Full-Time
Lead Sales Enablement Manager
Posted on 9/11/2026
Quizlet
201-500 employees
Education tools for students and teachers
Compensation Overview
$143.3k - $188.1k/yr
San Francisco, CA, USA + 1 more
More locations: New York, NY, USA
Hybrid
Two days on-site per week required: Wednesday and Thursday.
 Sales & Account Management (1) |
|---|
Get referred to Quizlet
See people who can refer or advise you
- 7+ years of experience in sales enablement, creative strategy, integrated marketing, digital advertising, partnerships, or agency or publisher environments.
- A track record of inventing and scaling custom, multi-platform partnership programs.
- Demonstrated ability to lead ambiguous, cross-functional projects independently from end to end, including projects with no existing internal playbook.
- Strong strategic and conceptual thinking, with the ability to connect advertiser goals, audience insights, and creative execution into a single, ownable narrative.
- Exceptional written, verbal, and presentation skills, with the executive presence to influence senior Sales, Account Management, and cross-functional leadership.
- Experience building scalable systems that improve effectiveness across a broader team.
- Serve as the key creative and strategic liaison for important accounts in high-stakes client discussions.
- Design big-picture, integrated custom programs and 360° partnerships across media, content, sponsorships, and platform moments to solve advertiser objectives.
- Lead the creative strategy for top-tier and strategic pitches end-to-end, from initial ideation through final delivery, balancing creative ambition with revenue and delivery realities.
- Define and manage scalable enablement processes across verticals by translating advertiser, market, and performance insights into playbooks, frameworks, standards, and training that the broader sales organization can use independently.
- Partner with Product, Marketing, and Ad Operations to bring new ad products, packages, and inventory strategies to market, identifying functional opportunities and risks.
- Lead scale-oriented strategic initiatives such as ad product packaging, pricing structure, and exception-handling rigor.
- Act as a strategic advisor to Sales leadership by identifying opportunities to improve win rates, deal efficiency, and partnership quality, and presenting recommendations.
- Serve as the subject-matter expert on Quizlet Ads offerings, digital advertising trends, and competitive positioning.
Quizlet offers learning tools for students and teachers, serving over 60 million active users each month and providing a leading education app on web and mobile. Users create study sets (flashcards) and study them in various modes across devices, with free access and optional premium features, while advertising supports revenue. The platform distinguishes itself with a large global user base, a broad library of user-generated content, and multi-device access in a free-plus-premium model. Its goal is to empower learning worldwide by providing versatile study tools that help students and teachers succeed while growing the user base and monetization.
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Series C
Total Funding
$62M
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Founded
2005
Get referred to Quizlet
See people who can refer or advise you
Simplify's Take
What believers are saying
- February 2026 Coconote acquisition expands audio and video capture into flashcards, quizzes, and notes.
- Brand Metrics extended partnership in 2026, validating Quizlet Ads and Q-IQ monetization.
- Quizlet launched native ChatGPT integration in 2026, turning conversations into flashcards and study sets.
What critics are saying
- Quizlet Free lost practice tests, expanded Learn, and Q-Chat, pushing users toward paid competitors.
- Unstuck AI beats Quizlet on uploaded materials and lecture capture, threatening premium retention in 2026.
- Google, OpenAI, and ChatGPT-native study apps can commoditize Quizlet's AI layer quickly.
What makes Quizlet unique
- Quizlet owns memorization workflows with flashcards, Learn mode, and spaced repetition.
- The February 2026 Coconote acquisition adds audio-to-studies generation competitors lack.
- Two in three U.S. high school students use Quizlet, giving unmatched distribution.
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Benefits
Shared financial success: Competitive salaries, stock options and a 401k that makes saving for retirement easy.
Competitive healthcare: Comprehensive health, dental, vision and disability plans for you and your family.
PTO and family benefits: Everyone gets four weeks of PTO. Our generous family leave plan has you covered when you welcome a new, little learner into your family.
Professional development: Learning never stops. Get reimbursed each year for professional development, and learn from the best with regular tech talks.
A welcoming workplace: Enjoy free lunch and dinner with great company. Benefit from adjustable desks and employee lounges while taking in amazing views of the Bay.
Commuter benefits: We don’t have a school bus, but we'll help cover your public transportation and parking. If you decide to work late, your ride home is on us as well.
Growth & Insights and Company News
6 month growth
↑ 4%1 year growth
↑ 4%2 year growth
↑ 7%A Q&A with Career Design's new chief product officer. Kiley McEvoy, Thayer '07, brings lessons from Google and Quizlet to the role. Kiley McEvoy, Thayer '07, is the inaugural chief product officer at the Dartmouth Center for Career Design. More Reading In June, Kiley McEvoy, Thayer '07, joined the Center for Career Design as its first chief product officer - a role more commonly found in tech companies than liberal arts colleges. McEvoy returns to Dartmouth after nearly two decades in product management at Google and YouTube, a stint in the federal government, Shaper, and, most recently, the ed-tech company Quizlet. The center's unique formula uses close one-on-one coaching, expanded internship funding, a network of 80,000 alumni, and personalized guidance from custom, AI-powered tools to prepare students. McEvoy is the first chief product officer in an Ivy League career center. The idea is to leverage McEvoy's engineering training and career in learning technology to create custom platforms specifically designed for students and alumni, who may also use the center. These tools include a dashboard where students can easily keep track of the skills they develop over four years and a platform that lets them map the career trajectories of alumni with similar interests to their own. Already, he's begun reviewing the technology and products currently in use at the center and identifying ways to make the career-design process more efficient and responsive to student needs. Dartmouth News asked McEvoy to talk about the opportunities he sees and how the platforms he is developing can help extend the coaching and relationships at the heart of career design. What is a chief product officer? A CPO is really just a head product manager. The job is to stitch together the expertise of a lot of different groups - engineers, designers, legal, data scientists, etc. You have to speak all of those languages, and, most importantly, understand the end user and what they need and want in a product so Dartmouth can deliver an engaging experience - in this case, for students and alumni planning their careers. Why does the Center for Career Design need a CPO? Lots of external career-planning tools are sold to schools, but none offer a customized experience for the Dartmouth community. My main purpose is to work with students, alumni, and staff to understand their needs and build something that can go beyond just broad recommendations of career paths. Dartmouth want a platform that lets everyone helping you plan your career - alumni, coaches, and students themselves - engage with you in a single place. That's typically not the development approach an outside vendor can provide. How does artificial intelligence fit into these new tools? My approach to using AI tools is cautious and careful, and I don't leverage it where I don't think it makes sense. The main benefit in this role is that it allows Dartmouth to build tools faster and leverage a lot more information when helping a student explore career paths. But the end result won't simply be a chatbot that spits out your perfect career. Career planning is a very personal experience that depends on the knowledge and collaboration of a coach. The main goal of the platform Dartmouth is building is to allow coaches to work with students across more surfaces in ways that current undergraduates have come to expect. What would that look like for students and alumni? Let's say a student is in a course they find especially interesting. Or the opposite - they're starting to realize there's a particular aspect of their major they don't enjoy. The student might not realize it, but those are valuable data points that might help their career coach identify or rule out roles in the industry that student is focused on. By having a readily available platform on that student's phone, they could easily feed those quick insights to their coach ahead of their next meeting. It also might be a similar insight an alum had provided in their use of its platform, creating a strong reason for connection on both sides. Dartmouth want a platform that lets everyone helping you plan your career. Kiley McEvoy, chief product officer, Dartmouth Center for Career Design I can give a personal example where I could have benefited from a career coach. In product management, there's lots of different types of products you can work on, and early on I gravitated toward the flashy, cool ones. I worked on Google Glass and YouTube, thinking that the excitement and the press that those were getting would lead to career enjoyment. I've also worked on things that were less flashy, such as search result quality, Medicare, and product experience personalization. Things that are more highly analytical, but that no one is writing articles about. It took me a decade to understand that those highly analytical and experimental jobs, where you're diving into the data, made me much happier. If I'd had the chance to talk with other alumni further along in their product management careers, I think I could have reached that realization much earlier than I did. Those are the kinds of insights Dartmouth want to help a student have in their junior or senior year, not a decade into their career - and having alumni contribute their own experience is a big part of how Dartmouth get them there. How did your experience at Thayer shape you? Thayer was an awakening for me. My undergrad degree was engineering, but not applied engineering, so when I found the Machine Shop and labs in Thayer, it opened my eyes to the hands-on side of building. I'm a passionate builder, in the sense Dartmouth is talking about now of building platforms and technical systems, but in my personal life, I've been building a cabin in Colorado - something I wouldn't have done had I not been part of the cabin-building club at Dartmouth. Thayer helped me kind of custom-build a degree to become a product manager. I took classes in computer science, I took classes at Tuck, and obviously many at Thayer, and then when I applied for a job at Google, I was able to say, essentially, I got a degree in product management from Dartmouth. How have you navigated the changes in the tech industry and in the career landscape over the course of your career? A lot has changed, but the underlying theme of everything I've done has always been the problem-solving skills I learned at Thayer. Thayer taught me how to walk into a brand new domain without false confidence and to take in all the information, understand the problems, and find the tools to address those problems. Another thing I've learned is to always focus on the end user. Product managers are inventive, but often what is in your head is not what the user actually needs or wants. It's not enough to ask, what would you like me to build? It's an in-depth process to facilitate and work with users and brainstorm with them to help them realize what would make a difference in their lives. I've spent a lot of time studying that process at Google and Quizlet and the U.S. government. Did your work at Quizlet inform how you're approaching Dartmouth students? My job at Quizlet was focused on high school and early college users, and that has helped me see the amount of pressure and stress students are under, which seems to be significantly more than when I was in high school and college. Students need the tools they're using to just work. They don't have time for things that are broken or inefficient or not delivering what they need. How will you engage students in your work? I'm working with the interns at the Center for Career Design, and I plan to expand that into a much larger program. Students and young alumni have already been reaching out to Dartmouth with ideas. I want to have a platform soon where I can invite them to come on in so Dartmouth can build together, even if they aren't pursuing a technical degree. Office of Communications
Age of Learning vs Quizlet: Revenue, Funding & Team size compared. Age of Learning generates $126.8M in revenue; Quizlet generates $139M. Quizlet and Age of Learning are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Age of Learning and Quizlet on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters - every figure GetLatka has verified for each company. | Company | Age of LearningThis company | Quizlet | | Revenue | $126.8M | $139M | | Valuation | $3B | $1B | | Funding raised | $450M | $62M | | Customers | Not disclosed | 1M | | Team size | 435 | 547 | | Growth | Not disclosed | 73.8% | | Founded | 2007 | 2005 | | HQ | Glendale, United States | San Francisco, United States | Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews. Age of Learning at a glance. Age of Learning generates $126.8M in revenue with 435 employees, headquartered in Glendale, United States. * Revenue - $126.8M * Valuation - $3B * Funding - $450M * Team size - 435 * Founded - 2007 Age of Learning is the leading education technology innovator, developing engaging Pre-K through 2nd grade learning solutions that help children build a strong foundation for academic success. Quizlet at a glance. Quizlet generates $139M in revenue with 547 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States. * Revenue - $139M * Valuation - $1B * Funding - $62M * Customers - 1M * Team size - 547 * Founded - 2005 Quizlet is an online learning platform that provides tools and resources for students and educators to study and learn a variety of subjects. The platform offers a wide range of study materials, including flashcards, games, quizzes, and... Other Age of Learning alternatives. Age of Learning competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category. Age of Learning vs Quizlet: frequently asked questions. Is Age of Learning or Quizlet bigger? Quizlet is the bigger company by revenue, at $139M against $126.8M for Age of Learning. How much revenue does Age of Learning make? Age of Learning generates $126.8M in annual revenue with a team of 435. How much revenue does Quizlet make? Quizlet generates $139M in annual revenue with a team of 547. How much funding has Age of Learning raised? Age of Learning has raised $450M in total funding since it was founded in 2007. How much funding has Quizlet raised? Quizlet has raised $62M in total funding since it was founded in 2005.
Quizlet has launched new study tools informed by its second annual How America Learns survey of over 2,000 US students, teachers and parents. The research found declining AI enthusiasm in education, with only 30% expressing positive attitudes compared to 43% in 2025. However, benefits persist: 60% of students report improved efficiency, whilst 37% cite reduced stress. The survey revealed 98% of students want adaptive study tools, yet only 18% feel confident about their progress. Quizlet responded with features including audio recording that converts lectures into study guides, podcast-style note playback, and spaced repetition scheduling. New collaborative tools allow students to track progress with peers and transform practice questions into games. CEO Kurt Beidler said the updates reflect commitment to "purposeful, trustworthy and demonstrably helpful" AI for learners.
Unstuck AI vs Quizlet: which study tool wins for students in 2026? Published 6 days ago Table of content. The AI study tool market split into two clear camps by 2026. On one side sit chat-first AI platforms such as Unstuck AI, built to ingest course materials and answer questions grounded in the source text. On the other side sit established study platforms such as Quizlet, originally built for flashcards and gradually layered with AI features over the past three years. Picking between the two depends less on which is better overall and more on which study task takes priority. This comparison breaks the decision into six concrete study tasks every student handles: importing course materials, asking questions about complex concepts, capturing lecture content, building flashcards, taking practice tests, and reviewing material over the long term. Readers who want a deeper Unstuck AI review can use this comparison as a practical starting point, since the head-to-head format shows where Unstuck AI performs best and where Quizlet still has the advantage. Each task gets a head-to-head section, a winner, and a brief reasoning. A pricing chart, decision matrix by student profile, and editor's take sit at the back. All figures and feature details are drawn from official documentation, independent reviews published between October 2025 and April 2026, and pricing pages verified during writing. Pricing on both platforms can shift, so confirming the latest numbers on each vendor's official page before subscribing remains worthwhile. Quick verdict. Unstuck AI is the stronger pick for active learning from uploaded materials, particularly for students working through dense PDFs, slide decks, or recorded lectures. Quizlet remains the dominant choice for memorization, language learning, and exam preparation, with the deepest community library of flashcard decks and the most refined spaced-repetition system in the category. Pricing tilts toward Quizlet at $35.99 annually versus Unstuck AI's $119 annually for the Unlimited plan. Feature strength across six study tasks. The radar above maps each platform's strength across the six tasks examined below. The pattern is consistent: Unstuck AI dominates the left half (upload, explanation, lecture capture) while Quizlet wins the right half (flashcards, practice tests, long-term review). The next section walks through each task in detail. Task-by-task winner summary. Specifications snapshot. Before getting into the task-by-task showdown, the spec sheet below captures the broad differences between the two platforms at a glance. Six study tasks compared. Each task below represents a distinct phase of how students actually use these platforms. The two-column breakdown shows each tool's approach, followed by a task winner and the reasoning. Pricing and value. Pricing models on the two platforms differ structurally. Unstuck AI keeps things simple with a single paid tier (Unlimited) plus a free tier with caps. Quizlet uses a multi-tier structure with separate Plus, Plus Unlimited, and Family options that map to different student situations. Annual cost comparison. The cost spread is meaningful. Quizlet Plus at $35.99 annually works out to roughly $3 per month, the cheapest paid path among the two tools. Unstuck AI Unlimited at $119 per year is more than three times that price, though it bundles lecture transcription and unlimited multi-format upload that Quizlet does not offer. Paying monthly rather than annually inflates Unstuck AI's cost dramatically to $239.88 per year, making the annual commitment the only sensible paid path for active users. Free tier comparison. Free tiers tell a different story than paid pricing. Unstuck AI's free plan is genuinely useful for testing material upload and AI chat, with caps that limit but do not block normal study workflows. Quizlet Free, by contrast, faced significant feature reductions in 2025 and 2026, with practice tests, expanded Learn mode, and Q-Chat moving behind the Plus paywall. The free version still works for basic flashcard review but no longer covers the platform's most useful capabilities. Side-by-side scorecard. The averages land within one tenth of a point of each other, which captures the real takeaway: neither tool is broadly better than the other. Each one dominates the half of the workflow it was built for and falls behind on the other half. Treating the scorecard as a single overall number obscures that pattern, which is why the column-level edges matter more than the bottom row. Best fit by student profile. Recommended platform depends heavily on the type of student work involved. The matrix below maps common student profiles to a starting pick. Final verdict. The cleanest framing of this decision in 2026: Unstuck AI for material-grounded chat and lecture work, Quizlet for memorization and exam prep. Picking one tool to cover everything generally leads to compromise on at least one core study task. A blended approach using Unstuck AI's free tier alongside Quizlet Plus at $35.99 annually delivers strong coverage across all six tasks at a combined cost lower than either tool's premium plan alone. For students whose work centers on reading dense PDFs, attending recorded lectures, and processing complex source material into understandable explanations, Unstuck AI Unlimited at $119 per year earns its premium pricing through lecture transcription and grounded-citation chat. For students focused on language learning, AP exam preparation, or building deep recall through flashcards and spaced repetition, Quizlet Plus at $35.99 per year is the better-value pick by a wide margin.
CBP facility codes positive appear to have leaked through on-line flashcards. Search. Follow OverBeta. Join its community. A person on Quizlet, an internet studying platform, created a public flashcard set in February that seems to have uncovered extremely confidential information about safety procedures in US Customs and Border Protection services round Kingsville, Texas. The Quizlet set, titled "USBP Evaluate," was out there to the public till March 20, when it was made personal lower than half an hour after WIRED messaged a telephone quantity doubtlessly linked to the Quizlet person. Although a person with the person's title was listed at an tackle of an residence lower than a mile from a Kingsville CBP facility, WIRED has not been in a position to verify that the flashcard set was created by an energetic CBP agent or contractor. "This incident is being reviewed by CBP's Workplace of Skilled Duty," a CBP spokesperson wrote in a press release to WIRED. "We are going to not be getting forward of this evaluation. A evaluation ought to not be taken as a sign of wrongdoing." If the Quizlet set was created by a person related to CBP, it represents a severe breach in safety for an company created to "safeguard the American homeland." The general public Quizlet set contained information about alleged codes for particular facility entrances. "Checkpoint doorways code?" requested one card, with a particular four-digit mixture listed in response. One other asks for the code of a particular gate at the facility, once more with a precise mixture listed as the reply. Two different gate codes had been described on this method, however WIRED is not utilizing the gate names, as a result of it is unclear in the event that they are confidential. One other sequence of playing cards described sure immigration offenses and associated federal prices: misuse of a passport, fraud or misuse of a visa, and fleeing from a checkpoint. Playing cards about voluntary return to nations outdoors the US, expedited removing, and warrant of removing described types that wanted to be crammed out after which supplied a reminder a couple of guidelines on one thing referred to as an "brokers Sources Web page" to guarantee "accuracy of all above." "We take experiences of delicate or inappropriate content material severely and act promptly when content material is discovered to violate our insurance policies," a Quizlet spokesperson wrote in a press release. "We encourage anybody who encounters regarding materials to report it instantly from the flashcard set, class, or profile web page, or to contact us so we will evaluation and take acceptable motion." Different playing cards supplied detailed information about the Kingsville workforce's 1,932-square-mile space of duty, together with the six county traces, and the company's inside grid and zone organizational system. One grid "does not exist," a card notes, due to the construction of native highways. One other card named the 11 CBP "towers" in the space. (A few of the tower names correspond to the gates and codes that WIRED is withholding due to their potential confidentiality.) The cardboard notes the abbreviated names of two towers and the shared space of duty of a 3rd tower. The final card detailed an obvious inside system, "E3 BEST," that permits officers to "file, examine and adjudicate secondary referrals at USBP checkpoints" by permitting them to "question topics and autos concurrently by means of a number of regulation enforcement databases and create e3 Occasions for referrals leading to an arrest." This potential publicity of confidential information comes amid a rapid hiring surge at CBP, with up to $60,000 in recruitment and retention incentives out there to some new brokers. ICE is additionally in search of to quickly recruit, with its plan providing a $50,000 signing bonus and up to $60,000 in pupil mortgage reimbursement. Disclaimer: This article is sourced from external platforms. OverBeta has not independently verified the information. Readers are advised to verify details before relying on them. Read also: