C

Coefficient Giving

Philanthropic advisor funding high-impact global projects

Overview

Coefficient Giving serves as a philanthropic advisor and grantmaker that uses evidence and reason to identify high-impact, neglected global problems and direct funding to solutions. It researches interventions, assesses impact, and designs grant programs, acting as the primary advisor to Good Ventures and coordinating with other donors through multi-donor funds. It stands out by combining rigorous research with hands-on grantmaking and donor collaboration, guided by effective altruism principles and its history with GiveWell and Good Ventures. Its goal is to amplify donor impact by funding high-leverage causes and expanding collaborative funding to maximize overall positive outcomes.

Work here?Claim your company

About Coefficient Giving

Simplify's Rating
Why Coefficient Giving is rated
B
Rated B on Competitive Edge
Rated A on Growth Potential
Rated C on Differentiation

Industries

Data & AnalyticsConsultingSocial ImpactHealthcare

Company Size

51-200

Company Stage

N/A

Total Funding

N/A

Headquarters

San Francisco, CA

Founded

2014

Get referred to Coefficient Giving

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's take

What believers are saying

  • September 2026 AI and biosecurity commitments exceeded $1 billion annualized, proving fundraising momentum.
  • GiveWell's August 2026 DRC malaria grant validates Coefficient Giving's cost-effectiveness edge in global health.
  • Project Tailwind and Launchpad Funds attract builders, expanding grantee pipelines and donor participation.

What critics are saying

  • Heavy concentration in AI safety invites backlash if funded labs miss catastrophic warnings.
  • The organization still depends on Good Ventures and Moskovitz-Tuna capital for major commitments.
  • Big commitments like DRC nets and Resolution can fail on coordination, delaying impact through 2029.

What makes Coefficient Giving unique

  • November 2025 rebrand to Coefficient Giving signals a multi-donor platform, not one-foundation dependence.
  • Its 2026 funds span malaria, TB, lead exposure, and transformative AI research.
  • It moves faster than peers, approving Resolution's $160 million grant in six weeks.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

  • Health Insurance
  • Dental Insurance
  • Vision Insurance
  • Life Insurance
  • Paid Vacation
  • Parental Leave
  • Remote Work Options
  • Professional Development Budget

Company News

Sampura Research
Nov 10th, 2026
Sampura Research: Human-AI Complementarity for Alignment

We’ve left Google DeepMind to start Sampura Research, a nonprofit building Human-AI Complementarity for Scalable Oversight — the research agenda we’ve pioneered for the past several years.

Nature
Sep 30th, 2026
How to spend $25 billion on science: OpenAI's staggeringly rich research charity gets under way.

How to spend $25 billion on science: OpenAI's staggeringly rich research charity gets under way. Jacob Trefethen, who leads life sciences at the OpenAI Foundation, speaks to Nature about the organization's ambitions to cure disease. The OpenAI Foundation - the charity arm of the artificial-intelligence behemoth - is on track to become one of the wealthiest non-profit organizations on the planet. And, with a 26% stake in OpenAI, which is seeking a valuation of around US$1.4 trillion, it could even become the richest. The foundation was created in October 2025, after a tumultuous shake-up of OpenAI's governance and structure. It has so far committed to giving away at least $25 billion. This month, the foundation cut a round of cheques as part of a $125-million commitment to fund the creation of freely available data for health and life-sciences research. The grants included $40 million for a project at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to develop cancer vaccines; $500,000 for a pilot project to repurpose data from bankrupt biotechnology companies; and $15 million to an effort to better predict how drugs cross the blood-brain barrier and other membranes. Those awards follow a tranche of $100 million for Alzheimer's disease research. Jacob Trefethen, who previously worked at Coefficient Giving, a billionaire-funded foundation, is now head of life sciences at the OpenAI Foundation in San Francisco, California. He tells Nature that this is only the start, and the foundation plans to move fast. Why is the OpenAI Foundation funding health and life sciences? Our mission is to ensure AI benefits all of humanity. Part of the reason that we're starting in the life sciences and health is that we think that's one of the areas where AI can have the most benefit. The non-profit Chan Zuckerberg Initiative announced in 2016 that its aim was to cure all disease by the end of the century. Does the OpenAI Foundation have a similar goal? We intend to be ambitious. We have started with three areas in the life sciences to focus: AI for Alzheimer's; public data for health; and high-burden diseases - which for us means any disease that leads to over half a million deaths around the world each year or similarly massive ill health. We're going to try and ask the question, what's newly possible, for example, in tuberculosis - the largest infectious killer - that may help people who don't currently have good-enough options. We have a kind of unifying philosophy and a hope to move quickly. How do biological data fit in? We think that the combination of intelligence and more observations of the world is what will deliver breakthroughs for people against disease. And those observations mean scientific data. We think a lot of these problems that we're working on, like Alzheimer's, we collectively don't know enough to deliver treatments that are excellent for patients. And so that requires more data of various forms to get there, probably. We want to support that underlying scientific infrastructure so that all researchers can build on it and all patients can benefit. Is it a bit self-serving for the OpenAI Foundation to support projects that will generate data that could make OpenAI's model more capable? * Access the most recent journalism from Nature's award-winning team * Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-03015-0 This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Formation Research Ltd
Sep 17th, 2026
Announcing a $2.15 million grant from Coefficient Giving.

Announcing a $2.15 million grant from Coefficient Giving. Formation Research has been awarded a $2.15 million grant from Coefficient Giving to grow as an organisation. Formation Research is pleased to announce that Formation Research has been awarded $2.15 million in funding from Coefficient Giving. The grant supports two years of work on lock-in and power concentration risks, and will allow Formation Research to grow the organisation. Formation Research is now hiring technical staff. For the near term, its focus is empirical research on secret loyalties as an intervention against AI-enabled lock-in. This work centres on building model organisms of secretly loyal AI systems, and on developing and deploying alignment audits to detect them. Beyond this, Formation Research intend to expand into other high-impact technical work under the lock-in and power concentration threat model. If this sounds like something you'd like to work on, please register your interest. Coefficient Giving is a philanthropic funder and advisor whose mission is to use its resources to help others as much as possible.

GiveWell
Aug 24th, 2026
Announcing our largest grant to date.

Announcing its largest grant to date. GiveWell, with co-funding from Coefficient Giving, recently made its largest grant to date: $276 million to the Against Malaria Foundation (AMF) to support the procurement and distribution of 92 million nets in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) from 2027 through 2029. Good Thoughts estimate that the nets, 46 million of which Good Thoughts think would not otherwise be distributed, will avert roughly 67,000 deaths. Good Thoughts has supported AMF's work for more than 15 years, and the insecticide-treated nets it procures and distributes remain one of the most cost-effective ways Good Thoughts has found to save lives. This grant, which involved a more rigorous investigation process than most, is part of a larger story about scaling its team and systems to handle substantially more funding while deepening its research rigor. Last year, Good Thoughts directed more than $400 million to highly cost-effective programs to save and improve lives and, this year, Good Thoughts expect its grantmaking to approach, and possibly exceed, $1 billion. This increase in grantmaking aims to meet global needs faster and more effectively. In this episode, GiveWell co-founder and CEO Elie Hassenfeld speaks with Senior Program Officer Alex Bowles about the questions the team set out to answer during the grant investigation. Elie and Alex discuss: * Assessing the impact of insecticide-treated nets in DRC: GiveWell usually estimates a program's cost-effectiveness and impact by analyzing academic evidence, particularly randomized trials, and making a number of adjustments. Because of its growing capacity, Good Thoughts were able to do something new for this grant: Good Thoughts tested its assumptions about DRC's past net campaigns by drawing on two new, independent lines of evidence. First, Good Thoughts analyzed a recent national survey, which showed a reduction in malaria infections close to what Good Thoughts had predicted. Second, Good Thoughts commissioned a firm based in DRC to interview households and community leaders. Those interviews confirmed records about nets received and provided information about the challenges of conducting net campaigns in DRC. Taken together, this more robust approach increased its confidence that nets work well and are likely to reach intended households in the locations funded by this grant. * Planning and coordinating at scale: This grant is nearly three times the size of its previous largest grant (also to AMF) and is concentrated in one country rather than being spread across several. The grant commits funds at the beginning of a multi-year planning cycle, which Good Thoughts think will make these campaigns easier to plan. It also aims to ensure that campaigns happen across all 26 of DRC's provinces, in some cases on an expedited timeline. This shift in its funding approach makes close coordination with AMF and other partners - including the Global Fund, which is funding much of the net distribution, and the national malaria program - even more important than before. * Rethinking how often nets are distributed: In most countries, nets are distributed every three years, but evidence shows that nets wear out more quickly in DRC, in part because of the climate. Its analysis of national survey data, net durability studies, and AMF's post-distribution monitoring suggests that nets in DRC last roughly 18 to 24 months. DRC had already shortened its campaign cycle, aiming to distribute nets every 30 months. With the support of the government, GiveWell is supporting net campaigns every 24 months in several provinces with high rates of malaria transmission, and funding evidence gathering so Good Thoughts can learn whether more frequent net campaigns is a cost-effective strategy for further reducing malaria rates. Good Thoughts think this approach will help further prevent malaria and potentially save more lives. A larger, more experienced team enabled Good Thoughts to investigate this grant more deeply than Good Thoughts could have even two years ago - looking back at past grants to assess their estimated impact and asking important questions about the challenges of implementing such a large program. The same capacity that allowed Good Thoughts to research this grant, which Good Thoughts expect to save tens of thousands of lives, is also helping Good Thoughts look ahead to newer strategies that could save even more lives in the future. This episode was recorded on August 14, 2026, and represents its best understanding at that time.

MedAccess
Jul 23rd, 2026
MedAccess receives $580K grant to accelerate access to future TB vaccines in LMICs

MedAccess has received a $580,000 grant from Coefficient Giving to develop access solutions for future tuberculosis vaccines. The funding will support analysis of market barriers that could prevent people in low- and middle-income countries from accessing new TB vaccines and help design innovative finance solutions. Tuberculosis killed an estimated 1.23 million people in 2024, making it the world's leading infectious killer. More than a dozen new TB vaccine candidates are currently in clinical development, with several in late-stage trials. MedAccess will work with global partners to explore how innovative financing and market-shaping approaches can make vaccines more affordable and support rapid introduction in high-burden countries. The organisation co-chairs the Catalytic Instrument Task Force, part of the WHO TB Vaccine Accelerator's Finance and Access Working Group.

Recently Posted Jobs

Sign up to get curated job recommendations

There are no jobs for Coefficient Giving right now.

Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today

We update Coefficient Giving's jobs every few hours, so check again soon!Browse all jobs