Full-Time
Posted on 8/21/2026
Automates SOC 2 compliance checks via SaaS
$207k - $244k/yr
Remote in USA
Remote
See people who can refer or advise you
Vanta provides a SaaS platform that helps small to mid-sized organizations obtain and maintain SOC 2 certification through automated checks and continuous monitoring. The product integrates with a company’s systems to run checks, track control effectiveness, and generate ready evidence, reports, and submission-ready documentation. It differentiates itself by offering ongoing compliance instead of one-off audits, with scalable checks and automated workflows tailored to SMEs and tech companies. The goal is to make SOC 2 faster, cheaper, and easier to sustain so organizations can focus on their core business while keeping strong security controls.
Company Size
1,001-5,000
Company Stage
Series D
Total Funding
$503M
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Founded
2018
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
100% Benefits Coverage
Flexible & Remote Work
Paid Parental Leave
Unlimited PTO
Health & Wellness
401(k)
Stop treating SOC 2 vulnerability scanning like a checkbox. Stop treating SOC 2 vulnerability scanning like a checkbox written on aug 12, 2026. Posted in how-to. The annual scan is dead. Auditors stopped accepting a single 300-page Nessus PDF years ago. Under CC7.1, SOC 2 vulnerability management requires continuous monitoring. A vulnerability disclosed today affects code you shipped six months ago; finding out about it during your annual audit means you failed the control. You need a defined way to identify newly discovered flaws affecting the packages your software already uses. If your tool alerts the team when a new CVE affects lodash or spring-core, that alert becomes part of your CC7.1 evidence. The process matters more than the specific scanner you buy. Panoptic Scans, LLC. saw a Series B startup fail their Type II audit earlier this year because they had no ticket history showing they actually fixed the critical findings their scanner found. They bought the tool but ignored the alerts. What auditors actually look for in 2026. A strong process includes automated scanning, alert review, severity-based SLAs, ticket history, and reporting. Your tooling can vary, but the evidence must show a repeatable process. * Infrastructure Scanning: Checks the operating system and network layers for open ports, outdated Linux kernels, and missing patches on web servers like Nginx. * Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST): Crawls your application to inject commands, execute cross-site scripting, and find misconfigurations in HTTP headers. Authenticated scans catch the flaws hiding behind your login screen. * Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Looks at your package.json or requirements.txt files to see if you import libraries with known flaws. * Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM): Scans your AWS or Azure environments for public S3 buckets and overly permissive IAM roles. You can automate much of this. Hosted Nuclei scans run continuously against your external attack surface. Panoptic Scans integrates directly with Vanta to pull your scan results into your compliance dashboard automatically. You don't have to manually upload CSVs every Friday at 4pm. Set SLAs you can actually meet. SOC 2 does not mandate specific remediation timelines. You define them in your security policy. Common industry practice sets clear deadlines based on severity. | Severity | Expected SLA | Audit Reality | | Critical | 7 to 15 days | Requires immediate Jira ticket and verified fix | | High | 30 days | Must not exceed the SLA window | | Medium | 90 days | Often accepted as risk exceptions if documented | | Low | 180 days | Rarely scrutinized unless ignored entirely | Missing your own documented SLAs is a frequent audit failure. Do not promise 24-hour remediation for high-severity bugs if your engineering team deploys once a week. Set a 30-day SLA. Meet it consistently. Auditors prefer a slow, reliable process over a fast, broken one. Focus on context-aware prioritization that factors in asset criticality and exposure. A critical CVE on an internal testing server matters less than a medium-severity flaw on your public API gateway. Stop fighting your compliance tools. Automate the discovery phase and let the scanners generate the evidence for you.
Vanta has appointed Sarah Scharf as chief marketing officer. Scharf joined Vanta in 2020 as its first product marketer and has since led every function within the company's marketing organisation. Reporting directly to CEO Christina Cacioppo, she will oversee product marketing, brand, communications, content, growth, and revenue marketing. During her tenure, Scharf led Vanta's positioning through three category shifts: from automated compliance to trust management to agentic trust. The appointment comes as Vanta surpassed $300 million in annual recurring revenue, reaching the milestone nine months after hitting $200 million. Over 16,000 companies, including Snowflake, GitHub, and Ramp, use Vanta's platform. Before Vanta, Scharf spent seven years at Google in product marketing roles. She holds a degree from Stanford University.
$4 billion Vanta has a new CMO who wants to make security compliance marketing 'a little zingier' Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 AM PT Security-compliance software startup Vanta wants to become known as a "trust company" that can also have a bit of fun. It's entrusting a new CMO to get it there. Vanta has promoted its VP of marketing, Sarah Scharf, to CMO, the company exclusively told CMO Insider. In an interview, Scharf said the two tasks at the top of her to-do list are to solidify the Vanta brand's association with trust among its clients and potential customers, and to reinvent how the company gets marketing done internally in the age of AI. "How can we capture the moment and also reposition Vanta in a way to showcase how we help businesses of all sizes instill and maintain that trust in a world where AI makes it harder to come by and maintain?" Scharf said. Founded in 2018, Vanta offers an automated platform that helps companies assess the security and compliance of their products. While it's best known for helping startups complete processes like SOC 2 audits, it's branched out to offer services to larger enterprise customers, in areas such as assessing third-party risk and AI governance. Its customers include Snowflake, GitHub, and the Golden State Warriors. Vanta said it was valued at about $4 billion in a funding round last year. Vanta has sought to stand out from its competitors with playful marketing, such as plastering San Francisco with billboards reading: "Compliance that doesn't SOC 2 much." Scharf, who joined the company in 2020, said she wants Vanta to continue marketing "with a wink," while other security brands tend to focus on fear and posturing to emphasize their strength. "We're a compliance company, we're giving you security information. Some of that is going to be bland and boring, but what can we do to make it just a little zingier?" Scharf said. "We want to be seen as trusted experts, someone you can come to with a question," she added. "We're not arrogant or looking down." While these marketing efforts can help humanize the brand in an often dusty sector, Sarah Ashdown, consumer marketing and revenue director at the consultancy Manifesto Growth Architects, said Vanta can't simply build "trust" into a platform or claim it through positioning alone. "Trust is earned over time through the quality of the service, the outcomes customers achieve, and the relationship a business builds with them," Ashdown said. Where Scharf is investing Vanta's marketing budget. Scharf said the company is investing its marketing budget in areas such as influencer marketing and podcasts. This summer, it launched a video podcast called "The Tabletop," in which it invites chief information security officers to role-play live "situation-room"-style scenarios, such as how they would respond to a security breach. "That's what people want to watch and engage with, and also has the added benefit now that LLM search is blowing up, and high-authority, owned content is very additive for LLM discovery," Scharf said. Internally, Scharf said Vanta is using AI to streamline repetitive tasks, like resizing advertising assets and editing content. It's also using tools like Midjourney to prototype campaigns. When hiring, Scharf said she is screening candidates for AI proficiency - though "not from a tokenmaxxing perspective."
The 5 best Secureframe alternatives in 2026. Secureframe is a well-reviewed compliance automation platform, holding around 4.7 on G2 across 700+ reviews. But its pricing is fully custom and gated behind a sales call, reviewers report renewal increases of 5 to 15%, and its AI questionnaire answers draw recurring accuracy complaints. Whether you are price-checking before a renewal or found the questionnaire feature underwhelming, here are the 5 best Secureframe alternatives in 2026. If the questionnaire feature is why you are shopping, ResponseHub is a dedicated replacement: cited AI answers, unlimited usage, $124/month, self-serve trial. For the full compliance suite, Vanta and Drata are the bigger-ecosystem rivals, Sprinto is the reported price floor, and Hyperproof serves complex multi-framework programs. At a glance. | Tool | Best for | Published pricing | Free trial | Questionnaire automation | | ResponseHub | Security questionnaires, RFPs, DDQs only | $124/mo Starter, $332/mo Business, unlimited usage | 7-day, self-serve | Core product, cited AI answers | | Vanta | Certification automation, largest ecosystem | Not published; sales-led | No | Paid add-on | | Drata | Certification automation, trust center | Not published; sales-led | No | Via SafeBase, tied to platform | | Sprinto | Startup-budget compliance | Not published; sales-led | No | Add-on, token-limited | | Hyperproof | Multi-framework GRC programs | Not published; sales-led | No | Feature in TPRM module | Competitor details last verified: August 2026 Why teams look for Secureframe alternatives. Secureframe's review base is strong, so the complaints are specific rather than general. Three stand out. Pricing opacity: quotes are fully custom, and reviewers report renewal increases of 5 to 15% arriving as surprises. Questionnaire AI accuracy: multiple recent reviews describe AI-suggested answers that were incorrect or incomplete, which matters because wrong answers on a security review carry real risk. And tier gating: advanced questionnaire automation reportedly sits in higher tiers, so the feature that might justify the platform costs extra. Teams whose main use case is questionnaires end up paying suite prices for a feature that reviewers say needs babysitting. The accuracy-first questionnaire tool Best for: Teams whose Secureframe complaint is the questionnaire feature If Secureframe's AI questionnaire answers have burned you (a recurring theme in its recent reviews), the fix is a tool where answer quality is the entire product. ResponseHub grounds every AI answer in your own uploaded policies and past questionnaires, and shows its work: each answer cites the exact policy, page, section, and sentence it came from, with a confidence score telling reviewers where to look harder. No generic training-data guesses. It ingests Excel and Word questionnaires and web portals via a Chrome extension, exports answers back into the buyer's original file, and improves with every completed questionnaire. Usage is unlimited on all plans, so a busy quarter does not change your bill. * Questionnaires, RFPs, and DDQs only: no compliance monitoring * No trust center Starter $124/mo, Business $332/mo. Unlimited usage. 7 days, self-serve 2. Vanta. The biggest ecosystem Moving from Secureframe to Vanta is a sideways move up the market: broadly the same certification automation with the category's largest integration library, auditor network, and brand weight, which can matter when enterprise buyers ask what you use. The costs are structural: no published pricing (third-party median around $20,000 a year), questionnaire automation as a paid add-on, and the category's loudest renewal-increase complaints at 30 to 50% in recent reviews. Worth it for ecosystem depth; check what your renewal will look like in year two before signing year one. Not published. Third-party estimate: ~$20k/yr median. 3. Drata. The trust center leader Best for: Teams that want proactive trust sharing alongside certification automation Drata's differentiator against Secureframe is SafeBase, the trust center it acquired for $250M in 2025. If your strategy is reducing inbound questionnaires by letting prospects self-serve your security documentation, Drata now does that better than anyone in the suite category, with AI questionnaire assistance included in the SafeBase product line. The familiar catches apply: quote-only pricing (third-party median around $25,000 a year), sales-led buying, reported renewal increases, and questionnaire tooling that requires the platform. A strong upgrade path if trust-center strategy justifies the spend. Not published. Third-party estimate: ~$25k/yr median. 4. Sprinto. The reported price floor Best for: Startups for whom Secureframe's quote was still too high Sprinto's pitch is Secureframe's feature set at a lower reported price: third-party estimates start around $6,000 to $8,000 a year for core certification automation aimed squarely at early-stage startups. Reviewers like the guided compliance journey; the same reviews flag a token-metered questionnaire AI with overage charges, an agent app requirement, and support that thins out at busy moments. As a first compliance platform on a tight budget, it is credible. As a questionnaire solution, the metering makes it the weakest option on this list. Not published. Third-party estimate: ~$6k-15k/yr. 5. Hyperproof. The step up in GRC depth Best for: Teams that outgrew certification-first platforms If you are leaving Secureframe because your compliance program got more complex rather than because of price, Hyperproof is the direction to look. It is a GRC operations platform: cross-framework control mapping, audit workflows, risk registers, and TPRM, built for dedicated compliance teams managing several frameworks at once. Expect enterprise dynamics: third-party estimates from a ~$12,000 floor to a ~$40,000 median, no self-serve trial, and reviewer complaints about learning curve and reporting flexibility. Questionnaire response lives inside the TPRM module as a supporting feature. Not published. Third-party estimate: ~$12k/yr floor, ~$40k median. How to choose. Split the decision by complaint. If questionnaire answer quality drove you here, that is a tool problem, not a tier problem: ResponseHub's cited answers fix it for $124/month, verifiable on a free trial. If pricing drove you here, get competing quotes from Sprinto (reported floor) and Vanta or Drata (bigger ecosystems) and negotiate renewal caps in writing. If program complexity drove you here, evaluate Hyperproof. Only ResponseHub on this list lets you try before a sales conversation, which is itself information about how these vendors sell. Frequently asked questions. Why are Secureframe's AI questionnaire answers sometimes wrong? Recent G2 reviews report AI-suggested answers that are incorrect or incomplete. Dedicated tools ground answers differently: ResponseHub, for example, generates answers only from your uploaded policies and past questionnaires, citing the exact source passage with a confidence score, so reviewers can verify each answer in seconds. What is the cheapest Secureframe alternative? For questionnaire automation alone, ResponseHub publishes the lowest price in the category at $124/month with unlimited usage. For full compliance automation, Sprinto has the lowest third-party-reported entry pricing at roughly $6,000 to $8,000 a year. Does Secureframe raise prices at renewal? Multiple recent reviews report renewal increases of 5 to 15%. This is a category-wide pattern: Vanta and Drata reviewers report renewal increases too. If you sign any sales-led compliance contract, negotiate renewal terms upfront. Can a small team skip compliance suites entirely? If you already hold your certifications (or do not need them yet) and the actual workload is answering security questionnaires from buyers, then yes: a dedicated tool like ResponseHub handles that from $124/month without a platform subscription. If you need to earn and maintain certifications, you will want a suite. Related comparisons. Its verdict Secureframe is one of the better-reviewed platforms in its category, which makes its weak spots (opaque pricing, renewal surprises, and a questionnaire AI that reviewers do not fully trust) stand out more. Suite shoppers should quote Vanta, Drata, and Sprinto against it. But if the questionnaire feature is what you actually use, stop paying suite prices for it: ResponseHub does that job with cited, verifiable answers at $124/month, unlimited. The 7-day trial is self-serve, so you can test it on a real questionnaire today. Security questionnaires don't have to be this hard Get started. Get started in under 5 minutes with its self-serve trial or contact ResponseHub for a demo
Cloud Combinator & Vanta partner for AI security on AWS. 2h ago · 0:00 listen · Source: EU-Startups Summary. Cloud Combinator has partnered with Vanta to offer AI security and compliance solutions for AWS startups. This collaboration aims to address the challenge of proving AI systems are secure and compliant from the start. Cloud Combinator, an AWS Advanced Tier Services Partner, specializes in data, AI, and machine learning. Vanta is an agentic trust platform. They are working together through the AWS BOX Program. The partnership focuses on AI security and compliance as a specialized discipline. Many teams need a partner to manage this, rather than hiring new staff. This is especially true with new regulations like the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001 becoming global benchmarks. Cloud Combinator provides architecture and governance. Vanta offers an agentic trust platform that automates evidence collection and monitors controls on AWS. This joint solution helps startups gain expertise that was previously only available to large enterprises. The partnership covers the full AI compliance lifecycle, from scoping to audit-ready evidence. This allows AI startups to move from a working product to an enterprise contract more quickly. This is an AI-generated audio summary. Always check the original source for complete reporting.