Full-Time
Updated on 8/23/2026
Nonpartisan journalism explaining California politics
$85k - $100k/yr
California, USA
Hybrid
Remote within California, with regular travel across the state.
See people who can refer or advise you
CalMatters is a nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism organization focused on explaining how California's state Capitol works and why it matters. It produces in-depth reporting on issues like environmental regulation, education, health care, criminal justice, and economic inequality, and distributes content through partnerships with more than 200 media organizations across California. The team digs into who influences policy and how decisions affect Californians, aiming to increase public understanding and engagement with state government.
Company Size
51-200
Company Stage
N/A
Total Funding
N/A
Headquarters
Sacramento, California
Founded
2015
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Vision Insurance
Life Insurance
401(k) Retirement Plan
401(k) Company Match
Parental Leave
Remote Work Options
👩🍳 How we use AI at Tech in Asia, thoughtfully and responsibly.🧔♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news hereImporters face uncertainty as a court case about tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump affects the upcoming holiday shipping season, according to the Port of Los Angeles.A US Court of International Trade ruling threatened to delay or block Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, but a federal appeals court temporarily reinstated them.Deadlines for responses are set for June 5 and June 9, with no clear resolution yet.Shipping volumes at the Port of Los Angeles are significantly lower than last year. May cargo volume is expected to decline by double digits, following a 30% drop in early and late May.Ten vessel arrivals in June have been canceled, including five in the first week.Companies are reluctant to place orders due to fluctuating tariff rates, with nearly 60 trade policy announcements since January.🔗 Source: Reuters🧠 Food for thought1️⃣ Historical pattern of import surges followed by sharp declinesThe current shipping decline at the Port of Los Angeles follows a pattern seen in previous trade disputes, where tariff announcements trigger inventory stockpiling followed by dramatic volume drops.During the 2019 trade tensions, eastbound shipping from China to the U.S. increased by 7.8% as companies rushed to import goods before tariffs were imposed 1.This cycle is now repeating, with the Port of Los Angeles expecting May volume to drop by double-digit percentages and reporting 10 canceled vessel arrivals for June, including five in the first week alone.The last major tariff implementation in 2019 threatened nearly 1.5 million U.S. jobs and over $186 billion in economic activity according to a study commissioned by the Port of Los Angeles 2.This pattern creates operational challenges for ports, as they must first manage congestion during the rush period and then deal with underutilization when volumes collapse.2️⃣ Tariff uncertainty ripples beyond ports to regional economiesPort volume declines directly impact regional employment, with California ports already reporting that longshore workers are facing reduced hours similar to pandemic conditions.The Port of Oakland has experienced a 15% month-over-month drop in container activity as tariffs took effect, while vessel cancellations at California ports now exceed those seen during the COVID-19 pandemic 3.These employment effects extend beyond dock workers—historical data shows that the 2002 steel tariffs resulted in more jobs lost than saved across the broader economy 4.Agricultural exporters are particularly vulnerable to retaliatory tariffs, with California farmers who export through these ports facing diminished market access just as their seasonal harvests arrive 3.The economic impact of tariffs affects lower and middle-income households through increased costs of consumer goods, with Americans paying an estimated $38 billion in additional costs during previous trade disputes 2.3️⃣ Holiday shipping season faces unprecedented planning challengesThe timing of this tariff uncertainty creates difficulties for retailers preparing for the crucial holiday season, which typically requires months of advance planning.Retail analysts are predicting a decline in inbound cargo levels, with projections of a net volume decline of 15% or more for the remainder of the year—directly affecting holiday merchandise availability 5.Many retailers who accelerated imports to beat tariff deadlines now face a mismatch of having excess inventory of low-demand products while potentially lacking sufficient stock of high-demand seasonal items 5.This inventory imbalance is particularly problematic for holiday merchandise, where timing is critical and substitutions are difficult when specific themed products are unavailable.The June 5th and 9th response deadlines mentioned in the article for the tariff legal challenge fall during a critical planning period when retailers typically finalize holiday orders, extending the uncertainty through the peak preparation window
OpenAIs new corporate structure sets the stage for what legal experts believe is a complex relationship between its nonprofit parent and for-profit subsidiary that could be the subject of future litigation. Earlier this week, the parent of ChatGPT said it would keep its nonprofit parent but change its capped-profit LLC subsidiary to a public benefit [] The post OpenAI’s New Corporate Structure Sets Up a Tangled Legal Future appeared first on PYMNTS.com.
On Monday, Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, offered to buy the nonprofit that effectively governs OpenAI for $97.4 billion. The unsolicited buyout would be financed by Musk’s AI company, xAI, and a consortium of outside investors, per a letter sent to California and Delaware’s attorneys general.OpenAI CEO Sam Altman quickly dismissed Musk’s bid, and took it as a chance to publicly dunk on him. “No thank you, but we will buy Twitter for $9.74 billion if you want,” Altman wrote in a post on X just hours after reports emerged of Musk’s offer for OpenAI. Musk owns X, the social network formerly known as Twitter; he paid roughly $44 billion for it in October 2022. The two have a history. Musk is an OpenAI co-founder, and both he and xAI are currently involved in a lawsuit that alleges that OpenAI engaged in anticompetitive behavior, among other things.But Altman’s rejection a $97.4 billion takeover offer is more complicated than just saying “no thanks,” according to corporate governance experts who spoke with TechCrunch.Stalling OpenAI’s non-profit conversionNEW YORK, NEW YORK – DECEMBER 04: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman visits “Making Money With Charles Payne” at Fox Business Network Studios on December 04, 2024 in New York City. (Photo by Mike Coppola/Getty Images)Image Credits:Mike Coppola / Getty ImagesFor background, OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit before transitioning to a “capped-profit” structure in 2019
Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More. While the 2024 U.S. election focused on traditional issues like the economy and immigration, its quiet impact on AI policy could prove even more transformative. Without a single debate question or major campaign promise about AI, voters inadvertently tipped the scales in favor of accelerationists — those who advocate for rapid AI development with minimal regulatory hurdles. The implications of this acceleration are profound, heralding a new era of AI policy that prioritizes innovation over caution and signals a decisive shift in the debate between AI’s potential risks and rewards.The pro-business stance of President-elect Donald Trump leads many to assume that his administration will favor those developing and marketing AI and other advanced technologies
10/2 at 2 pm - San Bernardino - CalMatters is teaming up with KVCR and San Bernardino Valley College.