Staff Salesforce & Certinia Developer

Procore Technologies reported Q4 revenues of $349.1 million, up 15.6% year-on-year, exceeding analysts' expectations by 2.4%. The construction software company delivered a strong quarter with a solid beat on billings estimates and accelerating customer growth. The design software sector overall showed robust Q4 performance, with the seven stocks tracked beating consensus revenue estimates by 3.2%. However, the group has declined collectively, with share prices down 3% on average since reporting. Autodesk posted the strongest results in the sector with revenues of $1.96 billion, up 19.4% year-on-year and beating expectations by 2.1%. Procore's stock has risen 14.5% since reporting and currently trades at $54.83, whilst Autodesk shares are up 3% to $240.40.

Five things you need to know before integrating Procore with Oracle. 25 March 2026 Practical guidance to de-risk your oracle-procore integration from day one. By David Baxter Global Integration Lead at Inoapps Integrating Procore with Oracle isn't inherently difficult, but in its experience the ease of delivery depends heavily on the decisions made at the very start of the project. Across multiple construction implementations, Inoapps Limited has seen the same five areas consistently determine whether an integration goes smoothly or encounters avoidable challenges. In this blog, I'll outline those lessons and the practical steps you can take now to de-risk delivery. 1. Know your starting point: understand your historical data and processes. Before getting started, it's worth taking a step back to look at how things have really been working up to now. Most construction companies have been using Procore for years, sometimes alongside other Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) applications. Over time, behaviors can creep in that aren't always documented. Internal teams often make assumptions about how data has been flowing between systems, only for Inoapps Limited to discover mid-project that the actual behavior is quite different. Inoapps Limited saw this firsthand on a projects where the team understood that every Procore change order generated a new line in their ERP. In reality, some change orders had been updating existing lines, which meant there were ten lines in Procore but only seven in the ERP - a mismatch that only surfaced during migration. It wasn't a fault in the system, just undocumented behavior that had gone unnoticed. What you can do now: * Review how Procore interacted with your legacy ERP * Identify differences between historical behavior and your future Oracle model * Validate how change orders, commitments and invoices were created or updated over time * Document gaps so the integration design can accommodate them Understanding your historical behaviors up front keeps the project grounded and prevents mid-stream surprises. 2. Align your master data early: ensure your structures work together. Once you're clear on how things have worked historically, the next step is to ensure Oracle and Procore speak the same structural language. Oracle uses tasks and expenditure types, while Procore has cost codes and cost types. It isn't that complex, but if you don't line the structures up early, your integration ends up trying to translate between two different worlds. In one project, Inoapps Limited ended up hitting pause because it turned out there wasn't a place in Procore to store Oracle's mandatory task field. After several workshops, the solution turned out to be creating custom Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) segments inside Procore. It worked well, but everyone wished it had been uncovered sooner. What you can do now: * Map Oracle and Procore WBS elements before integration design begins * Identify whether your Procore WBS is static or regularly changing * Decide which system will 'own' WBS updates across the lifecycle * Address missing elements (like Oracle tasks) before testing or build A clear, aligned WBS ensures smooth design and avoids mismatches during testing. 3. Be clear on who does what - and in which system. With structure settled, the next step to clarify is who owns each part of the process across your two systems. This is one of the most important decisions you can make early on. Integrations don't typically run into problems because of technology. Issues arise when responsibilities - like raising change orders, updating budgets, or managing approvals - haven't been clearly allocated. Defining this from the outset means you can avoid duplicating work or sending conflicting updates. With one of its customers, the initial project budget was created in Oracle by the accounting team, while project managers made all later changes directly in Procore. This required the baseline to be passed from Oracle into Procore, with all revisions then flowing from Procore to Oracle. With invoicing, if invoices are approved in Procore, there is no need to duplicate the approval step in Oracle. However, if there is no approval workflow in Procore, you would want that in place in Oracle. These ownership decisions had to be clarified early for the integration to run smoothly. What you can do now: * Define where budgets originate and where revisions happen * Identify which system handles approvals * Agree where change orders will be raised and managed * Document the end-to-end project lifecycle and assign ownership for each step Clear ownership makes your integration cleaner, more predictable, and easier for teams to work with. 4. Build a test strategy that works with Procore. After ownership comes validation - and this is where Procore behaves differently to what you may expect. To date, Procore has only offered a sandbox that automatically refreshes every month. If you aren't on top of that refresh window and how Procore's environment behaves, it means you could arrive one morning to find your test data and evidence wiped. The good news is that as of 19 March, Procore has introduced the ability to create sandbox clones that aren't part of the monthly refresh cycle. This gives your teams established environments for testing and UAT. The new clones don't replace the monthly sandbox - that environment still resets - but you now have a way to preserve test data and evidence without losing work mid-sprint. How you can come to testing prepared * Use Procore's persistent sandbox clones for UAT and longer test cycles * Use the monthly sandbox mainly for quick checks * Plan test cycles and sprints around expected refresh dates * Store test evidence outside the sandbox to prevent accidental loss A Procore-aware testing strategy keeps your timelines intact and prevents avoidable rework. 5. Understand how your billing and cost calculations flow through the integration. The last major area of readiness is billing. Construction invoicing often includes retainage, materials stored v materials used, cumulative calculations, and region-specific rules like US pay-when-paid. Procore captures these complexities, but Oracle needs clean and accurate inputs. This sometimes means referencing more than one invoice to calculate the right values. For example, when materials move from 'stored' to 'used,' the integration needs to look at the previous invoice to calculate what's payable now. What you can do now: * Document how retainage, materials and staged billing work for your business * Provide example invoices showing typical and edge case scenarios * Flag subcontractor variations early * Identify any billing rules that rely on cumulative or rolling calculations Understanding your billing rules helps ensure Oracle receives clean, accurate financial data every time. Successful integrations are built on clarity. Clarity about how your systems behaved in the past, how they should operate in the future, and how data will flow between them. Addressing these five areas early will protect your timelines and lower your delivery risk. Needs some help? If you'd like to validate your approach or discuss how these factors apply to your project, Inoapps Limited is happy to assist. Get in touch to arrange a conversation with one of its integration experts.