Deno provides a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript, with Node.js compatibility and built-in development tools. It runs code in a sandbox where file, network, and environment access are blocked by default unless explicitly enabled, which helps protect data. The runtime includes a package of essential tools—such as a linter, test runner, and assertion library—and offers Fresh, a web framework designed for edge servers, plus SaaSKit, a template for building SaaS apps with features like authentication and billing. Deno’s approach combines security, fast development cycles, and easy deployment to help developers build, test, and deploy web applications. Its differences from competitors come from its strict security model, out-of-the-box toolset, Node.js compatibility, and a focus on edge-friendly frameworks and SaaS templates. The company aims to make it simpler and safer for developers to create, test, and deploy scalable web apps and services.
Work here?Claim your company
Industries
Company Size
51-200
Company Stage
Series A
Total Funding
$25.9M
Headquarters
New York City, New York
Founded
2019
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Total Funding
$25.9M
Above
Industry Average
Funded Over
2 Rounds
Industry standards
The cost of switching JavaScript runtimes in 2026. Bun achieves 94,000 requests per second in throughput tests, significantly outperforming Node.js and Deno. Performance gains from migrating to Bun can save companies up to 3,000 dollars per month in serverless costs. Bun delivers the highest throughput and lowest cold start costs. Bun reaches 94,000 requests per second in HTTP throughput tests for a simple JSON endpoint. This outperforms Deno at 52,000 requests per second and Node.js at 31,000 requests per second. In production environments with actual database queries and business logic, the performance gap between Bun and its competitors narrows to 20-30 percent because the real bottleneck is the PostgreSQL connection pool. Serverless cold start times favor Bun at 45ms, compared to 95ms for Deno and 180ms for Node.js. These millisecond differences translate to direct savings. One company saved 3,000 dollars per month by migrating AWS Lambda functions from Node.js to Bun. Bun uses JavaScriptCore and Zig for native code to achieve these speeds. Bun's Bun.file API performs file operations 2-3 times faster than the Node.js fs module. Node.js runs on the V8 engine and relies on decades of optimization. Deno also uses the V8 engine but utilizes Rust for native bindings. This architecture introduces some overhead for permission checks, though users can disable permissions in production to recover performance. Debugging Bun can be difficult because its profiling tools are less polished than Node.js tools like Chrome DevTools or clinic.js. You should prioritize Bun when you build CLI tools, build scripts, or serverless functions where cold starts matter. Teams should avoid Bun for core business logic with exotic dependencies or systems with complex native module requirements. Compatibility and TypeScript configuration overhead. Node.js maintains 100 percent compatibility with npm packages. Bun works with approximately 97 percent of npm packages, while Deno manages about 85 percent using the npm: specifier. This 3 percent gap in Bun can stall migrations for weeks if a service relies on obscure Node.js internals. Deno 2 increases this compatibility by allowing users to import npm modules via URLs. Ryan Dahl stated that Deno 2 provides the ability to run complex frameworks like Next.js out of the box. Deno 2 also supports npm workspaces and allows developers to add dependencies using the deno add subcommand. Deno 2 introduces the deno install command with an -entrypoint flag to install all dependencies from a specific module. Deno 2 also includes a deno remove subcommand and a concise lockfile format, version 4, to minimize diffs during dependency updates. TypeScript handling differs across the three runtimes. Bun and Deno provide native, zero-config TypeScript support. Developers using Node.js face a burden managing tsconfig.json files. All three runtimes include native test runners, but Bun's Jest-compatible API is more ergonomic than the Node.js runner added in version 18. Deno also supports a form of npm workspaces to help developers manage interdependent packages in one repository. Ryan Dahl expects that in five years, Chrome will execute TypeScript natively by performing type-stripping inside the V8 engine. Deno production stability and the Cloudflare transition. Deno is ready for production use cases because it provides long-term support and API stability. The Deno team joined Cloudflare on October 9, 2026. Deno Deploy shuts down in approximately six months, and the Deno runtime receives one year of maintenance before development ends. This timeline forces teams to plan migrations away from Deno Deploy. A developer migrating a Fresh 2 SSR site from Deno Deploy to Cloudflare Workers found that the application code only required two Deno-specific API calls to become portable because the built server exported the fetch module. The site used a 15-line worker to handle 301s for legacy /posts/* URLs, while everything else deferred to static assets. This approach removed the need for a runtime server entirely. Deno 2 simplifies permission management by changing the Deno.errors.Notcapable error to replace Deno.errors.PermissionDenied. This change helps developers distinguish between OS-level errors and runtime permissions. The permissions check for the Deno.mainModule API and the process.argv API no longer requires full -allow-read permission. Deno also allows permissions for reading and writing files that contain commas in the filename. Deno uses Rust for native bindings, which introduces some overhead for permission checks. Deno's embrace of web standards means code written for Deno often runs unchanged in browsers and edge runtimes. Is the Deno runtime the best choice for enterprise stability given the Cloudflare acquisition?
Node.js creator Ryan Dahl moves from Deno to Cloudflare. Per The Register, Node.js creator Ryan Dahl is leaving Deno for open-source Cloudflare Workers, which is absorbing the startup he founded. What happened. Ryan Dahl, the creator of Node.js, is moving on from Deno to work on open-source Cloudflare Workers, according to a report in The Register. The article describes Cloudflare as absorbing Deno, the startup Dahl founded, and presents the shift as a stance on how server-side software should be built. The Register's lede attributes to Dahl the view that developers are building servers "wrong". That remark frames the move as a critique of current server-side practice rather than a routine product update. The full commercial terms of the deal and Cloudflare's stated roadmap for the work were not part of the material reviewed for this briefing. Why it matters. The story is about developer infrastructure, and it points to a wider shift in how organisations run digital services. Edge and serverless platforms such as Cloudflare Workers let teams deploy code without managing the underlying servers. When a runtime's principal architect moves to a platform, it can signal where the next generation of tooling is heading, and that affects how quickly organisations can ship changes to the people who use their services. For leaders in experience and digital transformation, runtime and platform choices are not purely technical decisions. They shape release cadence, reliability and the friction engineers face when they fix problems that customers notice. Consolidation around a small number of platforms also raises questions about lock-in, portability and how much control an organisation keeps over the services it runs. The renascence take. Most coverage will read this as a founder-and-company story. The more useful lens is that developer experience is itself a service, and it has customers: the engineers who build everything else. Most readers will focus on the personalities and the corporate deal, but the lasting signal is about defaults. Teams adopt whatever platform removes the most friction, so the runtime an organisation chooses quietly sets the quality of its digital services. Treat a platform migration as a change to the customer experience, with user-facing measures attached, rather than as an engineering preference. Before choosing or switching a runtime, map where developer time goes today and which delays customers actually feel. This briefing was written by its Newsdesk, synthesising reporting from the outlets below. Follow the links for the original coverage. Questions Renascence get on this topic. According to The Register, Ryan Dahl, creator of Node.js, is moving on from Deno to work on open-source Cloudflare Workers. The report describes Cloudflare as absorbing Deno, the startup Dahl founded. More in Digital Transformation Stay ahead of CX Get the signal, not the noise. The stories shaping customer experience - plus the Journal and Experience Loom - in your inbox.
Cloudflare is acquiring Deno, the startup behind the programming runtime of the same name, it announced Friday. Financial terms were not disclosed. Cloudflare will use the deal to improve its Workers programming model and platform, which lets customers build and run software on its network. Kenton Varda, principal engineer for Cloudflare Workers, said Deno's recently launched open source Workers implementation, celld, "delighted" the team. Varda rejected a "popular theory" that Cloudflare made Workers different to create "lock-in." He said being open source and giving people an escape hatch "is good business." Deno co-founder Ryan Dahl, who also created Node.js, said the team is "joining Cloudflare to make the Workers programming model a mainstream way to build servers." Deno had raised $26 million, including a Series A led by Sequoia.
. 41 minutes ago 13 9:25 AM PDT · October 10, 2026 Cloudflare announced Friday that it's acquiring Deno, the startup behind the programming runtime of the same name. According to Cloudflare's Kenton Varda, Cloudflare will use this acquisition to improve its Workers programming model and platform, which allows customers to build and run software on Cloudflare's network. (Varda is principal engineer for Cloudflare Workers.) Deno - which was co-founded by Bert Belder and Node.js creator Ryan Dahl - recently launched celld, an open source implementation of Workers, which Varda wrote "delighted" the Cloudflare team. Varda argued that contrary to "a popular theory" that the company "made Cloudflare Workers work differently from other cloud platforms in order to create 'lock-in,'" the company believes "being open source and giving people an escape hatch is good business." Dahl, meanwhile, wrote that his team is "joining Cloudflare to make the Workers programming model a mainstream way to build servers." The financial terms of the acquisition were not disclosed. Deno had raised a total of $26 million, including a Series A led by Sequoia. Subscribe for the industry's biggest tech news
Dactyl turns a sentence into a real native app, no Xcode needed. Check this before you trust it with real users. A team from Deno launched Dactyl, an AI builder that writes real native iOS and Android apps in your browser. Here's what to verify first. BuilderWithin Editorial Team BuilderWithin Most AI app builders that promise a native mobile app actually hand you something else. Often that's a mobile website dressed up to look like an app, what's called a web view. Sometimes it's a React Native project, a common way to write one code base meant to work on both iPhone and Android, that still behaves differently from a real native build. Dactyl, a new tool from a team of engineers at Deno, the JavaScript runtime company, is trying a different approach: describe an app, and it writes real, native SwiftUI (Apple's own framework for building iOS interfaces) code you can preview instantly in your browser. Bert Belder, a Deno co-founder, confirmed on X that the project comes from a small group at Deno, built around a SwiftUI renderer running in WASM (a format that lets code originally written for one platform run inside a web browser at near-native speed). That's what powers Dactyl's in-browser simulator: you can tap through a real, working version of your app the moment it's built, without installing Xcode, a simulator app, or owning a Mac at all. What it actually builds. According to Dactyl's own site, the agent writes real SwiftUI you can read, edit, and export as an Xcode project (Apple's official app development toolkit) at any point, with no lock-in to the platform. The same Swift code compiles into a native Android APK as well, the installable file format Android apps normally ship in, which Dactyl says means no rewrite and no web view for the Android version either. Beyond the interface, Dactyl says it wires up working infrastructure by default: real Sign in with Apple and Google, camera and GPS access, and StoreKit (Apple's in-app purchase system) for real payments, all functioning in the browser preview before you ever install the app on a device. Getting an app onto your own phone just takes scanning a QR code, no Apple Developer account required. Publishing to the App Store or TestFlight does require that $99-a-year Apple Developer account, which Dactyl says it walks you through from inside the editor. Play Store publishing isn't available yet; Dactyl's FAQ lists it as coming later. The pricing model is the more interesting part. Dactyl's Builder plan costs $20 a month, and it's designed to run on a ChatGPT subscription you already pay for rather than reselling you tokens at a markup. Connect your own ChatGPT plan and the AI work runs on your existing allowance; Dactyl says failed builds don't cost you anything. A free tier exists too, running on Dactyl's own included credits instead. That bring-your-own-subscription model is worth noting on its own, separate from any specific price comparison. It ties what you can build to the usage limits of whatever ChatGPT plan you already have, rather than a separate credit system layered on top. If OpenAI changes what a Plus or Pro plan includes, as it's doing again this week with Codex's usage caps, that also changes how far your Dactyl budget goes, even though the two products aren't related. What to check before you rely on it. Dactyl is a new product from a small team, not an app-builder platform with years of production traffic behind it. That matters because of what it's plugging in by default: real user authentication, real payment processing, and real device data like location and camera access. Before you point Dactyl at actual users or real payments, read its privacy and data-handling terms directly. Confirm where user data from Sign in with Apple or Google actually gets stored, and whether that meets whatever privacy commitments you're making to your own users. A tool that wires up real auth and payments this easily is also a tool where a misconfigured default could expose more than you intended, and there's no public track record yet to lean on. What builders should do next. Don't take the pricing page's numbers as your numbers. Build one small but real feature end to end, entirely inside the free tier: a login screen using Sign in with Apple plus one saved user record. Track two things while you do it: how many corrections you have to make to get the auth flow actually working, and how much of the free credit allowance that single feature consumes before you'd need to pay. That tells you whether the $20 Builder plan, on top of a ChatGPT subscription you already have, is worth it for your specific project, instead of relying on Dactyl's own comparison to other native app builders. Where this fits. Dactyl is one more entry in a pattern worth watching rather than a single product worth ranking: AI app builders are increasingly competing on how close their output gets to real, exportable native code instead of a wrapped web view, and on whether they resell AI usage or let you bring your own subscription. Both choices affect what you can actually ship and what happens to your project if the tool disappears. Judge any builder, this one included, by what you can walk away with, not by what the demo shows. End of article BuilderWithin Weekly · Free If you found this useful, subscribe free. Get BuilderWithin Weekly in your inbox. Daily briefings publish on the site, and the weekly roundup pulls together what mattered. Unsubscribe any time. BuilderWithin Weekly · Free · No spam Get BuilderWithin Weekly in your inbox. One weekly roundup in your inbox. Daily briefings publish on the site for people who ship products. Unsubscribe any time · Weekly email, always free
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
We update Deno's jobs every few hours, so check again soon!Browse all jobs
Industries
Company Size
51-200
Company Stage
Series A
Total Funding
$25.9M
Headquarters
New York City, New York
Founded
2019
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
We update Deno's jobs every few hours, so check again soon!Browse all jobs