
Work Here?
TeraSwitch provides data center hosting, internet service, and cloud services from its Pittsburgh, PA location. It offers customers space and power for their servers, direct fiber connectivity, and scalable cloud options to run applications and store data. The company combines data center infrastructure, internet access, and cloud services in one provider, helping customers manage network bandwidth, security, and service uptime from a single source. Its goal is to give businesses reliable, scalable infrastructure with local support to meet growing data and connectivity needs.
Industries
Data & Analytics
Hardware
Enterprise Software
Company Size
1-10
Company Stage
N/A
Total Funding
N/A
Headquarters
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Founded
2002
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Vision Insurance
Paid Vacation
Paid Holidays
Solana stays online despite 102 of 699 validators going offline. Marinade Finance found that 28.83% of staked SOL went delinquent for about 33 minutes after a Teraswitch routing failure took 102 validators offline, bringing Solana closer to its finality threshold. Published 44 minutes ago Solana remained online after an infrastructure failure temporarily knocked 102 of its 699 staked validators offline, allowing the network to continue producing blocks and processing transactions without a coordinated restart. Solana Foundation technology executive Jacob Creech said 597 of the network's 699 staked validators continued voting, while affected validators recovered within about 40 minutes. He confirmed that the incident occurred on August 12 and did not stop Solana from producing blocks or processing transactions. AI Summary Solana's network remained online despite 102 validators going offline due to infrastructure failure, with 597 continuing to vote and affected ones recovering within 40 minutes "Blocks kept producing and transactions kept landing," Creech said, describing the incident as a test of Solana's infrastructure resilience. While the blockchain continued operating, data from staking platform Marinade Finance showed that the impact on Solana's voting stake was considerably larger than the validator count alone suggested. Staked SOL impact was larger. Analysis from staking platform Marinade Finance, as covered by The Crypto Times, found that 28.83% of staked SOL became delinquent for roughly 33 minutes during the disruption. That brought the network closer to Solana's 33.34% threshold for transaction finality. Solana can continue producing blocks while a portion of its validators is offline, but more than two-thirds of the network's stake must participate for transactions to reach finality. The incident therefore left a relatively narrow margin before finality could have been disrupted. Marinade estimated that around 90 validators were affected by the routing failure, while Creech reported that 102 validators temporarily stopped voting. The difference reflects separate measurements and does not mean all 102 validators were necessarily affected by the same infrastructure failure. The affected validators recovered without requiring Solana to restart its mainnet. Routing fault disrupts multiple regions. The disruption originated from a networking problem at Teraswitch rather than from a failure in Solana's blockchain software. As reported in The Crypto Times preceding report, according to Teraswitch, a malformed default route was advertised from its Miami facility and propagated through a route reflector in Amsterdam. Routers at several European and Asia-Pacific locations then preferred the incorrect route, disrupting connectivity to validators operating at those sites.The disruption affected 12 sites, including locations in London, Amsterdam, Dublin, Frankfurt, Singapore, and Tokyo. North American sites were largely unaffected. Engineers identified the problematic route within roughly 10 minutes and removed the Miami site from the private backbone. Connectivity gradually returned, with full recovery taking up to about 33 minutes for some affected operators. Teraswitch has since introduced a global configuration change intended to prevent a similar routing problem from blocking traffic across its infrastructure. The provider said its investigation into the underlying cause remains ongoing. Solana's hidden infrastructure risk. The incident highlighted a distinction between decentralization at the validator level and decentralization at the infrastructure level. Solana has hundreds of independent validators, but those operators can still rely on the same hosting providers, autonomous systems or data centers. If a common provider experiences a major networking failure, multiple independent validators can disappear from the consensus process at the same time. Marinade found that one autonomous system hosted more than one-quarter of all staked SOL, with about 94% of that stake going offline during the incident. That concentration meant the effect on Solana's consensus was far larger than the number of affected operators alone would suggest. Marinade said it plans to review limits on stake concentration across autonomous systems and data centers. It also plans to provide more visibility into whether validators have automatic failover or backup infrastructure. Different from Solana's earlier outages. The incident is particularly notable given Solana's history of network interruptions. In February 2024, Solana's Mainnet-Beta experienced a major outage after block production halted, prompting core engineers and validators to investigate the issue and prepare a network restart. Validators created snapshots from their local ledger state before restarting the network. The outage lasted several hours before block production resumed. This time, Solana did not stop producing blocks and did not require a coordinated restart. The failure occurred in the infrastructure used to connect validators rather than in the blockchain's consensus process. What comes next. The immediate disruption has been resolved, and there was no indication that user funds were lost because of the outage. The main economic impact fell on affected validators, which missed staking rewards while offline. The bigger issue is whether Solana can reduce the amount of stake exposed to a single infrastructure provider or network path. Creech said the distribution of validators across independent infrastructure providers helped the network withstand the failure. But the incident also showed that infrastructure diversity can have limits when a large share of stake remains exposed to the same underlying network dependency. Teraswitch is continuing its investigation and is expected to provide a fuller explanation of the routing failure. Validator operators and staking platforms are also likely to reassess their redundancy and failover arrangements. Disclaimer: The information researched and reported by The Crypto Times is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Investing in crypto assets involves significant risk due to market volatility. Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified Financial Advisor before making any investment decisions.
Solana (SOL) network narrowly avoids shutdown after major data center failure. Key takeaways. Table of Contents * A network routing malfunction at Teraswitch data centers disrupted operations for nearly 29% of staked Solana tokens on Wednesday * Solana approached within approximately 20 million SOL of the critical 33.34% threshold that would trigger a complete network halt * The infrastructure failure began at Teraswitch's Miami location before cascading to facilities throughout Europe and Asia * A single network operator managed over 25% of all staked SOL, exceeding Solana's recommended safety parameters * The Solana Foundation maintained that block production and transaction processing continued uninterrupted, demonstrating network durability The Solana blockchain experienced a critical moment on Wednesday when infrastructure problems at Teraswitch, a major data center provider, caused nearly 29% of the network's staked tokens to go offline. The episode sparked renewed concerns regarding the centralization of Solana's validator infrastructure. The disruption originated from Teraswitch's Miami data center. An improperly configured default route was broadcast and subsequently propagated through a route reflector based in Amsterdam, affecting multiple European and Asian regions. Twelve data center facilities lost network connectivity, spanning cities like London, Amsterdam, Dublin, Frankfurt, Singapore, and Tokyo. Facilities in North America remained operational throughout the incident. According to staking service Marinade, approximately 90 validators became delinquent while the outage persisted. These validators collectively represented 28.83% of Solana's total staked supply. The network teetered roughly 20 million SOL away from crossing the critical 33.34% threshold that would have prevented the blockchain from achieving finality. Transaction finality represents the stage where blockchain transactions become permanently confirmed and irreversible. When validators controlling more than one-third of staked tokens simultaneously go offline, the network loses its ability to finalize transactions, effectively halting the entire system. Teraswitch engineers detected and diagnosed the routing issue within approximately 10 minutes of occurrence. Network connectivity was fully restored by 4:16 a.m. UTC. The 90 impacted validators forfeited a total of 333 SOL in staking rewards, losses that Marinade confirmed would be compensated through validator bond mechanisms. Infrastructure centralization emerges as primary concern. Marinade highlighted stake centralization as the more significant underlying issue. Analysis revealed that one network operator, identified through ASN AS20326, controlled 27.34% of the entire staked Solana supply during the incident. This concentration exceeded the 25% threshold established by Solana's stake distribution guidelines. Approximately 94% of the SOL associated with this operator went offline during the disruption. An additional 14.1 million SOL became unavailable across validators operated by Latitude.sh, Limestone, Butterfly Research, and Allnodes. Marinade indicated it could not definitively establish whether these outages stemmed from the identical routing malfunction. Marinade also acknowledged its own stake distribution challenges, revealing that four autonomous system numbers (ASNs) control two-thirds of the stake it distributes. "Nobody should be comfortable with that, us included," the platform stated. Solana Foundation defends network performance. Solana Foundation Vice President of Technology Jacob Creech characterized the incident as validation of the network's architectural resilience. He emphasized that 597 out of 699 staked validators maintained voting operations throughout the disruption. Affected validators returned to normal operation within 40 minutes. "Because Solana validators are distributed across independent infrastructure providers, the failure of a single provider did not interrupt the network," Creech stated on X. Solana currently has $4.3 billion in total value locked across DeFi protocols and has experienced several network outages in past years. A February 2024 shutdown required approximately five hours before validators successfully restarted the network. At the time of this report, Solana was trading at approximately $75.79. Limited Time Offer Get 3 free stock ebooks. Discover top-performing stocks in AI, Crypto, and Technology with expert analysis. * Top 10 AI Stocks - Leading AI companies * Top 10 Crypto Stocks - Blockchain leaders * Top 10 Tech Stocks - Tech giants
Solana narrowly avoids finality halt after major routing fault. The incident led to approximately 90 validators going offline, resulting in a collective loss of 333 SOL in staking rewards. Traffic began recovering within about 10 minutes, with full restoration taking up to 33 minutes for some operators. Published 5 hours ago · Updated 4 hours ago Solana came close to a network finality halt on the morning of August 12, 2026, after 28.83% of staked SOL went delinquent following a routing failure at infrastructure provider Teraswitch. According to an analysis by staking platform Marinade Finance, the incident brought the network to 86% of the threshold where transaction finality would stop, leaving roughly 19.9 million SOL of headroom before the critical 33.34% mark. AI Summary Solana's network finality nearly halted due to infrastructure issues, prompting concerns over concentration risks and the need for greater diversification Marinade Finance notes that the disruption stemmed from a BGP routing error at Teraswitch. A default route originating from the provider's Miami site was advertised without proper attributes. Data from Validators App, shows a route reflector in Amsterdam then propagated it across sites in Europe and Asia-Pacific. This left 12 key locations, including facilities in London, Amsterdam, Dublin, Frankfurt, Singapore, and Tokyo, without valid forwarding paths. North American validators remained largely unaffected. The incident led to approximately 90 validators going offline, resulting in a collective loss of 333 SOL in staking rewards. Traffic began recovering within about 10 minutes, with full restoration taking up to 33 minutes for some operators. Notably, AS20326, which hosts more than a quarter of all staked SOL (around 122.39 million SOL), saw 94% of its stake go dark simultaneously, pushing its effective share above the Solana Foundation Delegation Program's 25% recommended cap. Helius, one of the network's largest validators, remained offline for the full duration of the event. Meanwhile, only a few operators successfully failed to backup infrastructure. Infrastructure concentration raises concerns amid past outages. The near-miss has reignited discussions about Solana's infrastructure concentration risks. Marinade noted that counting stake purely by hosting provider underestimates correlated failures, as additional stake on other providers also went down concurrently. The platform announced it will tighten its own per-ASN and per-data-center concentration limits and begin publishing whether validators support hot-swap and automatic failover capabilities. Solana has a history of outages in the past, particularly during its earlier years when network congestion, software bugs, and spam attacks caused multiple full or partial halts lasting hours. While the chain has maintained a longer stretch without complete stoppages in recent periods, today's event demonstrated that finality - rather than pure block production - can still be threatened by single points of failure in the underlying network layer. Blocks may continue to be produced, but without sufficient stake online, transactions cannot be finalized as irreversible. Validators and stake pools are now under pressure to improve redundancy. The modest economic impact of 333 SOL in lost rewards belies the systemic risk: had delinquency crossed one-third of stake, finality would have stalled network-wide with no simple recovery bond available. While the rapid resolution averted that scenario, the episode serves as a clear reminder of the need for greater geographic and provider diversification across Solana's validator set. Disclaimer: The information researched and reported by The Crypto Times is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Investing in crypto assets involves significant risk due to market volatility. Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified Financial Advisor before making any investment decisions.
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
Industries
Data & Analytics
Hardware
Enterprise Software
Company Size
1-10
Company Stage
N/A
Total Funding
N/A
Headquarters
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Founded
2002
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today