Full-Time
Updated on 8/23/2026
Global political risk research and consulting
$93k - $110k/yr
New York, NY, USA
Remote
The role requires working effectively both in-office and remotely, with evening and weekend availability as needed.
| , |
See people who can refer or advise you
Eurasia Group is a global political risk research and consulting firm. It analyzes political and policy developments to help clients understand how politics affect markets, investments, and strategy. Its product is analysis and advisory services delivered through research reports, country risk profiles, scenario planning, and tailored briefings produced by research analysts who are trained social scientists with deep regional expertise and language skills. The firm differentiates itself with a worldwide network of experts and offices in major cities, enabling access to diverse on-the-ground insight and a wide range of perspectives. Its goal is to help clients make informed business decisions in politically sensitive or unstable environments.
Company Size
501-1,000
Company Stage
N/A
Total Funding
N/A
Headquarters
New York City, New York
Founded
1998
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Professional Development Budget
Dominic Barton, strategic counsellor to Eurasia Group and chair of Rio Tinto, says companies must integrate geopolitical risk into core business operations rather than treating it as a side concern. Speaking after US President Donald Trump imposed 50% tariffs on some Canadian goods, Barton noted the breakdown of assumptions about international institutions and free trade. Barton, a former McKinsey leader and Canadian ambassador to China, argues CEOs need to spend more time understanding foreign governments. He says geopolitics should inform decisions about balance sheets, debt levels, supply chain security, and data management. Rio Tinto has adjusted its approach to China, significantly increasing purchases of Chinese equipment. "It's more expensive than some of the traditional Western suppliers. But it's better," Barton said.
The Asia Group expands Japan advisory capabilities with new trade, energy, finance, and geopolitical expertise. * July 16, 2026 Tokyo & Washington, DC | July 13, 2026 - The Asia Group (TAG) is announcing a significant expansion of its Tokyo-based talent with the appointment of David Boling as managing director of Japan and the addition of new senior experts - Issei Morita, Vivian Law, and Taro Han. These appointments significantly expand TAG's ability to advise clients navigating Japan's evolving policy landscape, including economic security, energy transition, trade and investment, advanced technology supply chains, and U.S.-Japan strategic cooperation. TAG's Tokyo-based team will provide the experience, judgment, and local perspective needed to help clients navigate emerging opportunities and challenges. TAG Managing Partner Kurt Tong said: "TAG's Tokyo presence continues to grow stronger with exceptional talent and deep local expertise across the team. Issei, Vivian, Taro, and David each bring distinguished experience and practical judgment that will strengthen our ability to help clients navigate Japan's dynamic policy, economic, and business landscape." Issei Morita joins as a senior vice president and brings deep expertise in geopolitical risk, capital markets, and corporate strategy, helping Japanese and international companies assess policy and market developments. Previously, Issei was a director at Eurasia Group, where he led strategic engagement for the Japanese market. He also brings two decades of experience in asset management and as a financial journalist. Vivian Law joins as a vice president and strengthens TAG's capabilities in energy transition, sustainability, and public policy engagement across Japan, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Vivian was a public policy advisor at a public affairs firm in Tokyo and Taipei, and previously worked for a decade at the Hong Kong Trade Development Council. Taro Han joins as a vice president and adds extensive experience in energy security, trade policy, and U.S.-Japan relations. Before joining TAG, Taro served for 13 years at Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), the subsidiary Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (ANRE), and the Embassy of Japan in Washington DC. David Boling joined TAG in January as a principal. A former deputy assistant U.S. trade representative for Japan, he led key negotiations in the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement and has extensive expertise helping U.S. companies navigate regulatory and market barriers. His prior roles at Eurasia Group, the U.S. Congress, and the U.S. Department of Justice equip him to provide clients with deep policy insight and practical guidance. Together, TAG's Tokyo team combines expertise across trade, energy, geopolitics, defense, tech and economic security, sustainability, and government relations, providing clients with one of the most comprehensive advisory platforms focused on Japan and the broader Indo-Pacific region. This strong new line-up rounds out the Tokyo office's roster of strong leaders and analysts, which includes principal Aki Kawai (who focuses on defense issues), senior associates Rintaro Nishimura and Grace Ahearn, associates Hana Anderson and Yuki Kurihara, and office manager Rie Ito. About The Asia Group The Asia Group is the premier partner to the world's leading companies seeking to excel across the Indo-Pacific. With a multi-disciplinary team of dynamic professionals across the region, The Asia Group enables companies to unlock value and mitigate risk at the intersection of public policy and corporate strategy. TAG white paper - advancing Taiwan's public health resilience: adult immunization as a preventive strategy for lifelong protection. Taiwan's transition to super-aged society in 2025 presents an optimal moment to explore new perspectives and approaches to key public... Taro Han in the new york times on how Japan assisted asian developing countries to build strategic petroleum reserves. Japan's involvement is part of an effort to bolster its regional energy security, according to Taro Han, a former official... Han Lin in the strait times discussing allegations of China interference in U.S. Elections. "Election interference allegations strike at the most politically sensitive fault line in US-China relations," said Han Shen Lin, the China... George Chen in the straits times on president xi jinping's AI diplomacy. Conference attendee George Chen, partner and chair of digital practice at The Asia Group, an American strategic advisory firm, said...
Alcoa and Eurasia Group have published a new white paper titled: "Competitiveness & Green Transition in the Aluminum Industry: Finding Synergies or Facing Trade-Offs."
Eurasia Group, a U.S.-based research firm, announced on Jan. 8 its top 10 risks in the world for 2024, ranking "the United States vs. itself" as the biggest risk.
2023 saw governments around the world grapple with the commercial emergence of artificial intelligence (AI).From the White House’s Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI, to the European Union’s (EU) AI Act, China’s already implemented policies, and Japan’s “Hiroshima Process,” the world’s largest economies took their own distinct approach to balancing oversight of AI’s implications with support for its further innovation.2024 is already shaping up to be a year where national, and even supranational, policies are sharpened, signed, and implemented.But regulation of AI is a complex and evolving topic that involves various considerations — not the least of which is the fact that the technology knows no borders, putting a spotlight on global cooperation and coordination around industry standardization, similar to frameworks that apply to financial regulations, or to cars and healthcare.In the latest discussion around the regulation of the technology, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has laid out an action plan for AI governance in a report entitled “Building Blocks for AI Governance.”Authored by AI pioneer Mustafa Suleyman and risk consultant Ian Bremmer, the report outlined five guiding principles “to govern AI effectively,” noting that: “If the Cold War was punctuated by the nuclear arms race, today’s geopolitical contest will likewise reflect a global competition over AI.”After all, AI represents an innovation that can impact nearly every facet of modern life. That means that AI governance is not just a single, linear problem to be solved, and AI can’t be dealt with on the basis of previous technological oversight because AI is unlike any previous technology.Already, the IMF has noted in a separate report that up to 60% of jobs in advanced economies will be impacted by AI.Read also: How AI Regulation Could Shape Three Digital EmpiresLearning How to Manage and Govern AIMany western observers believe that an ongoing process of interaction between governments, the private sector, and other relevant organizations is necessary for AI regulation to be effectively implemented. And few believe that effective oversight of AI — meaning a framework that supports innovation while negating AI’s risks — will be possible to achieve with a single piece of legislation.“Trying to regulate AI is a little bit like trying to regulate air or water,” University of Pennsylvania law professor Cary Coglianese told PYMNTS earlier this month as part of the “TechReg Talks” series. “It’s not one static thing.”“AI’s unique characteristics, coupled with the geopolitical and economic incentives of the principal actors, call for creativity in governance regimes,” wrote Suleyman and Bremmer for the IMF.Because of the rate and speed at which the capabilities of AI systems are evolving, the present moment represents an increasing time of urgency for businesses, governments and both inter and intra-national institutions to understand and support the benefits of AI while at the same time working to mitigate its risks.“Any idea that regulation is going to be globally ubiquitous is a fool’s errand,” Shaunt Sarkissian, CEO and founder of AI-ID, told PYMNTS in November.He suggested an approach where regulations primarily target use cases, with technology and security measures tailored to specific applications, arguing for example that within healthcare, the existing regulations, such as HIPAA, provide a strong foundation.See more: US Eyes AI Regulations that Tempers Rules and InnovationThe five guidelines published by the IMF call for the qualities of effective AI oversight to include being:Precautionary, as in weighted toward AI’s potentially catastrophic downsides;Agile, as in capable of responding in-turn to AI’s rapid advances;Inclusive, as in collaborative and not dominated by any one actor, public or private;Impermeable, as in providing no avenue for exit from compliance;and Targeted, as in modular and adaptable rather than one-size-fits-all.Elsewhere on the AI regulation front, the House Financial Services Committee last week formed a working group to examine the effect of AI on the financial services and housing industries, while Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has gone on the record saying that action on AI needs to come from Congress, not the White House.When it comes to adherence with existing laws around AI, Cornell University found that just 18 out of 391 companies in New York City had disclosed the impact of AI on their hiring decisions in accordance with an ordinance passed six months ago.For all PYMNTS AI coverage, subscribe to the daily AI Newsletter