Full-Time
Observability platform for cloud applications
$176.5k - $207.5k/yr
No H1B Sponsorship
Remote in USA
Remote
Remote within the United States.
See people who can refer or advise you
Honeycomb.io provides a cloud observability platform for cloud applications. It collects telemetry data from applications and lets users query billions of events to understand performance and behavior. It uses Service Level Objectives (SLOs) to alert when customer experiences degrade, enabling teams to quickly debug issues. It offers tools like Query Builder, Query Assistant, and BubbleUp to analyze data and compare subsets against baselines. Its pricing is likely subscription or usage-based, charging based on data sent for analysis. The company differentiates itself by handling high-cardinality event data at scale with fast, flexible querying and by focusing on problem diagnosis and reliability for a wide range of customers. The goal is to help teams identify, debug, and optimize cloud applications to improve reliability and customer experience.
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Series D
Total Funding
$146.9M
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Founded
2016
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Health Insurance
Unlimited Paid Time Off
Remote Work Options
Home Office Stipend
Phone/Internet Stipend
Parental Leave
Professional Development Budget
Company Equity
What customers are doing with AI and Honeycomb. At O11yCon, Honeycomb talked to engineering teams across the industry, and the numbers are starting to get genuinely wild: Mixpanel DevOps Engineer Eddie Bracho told Honeycomb their engineering team is generating 50% more PRs than before AI came into the mix (sorry). | June 30, 2026 Contents. Conference Talks June 4, 2026 Nathen Harvey shares DORA report results at O11yCon 2026. Watch this highlight reel of Nathen Harvey, DORA Lead and Product Manager at Google Cloud, talking about results from the most recent DORA report at O11yCon 2026. At O11yCon, Honeycomb talked to engineering teams across the industry, and the numbers are starting to get genuinely wild: Mixpanel DevOps Engineer Eddie Bracho told Honeycomb their engineering team is generating 50% more PRs than before AI came into the mix (sorry). That kind of velocity is exciting, but it's also a pressure test for every part of your stack that isn't writing code, including your observability practice. Here's what Honeycomb is hearing from customers about how that's playing out. Code volume is the new forcing function. Eddie put it plainly: the investment Mixpanel had already made in observability infrastructure is what's letting them absorb the new volume. "We still have the same number of engineers. They're just writing more code now. Being able to rely on Honeycomb there has been really great." Observability isn't just a "nice to have" anymore. When your deploy frequency jumps 50%, you need to be able to tell quickly whether a new change is behaving as expected or if it's misbehaving. The feedback loop either keeps up or becomes the bottleneck. Yi-an Lai, Engineering Manager at Gem (a recruiting tech platform), framed it well: "Shipping code is just a little part of an engineer's job. We also do code reviews, design complex interconnected systems, and a big part of our job is participating in on-call rotations where engineers help triage and solve customer-reported issues. We may be faster at shipping code, but it is critical for us to also become faster and more efficient in supporting our product." AI helps with the left side of the loop. The right side, understanding what your code is doing once it's out in the world, still needs work. The Honeycomb MCP server. Several of the teams Honeycomb talked to have been connecting the Honeycomb MCP server to their AI coding agents, and the use cases are interesting. At Gem, Yi-an's team built AI-assisted tooling to help engineers during on-call rotations: "Instead of just reasoning with static code, it's able to gather concrete evidence, or it's able to dive deep into traces to uncover performance bottlenecks." Mixpanel is building toward an incident triage bot. The goal: whenever there's a page, automatically open an agent session, pull in data from Honeycomb alongside GCP logs and Kubernetes, and surface as much context as possible before a human even opens their laptop. "How do I surface as much context as possible to an engineer?" is how Eddie described it. The Honeycomb MCP server is a core component of that. StarSling (which builds faster, cheaper GitHub Actions via a self-improving CI loop) has gone the furthest down this path. Their Co-founder Daniel Worku described an interesting approach: start with the Honeycomb MCP server, layer on the Honeycomb skill that wraps the MCP with sub-agents and prompts, then build a custom skill on top of that with specific context about how their architecture works. "When we have an incident, I can just run that skill. I'm like, 'what's going on?' And we usually get an intelligent answer out the backend." The progression from raw MCP access to a bespoke, context-rich skill is something Honeycomb expect to see more teams working through. BubbleUp for Bubble. One thing Shogo Wada at Bubble told Honeycomb deserves attention. Bubble is a no-code platform, which comes with its own challenges: AI doesn't know the company's proprietary language, which makes instrumenting agents harder. But for their backend systems, Honeycomb has become useful in a specific organizational way. "Before Honeycomb, we were using logs and metrics. There were a few engineers who could see the patterns in the dashboard and come to a conclusion. But they needed to spend years at the organization to get there. With Honeycomb, anybody can see the correlation and come to the conclusion and go from there." BubbleUp, specifically, comes up a lot in conversations like this. Finding the signal in high-cardinality data used to require deep institutional knowledge. When that knowledge is encoded in a tool anyone can use, you stop depending on the two people who've been around long enough to read the tea leaves. Reactive now, proactive next. Most teams are honest that their current AI-assisted observability workflows are still reactive. Yi-an at Gem said as much: "A majority of it is reactive, but our team is also currently going through a revamp of our frontend observability stack. We're adopting OpenTelemetry, and with this transition, we expect to first standardize and then switch from reactive to proactive monitoring." That's the arc Honeycomb keep seeing: instrument properly, standardize on OpenTelemetry, get the data rich enough that AI can start surfacing things before a customer notices. Right now, most teams are using AI to go faster once an alert fires. The teams further along are working toward AI that catches things before the alert even needs to fire. The infrastructure needs to be there first, though. You can't ask an agent to reason about your system if your telemetry is incomplete, inconsistent, or siloed across three tools that don't talk to each other. What this actually requires. Rich, high-cardinality telemetry is the foundation everything else is built on. Observability is only as useful as the data behind it. The good news is that the teams doing this well aren't running exotic infrastructure: OpenTelemetry, distributed traces with enough context attached, and SLOs that measure the customer experience rather than just server health. The AI tooling on top of that is increasingly accessible, but the data quality underneath it still requires deliberate investment. If your AI coding agents are already shipping 50% more code, that investment is probably due.
Honeycomb releases second edition of bestseller Observability Engineering to redefine the practice for an AI world. New insights include why most companies cannot safely validate AI-generated code in production, how shipping faster leads to organizations learning slower, and more. | June 17, 2026 Whitepapers March 4, 2026 The Director's Guide to the Future of Observability: AI, OpenTelemetry, and Complex Systems. SAN FRANCISCO - June 17, 2026 - Honeycomb.io, the observability platform for the new shape of software, today announced the publication of Observability Engineering: Achieving Production Excellence, 2nd Edition by Charity Majors, Liz Fong-Jones, and George Miranda with Austin Parker. Majors is Co-founder and CTO of Honeycomb, Fong-Jones is Honeycomb's Technical Fellow, and Parker is Honeycomb's Director of AI Strategy. The book is produced in collaboration with O'Reilly and was almost entirely rewritten to reflect the new challenges facing today's engineering teams. "The core argument hasn't changed from the first edition: fast feedback loops are the beating heart of every high-performing engineering organization, and observability is what makes them possible," said Charity Majors. "But the stakes have gotten a lot higher. Most teams are shipping faster than ever, accelerated by AI, yet their production feedback loops haven't kept pace. This means they're not learning faster, they're just accumulating risk faster. That tension is why we wrote this second edition. The only way to close that gap, turning production signals into understanding at the speed of AI-assisted development, is observability." The Foundations of Observability in the Age of AI The first edition, published in 2022, established the principles of modern observability for distributed systems. This second edition is not a revision of that book, but rather a near-complete rewrite, as the assumptions the first edition was built on have changed. The multi-stage software development lifecycle that organized the first edition's argument - write, test, deploy, observe - is compressing into rapid loops of intent and validation, with most of what used to live in pre-production now happening live. The book had to change because the world it described no longer exists. At more than 600 pages, nearly twice the length of the first edition, the second edition extends the same foundational principles across the full scope of modern software engineering: instrumentation for AI-assisted development, debugging LLM-powered applications in production, telemetry pipeline management, ontologies as a shared language for humans and agents, organizational learning speed as a competitive constraint, and the strategic and financial decisions facing engineering teams navigating the shift. "The core questions haven't changed since the first edition: what is your system actually doing, why, and does your code do what you think it does in production? What's changed is how much of that code humans wrote," said Liz Fong-Jones. "When agents generate most of your diffs, you can't validate by reading every line; the proof has to come from production telemetry. So that's what we wrote: instrumentation for AI-assisted development, debugging LLM applications live in production, telemetry pipeline management, and the organizational decisions that follow from all of it. Martin Fowler told us to make the book shorter. We made it nearly twice as long, because that's how much the field has grown." The latest edition features contributed chapters from practitioners at the frontier of this work, including Boris Tane of Polylane on why observability agents succeed or fail based on context quality; Phillip Carter on building continuous improvement loops for LLM applications using production telemetry; Kesha Mykhailov and Darragh Curran from Fin on the organizational and engineering realities of operating AI at scale; and Hazel Weakly, an Architect at ING and Fellow at the Nivenly Foundation, wrote the foreword and contributed guidance on instrumentation for regulated environments. The ClickHouse engineering team also contributed a chapter that provides an in-depth look at how their open-source datastore is architected and tuned specifically for observability workloads. Meeting the Moment and Continuing the Conversation The book's publication coincides with a period of significant product development at Honeycomb. In May, the company launched Agent Timeline, giving engineering teams full visibility into agentic workflows in production, alongside a redesigned Canvas investigation workspace, all built on the same high-cardinality, high-dimensionality foundation the book describes. The thesis of the second edition and the direction of the product are, at this point, the same argument. Early-release editions of the book were shared with practitioners at O11yCon San Francisco in May and LDX3 London earlier this month, where Liz Fong-Jones keynoted and signed copies ahead of the full release. Charity Majors will keynote LDX3 New York in September. Visit the Honeycomb booth to get a signed copy. Additional author appearances will be announced at https://www.honeycomb.io/events. Observability Engineering, 2nd Edition is available now through O'Reilly Media in print and digital formats. Get your free copy of the book here: https://www.honeycomb.io/observability-engineering-oreilly-book. About Honeycomb Honeycomb is the observability platform for the new shape of software. Built on a decade of distributed tracing leadership and deep roots in the OpenTelemetry community, Honeycomb gives engineering teams - and the AI agents now operating alongside them - real-time, high-cardinality answers about any production system, with no pre-aggregation and no cardinality limits. Learn more at www.honeycomb.io and follow Honeycomb on LinkedIn. Media Contact Ciri Haugh [email protected]
Honeycomb and Embrace have launched a strategic partnership integrating Embrace's real user monitoring for mobile and web into Honeycomb's observability platform. The integration enables engineering teams to correlate frontend performance data with backend system health, addressing a longstanding gap where backend teams lacked visibility into user experiences whilst frontend developers used disparate tools. Built on OpenTelemetry, the partnership allows session data, crash signals, network insights and Core Web Vitals from mobile and web applications to flow directly into Honeycomb. This creates a unified view across the entire stack using a shared data standard. The integration is available through AWS Marketplace. Embrace customers include AllTrails, Best Buy, Ford and The New York Times. The company has raised Series B funding from NEA, Allianz, Greycroft and Eniac.
Embrace partners with Honeycomb to unite frontend performance depth with backend observability precision. partnership Here's the big news: embrace.io has launched a strategic partnership with Honeycomb to bring web and mobile RUM to the industry-leading services and infrastructure reliability platform its friends at Honeycomb are building. The reasons go deeper than the product. embrace.io built Embrace on OpenTelemetry because embrace.io believe the future of observability is open, composable, and high-fidelity. embrace.io has always believed that frontend and mobile performance and reliability aren't a separate discipline from observability, they're just the part of the system that legacy platforms didn't reach. Honeycomb has pioneered the same philosophy embrace.io has been building on at Embrace on the backend: that high-cardinality, context-rich data lets engineering teams understand systems in ways that weren't previously possible. That shared foundation, around high-fidelity data and OpenTelemetry, makes this partnership much more than a typical integration, and will help entire engineering organizations better understand highly complex systems and deliver better experiences for every user on every screen. Scattered tooling and separate workflows. Backend and reliability teams have had strong observability options for a while now. Honeycomb has led the pack with a best-in-class high-cardinality model for services observability, and a genuine commitment to OpenTelemetry. But engineers across teams kept telling embrace.io the same thing: they wanted to know what end-users were experiencing on the other side of the API call. Mobile and web developers didn't want shallow RUM tools bolted onto an expensive "all-in-one" platform that wasn't built for them, so they'd seek out point solutions with zero ties to the reliability teams. Client-side environments like mobile apps are notoriously complex to troubleshoot. The result is predictable: no shared data, duplicate investigations, and a structural disconnect between the teams who need to collaborate the most. The pain isn't subtle. An SRE gets paged at 9am on a Monday, narrows a latency spike to a specific endpoint, and then has to stop and ask: is anyone actually feeling this? They have no way to know without calling someone on the mobile team. Or, a mobile engineer sees an ANR spike on the checkout screen and spends twenty minutes trying to rule out a client bug before they can even ask for backend help. A frontend engineer watches a Core Web Vitals metric deteriorate for three weeks because it never crossed the threshold that would have paged someone (yet the users felt it). These aren't edge cases. They're the standard experience for engineering teams working on user-facing software. And they all share the same problem: the ability to get answers stops at the API boundary. What changes when the data is connected and tooling depth matches expertise. Because both platforms are built on OpenTelemetry, user telemetry from Embrace flows into Honeycomb as standard, enriched, composable data with the same format and same dimensions, queryable with the same tools. No proprietary schema, no translation layer. In practice, this changes how three kinds of engineers work: * The SRE on-call starts in Honeycomb and ends in Embrace. When a backend issue fires, Honeycomb narrows the problem to a specific service and traffic slice. From there, one click surfaces the affected real user sessions in Embrace, including who they are, how many, and what they were doing when things went wrong. That's usually enough to decide whether it's worth waking up the frontend engineering team. Honeycomb tells them the "where," Embrace tells them the "who," "how many," "what customer activities are affected," and "how bad." * An app engineer starts in Embrace and ends in Honeycomb. When a checkout flow in the app is freezing (and frustrating users), Embrace quickly shows whether the problem is on the device or somewhere upstream. If it's upstream, one click opens the matching backend trace in Honeycomb, and the engineer can hand off a specific, evidence-backed ticket instead of a hunch. * The web performance / frontend engineer loops between both. Honeycomb catches a Core Web Vitals metric drifting in the wrong direction before it crosses an alert threshold. Embrace gives per-page and per-interaction breakdowns along with Synthetic analysis. They identify a recently-shipped vendor SDK as the cause, ship a fix, and can confirm the improvement in Honeycomb within a day. What this means for composable observability, and for its AI-driven future. The handoff points work because the data is open and the philosophy is shared. The session ID in a Honeycomb span drives into Embrace where users can explore populations of affected users, and the trace ID in an Embrace network span is a link to Honeycomb where you can explore the dynamics of service behavior. The data doesn't stop at the API boundary anymore. Today's integration is the foundation, not the destination. Where embrace.io is headed is a single observability surface where any question about a service, a user, a revenue line, or a cohort on a specific device build has one place to live. That means BubbleUp running on the joint event set, SLOs that incorporate real user experience scores, and web and mobile apps treated as first-class services. Drift on either side gets cross-checked automatically before any threshold fires, and the impact gets surfaced in language that product and leadership can actually act on, not just the engineering team. Engineering teams worry less about the tooling and more about their end-users. That also matters for where AI-driven development is heading. When an AI agent can pull backend trace data from Honeycomb and jump directly to the affected user sessions in Embrace, it can traverse the full stack in one step and surface the context that tells a developer whether to page the team or close the ticket. When Honeycomb's querying capabilities and Embrace's MCP server are working together inside an agentic workflow, the on-call engineer supervises rather than assembles. The quality of that agent's answer is only as good as the data it can reach, of course. Connected data means connected reasoning, and embrace.io'll have a lot more to share on that soon. Engineering teams that have been treating web and mobile performance as separate from their observability practice can now bring it into the same workflow, the same data, and the same tools. That's the promise, and embrace.io is excited to deliver it with Honeycomb.
Honeycomb unveils Agent Timeline, Canvas Agent & Skills for AI observability. Honeycomb.io, the observability platform built for the new shape of software, today introduced a series of agentic intelligence and agent observability features purpose-built for AI agents in production. These new and enhanced capabilities include Agent Timeline, Canvas Agent, and Canvas Skills. Engineering teams will now have real-time visibility into what their agents are actually doing without proprietary software development kits (SDKs) or framework lock-in. AI agents are rapidly handling tasks such as code generation, incident triage, cloud infrastructure deployment, and customer service. However, the tools built to observe software systems weren't designed for non-deterministic, multi-hop agent workflows. Dashboards break down, averages lie, and when an agent causes an incident, teams have no way to reconstruct what it decided or why. Observability for AI systems Honeycomb's new AI-native observability capabilities allow Engineering teams to track and analyze the performance, behavior, and interactions of AI agents. With Agent Timeline, users can render multi-agent, multi-trace workflows as a single coherent view, connecting every LLM call, tool invocation, agent handoff, and downstream system impact in real time. Engineering teams can now trace what an agent did, reconstruct the full decision path, and understand failures without switching tools or piecing together logs by hand. Observability with AI agents New and enhanced features from Honeycomb supercharge human and agent teams by surfacing intelligence at machine speed. These include: * Canvas, newly rebuilt to serve as a collaborative workspace, a chat interface, and autonomous agent all in one, allows engineering teams to query issues in plain English, work with human and agent team members on investigations, and produce sharable visualization snapshots. * Auto-investigations set your Canvas agent to work automatically when an alert fires, an SLO burns, or an anomaly surfaces, gathering data, creating and testing hypotheses, and proposing remediation, all before an engineer even opens their laptop. * Canvas Skills encode your best engineers' debugging knowledge and best practices for frameworks or services like Kafka into reusable playbooks that run autonomously. Built on open standards for maximum flexibility As a prominent supporter and contributor to the OpenTelemetry project, Honeycomb has integrated the OpenTelemetry (OTel) GenAI semantic conventions (v1.40.0) into its platform. By making gen_ai.* attributes first-class citizens, Honeycomb ensures that model evaluations, tool executions, MCP calls, LLMs, and agents are all properly observed. This alignment with OpenTelemetry GenAI standards allows for the automatic generation of structured GenAI insights without requiring re-instrumentation as specifications change, custom setups, or the use of proprietary SDKs. Honeycomb's proprietary unified data store was built for exactly the kind of unpredictable, high-dimensionality telemetry that AI agents generate, from the ground up. Availability Canvas, Canvas Agent, and Skills are available starting next week for all Honeycomb customers. Agent Timeline is available in Early Access, and anticipated to be generally available next month. Christine Yen, cofounder and CEO of Honeycomb AI has upended how software works: introducing real nondeterminism into production, and fundamentally changing how teams of humans and agents build and validate code, Engineers are drowning in uncertainty as most observability tools weren't built for this sort of "unknown unknown." Honeycomb was built for the hardest parts of building software - and autonomous agents have taken those hardest parts mainstream. Shogo Wada, Staff Software Engineer at Bubble Honeycomb is great at dealing with unknown-unknowns, and Canvas takes it even further, During a recent investigation, we found a cause of slowness in our API by asking Canvas to investigate. While the cause was not directly visible on the affected spans, Canvas compared whole traces and found patterns within their child spans. Before Canvas, this would have been a manual process of opening traces one by one. Additionally, as Canvas is a collaborative tool among the team, we could theoretically explore multiple hypotheses in parallel, getting to a root cause faster. Ray Sharma is an Industry Analyst and Editor at The Fast Mode. He has over 15 years of experience in mobile broadband technologies and solutions, conducting research and analysis on various technology segments and producing articles and write-ups on the latest developments within the sector. He is also in charge of social media engagement and industry liaisons. The Fast Mode 9658 likes TWEETS 28.4K FOLLOWING 3479 FOLLOWERS 13.2K