Full-Time
Updated on 9/3/2026
All-in-one revenue delivery for SaaS
No salary listed
London, UK
Hybrid
Regular in-person collaboration with the Checkout team and wider Payments group is required.
See people who can refer or advise you
Paddle is a platform that handles the back-end work for software sales. It combines billing, payments, tax compliance, subscription management, invoicing, and localization into one system so software teams can sell globally without worrying about administrative tasks. It works by processing payments and subscriptions, generating invoices, and ensuring compliance with international tax rules, all accessible through APIs and real-time webhook events for easy integration and up-to-date data. Paddle differentiates itself by offering an all-in-one revenue delivery infrastructure, with built-in tax and localization support, comprehensive documentation, and actionable reporting, so teams can connect payments to growth. Its goal is to help software makers grow internationally and scale their businesses by taking care of the complex back-office work, allowing developers to focus on building products.
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Debt Financing
Total Funding
$316.4M
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Founded
2012
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Competitive compensation & share options
Private healthcare & mental health coaching
Flexible time off
Learning & development
Family leave
Wellbeing points
Transportation subsidies
Home workstation budget
Paddle vs Yuno: Revenue, Funding & Team size compared. Paddle generates $90.9M in revenue; Yuno generates $149.8M. Yuno is 1.6x bigger than Paddle by revenue. The table below compares Paddle and Yuno on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters - every figure GetLatka has verified for each company. | Company | PaddleThis company | Yuno | | Revenue | $90.9M | $149.8M | | Valuation | $1.4B | Not disclosed | | Funding raised | $293.3M | Not disclosed | | Customers | 2K | Not disclosed | | Team size | 397 | 1.4K | | Founded | 2012 | 2022 | | HQ | London, United Kingdom | Bogotá, Colombia | Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews. Paddle at a glance. Paddle generates $90.9M in revenue with 397 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom. * Revenue - $90.9M * Valuation - $1.4B * Funding - $293.3M * Customers - 2K * Team size - 397 * Founded - 2012 Paddle is an all-in-one payments, billing, subscription management, and tax management platform serving software companies. The company expanded its data and analytics capabilities significantly in 2022 through the acquisition of... Yuno at a glance. Yuno generates $149.8M in revenue with 1.4K employees, headquartered in Bogotá, Colombia. * Revenue - $149.8M * Team size - 1.4K * Founded - 2022 Yuno is a leading global payment orchestration platform. We empower businesses to simplify their payment operations, maximize revenue, and accelerate global expansion. Yuno connects your business to over 1,000 global payment methods... Other Paddle alternatives. Paddle competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category. Paddle vs Yuno: frequently asked questions. Is Paddle or Yuno bigger? Yuno is the bigger company by revenue, at $149.8M against $90.9M for Paddle. How much revenue does Paddle make? Paddle generates $90.9M in annual revenue with a team of 397. How much revenue does Yuno make? Yuno generates $149.8M in annual revenue with a team of 1.4K. How much funding has Paddle raised? Paddle has raised $293.3M in total funding since it was founded in 2012.
Top 5 B2B subscription billing platforms (Chargebee alternatives) in 2026. on 25/08/2026 TL;DR If you're evaluating alternatives to Chargebee in 2026, the strongest contenders are Maxio, Stripe Billing, Recurly, Zuora, and Paddle. Each platform caters to different business needs, from startup-friendly recurring billing to enterprise-grade revenue management and global tax compliance. Choosing the right solution depends on your pricing model, transaction volume, operational complexity, and growth plans. Why businesses are looking beyond Chargebee. Chargebee remains a respected player in the subscription billing industry. However, as SaaS companies and subscription-based businesses scale, many begin exploring alternatives that offer stronger revenue recognition, more flexible pricing models, enterprise-grade workflows, deeper analytics, or global payment capabilities. Modern B2B subscription businesses require more than recurring invoicing. They need platforms that can handle: * Usage-based pricing * Hybrid billing models * Multi-currency transactions * Global tax compliance * Revenue recognition * Dunning and churn recovery * Contract lifecycle management * SaaS metrics and reporting The following platforms stand out as the best Chargebee alternatives for 2026. 1. Maxio. Best for: Growing B2B SaaS companies that need billing, financial operations, and revenue recognition in one platform. Maxio has emerged as one of the strongest alternatives to Chargebee by combining subscription billing with SaaS finance tools. The platform is particularly attractive for companies that want deeper visibility into recurring revenue metrics while maintaining compliance with modern accounting standards. Key features. * Subscription management * Revenue recognition * SaaS metrics and analytics * Automated invoicing * Contract management * Customer lifecycle tracking Pros. Built specifically for B2B SaaS Strong finance and accounting capabilities Advanced revenue reporting Cons. Higher implementation effort than simpler solutions Better suited for scaling companies than very early-stage startups 2. Stripe Billing. Developer-first SaaS businesses and technology companies. Stripe Billing is one of the most flexible subscription platforms on the market. It allows businesses to build custom billing experiences while leveraging Stripe's extensive payment infrastructure. It is particularly popular among startups and software companies with engineering resources. * Subscription management * Usage-based billing * Automated invoicing * Flexible APIs * Multi-currency support * Revenue reporting Extremely customizable Fast implementation for Stripe users Excellent developer ecosystem May require developer involvement Less out-of-the-box functionality for finance teams 3. Recurly. Businesses focused on reducing churn and improving payment recovery. Recurly has built a strong reputation around subscription lifecycle management and intelligent dunning capabilities. The platform helps companies recover failed payments and reduce involuntary churn through automated workflows and payment optimization features. * Subscription lifecycle automation * Smart dunning management * Revenue optimization * Multi-currency billing * Customer retention tools * Payment recovery workflows Strong churn reduction capabilities Reliable recurring billing engine Mature subscription management features Enterprise-focused pricing Less suitable for small businesses 4. Zuora. Large enterprises managing complex subscription and revenue models. Zuora is widely recognized as one of the most sophisticated subscription billing platforms available. Organizations with multiple entities, custom contracts, usage-based pricing, and complex revenue recognition requirements often consider Zuora the gold standard. * Enterprise subscription management * Revenue recognition * Usage-based billing * Quote-to-cash workflows * Financial operations automation * Global taxation support Enterprise-grade capabilities Highly configurable workflows Strong compliance and financial controls Complex implementation Significant investment required 5. Paddle. Global SaaS companies selling internationally. Paddle differentiates itself through its Merchant of Record model, which handles payments, taxation, invoicing, and compliance on behalf of vendors. For software companies expanding globally, this can significantly reduce operational overhead. * Global subscription billing * Automated tax handling * Payment processing * Subscription management * Compliance support * International sales enablement Simplifies global tax compliance Reduces administrative burden Ideal for international SaaS growth Less customization than some competitors Transaction-based pricing may impact margins Quick comparison. How to select the right Chargebee alternative. Choosing the best subscription billing platform depends on your business model. Choose Maxio if: You need finance-focused subscription management with strong reporting and revenue recognition. Choose Stripe Billing if: You have technical resources and want maximum flexibility. Choose Recurly if: Reducing churn and recovering failed payments is a top priority. Choose Zuora if: You manage complex enterprise subscriptions and global revenue operations. Choose Paddle if: You sell globally and want a platform that handles taxes and compliance for you. Final thoughts. The subscription economy continues to evolve, and businesses need billing platforms capable of supporting increasingly complex revenue models. While Chargebee remains a strong option, platforms like Maxio, Stripe Billing, Recurly, Zuora, and Paddle offer unique advantages for companies with specific operational, financial, and growth requirements. Whether you're a fast-growing SaaS startup or a mature enterprise, selecting the right billing infrastructure can improve cash flow, reduce churn, simplify compliance, and create a stronger foundation for recurring revenue growth. Ready to upgrade your subscription billing stack? Evaluate your pricing model, compliance requirements, revenue operations, and future growth plans before making a decision. The right subscription billing platform can streamline operations, accelerate revenue growth, and help your business scale confidently in 2026 and beyond.
Tolt vs Rewardful: which SaaS Affiliate tool wins? A side-by-side look at Tolt vs Rewardful pricing, payment processor support, and cookie windows, with a flat-fee option for early SaaS teams. Tolt and Rewardful show up in the same searches because they solve the same problem: tracking affiliate-driven signups for a SaaS product billed through Stripe. I get asked about both constantly, usually from a founder who's already narrowed the shortlist to these two and wants the real differences, not a marketing page. Here's the honest comparison: pricing tier by tier, plus where the two actually diverge on payment processor support and cookie windows. Tolt's tiers scale by how much monthly revenue your affiliates generate, not by team size. Basic runs $69 a month and covers up to $10,000 a month in affiliate-driven revenue, with unlimited affiliates, two programs, and manual payouts only. Growth is $99 a month, raises the cap to $20,000 a month, and adds automated payouts, though Tolt charges a 2% processing fee on those. Pro is $199 a month with a $50,000 a month cap, unlimited programs and team members, and it's the first tier where Tolt drops the "powered by Tolt" branding from your affiliate portal. Past that, Tolt moves you to custom Enterprise pricing. Rewardful's ladder is similar in shape but different in the numbers. Starter is $49 a month for up to $7,500 a month in affiliate revenue, one campaign, and up to two team members. Growth is $99 a month, the same price as Tolt's Growth tier, but the revenue cap is $15,000 rather than $20,000, and it comes with unlimited campaigns and team members plus a branded, custom-domain portal. Enterprise starts at $149 a month for anything over $15,000, adding phone and chat support and one-click PayPal payouts. Rewardful states a flat 0% transaction fee on every plan, including payouts, and that number doesn't move as you scale. | / | Tolt | Rewardful | | Entry price | $69/mo | $49/mo | | Entry-tier revenue cap | $10,000/mo | $7,500/mo | | $99/mo tier revenue cap | $20,000/mo | $15,000/mo | | Payout/transaction fee | 2% on automated payouts (Growth+) | 0% on every plan | | Top published tier | $199/mo, $50,000/mo cap | $149+/mo, above $15,000/mo | | Free trial | 14 days, no card required | 14 days | Both platforms base the cap on affiliate-driven revenue, not your total company revenue, so a small program on a large SaaS product can sit comfortably on Tolt's Basic or Rewardful's Starter tier for a long time. What pushes you up a tier is affiliate performance, not company size, which is worth knowing before you assume you need Growth or Pro on day one. This is the clearest technical difference between them. Tolt integrates with Stripe, Paddle, and Chargebee. Rewardful, by its own admission, doesn't go that far: its help docs say plainly that it currently supports only Stripe or Paddle. If your billing runs through Chargebee, Rewardful is off the table entirely, no matter how the rest of the comparison shakes out. If you're on Stripe or Paddle, both work fine, and the processor question won't decide it for you. Rewardful defaults to a 60-day cookie window and lets you shorten or extend it per campaign under Advanced Settings. Tolt doesn't publish one fixed default; its cookie length is configurable per program, and the company's own content recommends 90 to 180 days for B2B SaaS to match longer sales cycles. Neither answer is wrong. A 60-day default fits a lot of self-serve SaaS with short evaluation periods, while a 90-plus day window suits a product sold to a buying committee. Set yours to match how long your actual sales cycle runs, not whichever number a competitor happens to publish. Beyond pricing and processors, a few things separate the two day to day. Tolt gives you double-sided rewards (paying both the referrer and the referred customer), custom commission flows, and, once you're on Growth or above, payout methods spanning PayPal, Wise, local bank transfer, crypto, and wire, plus W-9/W-8 collection, invoicing, and 1099 filing built in, all useful if you're paying a mix of US and international affiliates and don't want to run that paperwork by hand. Rewardful leans on its REST API, multi-currency support, fraud detection, and configurable first-touch or last-touch attribution, which matters if two affiliates ever end up competing for credit on the same signup. Both offer a branded affiliate portal on a custom domain, though Tolt only drops its own "powered by" badge at the $199 Pro tier, while Rewardful includes that at Growth for $99. Support scales with price on both. Tolt's Basic and Growth tiers get standard support, and Pro adds a dedicated Slack channel. Rewardful holds phone and chat support back for Enterprise; Starter and Growth customers work through email and its help docs. Neither is unusual for the category, but it's worth knowing before you pick a tier expecting faster answers than it actually gets you. Track record is worth a mention too. Rewardful launched in 2017 and was acquired by saas.group in November 2021, so it's had close to a decade to build out documentation and third-party integrations. Tolt is newer, founded in 2022, and it shows in a faster pace of feature releases but a thinner integration ecosystem outside its core three processors. If Chargebee is your billing platform, Tolt wins by default; Rewardful simply doesn't connect to it. If you want automated payouts without a fee cutting into them, Rewardful's 0% transaction rate is hard to beat on paper, though you're trading that for a lower revenue cap at each price point. If you need global payouts in crypto or local bank rails, Tolt's payout options are broader. For the fuller side-by-side against a third option, its dedicated Tolt comparison and Rewardful comparison go deeper into each one specifically against Referralful. Both Tolt and Rewardful charge you before you've signed a single affiliate, and both tie your bill to a revenue cap that forces an upgrade conversation as your program grows. That's a reasonable model once you've got real affiliate volume. It's a worse fit if you're pre-revenue on affiliates and don't want a subscription running before the program has proven itself. That's the gap Referralful was built for: it's free until your first affiliate actually joins, then a flat $19.99 a month with no revenue cap and 0% payout fees, a 30%-for-12-months default commission, and a 60-day cookie out of the box. You can see the full breakdown on its pricing page. Neither has a permanent free tier. Both offer a 14-day free trial, and Tolt's doesn't require a credit card to start. Tolt does. Rewardful's own help center says it supports Stripe and Paddle only, not Chargebee. Rewardful defaults to 60 days and lets you adjust it per campaign. Tolt doesn't publish one fixed default; it's configurable per program, and Tolt's own content recommends 90 to 180 days for B2B SaaS. If you're not yet running affiliate volume that needs a $50-99 a month tool, Referralful is free until your first affiliate joins, then $19.99 a month flat with no revenue cap. If you're weighing Tolt against Rewardful and want to see a third, flat-fee option before you commit, take a look at Referralful's pricing page. Tolt Rewardful SaaS Affiliate Software Referralful tracks every referral, calculates commissions, and pays affiliates through Stripe. Free until your first affiliate joins.
Monetizing your app: Paddle payments integration. 2026-08-03 Building the product is only half the battle; getting paid is the other. To help developers monetize their SaaS applications instantly, BYOB provides a deep, native integration with Paddle, a merchant of record that handles global taxes, subscriptions, and invoicing. Tldr. * Automated reconciliation of products, prices, and client tokens. * Secure webhook handling to update durable entitlement state in the database. * Strict separation of Sandbox and Production environments. Idempotent product syncing. Manually copying and pasting Price IDs from the Paddle dashboard into your codebase is tedious and error-prone. BYOB uses an idempotent reconciliation pattern driven by a catalog_key stored in each product's custom_data. You define your products and pricing tiers (amounts, currencies, billing intervals), and the agent automatically lists existing Paddle products/prices, reuses them by matching stable catalog fields, and creates only what's missing. The resulting Price IDs (pri_...) and PUBLIC_PADDLE_CLIENT_TOKEN are written to your project environment through secure env tooling - no manual copy-paste from the Paddle dashboard. Secure webhook automation. When a user upgrades their subscription, the payment happens on Paddle's servers. Paddle then fires a webhook back to your app to grant the user access. BYOB automatically generates the SvelteKit +server.ts webhook endpoints for you. These endpoints: * Securely verify the Paddle-Signature to ensure the payload is authentic. * Parse completion events like transaction.paid, transaction.completed, and subscription.activated - which are the only events that confirm actual payment (note: subscription.created proves provider contact, not customer payment). * Update the durable entitlement state in your database (Cloudflare D1 or Supabase), unlocking premium features for the user instantly. Inline vs. Hosted Checkout. Flexibility is key for conversion rates. The BYOB Paddle integration supports both: * Inline Checkout: Embedding the Paddle checkout UI directly into your pricing page for a seamless experience. * Hosted Checkout: Redirecting users to a Paddle-hosted page, which is ideal for complex invoicing or mobile flows. Environment separation. Mixing test payments with real money is a recipe for disaster. BYOB strictly enforces environment separation. The platform intelligently manages PUBLIC_PADDLE_ENV and your client/secret keys. When working in local development or preview branches, BYOB automatically routes your checkouts and webhooks to the Paddle Sandbox. When you hit production, the real keys take over. Paddle webhook notification settings must use the deployment URL (from byob deployment status), not the preview URL. Preview URLs are tied to the active workspace and are not stable endpoints for incoming webhooks. Summary. Monetization shouldn't require weeks of integration work. With BYOB and Paddle, you can go from free-tier to profitable SaaS in minutes. BYOB team. The creative minds behind BYOB. BYOB is a diverse team of engineers, designers, and AI specialists dedicated to making web development accessible to everyone. Related guides. Ready to start building? Join thousands of developers using BYOB to ship faster with AI-powered development.
Stripe vs Paddle: which payment processor is right for your SaaS? April 26, 2026 Stripe and Paddle are the two most common payment processors for SaaS businesses - and on the surface they look similar. Both handle recurring billing, both have solid APIs, and both are trusted by thousands of software companies. But they are fundamentally different products, and choosing the wrong one can cost you significantly more than just the processing fee. This guide breaks down exactly how Stripe and Paddle differ on pricing, features, tax handling, and overall complexity - so you can make the right call for your business. The core difference: gateway vs. Merchant of Record. Before comparing features and pricing, you need to understand what each actually is. Stripe is a payment gateway. It processes card transactions on your behalf, but you remain the merchant of record. That means you are legally responsible for collecting and remitting VAT, GST, and US sales tax. Chargebacks, fraud liability, and global tax compliance are your problem. Paddle is a Merchant of Record (MoR). Paddle sells your product to customers on your behalf. You deliver the software; Paddle handles the entire commercial relationship - taxes, compliance, chargebacks, and refunds. From the customer's perspective (and the tax authority's perspective), they bought from Paddle. This distinction explains almost every other difference between them. Pricing. Stripe. | Transaction type | Rate | | Domestic card (US) | 2.9% + $0.30 | | International card | 2.9% + $0.30 + 1.5% surcharge | | Stripe Tax (EU VAT) | ~0.5% additional | | Monthly fee | None | Stripe's headline rate is 2.9% + $0.30. For a $100 transaction, that's $3.20 in fees and $96.80 net. However, if you sell to EU customers and use Stripe Tax to handle VAT compliance, that adds roughly 0.5% per transaction. The real cost for EU sellers is closer to 3.4% + $0.30. For international cards without Stripe Tax, add another 1.5%. Volume discounts are available but require direct negotiation with Stripe. Paddle. | Transaction type | Rate | | All transactions | 5% + $0.50 | | International cards | Same - no surcharge | | Monthly fee | None | Paddle charges a flat 5% + $0.50 regardless of card origin or country. For a $100 transaction, that's $5.50 in fees and $94.50 net. No volume discount tiers are listed publicly - rates are negotiable for high-volume merchants. True cost comparison. The fee gap looks large (2.9% vs 5%) until you factor in what each includes. | Scenario | Stripe true cost | Paddle true cost | | $100 domestic (US only) | $3.20 | $5.50 | | $100 domestic + Stripe Tax | ~$3.70 | $5.50 | | $100 international card | ~$4.70 | $5.50 | | $100 international + VAT | ~$5.20 | $5.50 | For US-only businesses, Stripe is clearly cheaper. For EU-heavy or globally distributed SaaS businesses, the gap shrinks significantly - and at a certain point Paddle's all-in pricing becomes competitive when you account for what you don't have to build or pay for separately. Tax and compliance. This is where the products diverge most sharply. Stripe does not handle tax compliance by default. You are responsible for: * Registering for VAT/GST in each country where you have nexus * Calculating the correct tax rate per transaction * Filing returns and remitting tax to each authority * Staying current with changing thresholds (e.g., EU OSS scheme) Stripe Tax partially addresses this - it calculates and collects the right tax amounts - but you still need to file returns and remit funds yourself, or use a third-party service like Avalara or TaxJar. Stripe Tax costs an additional 0.5% per transaction where it's active. For a US-only SaaS with fewer than ~5 states of nexus, this overhead is manageable. For a SaaS with global customers, it becomes a significant operational burden. Tax compliance is the core reason most founders choose Paddle. Because Paddle is the merchant of record, Paddle is legally responsible for collecting and remitting VAT, GST, and US sales tax globally. You never register for VAT in the EU. You never file a German tax return. Paddle handles all of it as part of the 5% + $0.50 fee. This also means: * Chargebacks are Paddle's legal liability, not yours * Refunds are processed by Paddle * Your invoices come from Paddle (which matters for B2B customers in VAT-registered countries) Subscription management. Both platforms have mature subscription billing, but the approach differs. Stripe Billing. Stripe Billing is a comprehensive subscription engine. It supports: * Free trials, usage-based billing, and metered charges * Proration on plan changes * Multiple currencies with automatic conversion * Smart Retry logic for failed payments (dunning) * Customer portal for self-service upgrades and cancellations * Flexible invoice customisation The API is extensive and well-documented, but implementing a full subscription flow requires engineering work. Most features are configurable, not out-of-the-box. Paddle Billing. Paddle Billing (the current product, distinct from the legacy Paddle Classic) offers: * Subscription management with trials, pauses, and cancellations * A hosted checkout overlay - no PCI scope on your end * Automatic dunning and recovery * A customer portal for self-service management * Localised checkout - prices shown in the customer's currency The main trade-off: Paddle's checkout is a hosted overlay. You have less control over the UI compared to building your own Stripe-powered checkout. This is a deliberate choice - Paddle owns the checkout because they're the merchant of record. Developer experience. Stripe's API is widely regarded as the best in the payments industry. The documentation is thorough, SDKs cover every major language, and the developer dashboard is excellent. Webhooks are reliable and well-structured. The flip side: because Stripe is so flexible, there are many ways to implement any given flow. Getting subscriptions, trials, proration, and tax right often takes longer than founders expect. Paddle's API is good but narrower - you're building within the constraints of Paddle's model. The upside is that many things are handled for you by default: checkout, tax, compliance. Less flexibility, less setup. Paddle's webhooks and API have improved significantly since the Paddle Billing rewrite. Teams moving from Paddle Classic to Paddle Billing should expect a migration effort. Analytics. Neither Stripe nor Paddle was designed to be your analytics platform. Stripe offers a basic dashboard for revenue and transaction monitoring, plus Stripe Sigma - a SQL-based tool for custom reporting. Sigma is powerful but requires SQL knowledge and isn't cheap. Paddle acquired ProfitWell in 2022 and offers ProfitWell Metrics (free MRR reporting) alongside Paddle's reporting dashboard. ProfitWell Metrics is useful for tracking headline numbers but has limited flexibility for custom analysis. For either platform, a dedicated analytics layer gives you visibility that the native tools don't: cohort analysis, LTV by plan, churn by acquisition channel, expansion MRR trends, and custom dashboards you can share with your team or investors. When to Choose Stripe. Choose Stripe if: * You're US-focused and don't have significant EU or global exposure * You have engineering resources to build and maintain the integration * You want maximum control over checkout UX, billing logic, and integrations * You're at a scale where custom pricing negotiations make the lower base rate worth it * You already use Stripe and the switching cost isn't justified When to Choose Paddle. Choose Paddle if: * You sell globally and don't want to deal with VAT registration in 30+ countries * You're a small team or indie developer where compliance overhead is a real constraint * You want an all-in price that covers tax, chargebacks, and compliance * You don't have the engineering resources to build a robust Stripe integration * You want to move fast without a legal or finance overhead Summary. You can also compare Stripe, Paddle, and every other major payment processor side by side - including calculated fees at your exact transaction amount - using its free payment fee comparison tool. | / | Stripe | Paddle | | Type | Payment gateway | Merchant of Record | | Base rate | 2.9% + $0.30 | 5% + $0.50 | | International surcharge | +1.5% | None | | VAT/GST handling | You (via Stripe Tax, paid) | Included | | US sales tax | You (via Stripe Tax, paid) | Included | | Chargeback liability | You | Paddle | | Checkout UI control | Full | Hosted overlay | | Developer flexibility | High | Medium | | Setup complexity | Higher | Lower | | Best for | US-focused / tech teams | Global / lean teams | One more thing: knowing your numbers. Whichever processor you choose, your payment processor is where your revenue data lives - but it's rarely enough on its own to understand your business. Chartsy connects to both Stripe and Paddle and gives you the analytics layer neither provides natively: MRR and ARR calculated from actual invoice data, churn breakdowns by plan and cohort, LTV analysis, expansion and contraction MRR tracking, and an AI-powered interface where you can ask any question in plain English and get an instant chart. Whether you're on Stripe, Paddle, or both, Chartsy turns your payment data into the dashboards and reports that actually drive decisions.