V

Velocity Risk

Specialty property MGA offering catastrophe risk

Overview

Velocity Risk Underwriters provides specialty property insurance for commercial properties exposed to catastrophes as a managing general underwriter (MGU) and operates as a hybrid MGA/carrier via a tech-enabled platform that connects brokers, agents, and capital providers. It prices and manages risk using its VISTA data-driven underwriting system, catastrophe modeling, and research, offering E&S policies such as BOP, standalone commercial property, and risk transfer solutions. Its approach combines underwriting and capital access through its carrier relationships, with a focus on underserved, catastrophe-prone areas in Florida, Texas, and the Southeast. The goal is to efficiently connect risk with capital and expand access to catastrophe-property coverage for commercial properties and scalable risk transfer through its platform and network.

Work here?Claim your company

About Velocity Risk

Simplify's Rating
Why Velocity Risk is rated
B-
Rated B on Competitive Edge
Rated B on Growth Potential
Rated C on Differentiation

Industries

Data & AnalyticsFinancial Services

Company Size

51-200

Company Stage

Growth Equity (Non-Venture Capital)

Total Funding

$119.4M

Headquarters

Nashville, TN

Founded

2014

Get referred to Velocity Risk

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's take

What believers are saying

  • Ryan Specialty closed Velocity's acquisition on February 3, 2025, backing distribution expansion.
  • Velocity promoted Paul Carnegie president on May 1, 2026, strengthening operating continuity.
  • The LSU hurricane model partnership supports differentiated catastrophe pricing in Florida and Texas.

What critics are saying

  • Florida's October 2026 subpoena probes Velocity's anti-public-adjuster clauses and trade-group communications.
  • Jake Rothfuss accepted Selective's EVP role in 2026, leaving Velocity by April 2027.
  • If Florida courts void the clause, Velocity's claims leverage and pricing discipline weaken materially.

What makes Velocity Risk unique

  • Velocity Risk writes 50-state E&S catastrophe property risks through proprietary VISTA underwriting.
  • Its niche is commercial catastrophe exposure, not standard homeowners lines, sharpening broker relevance.
  • Ryan Specialty kept Velocity inside Underwriting Managers after the February 2025 acquisition.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Funding

Total Funding

$119.4M

Above

Industry Average

Funded Over

1 Rounds

Growth Equity Non VC funding comparison data is currently unavailable. We're working to provide this information soon!
Growth Equity Non VC Funding Comparison Coming Soon

Growth & Insights and Company News

6 month growth

0%

1 year growth

0%

2 year growth

0%
Tygart Media
Oct 23rd, 2026
Restoration Roundup - friday, october 23, 2026.

Restoration Roundup - friday, october 23, 2026. The Restoration Roundup is Restoration Intel's daily sweep of what the industry actually said in the last 24 hours - across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, the trade press, and the restoration podcasts. Only substantive items run: product news, data, named opinions, hires and moves, event announcements. No engagement bait, no filler - and on quiet days, Restoration Intel say so instead of padding. Thursday brought a state investigation into insurers, a sharper way to read fire risk, and a plain-language refresher on what counts as contents. Three items made the cut. Florida's attorney general investigates insurers over anti-public-adjuster clauses. C&R Magazine reported (Thursday, Oct 22) that Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has opened an investigation and sent a document subpoena to Velocity Risk Underwriters, LLC, examining possible illegal agreements around "anti-public adjuster" clauses in surplus-lines policies - rules under which a homeowner who hires a licensed public adjuster can have the entire claim rejected. "Florida homeowners - especially those rebuilding after a hurricane - should have a fair chance to get the full value of their claim," Uthmeier said. "Insurance companies use their own adjusters. Homeowners should be allowed to hire an advocate on their side too." The subpoena demands Velocity's records on trade-group membership, communications with other insurers, and any agreements to keep homeowners from using public adjusters. C&R notes homeowners who use a public adjuster can receive up to 30 percent more on their claims than those who do not. Why it matters: If anti-adjuster clauses fall in Florida, the claims table changes for every restorer working hurricane files there - the homeowner's advocate stays in the room, and scopes get argued on the merits instead of settled by a policy trapdoor. Watch whether other surplus-lines carriers get subpoenas next. Wildfire is not conflagration - and the difference is a deployment map. In R&R Magazine (Thursday, Oct 22), Jamie Knippen, Cotality's director of hazard insights, drew a line the industry often blurs: a wildfire becomes a conflagration when flames cross into the built environment and begin spreading structure to structure, driven by ember cast that can travel more than a mile. Standard wildfire models weigh wind, drought, and vegetation; conflagration analysis adds building density, structural characteristics, ember dynamics, and hyper-local fuel sources - which is why two homes in the same ZIP code can carry completely different threat profiles. Citing Cotality's 2026 Wildfire Risk Report, she notes Texas ranks third most at-risk in the country, with more than 250,000 properties at moderate or greater risk, over half of them concentrated in Greater Austin and San Antonio. The 2025 Los Angeles fires and this year's Spokane Area Fires, she writes, were classic conflagrations. Why it matters: Property-level conflagration data tells a restorer where to pre-position people and equipment, which past clients to re-engage before fire season - and, just as valuable, when the real opportunity is too small to justify a deployment. That is catastrophe planning with numbers instead of gut feel. What counts as contents: the hard, the soft, and the billing line between them. Annissa Coy used an R&R Magazine explainer (Thursday, Oct 22) to pin down vocabulary every technician and homeowner trips over. Structure is the building and its installed components - drywall, flooring, installed cabinetry. Contents are the belongings inside it, split into hard contents (dishes, tools, furniture, and other non-textile items, porous materials included) and soft contents (clothing, linens, draperies, and other textiles). The familiar rule - turn the house upside down and whatever falls out is contents - is only a starting point: a dresser strapped to a wall is still contents, installed carpet is structure while a removable rug is contents, and contents cleaned on site never stop being contents. She closes on the practical point: contents are estimated and billed separately from structure because dwelling coverage and personal property coverage carry separate limits. Why it matters: Misclassifying contents versus structure is a quiet estimate error that surfaces as a coverage dispute. A crew that can explain the split in plain language - cabinet is structure, dishes inside it are contents - writes cleaner files and has fewer arguments at settlement. Quiet on the wires. Checked and quiet in the last 24 hours: Encircle, Kahi, Albiware and Alex Duta, BELFOR, ATI Restoration, ARC Facilities, Paul Davis, and Floodlight Group posted nothing substantive. SERVPRO's corporate and franchisee channels ran a wave of promotional posts with no news in them, and PuroClean's franchise channel posted training footage only. R&R's other Thursday-morning releases - a ZenTrades milestone, a Cotality Supplement launch, and the CAMP Digital summit - all carried timestamps before this edition's 24-hour window opened, so they did not run. The R&R Ask the Expert, Restoration Today, Phil & Michelle's Happy Hour, Restoration Rundown, DYOJO, and Albi After Hours podcasts released no new episodes. The Threads sweep returned no substantive industry posts, the Facebook newsfeed pass was personal only, and the LinkedIn sweep surfaced only company-page crawls with relative dates and one six-day-old newsletter - undated or out of window, so nothing ran from it. The Roundup prints what ran. The Roundup sweeps a standing watchlist of restoration companies, voices, trade press, and podcasts. The full source list, the bench of candidates, and every past edition live on the Restoration Roundup home page. Should be on this list? The watchlist grows from what the industry itself amplifies - if a voice is missing, tell Restoration Intel. Tip the desk. This week's ask: Storm photos. If your crews are working weather this week, send the desk one real photo from the field - the waterline, the roof, the street - not the stock shot. The Roundup runs on what the industry says in public. Tips run on what operators are seeing before it posts. The best tips run in the next edition under From the field, credited exactly how the sender chooses: name, company, or anonymous. Nothing runs without the sender's chosen credit, and a photo only runs if it is the sender's to share. How to send one: join the email edition below and reply to any Roundup email with your tip. A WhatsApp tip line is coming to this page when the desk's dedicated business number opens - until then, email replies are the desk's front door. Get the Roundup by email. One email, weekday mornings - the same sweep, in your inbox. The Roundup rides the Restoration Intel email list: sign up on the Restoration Intel home page (the Vault opt-in form), and each new edition lands by email as it publishes. Reply to any edition to tip the desk. Unsubscribe in one click, anytime.

Business Wire
Oct 21st, 2026
Selective Insurance Group hires Velocity Risk Underwriters chief Jake Rothfuss to lead Standard Lines

Selective Insurance Group (NASDAQ: SIGI) has named Jacob "Jake" Rothfuss executive vice president and president of Standard Lines. He will lead the Standard Commercial Lines and Standard Personal Lines businesses and report to John J. Marchioni, chairman, president and chief executive officer. Rothfuss is expected to start no later than April 2027, when his current contractual obligations end. He joins from Velocity Risk Underwriters, part of Ryan Specialty Underwriting Managers, where he has been chief executive officer since 2023. He joined in 2018 and became president in 2020. Earlier, Rothfuss spent nearly a decade at Farmers Insurance, rising to chief operating officer of Business Insurance. He began his career at The Hartford. Marchioni praised his "proven track record of underwriting excellence, operational leadership, and profitable growth.

Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog
May 25th, 2026
The insurance industry's New playbook: "hire a Public Adjuster, and you may lose coverage"

The insurance industry's New playbook: "hire a Public Adjuster, and you may lose coverage" A legal battle is unfolding in Massachusetts over the controversial insurance policy endorsement that many in the public adjusting profession view as an existential threat to their trade. The case, Swerling Milton Winnick Public Insurance Adjusters, Inc. v. Velocity Risk Underwriters, LLC, [1] involves allegations that an insurer and associated surplus lines carriers are using policy provisions to discourage insureds from hiring public adjusters by threatening loss of insurance coverage. I mentioned this lawsuit last week in Can Insurers Ban Policyholders from Hiring Public Adjusters? A New York Lawsuit Raises Troubling Questions. The lawsuit was initially filed in Massachusetts Superior Court before being removed to federal court in Boston. At issue is what the pleadings describe as an "Anti-Public Adjuster Endorsement," which states that it is a condition of the insurance policy that the insured "shall not hire, engage, retain, contract with, or otherwise utilize the services of a public adjuster" in connection with a covered loss. The plaintiff, Swerling Milton Winnick Public Insurance Adjusters ("SMW"), alleges that Velocity and participating surplus lines insurers are using this endorsement not simply as a contract provision, but as a coercive business strategy designed to eliminate public adjusters from the claims process. According to the complaint, insureds who attempt to hire public adjusters are allegedly met with threats of denied coverage, refusals to communicate, refusals to investigate claims, and pressure to terminate their public adjusters. The lawsuit arises out of a Rhode Island fire loss suffered by the Aquidneck Country Club. The club allegedly wanted to retain SMW to assist with adjusting the loss but decided not to do so after learning of the endorsement and its possible impact on coverage. The complaint alleges that the endorsement effectively forces insureds to choose between obtaining professional claim assistance and preserving coverage they already paid for. The pleadings go much further than simply arguing that the endorsement is unfair. The lawsuit accuses Velocity of orchestrating an industry-wide boycott of public adjusters. The complaint alleges that Velocity coordinated with multiple surplus lines insurers to include similar endorsements in policies and to suppress competition from public adjusters throughout New England and beyond. The public adjusters rely heavily on Massachusetts consumer protection laws, which prohibit unfair and deceptive business practices and unfair methods of competition in the insurance industry. The lawsuit also asserts claims for tortious interference with business relationships and coercive civil conspiracy. One of the central themes running throughout the complaint is that Massachusetts and Rhode Island have both chosen to license and regulate public adjusters as legitimate professionals, and insurers should not be permitted to contractually eliminate a profession that state law expressly recognizes and regulates. Velocity has now responded with a comprehensive motion to dismiss. The defense filing is well-crafted and strategically focused on procedural and jurisdictional attacks rather than directly litigating the fairness of the endorsement itself. The motion argues that the Massachusetts federal court lacks personal jurisdiction because the case primarily concerns a Rhode Island insured, a Rhode Island property, and a Rhode Island fire loss involving non-Massachusetts insurers. Velocity emphasizes that the only connection to Massachusetts is that SMW happens to be headquartered there. Velocity also argues that the Massachusetts consumer protection statutes do not apply because the alleged conduct did not occur "primarily and substantially" in Massachusetts. According to the motion, the insurance policy was issued for Rhode Island property, the insured was located in Rhode Island, and the claims activity occurred outside Massachusetts. The defense further contends that the complaint fails to plausibly allege wrongful conduct because the insurer is merely enforcing contractual rights contained in the policy. Velocity repeatedly frames the endorsement as a lawful exercise of freedom of contract, arguing that enforcing bargained-for policy conditions cannot constitute tortious interference or unfair conduct. Perhaps most significantly, Velocity argues that the public adjusters are improperly attempting to challenge rights belonging to policyholders rather than rights belonging to the public adjusters themselves. The motion asserts that SMW lacks standing to seek declaratory relief reforming policies to which it is not a party. That issue may ultimately define this lawsuit. Insurance policies are not ordinary commercial contracts negotiated between parties with equal bargaining power. They are heavily regulated contracts affecting matters of public welfare. Courts have long recognized that insurance policy forfeitures are disfavored, particularly where the alleged breach has nothing to do with causing the loss or prejudicing the insurer. The endorsement at issue here does not prohibit fraud, does not prohibit inflated claims, nor does it prohibit misrepresentation. It prohibits policyholders from hiring a licensed advocate to assist with navigating a complex claim process. This case is still in its early stages. The federal court has not yet ruled on the motion to dismiss. This lawsuit is a very important public adjuster case. If endorsements like this survive judicial scrutiny, they could spread through surplus lines markets. "The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience." - Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. [1] Swerling Milton Winnick Public Insurance Adjusters, Inc. v. Velocity Risk Underwriters, No. 1:26-cv-12095 (D. Mass. 2026).

Business Wire
Jan 8th, 2025
Ryan Specialty Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Velocity Risk Underwriters

Ryan Specialty (NYSE: RYAN), a leading international specialty insurance firm, is pleased to announce it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire

StockTitan
Jan 7th, 2025
Ryan Specialty Acquires Velocity for $525M

Ryan Specialty (NYSE: RYAN) has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Velocity Risk Underwriters for $525 million in upfront cash. Velocity, based in Nashville, specializes in first-party insurance for catastrophe-exposed properties, generating $81 million in operating revenue for the year ending December 31, 2024. The acquisition, expected to close in early 2025, will enhance Ryan Specialty's catastrophe insurance portfolio, particularly in Florida, Texas, and the Southeast.

Recently Posted Jobs

Sign up to get curated job recommendations

There are no jobs for Velocity Risk right now.

Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today

We update Velocity Risk's jobs every few hours, so check again soon!Browse all jobs