2023 MBA Internship Program

Market brief: 5% Treasury yield emerges as a major threat to the stock rally. by AdvisorHub Digital September 2, 2026 5% Treasury yield emerges as a major threat to the stock rally. Investors are increasingly worried that the 10-year Treasury yield could approach 5%, a level strategists say could threaten the stock market's record-setting run. Rising oil prices, persistent inflation, heavy government borrowing and expectations for additional Fed tightening have pushed yields sharply higher. Higher yields also make bonds more competitive with stocks while increasing corporate borrowing costs and putting pressure on equity valuations. Why It Matters: The 5% threshold could become an important test for portfolios. If yields continue climbing, investors may demand lower stock valuations while shifting more capital toward fixed income, potentially creating particular pressure for expensive growth and technology shares. Dell raises its revenue forecast by $25 billion as AI demand surges. Dell raised its annual revenue forecast from $167 billion to $192 billion after receiving more than $130 billion of AI-server orders over the past year. The company now expects $74 billion in AI-optimized server revenue in fiscal 2027, up from its previous $60 billion forecast. Second-quarter revenue jumped 58% to a record $47 billion, while Dell also raised its adjusted earnings forecast to $25.50 per share. Why It Matters: Dell's numbers provide another indication that the AI infrastructure boom is broadening beyond chipmakers. Surging demand for servers, networking and computing infrastructure suggests hyperscalers and enterprises are still committing enormous amounts of capital to AI despite concerns about the industry's spending levels. Berkshire makes a bigger bet on Alphabet and AI infrastructure. Berkshire Hathaway CEO Greg Abel says artificial intelligence could create significant opportunities across the conglomerate, particularly in energy. Berkshire recently invested another $10 billion in Alphabet, bringing its stake to nearly 106 million shares worth about $37.8 billion and making Alphabet its third-largest stock holding. Abel also said Berkshire Hathaway Energy is already seeing growing electricity demand from data centers, which accounted for roughly 8% of its Iowa load last year. Why It Matters: Berkshire's increased Alphabet investment is a notable endorsement of the AI buildout from one of the market's most valuation-conscious investors. Its energy exposure also illustrates how AI investment is spreading beyond technology into utilities and power infrastructure. Alternatives. KKR makes a $2 billion bet on garage doors. KKR has agreed to acquire A1 Garage Door Service for roughly $2 billion, according to people familiar with the transaction. A1 operates across about 20 states and has grown into one of the country's largest residential garage-door service companies. The acquisition follows a wave of private-equity investment in home services, where firms are targeting fragmented industries with recurring demand and opportunities to consolidate smaller operators. Why It Matters: The deal shows private equity continuing to move beyond traditional corporate buyouts into everyday service businesses. Home repair companies can offer relatively steady cash flow while providing buyout firms with opportunities to create larger national platforms through acquisitions. Cryptocurrency. BlackRock leads $236 million pullback from bitcoin ETFs. U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs recorded roughly $236 million of net outflows, with BlackRock's IBIT accounting for about $201 million and Fidelity's FBTC losing another $44 million. The reversal comes as bitcoin trades near $77,000 and rising interest-rate expectations pressure risk assets. Other crypto funds are moving in the opposite direction: ether ETFs have recorded 12 consecutive days of inflows, while XRP and solana funds also attracted new money. Why It Matters: The divergence suggests institutional crypto demand may be broadening rather than simply disappearing. Investors pulling money from bitcoin while continuing to add to ether, XRP and solana products could indicate greater willingness to diversify crypto allocations beyond the market's largest asset. The partnership with Socha Financial Group in New York's Finger Lakes region marks the mega-RIA's ninth acquisition of the year. Sep 1, 2026

Investment firm KKR has agreed to acquire A1 Garage Door Service for approximately $2 billion, according to sources familiar with the matter. The deal adds to growing home services merger activity, including Oak Hill Capital's $800 million-plus acquisition of Guild Garage Group earlier this year. Phoenix-based A1 Garage was founded in 2007 by CEO Tommy Mello and operates in around 20 states. The company received growth capital from private equity firm Cortec Group in 2022. KKR has prior experience in residential services through investments in Neighborly, acquired in 2021, and Groundworks in 2023. Private equity firms have been targeting residential services companies for their steady cash flows and high valuations in fragmented markets.

212-938-6402 202-828-5828 KKR agrees to historic $250 million penalty for alleged violations of HSR Act. Wednesday, September 2, 2026 On August 26, 2026, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice announced a proposed settlement with KKR & Co., one of the world's largest private equity firms, to resolve allegations that it had repeatedly violated the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act. The DOJ had filed its complaint in January 2025, accusing KKR of ignoring its merger notification requirements by submitting deficient HSR notification forms for at least 16 transactions over the course of 2021 and 2022. The penalty amount of $250 million is the largest civil penalty ever assessed for an HSR Act violation. Pursuant to the HSR Act, transacting parties are required to give advance notice to the federal antitrust agencies - the Federal Trade Commission and the DOJ - of a proposed merger or acquisition if the transaction satisfies certain size criteria, so that the agencies can conduct an antitrust review before closing. To assist with this review, the HSR Rules require, among other items, that the parties' filings include certain transaction-related documents that discuss competitive aspects of the transaction or related post-merger planning. According to the DOJ's complaint, KKR's deficiencies included (i) omitting responsive documents from its HSR filings, (ii) altering documents included in the HSR filings prior to submission (and specifically for submission), and (iii) failing entirely to notify federal antitrust enforcers of at least two reportable transactions prior to closing. These failures were evident from, among other evidence, emails directing that documents be withheld from review by KKR's own antitrust counsel or revised "for HSR purposes." Thus, KKR's actions impeded the federal antitrust agencies' ability to fully evaluate the competitive effects of KKR's transactions prior to consummation. In its competitive impact statement, the DOJ noted that such recurrent deficiencies were indicative of systemic noncompliance with the HSR Act, and that as a major investment firm with decades of experience with HSR filings, KKR knew of its compliance obligations. The DOJ also explained that the historic $250 million penalty is actually lower than the maximum amount permitted under the HSR Act and was adjusted downward from the maximum because KKR was willing to settle and had already implemented a new, more robust HSR compliance program intended to mitigate the risk of future violations. Meanwhile, KKR disputed the DOJ's claims and stated that they agreed to settle only to avoid the distraction associated with continuing the litigation. Another recent antitrust agency action for HSR violation. The DOJ's settlement with KKR follows closely on the heels of a recent FTC settlement with Edwards Lifesciences Corp. and Genesis MedTech Group Limited involving an alleged failure to comply with the notification and waiting period requirements of the HSR Act. According to the FTC's complaint, in early 2024, Edwards began negotiating to acquire JC Medical, Inc., a Genesis subsidiary. At the same time, unbeknownst to Genesis and JC Medical, Edwards was negotiating to acquire JenaValve Technologies, Inc., a JC Medical competitor, in a separate HSR reportable transaction. Because JC Medical and JenaValve were the only two companies conducting clinical trials for a specific transcatheter heart valve product, Edwards was concerned that an HSR filing for JC Medical would attract additional FTC scrutiny and significantly delay both transactions. Documents and testimony showed that Edwards wanted to avoid an HSR filing for the acquisition of JC Medical. To achieve this objective, the defendants structured the transaction as two separate payments: one payment of $115 million (below the then-HSR filing threshold of $119.5 million) for the voting securities of JC Medical, and a contemporaneous investment of an additional $25 million. According to the FTC, a sufficient part of this extra payment constituted additional consideration for JC Medical, which resulted in an acquisition price above the HSR threshold. However, Edwards and Genesis consummated the JC Medical acquisition without filing HSR and observing the statutory waiting period. Under the terms of the settlement, Edwards and Genesis agreed to pay penalties of $10 million and $2 million, respectively. In addition to the monetary penalties, Edwards agreed that it would not acquire any similar businesses without providing advance written notice to the FTC and that it would implement an antitrust compliance program. Key takeaways. These cases demonstrate that despite recent upheaval in leadership at both the FTC and DOJ, it is clear that the current administration still takes compliance with HSR reporting obligations very seriously. They also make clear that it is important for transacting parties to conduct a robust document collection process for HSR filings and to properly educate deal team members on HSR document collection obligations, including from whom documents must be collected and what types of documents are responsive. Transacting parties also need to exercise caution when a particular deal structure results in no HSR filing requirement. Though parties have no obligation to make a transaction reportable, they cannot disguise what should be a reportable transaction as a non-reportable one. There should be legitimate reasons, unrelated to HSR, for structuring a deal in a manner that does not trigger a filing obligation. Experienced antitrust counsel can guide parties through these issues. Current public notices. Published: 27 August, 2026 Published: 26 August, 2026 Published: 24 August, 2026 Published: 20 August, 2026 Published: 17 August, 2026 Published: 12 August, 2026 Published: 10 August, 2026 Published: 4 August, 2026 Published: 27 July, 2026