 2026, keeping donor and reputational pressure intense.
  • If convictions hit leadership, SPLC loses fundraising trust and operational freedom quickly.

What makes SPLC unique

  • SPLC still owns a national hate-group brand, amplified by decades of media coverage.
  • Ryan Haygood's August 2026 arrival signals elite civil-rights credibility and leadership continuity.
  • Its Alabama voting-rights launch keeps SPLC visible in Southern civic-engagement campaigns.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Funding

Total Funding

$400k

Above

Industry Average

Funded Over

1 Rounds

Grant funding comparison data is currently unavailable. We're working to provide this information soon!
Grant Funding Comparison
Coming Soon

Benefits

Remote Work Options

Growth & Insights and Company News

Headcount

6 month growth

-4%

1 year growth

-4%

2 year growth

-4%
The National Pulse
Aug 12th, 2026
Former SPLC director Heidi Beirich arrested on fraud and money laundering charges.

Former SPLC director Heidi Beirich arrested on fraud and money laundering charges. 5 hours ago Heidi Beirich, a former high-ranking official at the Southern Poverty Law Center, faces multiple charges for alleged fraudulent activities involving payments to informants, including personal financial benefits. | PULSE POINTS | | WHAT HAPPENED: Heidi Beirich, formerly Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and director of the Intelligence Project at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), has been arrested and charged with fraud conspiracy, bank fraud, and conspiracy to conceal money laundering. She is accused of funneling over $1 million to a neo-Nazi group informant and misusing donor funds for personal expenses. DETAIL: Beirich, identified as "Employee-2" in court documents, allegedly directed payments to a joint account she shared with an informant connected to the neo-Nazi National Alliance. The funds, originating from SPLC donors, were used to cover personal expenses, including housing. Previous reports have suggested that at least one informant was also her lover. Additionally, Beirich is accused of orchestrating payments to another informant to cover up a burglary at the SPLC's headquarters, which she later wrote about in a 2015 article. The SPLC itself was previously indicted on similar charges, including wire fraud and money laundering, earlier this year. KEY QUOTE: "I believe she was part of the effort to open bank accounts in completely fictitious companies' names and make payments to individuals for reasons that were not accurate as described." - Attorney General Todd Blanche IMPACT: The charges against Beirich spotlight the broader allegations of financial misconduct against the SPLC, raising questions about the misuse of donor funds and the organization's operational integrity. Beirich's case is likely to further erode public trust in the once-prominent civil rights group. FLASHBACK: The SPLC has faced scrutiny for years over allegations of financial mismanagement and questionable practices, such as paying extremist groups for supposed informant work, even allegedly funding cross-burnings. Significantly, these same groups and activities provide the SPLC with its primary purpose for existing, with critics arguing they have a financial interest in manufacturing and signal-boosting extremism, where it would otherwise not exist or remain marginal. | Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses. By Popular Demand. The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in its community of almost 15,000.

PSH
Aug 6th, 2026
Southern Poverty Law Center indictment: what nonprofits should know.

Southern Poverty Law Center indictment: what nonprofits should know. Client alertslitigation & disputesnonprofitsouthern Poverty Law Center indictment: what nonprofits should know. August 6, 2026 Earlier this year, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) was indicted in an Alabama federal court on charges of wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy. The superseding indictment filed on June 2, 2026, sets forth grand jury allegations of a scheme in which the SPLC "fund[ed] the leaders and organizers of racist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nations, and the National Alliance," with money which the SPLC had raised with representations that it would be used to fight these very groups. According to the grand jury's charges, the SPLC funded extremist groups through paid informants known as "field sources," and made false statements to set up bank accounts for fictitious entities in order to execute the transfers. For its part, SPLC has indicated in court filings that its field sources are part of an investigative informant program, which the SPLC has used to report planned or suspected criminal activity to law enforcement. The case remains in the early stages. This month, SPLC entered a plea of not guilty on all counts. It has also filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds of vindictive prosecution, arguing that the prosecution has been brought in retaliation for SPLC's speech protected by the First Amendment. As of this publication, the court has not yet announced a decision on that motion, and trial is scheduled to begin on October 5, 2026. The case has drawn headlines and public attention, including with public statements from both Government officials and SPLC's representatives and supporters. Yet for nonprofit organizations looking to understand their legal obligations, it may be most helpful to go back to the federal statutes underlying the indictment, and the conduct which is alleged to make out each violation. Counts 1-6 charge the SPLC with wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, of which the elements are: "(1) a scheme to defraud; (2) knowing and willful participation in the scheme with the intent to defraud; and (3) the use of interstate or foreign wire communications to further that scheme."[1] In brief, these counts charge that the SPLC defrauded its donors: that it "sought donations under the explicit indication that donor money would be used to help 'dismantle' violent extremist groups," then directed some donor funds instead to "the benefit of the violent extremist groups," including use "in the commission of state and federal crimes."[2] The basis of SPLC's potential liability for wire fraud, however, is not the underlying criminal or extremist activity of the groups it allegedly supported. Rather, it is SPLC's alleged fraud on its donors. Counts 7-10 next charge the SPLC with false statements to a federally insured bank, under 18 U.S.C. § 1014. These counts target SPLC's alleged opening of false bank accounts, under various names of fictitious entities, in order to transfer funds to its "field sources" without detection.[3] In each instance, the indictment charges that an SPLC employee submitted to the bank a false certification of the fictious entity. Finally, Count 11 charges SPLC with conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering, under 18 U.S.C. § 1956. This conspiracy count is predicated on the prior charges, and further alleges steps taken by the SPLC "to conceal the true nature, source, ownership, and control of fraudulently obtained donated money the SPLC paid to [field sources]."[4] Nonprofit organizations should remain mindful of their duties of disclosure and candor in their operations. The wire fraud statute, for example, broadly covers schemes "for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises."[5] As the United States Supreme Court recently affirmed, "a defendant commits federal fraud whenever he uses a material misstatement to trick a victim into a contract that requires handing over her money or property."[6] While a nonprofit may from time to time conduct projects involving a degree of confidentiality or sensitivity, such work cannot put an organization in the position of deceiving or misleading its donors. Partridge Snow & Hahn's Nonprofit & Tax-Exempt Practice Group is ready to advise parties with questions or concerns. [1] United States v. Abbas, 165 F.4th 659, 670 (1st Cir. 2026). [2] Superseding Indictment, ¶ 22. [3] "To establish a violation of § 1014, the government must prove that (1) the defendant made a false statement; (2) the defendant acted knowingly; and (3) the false statement was made for the purpose of influencing action on the loan." United States v. Alfonzo-Reyes, 592 F.3d 280, 291 (1st Cir. 2010). [4] Superseding indictment, ¶ 37. For the legal elements of the conspiracy charge, see United States v. Raymundi-Hernandez, 984 F.3d 127, 142-43 (1st Cir. 2020) (Elements of the crime are that the accused "(1) knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, (2) conspired to conduct such a financial transaction which in fact involves the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, (3) with knowledge that the transaction is designed in whole or in part... to conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity.") (quotation marks and brackets omitted). [5] 18 U.S.C. § 1343. [6] Kousisis v. United States, 605 U.S. 114, 118 (2025). Get in touch. General Inquiry How did you hear about Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP.?

Michigan News Source
Jul 30th, 2026
Benson's released emails show continued contact with SPLC after taking office as Secretary of State.

Benson's released emails show continued contact with SPLC after taking office as Secretary of State. LANSING, Mich. (Michigan News Source) - After months of document requests and political sparring, Michigan Democratic Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has turned over a batch of emails detailing her office's interactions with the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The records, released after months of requests and under the threat of a House Oversight Committee subpoena, show Benson using her official state email shortly after taking office in January 2019 to help organize a voting-rights trip to Alabama for roughly 20 secretaries of state. Past board member, present contact. Benson previously worked for the SPLC and later served on its board of directors before saying she stepped down prior to taking office as Michigan's secretary of state. She has described her board role as "mostly ceremonial" and has dismissed the legislative investigation as politically motivated. Republicans, however, say the newly released emails show Benson remained in contact with the organization after taking office, raising questions about the extent of her relationship with the SPLC while serving as Michigan's chief elections official. Emails detail coordination with SPLC as questions grow. Among the emails, Benson coordinated the Alabama visit with SPLC staff, asked the organization to host lunch for the group, connected National Association of Secretaries of State officials with SPLC employees to finalize logistics, and later thanked SPLC co-founder Joe Levin, writing that the organization had been "such a great supporter of the gathering" before adding, "please let me know anytime you need anything at all." The scrutiny has intensified because the SPLC - a nonprofit best known for tracking hate and extremist groups - is facing a federal criminal case in Alabama. The U.S. Department of Justice has charged the organization with wire fraud, false statements to a federally insured bank and conspiracy to commit money laundering, alleging it misled donors about millions of dollars used to pay informants inside extremist groups. The SPLC has pleaded not guilty and denies any wrongdoing. Subpoena paused, not abandoned. House Oversight Committee Chairman Jay DeBoyer told Michigan News Source that lawmakers had been prepared to authorize subpoenas this week after Benson's office failed to produce the requested records. Instead, he said, the committee received a batch of documents just minutes before the deadline and decided to delay subpoena action while members review whether the production fully complies with their request. "It was our intention yesterday to authorize subpoenas for those documents," DeBoyer said. "At literally 4:58 p.m., the day before, we get an email with some documents in it. In the spirit of cooperation, we said we would hold on issuing those subpoenas until we can do a thorough review of the documents they had sent to make a determination if they had actually complied with our request in our letter." According to DeBoyer, the committee requested all communications between the Secretary of State's office and the SPLC because the federal indictment overlaps with the period Benson was affiliated with the organization. He also said lawmakers are attempting to verify exactly when Benson left the SPLC board after receiving conflicting information. "We've been told multiple things that are inconsistent with each other," DeBoyer said. "We were told that she had stepped down when she was elected Secretary of State." However, he said others have suggested she may not have stepped down until as late as March 2019. "We're just going to see if we can validate that." For now, the committee is reviewing the newly released records before deciding whether additional action is necessary. "I would think through this week and into the weekend we'll be able to get through these documents enough to make a determination if our request had been complied with or not," DeBoyer said. "If it has, then great. If it has not, then we'll come back to seek a subpoena." FOIA fight heads to court. The dispute has also moved into court. Former Michigan Attorney General and former Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Cox has sued Benson's office, alleging it has improperly delayed fulfilling his Freedom of Information Act request for additional emails and communications involving the SPLC. Benson's office argues the request is exceptionally broad and requires extensive review before records can be released. DeBoyer also said that Cox's lawsuit appears to seek a broader range of records than the committee's investigation. "I think he's asking for some much broader stuff from the Secretary of State than we are," DeBoyer said. "We're more interested in the operations of state government." meet the author J.P. Isbell. Jen Isbell has spent nearly 20 years as a journalist. She is a Michigan News Source daily contributor who prefers pets over people because they cause fewer problems.

The Daily Bo Snerdley
Jul 30th, 2026
Michigan House Republicans release records on Benson's SPLC ties.

Michigan House Republicans release records on Benson's SPLC ties. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson at a press conference. Photo: Scott McClallen / The Center Square (The Center Square) - Michigan House Republicans say newly obtained records show Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson maintained ties to the recently indicted Southern Poverty Law Center after taking office. The records come amid ongoing scrutiny of Benson's relationship with the organization following a federal indictment announced in April. "The people of Michigan deserve answers when one of their most prominent public servants is deeply tied to an organization facing federal criminal charges," said House Oversight Committee Chair Jay DeBoyer, R-Clay Township. "Secretary Benson has a long, documented history with the Southern Poverty Law Center - one that she continued even after becoming Michigan's Secretary of State." Benson, a Democrat, is also running for governor this year. She has secured the backing of much of the Democratic establishment and has consistently led fellow Democrat Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson in public polling. Federal prosecutors announced charges against the SPLC including wire fraud, bank fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering in April. According to the federal indictment, the SPLC "secretly funneled" more than $3 million in donor funds between 2014 and 2023 to individuals associated with extremist organizations, including the Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations and the National Socialist Movement. "The SPLC was not dismantling these groups," Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said at a news conference announcing the charges. "It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred." The SPLC has denied the allegations. SPLC CEO Bryan Fair previously called the accusations "false" and defended the organization's work. Benson served on the SPLC's board of directors from 2014 through 2018, overlapping with the timeframe outlined in the indictment. The Michigan state House Oversight Committee has been investigating Benson's connections to the SPLC. It held a hearing regarding the issue Wednesday, releasing emails from the Michigan Department of State that Republicans say show she "maintained a working relationship" with the organization after being elected to office in 2018. "Her continued embrace of the SPLC makes her current situation even more difficult," said state Rep. Rachelle Smit, R-Martin. "Benson led an organization accused of funneling money to hate groups and domestic terrorists. The public should rightfully question whether she was directly involved or if her leadership was so flimsy that she was completely unaware of the potential heinous actions happening right under her nose." In May, Smit led a House Republican effort to pass a resolution calling on Benson to release records tied to her involvement with the SPLC. According to Republicans, the emails show that Benson participated in an SPLC event in 2019 and include internal communications among her staff about the SPLC's recent indictment that were taken "offline." "The emails we got from MDOS may seem like a step in the right direction, but the internal conversations we're now privy to do nothing but cement the clear relationship between Benson and the SPLC," DeBoyer said. "The emails we obtained just begs the question: what is Secretary Benson holding back if these are the conversations she felt comfortable being public?" Benson's office did not respond to The Center Square's request for comment on the hearing or emails. State Republicans have promised that they will keep the pressure on Benson, though they have held off on officially issuing a subpoena. "The people of Michigan deserve to know the full extent of that relationship and whether it had any bearing on the work of the Department of State," said Majority Vice Chair of the House Oversight Committee Matthew Bierlein, R-Vassar. "We intend to continue following the facts, reviewing every record, and making sure the people of Michigan receive the full transparency they deserve."

Pray In Jesus Name Ministries
Jul 17th, 2026
Firefighter fights back after refusing pride flag display.

Firefighter fights back after refusing pride flag display. Join Dr. Chaps on PIJN News as he reports on significant issues affecting religious communities. In this episode, the Pentagon reduces recognized faith groups in the military from over 200 to just 31, sparking discussions on religious representation. The Southern Poverty Law Center faces allegations of hypocrisy for allegedly funding KKK activities, despite their public stance against hate groups. Dr. Chaps also covers a jury's verdict in favor of a pro-life journalist accused of illegal videotaping outside a Planned Parenthood clinic. Dive into these pressing topics with a focus on religious freedom and societal impacts.

Recently Posted Jobs

Sign up to get curated job recommendations

SPLC is Hiring for 10 Jobs on Simplify!

Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today

Don't see your dream role? Check out thousands of other roles on Simplify. Browse all jobs →