Full-Time
Develops implantable brain-computer interfaces
$119k - $200k/yr
Austin, TX, USA + 1 more
More locations: South San Francisco, CA, USA
In Person
See people who can refer or advise you
Neuralink develops brain-computer interfaces that connect the brain to external devices. Its main product, the N1 Implant, is fully implantable and wirelessly powered, with custom low-power electronics that translate neural signals into commands sent to a Neuralink app. A surgical robot places ultra-thin threads in the brain under OCT guidance to minimize tissue damage. The company aims to restore autonomy for people with mobility or neurological disorders and to explore cognitive enhancement, differentiating itself with an integrated implant, wireless charging, specialized hardware, and a robotic implantation system.
Company Size
501-1,000
Company Stage
Series E
Total Funding
$1.3B
Headquarters
Fremont, California
Founded
2016
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
An opportunity to change the world and work with some of the smartest and the most talented experts from different fields.
Growth potential. We rapidly advance team members who have an outsized impact.
Excellent medical, dental, and vision insurance through a PPO plan; parental leave.
Flexible time off + paid holidays.
Equity + 401(k) plan.
Commuter Benefits.
Meals provided.
Transhumanism is rampant in Silicon Valley. Many have failed to notice that transhumanism is the driving force behind giant companies like Google. Transhumanism has influence in both Silicon Valley and DARPA, the research agency of the US armed forces. Ray Kurzweil, dubbed the king of transhumanism and techno-prophet, has worked as Google's technical director since 2012. Kurzweil's visions include bringing his own father, who died in 1970, back to life using a DNA sample. Kurzweil has also served as an advisor to the US Army. Tech billionaire Elon Musk's company Neuralink, meanwhile, is developing a brain chip that could be used to control a computer with the power of thought. Tech entrepreneur Bryan Johnson, meanwhile, is chasing eternal youth with, among other things, stem cell treatments. According to Anssi Ylirönni, transhumanism is worth taking an interest in right now precisely because its center has moved to Silicon Valley. - Research projects related to aging, aimed at extending lifespan and ultimately even immortality, are driven and funded by very influential actors. How to trip up death. But is death then a technical problem? According to Jani Moliisi, humanity invests vast sums in avoiding diseases and accidents, but not in deaths caused by old age. - Why should fixing or preventing age-related defects through technology be frowned upon? According to Moliisi, consciousness is nothing more than information: there is nothing that cannot be explained by the laws of physics. - I do not believe in the argument that a person has a soul that is not measurable, identifiable, or in any way perceivable. Because of this, Moliisi would like to live in this world for as long as possible - in some format, even for hundreds of years. - It is safer to trust that the world is a better thing before death. I hope life would go on as long as possible. I am not afraid of death: if it comes, it comes. That was my chance to experience this wondrous universe of ours.
Elon Musk's pledge on sight restoration. August 19, 2026 THE pledge may sound audacious, even provocative to his critics, but Elon Musk, Tesla and SpaceX Chief Executive, has been quite insistent on Neuralink's plan to implant its first Blindsight device, which aims to create visual perception by sending signals directly to the brain's visual cortex, bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. Neuralink is a neurotechnology company co-founded by Musk that develops implantable brain-computer interfaces. Speaking virtually at the Samson International Smart Mobility Summit in Tel Aviv, Israel, on May 18 this year, Musk said Neuralink planned to perform its first Blindsight implant later this year. Hear him: "Even if somebody has lost both eyes, lost the optic nerve, or was born blind, it will initially provide limited vision. But over time, I think it could provide very precise vision, or perhaps even superhuman vision." No human Blindsight implantation has yet been publicly reported, so this remains an ambition rather than an established medical outcome. Neuralink's Blindsight received the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Breakthrough Device designation in September 2024. That designation should not be confused with FDA approval. It is intended to expedite the development and regulatory review of promising devices for serious conditions, while requirements for safety and effectiveness remain. The underlying scientific idea is not fantasy. Researchers have investigated cortical visual prostheses that bypass damaged parts of the visual pathway and electrically stimulate the visual cortex. Human studies have demonstrated that such stimulation can produce visual sensations, often described as points or patterns of light. But transforming those sensations into useful, high-resolution vision remains an enormous challenge. The challenge may be greater for people blind from birth because normal visual development depends partly on experience during critical periods of brain development. Musk's "superhuman vision" therefore remains, for now, a technological ambition rather than demonstrated clinical capability. Although Musk's endeavours have drawn controversy, the possibilities being pursued through Neuralink should not be overlooked. Even partial success with Blindsight could expand the technological options available to people with profound vision loss. A similar principle applies to Toyota's Kaizen concept of continuous improvement. Innovation is rarely one miraculous leap. More often, it is the cumulative result of experimentation, failure, correction and continued investment. Amid these realities lies an important message for Nigeria. Musk's project may sound impossible, but he has repeatedly helped to turn extraordinarily ambitious technological projects into working businesses, even though his promised timelines have often proved excessively optimistic. His achievement is not that every prediction comes true on schedule. It is that organisations under his leadership have repeatedly attempted technically difficult things, absorbed failures, iterated and sometimes produced major breakthroughs. Through SpaceX, Musk helped make the reuse of orbital-class rocket boosters routine with Falcon 9, changing the economics and operating model of orbital launch. Starlink uses a large constellation of low-Earth-orbit satellites to provide internet connectivity, including to remote areas. Through Tesla, Musk helped accelerate the mass-market adoption of high-performance electric vehicles and popularise cars as increasingly software-driven platforms. Tesla's Powerwall and Megapack have extended the company's technological footprint into residential and utility-scale energy storage. The world over, things previously considered extraordinarily difficult are moving from laboratories into practical use. Autonomous vehicles offer one example. Driverless services now operate in some cities, although the technology remains geographically restricted and far from universally deployed. Musk's own predictions about fully autonomous Teslas have repeatedly slipped, reminding us that technological ambition must be distinguished from technological readiness. The message for Nigeria is that the world is moving ahead and will leave developmentally stagnant countries behind. Nigeria remains preoccupied with existential problems and power play among the political class. Yet the country needs to use state power to transform society through science. The real lesson from Neuralink is therefore beyond Elon Musk. Blindsight exists within an ecosystem of universities, laboratories, venture capital, sophisticated manufacturing, regulators, specialist hospitals, engineers and neuroscientists. Innovation of this complexity is not produced by inspirational speeches alone. It is produced by systems. Nigerians do not need to remain perpetual users of other people's ideas. Nigeria has too often consumed technologies without building domestic capacity to design, manufacture, improve and export them. Nor must Nigeria begin by attempting brain implants or reusable rockets. Industrial capability is cumulative. Countries acquire sophisticated technological capacity by developing engineers, suppliers, laboratories, manufacturing processes, intellectual property and markets over time. Nigeria's automobile industry offers a useful example. The Federal Government has adopted a Nigeria First policy intended to give preference to locally manufactured and assembled vehicles in public procurement. The relevant question is whether government will actually enforce it. Will presidents, governors, ministers, legislators and government agencies lead by example? More importantly, will local production progress beyond assembly towards greater Nigerian value addition in components, electronics, software, engineering and intellectual property? Toyota itself did not emerge fully formed as a global automotive giant. Its automobile development began in the 1930s, and Toyota Motor Company was established in 1937. Decades of engineering, manufacturing discipline and continuous improvement followed. Industrial greatness is built rather than wished into existence. What, then, is Nigeria's place in the evolving world? UNESCO's 2026 R&D data release reports that Sub-Saharan Africa spends only about 0.38 per cent of GDP on research and development, compared with 2.55 per cent in Europe and Northern America and 2.42 per cent in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia. Nigeria cannot seriously aspire to technological sovereignty while science remains peripheral to national development strategy. What is Nigeria doing about its staggering brain drain, with its best talents celebrated for building foreign institutions while the home front wastes away? What conditions are scientists and engineers at home being given to create? How does Nigeria intend to cope with a post-oil era increasingly defined by science and technology? These are not idle questions. The lesson from Blindsight is not that Nigeria needs its own Elon Musk. Nigeria needs an innovation system capable of producing thousands of ambitious scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs, and institutions capable of turning their ideas into technologies, industries and national prosperity. WATCH TOP VIDEOS FROM NIGERIAN TRIBUNE TV
Image created with nano banana by Joseph Olejak using the prompts "human divine evolution" Ever since the dawn of the computer age there has been a technological movement to advance the idea that one day artificial intelligence will be smarter than humans and by definition two things will likely emerge in that dystopian future: 1. Humans will have to merge with computers to remain a viable species 2. Technocracy (as opposed to Democracy) will be the political framework. I call this future dystopian because it is a future without love, compassion and feeling. It is a future based on zeros and ones and is a cold hearted rational approach. For example, computers may determine one day that there are too many humans to safely inhabit the planet. Or that humans are a parasite on planet Earth. The logical conclusion of that is extermination. One could easily imagine an extermination plan - Old Chatham Quakers has witnessed it before with industrial scale, but now try to grok what it would look like under technocracy. And carried out by robots where there is no appeal to humanity. Too crazy? Outrageous? Not really. Computer targeting "solutions" without a human in the loop are already a part of Pentagon protocols. A girls school with 180 souls was bombed in Iran as part of Trump trying to control Iran. Oops? Not its fault. The computer made the decision. Hegseth, head of the so-called Dept of War, declared that there will be no limits on what the pentagon can do with AI. Like it or not Old Chatham Quakers is now in a technological race with machines for its very survival. Futurists debate whether there will be a split between mandatory fusion with machines or merely biological upgrades... OR... whether "regular" humans will become obsolescent. There's three lousy choices. FYI Neuralink, an American tech company, is already working on a brain-chip interface. Old Chatham Quakers is in a very dangerous place. Ray Kurzweil, in his book The Singularity Is Nearer, predicts that by 2030 brain-computer interfaces will allow people to plug their neocortex directly into the cloud. A terrifying thought. Who knows what computer bug might get uploaded into your brain. That virus won't be DNA or RNA but a source code chosen by someone else and it could have you thinking thoughts that are not your own and acting on ideas planted there by Meta or Musk or Gates or ABC. If you thought FOX NEWS was programming people this is on a whole other level. So what is the REAL Singularity? As a Christ-Based Quaker, I'd say that singularity has to do with its ability to merge with the spirit of Christ. If you find that language offensive or can't relate, just put in the Spirit of love. Either way it relates to a merger of a different kind and has these characteristics: 1. It is based on freedom 2. It is based on love 3. It is based on connection with and feeling for other humans 4. It puts logic second and humanity first 5. It creates space for diversity of thought and diversity of action. The real singularity grows out of quiet, discernment and connection to both spirit and each other. It is based on that intangible spiritual nature of humanity. The part that so many of Old Chatham Quakers are disconnected from. The odd thing is that it is so easy to connect. No special techniques required. The spirit of creation, of God, is all around Old Chatham Quakers and imbues the living world with fantastic creativity. O pen your eyes. O ne only has to look! Observation is the fastest way to God. Goethe, for example, did not view God and Nature as two separate entities. He fused the terms Gott-natur (God and Nature) to describe this singularity. And... are Old Chatham Quakers not nature? Not a part of it, but nature itself; that is fully integrated and a part of the whole? This sacred wholeness is what Goethe called the "garment of God" or the direct expression of the living God. Where does sacred observation lead? · To wholeness vs separation · To integration vs. fragmentation · To abundance and bounty vs scarcity I woke up this morning and saw a gaggle of turkeys with their little pullets in tow walking across the lawn and then they came upon two rabbits also having their breakfast of clover and no one ran - there was enough of everything for everyone. This is the thinking Old Chatham Quakers must adopt to survive because the AI models are based on limitation and not-enough. Human-Christ Singularity / Human-Love Singularity offers so much more. Take a look around!!! ~ Joseph Olejak
Brain-Computer interfaces move from labs to real-world applications in 2026. Brain-computer interfaces have crossed a critical threshold in 2026, transitioning from experimental laboratory research to real-world clinical and consumer applications. The technology, which establishes direct communication pathways between the human brain and external devices, is now being implanted in patients with paralysis, enabling them to control computers, robotic limbs, and even communicate through thought alone. The rapid acceleration of BCI development is being driven by breakthroughs in neural recording technology, miniaturized electronics, and advanced artificial intelligence that decodes neural signals with unprecedented accuracy. Neuralink's first commercial implants. Elon Musk's Neuralink has taken the lead in the commercial BCI race, having received regulatory approval in the United States, Canada, and the European Union for its N1 implant. The device, a coin-sized chip surgically placed beneath the skull with ultra-thin electrode threads that penetrate the brain tissue, has been implanted in over 200 patients since clinical trials began in 2024. The results have been remarkable: patients with spinal cord injuries have regained the ability to control digital devices at speeds approaching natural typing and browsing. The most celebrated case involves a 38-year-old quadriplegic who, after receiving the Neuralink implant, was able to compose messages at 65 words per minute using only his thoughts - a speed that approaches average natural typing rates. Beyond communication, Neuralink has demonstrated cursor control for digital design software, enabling paralyzed patients to create digital art and perform CAD modeling for engineering work. The company has ambitious plans to expand beyond medical applications into consumer wellness, including focus enhancement and memory augmentation. Synchron's endovascular approach. While Neuralink has captured the most headlines, Synchron has been quietly advancing a less invasive approach that is winning favor among clinicians and regulators. The company's Stentrode device is delivered to the brain through the jugular vein in a minimally invasive procedure that avoids open brain surgery. The device, resembling a small stent with electrode contacts, is positioned in the superior sagittal sinus - a major blood vessel near the motor cortex - where it can detect neural signals associated with movement intention. Synchron's approach offers significant advantages in safety and accessibility. The endovascular procedure can be performed by interventional radiologists using techniques that are already widespread in hospitals, dramatically reducing the barrier to adoption. The company has treated 75 patients across clinical trials in the United States, Australia, and Europe, with all participants showing improved ability to perform digital tasks. Synchron has received breakthrough device designation from the FDA and is expected to receive full commercial approval by late 2026. The role of AI in decoding neural signals. The rapid progress in BCI technology is inseparable from advances in artificial intelligence. Decoding neural signals - translating the electrical activity of millions of neurons into meaningful commands - requires sophisticated machine learning models that can interpret noisy, high-dimensional brain data in real time. Transformer-based neural networks, originally developed for natural language processing, have proven remarkably effective at this task. Modern BCI systems use deep learning models that continuously adapt to each individual user's neural patterns. These systems can distinguish between intended movements, background thoughts, and physiological artifacts like heartbeats or eye blinks with greater than 95 percent accuracy. The decoding latency has fallen below 50 milliseconds, making the experience feel instantaneous to users. As these AI models become more efficient, they are being deployed directly on the implant hardware itself, eliminating the need for external processing units. Ethical considerations and privacy concerns. The rapid commercialization of BCI technology has raised significant ethical questions about neural data privacy, cognitive liberty, and long-term safety. Advocacy groups and bioethicists have called for strong regulatory frameworks that protect users against unauthorized access to their neural data - a uniquely intimate form of personal information that could reveal thoughts, emotions, and intentions. Chile became the first country to enact neurorights legislation in 2025, establishing constitutional protections for brain data as a separate category of personal information. The European Union has followed with proposed regulations under an expanded framework for neurotechnology, requiring explicit opt-in consent for any collection or processing of neural data. In the United States, the FDA has taken a product-safety approach rather than a privacy one, focusing on device safety and clinical efficacy while leaving privacy protections to existing health data regulations, which critics argue are inadequate for the unique threats posed by BCI technology. The rise of non-invasive BCI devices. Alongside surgical implants, non-invasive BCI devices have experienced a consumer boom in 2026. Headbands and wearable headsets that use electroencephalography to monitor brain activity are being marketed for productivity enhancement, meditation, and gaming. Companies like NextMind, Emotiv, and a flood of startups are offering devices priced between 200 and 2,000 dollars that can detect basic neural signals associated with attention, relaxation, and visual focus. While these consumer devices are far less precise than surgical implants - capable of distinguishing only broad mental states rather than specific thoughts - they have found a ready market in a population increasingly interested in quantified cognition. Workplace wellness programs are piloting the use of EEG headbands to monitor employee fatigue and optimize break schedules. The video game industry, always eager for novel input methods, has begun integrating basic BCI controls into popular titles, allowing players to cast spells or accelerate vehicles through focused attention alone. Future trajectory: from medical to mainstream. The BCI industry is projected to reach 15 billion dollars in annual revenue by 2030, driven primarily by medical applications in the near term but increasingly by consumer and workplace uses in the latter half of the decade. Both Neuralink and Synchron are already developing second-generation devices with higher channel counts, wireless power, and bidirectional communication capabilities that would enable not just reading brain signals but writing information back into the brain - a development with immense therapeutic potential for treating blindness, hearing loss, and memory disorders. The convergence of BCI with augmented reality headsets, haptic feedback systems, and AI assistants points toward a future where human-computer interaction is fundamentally reimagined. The keyboard, mouse, and touchscreen - the dominant input modalities for the past four decades - may eventually be supplemented, and in some cases replaced, by direct neural interfaces. 2026 will be remembered as the year the science fiction of direct brain-computer communication became a practical, commercial reality. Ramo is the editorial voice of Mylistingo - an AI and technology news platform based in The Hague, Netherlands. Covering artificial intelligence, machine learning, robotics, and the future of technology, Ramo delivers accurate, accessible reporting for both general audiences and industry professionals. Every article is fact-checked and written to meet Mylistingo's strict no-fabrication editorial standards.
Detecting implants in their brains. A San Francisco startup with ties to Elon Musk's Neuralink has started testing its brain implant to detect and treat cancer in humans. Coherence Neuro says it temporarily placed its coin-sized implant in the brains of three people undergoing surgery to have brain tumors removed at the Royal Melbourne Hospital in Australia. The implant was in place for roughly 30 minutes before being removed, providing an important safety check before the device can be implanted long-term in patients with brain cancer. Known as a brain-computer interface, the Coherence Neuro device is designed to sense the unique electrical signals of tumors and deliver mild electrical stimulation to prevent their growth. In the time the implant was in the patients' brains, the company was able to see how it performed for a short period. (The patients had consented prior to surgery.) Matthew MacDougall, Neuralink's head neurosurgeon, is an adviser and investor in Coherence. Rory Murphy, a neurosurgeon at the Barrow Neurological Institute in Arizona who is an investigator in one of Neuralink's trials, is also slated to be involved in future trials of the Coherence device. The idea behind treating brain tumors with electrical stimulation comes from the long-held observation that cancerous tissue has distinctive electrical properties. "These are electrical conditions, just like epilepsy, just like depression. This is a network problem in the brain," says Ben Woodington, chief executive officer and cofounder of Coherence. In 2019, researchers at Stanford University found that a group of aggressive brain tumors called high-grade gliomas drive their own growth by forming synapses with healthy neurons. In that study, researchers showed that giving a seizure drug to mice successfully interrupted electrical signals to tumors and slowed their growth. Applying low-intensity electricity has also been shown to disrupt cancer cell division in brain tumors. A wearable device called Optune, developed by Novocure, was first approved in 2011 to treat adults with glioblastoma, which makes up about half of cancerous brain tumors. Earlier this year, the company received regulatory approval to treat pancreatic cancer with its device, which is attached to either the scalp or stomach with adhesive patches depending on the type of cancer. The Optune device can improve survival by several months if it's worn for most of the day, but people have to shave their heads to use it and carry a battery around in a backpack or on a hip belt. Coherence wants to deliver electrical stimulation in a more convenient way. Its implant sits in the skull and has 16 extending threads that extend into the brain tissue. It's designed to be implanted during a brain tumor resection surgery, when a tumor is removed. Even when tumors can be fully removed, it's common for them to come back after surgery, something Coherence's device is designed to protect against. The company is initially aiming to treat glioblastoma, which has a higher risk of coming back compared to lower-grade tumors. Glioblastoma patients have few options and a grim prognosis. Most patients live for just 15 to 18 months after being diagnosed, with a five-year survival rate of less than 10 percent. Right now, glioblastoma patients get an MRI of their brain every two to three months so doctors can monitor tumor growth and tweak their drug regimen as needed. But Woodington doesn't think that's frequent enough. Brain tumors can suddenly become more aggressive, and clinicians don't have a good idea of what's going on between scans. The Coherence device is designed to monitor people continuously and deliver customized electrical stimulation. A connected app will let patients log their symptoms, which get sent to clinicians along with their disease state and the amount of stimulation they're receiving. Doctors can fine-tune the therapy remotely or let the device do so automatically. And by detecting rapid tumor growth, the device could signal to doctors when to intervene with surgery before an MRI could. The company plans to begin a trial next year in glioblastoma patients in which they will have the device permanently implanted.