Full-Time
Posted on 9/27/2025
Real-time construction project management platform
$80k - $110k/yr
Remote in USA + 1 more
More locations: San Francisco, CA, USA
Remote
Hybrid role with the option to work remotely within the US.
Fieldwire is a construction management platform that helps project managers, engineers, and contractors coordinate plans, photos, and tasks for commercial, industrial, heavy civil, and residential projects. It works by providing real-time updates and a centralized view of plans and tasks via a subscription-based software with tiered features like task management and reporting. Fieldwire differentiates itself through its global presence across North America, Europe, Australia, and Japan, and by offering field-facing visibility that keeps teams aligned on progress without extra QA/QC staff. The goal is to save time, reduce costs, and improve quality control by streamlining construction workflows.
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
Acquired
Total Funding
$341.2M
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Founded
2013
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Remote Work Options
Performance Bonus
BuildersAI alternatives - and why most teams choose BuildersAI. William Charlesworth-Jones Founder, BuildersAI Quick answer. The main alternatives to BuildersAI are Procore, Fieldwire, and Autodesk Construction Cloud. All three are built for large enterprise contractors with IT teams and significant implementation budgets. If you run a UK SME construction business, none of them were designed for you. Most contractors who compare BuildersAI end up choosing BuildersAI because it is the only platform that works from day one without training, prices per project rather than per user, and gives trades answers without going through the site manager. What you'll learn. Why people look for alternatives. If you are searching for BuildersAI alternatives, you are probably in one of two situations. Either you have seen BuildersAI mentioned somewhere and want to understand how it compares before committing, or you are already using something else and it is not working. Both are good reasons to be here. Construction software has a long history of promising a lot and delivering tools that only the office uses. Trades ignore them. Site managers work around them. The WhatsApp group stays open. The question worth asking is not which platform has the most features. It is which one everyone on site will actually use from day one, without training, without chasing people to log in. The real problem with construction software. Most construction software was built for enterprise contractors with IT departments, implementation teams, and training budgets. It assumes a level of technical comfort and management overhead that most UK SME contractors simply do not have. The result is a market where the tools with the most features have the lowest adoption on site. Site managers end up maintaining the system in parallel with WhatsApp because trades will not change. The investment produces no return. The gap in the market has always been a platform simple enough for any trade to use from day one, built around the actual problems UK sites face: wrong drawing revisions, lost compliance records, site managers losing hours to questions that should have answers already. What UK sites are actually losing every week. * Site manager time lost to avoidable questions5-15 hrs/week * Rework as a share of project cost2-5% * Projects running late or over budget95% * UK contractors using dedicated site softwareUnder 10% Procore. Procore is the largest construction management platform in the world. Large main contractors use it to manage complex, multi-year programmes across hundreds of stakeholders. What it does well: Comprehensive project management across financials, scheduling, drawings, RFIs, and submittals. Deep accounting integrations. Strong reporting at enterprise scale. Where it falls short for UK SMEs: Enterprise pricing, weeks of implementation, and low trade adoption. Built for the US market. The site manager often ends up running Procore and WhatsApp in parallel because trades do not engage with the system. Bottom line: Excellent for large main contractors with IT support. Not built for the majority of UK construction businesses. Fieldwire. Fieldwire is a field management platform with solid drawing and task management tools. It is more accessible than Procore and has a reasonable mobile app. What it does well: Drawing mark-up, task assignment, punch lists, and inspection forms. A cleaner interface than Procore for field use. Where it falls short for UK SMEs: Per-user pricing escalates quickly when you include all trades. No AI assistant. UK-specific compliance features are limited. Trades still call the site manager for answers because there is no way to get information themselves. Bottom line: A reasonable platform for drawing and task management, but not AI-first and not built around UK compliance workflows. Autodesk Construction Cloud. Autodesk Construction Cloud combines BIM 360, PlanGrid, and BuildingConnected into one platform. It is best-in-class for BIM coordination on complex projects. What it does well: Model coordination, design-to-build workflows, and deep integration with Revit and AutoCAD. Where it falls short for UK SMEs: Heavily enterprise-oriented. The BIM tooling is powerful but irrelevant to most SME site workflows. Cost, complexity, and trade adoption are all significant barriers. Bottom line: Worth evaluating if BIM coordination is central to your work. For typical SME site coordination, it is significant overkill. WhatsApp. WhatsApp is not construction software. It is a consumer messaging app that UK sites have adopted by default because nothing simpler existed. What it does well: Free, already on every phone, no learning curve. Where it fails: No version control on drawings. No read receipts on group messages. No audit trail for compliance or disputes. No way for a trade to find an answer without asking someone. The site manager becomes the human router for every query on site. Bottom line: WhatsApp is the problem this industry needs to solve, not the solution. BuildersAI wrote a full piece on the real cost of using it: The WhatsApp Problem No One is Talking About in Construction. How BuildersAI is different. BuildersAI was built specifically for UK SME contractors, from the ground up, around three things that everything else gets wrong. Trades use it from day one. If they can use WhatsApp, they can use BuildersAI. There is no onboarding process, no training required, no chasing people to log in. The platform is simple enough that adoption is not a project in itself. The AI assistant removes the site manager from the middle. Trades ask questions in plain English and get instant answers drawn from the project's drawings, documents, and announcements. The site manager stops being the human router for every query on site. Per-project pricing means costs do not escalate. Include every trade on site for a flat monthly fee. No per-user charges, no surprises as the team grows. Most contractors who compare BuildersAI come back to BuildersAI for the same reason: it is the only platform where you can set up a site in the morning and have every trade using it by the afternoon. See BuildersAI on a site like yours. BuildersAI will walk you through the platform using your project type as the example. Most sites are live the same day.
PLANO, Texas, May 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Fieldwire by Hilti, an industry-leading construction management software solution, and BoxLock, the leading Intelligent Access Control Platform, announced an innovative first-to-market integration that provides real-time Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) status directly onto electrical single-line drawings
Fieldwire is excited to introduce its new project management module on Fieldwire.
Fieldwire has recently added two powerful new features.
Hilti Group, a global leader in innovative tool and fastening solutions, technology, software, and services for the commercial construction industry, has entered into an agreement to acquire Fieldwire, a San Francisco-based construction technology company for an approximate $300 million.