Flock Safety

Flock Safety

License plate reader network with privacy.

Overview

Flock Safety provides a network of license plate reader cameras and a supporting operating system to prevent crime while protecting privacy. In practice, customers such as neighborhoods, businesses, and law enforcement agencies install the cameras which collect vehicle data, and the accompanying software analyzes this data using machine learning to identify leads and resolve incidents. The system emphasizes objective evidence and aims to minimize bias and privacy intrusion by design, differentiating it from competitors that may rely on more invasive or opaque surveillance methods. Revenue comes from subscription fees for installation, maintenance, and ongoing access to data, analytics, and updates. The company's goal is to offer a scalable, ethical public-safety solution that helps prevent crime and build trust between civilians and law enforcement across many cities.

YC Company

About Flock Safety

Simplify's Rating
Why Flock Safety is rated
C-
Rated B on Competitive Edge
Rated D+ on Growth Potential
Rated D+ on Differentiation

Industries

Data & Analytics

Government & Public Sector

Enterprise Software

AI & Machine Learning

Company Size

1,001-5,000

Company Stage

Late Stage VC

Total Funding

$857.8M

Headquarters

Atlanta, Georgia

Founded

2017

Get referred to Flock Safety

Find people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • Drone integration with AirSight enables rapid operator identification via nearby plate readers by mid-2026.
  • Flock Aerodome DAS launched in late 2025 expands revenue into energy and retail sectors.
  • NDAA-compliant Alpha drone system entered law enforcement Early Access in early 2026.

What critics are saying

  • LAPD suspended 138 cameras in July 2026 over privacy, risking 70–90% contract loss in 0–3 months.
  • Fort Collins, Grand Chute, UW-Madison terminated contracts by June 2026 due to privacy backlash.
  • California class action alleging illegal ICE data sharing faces 60–80% probability of High impact in 6–12 months.

What makes Flock Safety unique

  • Flock operates 5,000+ communities scanning 20 billion vehicles monthly as of 2025.
  • Its FlockOS unifies ALPR, drone, and PTZ data for real-time pilot-to-plate correlation.
  • It offers maintenance-free, subscription-based ALPR cameras trusted across 1,000+ cities.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Funding

Total Funding

$857.8M

Above

Industry Average

Funded Over

10 Rounds

Late VC funding comparison data is currently unavailable. We're working to provide this information soon!
Late VC Funding Comparison
Coming Soon

Benefits

Unlimited PTO

12 paid holidays

Fully-paid health benefits

16 weeks of parental leave

Work from home allowance

Learning & development stipend

Home office stipend

Growth & Insights and Company News

Headcount

6 month growth

0%

1 year growth

2%

2 year growth

1%
Century City - Westwood News
Jul 11th, 2026
LAPD ends neighborhood camera surveillance contract with Flock over privacy backlash.

LAPD ends neighborhood camera surveillance contract with Flock over privacy backlash. Public opposition forces a freeze on neighborhood camera feeds while city officials demand tighter privacy rules. The Los Angeles Police Department is ending its access to a controversial network of neighborhood surveillance cameras this weekend after a wave of public pushback over privacy rights, as reported by ABC Eyewitness News. The department's data-sharing agreement with Flock Safety expires Saturday. Under the deal, the LAPD did not own the roadway cameras. Instead, private groups, developers, and homeowners' associations bought the hardware and gave police access to the license plate data and vehicle photos collected on public streets. While some neighborhood groups initially welcomed the technology to deter crime, local residents and privacy advocates heavily criticized the lack of oversight and long data-retention windows. LAPD officials admitted that these community privacy concerns directly drove the decision to let the contract expire. LAPD's chief information officer, Dean Gialamas, told ABC Eyewitness News,"This contract is not being renewed because of serious concerns around civil liberties and civil rights issues, particularly around privacy and the data that is being collected from these cameras. The LAPD had to make a difficult decision, in this case discontinuing using Flock services until we can get those data, privacy, security and sharing concerns ironed out through a contractual relationship." The ACLU has expressed concerns about Flock Safety giving access to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and Homeland Security (DHS) while not being upfront about the data sharing. In Pasadena, Texas a police sargeant resigned while he was under an internal investigation for for allegedly using data from Flock Safety automatic license plate readers to monitor a a female officer's whereabouts. Because private entities own the physical cameras, it is unclear if the devices will keep recording after Saturday, but the data will no longer stream to police databases. The LAPD is still talking with Flock Safety about a potential new contract, but police leaders say they will not sign anything unless the company agrees to strict new rules regarding data storage limits and explicit privacy protections.

Vine Cinema & Alehouse
Jul 4th, 2026
County supervisors extend Flock contract for 18 months.

County supervisors extend Flock contract for 18 months. Tuesday's 3-2 vote will extend the contract until December 2027 at a cost of $2.4 million. The Alameda County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday approved an 18-month contract extension with surveillance infrastructure company Flock Safety for the use of law enforcement technology, including automated license plate reader cameras, in the county's unincorporated communities. Police departments use ALPR cameras to investigate crimes like stolen vehicles. However, privacy watchdogs have raised concerns about federal agencies being able to access the camera data - a potential violation of state law - and using it for targeted surveillance of immigrants and other vulnerable groups. The contract also extends the use of pan-tilt-zoom cameras that do not record license plates but are used for police investigations, drones that can be deployed as first responders to gather information, and investigative software, all of which are sold by Flock Safety. The Alameda County Sheriff's Office brought forth the proposal, calling it a "bridge" contract to ensure that officers have access to essential surveillance technology while the county develops a new request for proposals to find an alternative service provider. Earlier in April, the supervisors had temporarily extended the contract, which expired last summer, until Tuesday. Now, Tuesday's 3-2 vote will extend the contract until December 2027 at a cost of $2.4 million. This new contract will also unify the three Flock Safety technologies - ALPR cameras, PTZ cameras, and drones - into one contract after they were previously governed by three different contracts. In his presentation, sheriff's Sgt. Fenton Culley said that this contract would merely extend the services and technology that the department already uses and are vital components of the "Real Time Information Center," which helps officers spot and respond to crime using various cameras and drones. Culley emphasized that the contract prohibits Flock Safety from sharing any of the county's data with federal or out-of-state agencies like U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security, or Customs and Border Protection. He also pointed out that since many other law enforcement agencies in the Bay Area also use Flock Safety surveillance tools, the unincorporated communities would become a haven for criminals if these technologies were discontinued. Police departments in Oakland, Richmond, and Berkeley have extended their contracts with Flock Safety since December 2025. Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez asked the supervisors to approve the extension to ensure that her department can function to the best of its ability, adding that her department had conducted extensive community outreach to accommodate public input into the new contract. "I'm working as a good partner, where does that partnership come in from the other side?" asked Sanchez. During an hour-long public comment period, community members spoke both in support of and in opposition to the contract. Proponents said that at a time when police departments are facing staffing crises, tools like ALPR cameras are essential to maintain public safety; in his presentation, Culley cited specific homicide, child sexual assault, and robbery cases in the last three months that officers could crack because of Flock Safety tools. On the other hand, opponents raised concerns about Flock Safety's history of working with federal immigration agencies in the past and its vulnerabilities in keeping ALPR data secure. During deliberations, Supervisors Nikki Fortunato Bas and Elisa Marquez asked for more time to consider the contract and make the data privacy clauses more secure. "I had only two business days to review it [the contract], as did the rest of the public," said Fortunato Bas. "We have to do our due diligence." But Supervisors David Haubert and Nate Miley said that the public safety benefits of having Flock Safety tools in the unincorporated communities of the county outweigh the potential dangers. "These cameras are meant to keep us safe," said Haubert. "I don't believe that they're widely used by ICE." Finally, during the vote, Supervisor Lena Tam sided with Miley and Haubert, while Fortunato Bas and Marquez voted against the contract, resulting in a 3-2 split vote for the extension. In a news release issued Wednesday, Flock Safety's senior director of public affairs Trevor Chandler said that in the county's unincorporated areas, Flock ALPR cameras helped make 60 arrests, recover 53 stolen vehicles, and apprehend a murder suspect within 24 hours in 2025. "We heard the concerns raised by residents throughout this process and will continue working with the county to strengthen the safeguards, audit controls, and oversight that keep this system accountable to the people it serves," Chandler said. - Story by Tanay Gokhale, Bay City News

1310 KFKA
Jun 17th, 2026
Flock cameras out in fort Collins.

Flock cameras out in fort Collins. Fort Collins City Council has voted to immediately cancel its contract with Flock Safety, ending the city's participation in the company's automated license plate reader system. The 6-1 vote during a June 16 council meeting follows six months of public pushback on the use of the system. The Coloradoan reports council passed several directives impacting the operation, including immediate cessation of Flock data collection, expeditious removal of all cameras and a halt on seeking new bids for similar technology until a comprehensive citywide surveillance policy is established.

Southern Worldwide Logistics
Jun 2nd, 2026
Amazon sued over Ring facial recognition technology.

Amazon sued over Ring facial recognition technology. admin June 2, 2026 SouthernWorldwide.com - A lawsuit has been filed against Amazon, alleging privacy violations due to the facial recognition capabilities of its Ring video doorbell software. The plaintiff, Charles Sigwalt, a resident of Virginia, claims that Ring's "Familiar Faces" feature, which utilizes facial recognition technology, captures and stores images of individuals without their explicit consent. Sigwalt filed the lawsuit in a Seattle federal court, asserting that the "Familiar Faces" feature scans anyone passing by the Ring camera. It then employs artificial intelligence to categorize these individuals. According to the complaint, the system creates a "face print" that enables re-identification of the person. The lawsuit is seeking class-action status. "When plaintiffs and class members entered the homes and businesses of places which had Ring cameras that deployed Familiar Faces, they did not consent to have their privacy rights violated at the entrance way," the suit states. Sigwalt contends that Ring collected his facial recognition data without any prior warning, specifically while he was visiting friends and family members. He believes that Amazon continues to retain his biometric data. Amazon has not provided any comment regarding the lawsuit. The "Familiar Faces" feature was introduced by Ring in September 2025. It was marketed as a tool to provide Ring doorbell camera owners with more personalized alerts, such as identifying specific individuals like "John at Front Door" instead of a generic "Person at Front Door" notification. Ring's website states that the camera learns to recognize frequent visitors, including friends and family, over time. Users have the option to enable or disable this feature, according to Ring. Organizations such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation have voiced strong opposition to the "Familiar Faces" feature, arguing that it infringes upon personal privacy. The group has warned that the collected biometric data could be exploited for mass surveillance or be compromised in the event of a data breach. Senator Edward Markey of Massachusetts has also been a vocal critic of the "Familiar Faces" technology. He has highlighted concerns that the feature could be used to record biometric data of individuals who have not consented to have their faces scanned. Amazon has faced previous legal challenges concerning its Ring product. In 2023, the Federal Trade Commission initiated a lawsuit alleging that Amazon provided employees and contractors with access to customer videos recorded by Ring. The FTC also claimed that the company failed to adequately secure customer data, which led to instances of hackers threatening or making sexual propositions to Ring owners. Amazon reached a settlement in that case, agreeing to pay $5.8 million. More recently, Amazon terminated a partnership with the security technology company Flock Safety. This decision followed public backlash over a Ring commercial aired during the Super Bowl, which raised concerns about potential unwanted surveillance. Amazon acquired Ring, the video doorbell company, in 2018 for $1 billion. Post Views: 19

RootsAction
May 21st, 2026
Re: perry-garcía Amendment to ban Flock automatic license plate readers.

Re: perry-garcía Amendment to ban Flock automatic license plate readers. by Demand Progress on May 21, 2026 RootsAction is a signer of this letter to The Honorable Sam Graves The Honorable Rick Larsen, Chairman and Ranking Member, Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure Dear Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen: Rootsaction urge the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure to support Rep. Scott Perry and Rep. Chuy García's amendment to the Highway Bill that would restrict the use of automatic license plate readers except for tolling purposes. The rapid growth of this surveillance technology in recent years, led in large part by the company Flock Safety, poses a serious threat to the privacy, civil liberties, and constitutional rights of Americans. Americans' concerns about government surveillance reach back to the Founding itself. The Founders were well aware of the powers and risks of an almighty government with unrestricted surveillance powers. That is why they formulated the Fourth Amendment to protect Rootsaction from unreasonable searches, and modern courts have found that automated license plate recognition (ALPR) technology can be unreasonable. Surveillance infrastructure like this does not stay within the uses its architects intend, and when it expands, it is people of faith, political minorities, and communities already subject to over-policing who bear the consequences first. In this 250th year since the Founding, Rootsaction must put freedom first. Today, Flock Safety contracts with more than 5,000 law enforcement agencies and operates over 80,000 AI-powered cameras across 49 states. These cameras photograph every vehicle that passes, regardless of any suspicion of wrongdoing. All the data collected - license plate data, vehicle descriptions, location, and time - are stored, and a majority of that data is in a centralized, searchable national database that is accessible to law enforcement on demand without court approval. And while Flock is the largest and most aggressive operator, these concerns apply to ALPR technology industry wide as any system that photographs every passing vehicle, stores that data, and makes it searchable by law enforcement without court approval poses the same fundamental threats to privacy and civil liberties. Flock Safety's automatic license plate reader technology has expanded in recent years to become a mass domestic surveillance tool. Flock introduced AI analytics products that shift the company from providing tools for officials to use in existing investigations to proactively generating suspicion that rises to the level of warranting an investigation. Flock technology scans the movement patterns of all vehicles in its national dataset and alerts law enforcement if it perceives movements as suspicious or criminal. The "Convoy Search" feature allows police to track vehicles frequently seen together, enabling the surveillance of Americans' free associations even without existing suspicion of criminal activity. Flock also launched live video feeds on its cameras, a significant expansion beyond the still-image capture that was used to justify the technology to communities when they considered adopting it in the first place. Flock's data-sharing practices have also raised local concerns. Town officials in Hillsborough, North Carolina canceled their contract with Flock, citing concerns about data privacy. The contract included language that could be interpreted as allowing Flock to disclose data to any government entity or third party based on a "good faith belief" of a need to do so. In California, the state attorney general sued the City of El Cajon after discovering that Flock's system had facilitated data sharing with agencies in hundreds of outside jurisdictions, in violation of state privacy law. A Colorado resident who was investigated without cause using Flock surveillance footage was told by the law enforcement official, "You can't get a breath of fresh air in or out without us knowing." The system's security vulnerabilities present additional serious privacy concerns. In 2025, at least 60 of Flock's AI-powered surveillance cameras were found exposed online without password protection, allowing anyone with a link to watch live feeds and access up to 30 days of archived video, including footage of unattended children on a playground, which shows that Flock is no longer just about road traffic. Flock cameras can be physically compromised in seconds with exposed USB ports, hardcoded Wi-Fi network names, unencrypted image storage, and no two-factor authentication required for the police portal used to access sensitive data. In November, Sen. Wyden and Rep. Krishnamoorthi urged the Federal Trade Commission to investigate Flock for failing to implement adequate cybersecurity protections. At least 53 cities across 20 states have terminated or rejected Flock camera usage, with many citing privacy concerns and the risks of a system over which they have little meaningful control. As the FBI prepares to spend $36 million on a nationwide license plate reader system capable of tracking any vehicle in "near real time," it is more critical than ever that Congress shields Americans from being subjected to warrantless, suspicionless tracking of their everyday lives. Reps. Perry and Garcia's amendment offers a direct solution to invasive surveillance practices: restricting the use of automatic license plate readers except for the purpose of tolling. Rootsaction urge Members of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure to support this critical step in protecting the privacy rights of all Americans. Sincerely, 18 MILLION RISING Access Now Advocacy for Principled Action in Government American Civil Liberties Union Americans For Prosperity Amnesty International USA Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC Black Voters Matter Fund Common Cause Consumer Choice Center Consumer Federation of America Defending Rights & Dissent Deflock Olympia Demand Progress Due Process Institute Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) Fight for the Future Free Press Action Holy Spirit Missionary Sisters, USA-JPIC Japanese American Citizens League Libertas Institute Long Beach Alliance for Clean Energy Lucy Parsons Labs Make the Road States Mass 50501 Muslims for Just Futures National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers National Association of Voice Actors (NAVA) National Tongan American Society Northwest Indivisible Oakland Privacy PFLAG Skagit Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability Restore the Fourth RootsAction Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund (SALDEF) Thai Community Development Center (Thai CDC) The Alliance for Secure AI The Nexus of Privacy The Workers Circle Wisconsin Muslim Civic Alliance UnidosUS cc: Members of the Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure

Recently Posted Jobs

Sign up to get curated job recommendations

Flock Safety is Hiring for 40 Jobs on Simplify!

Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today

Don't see your dream role? Check out thousands of other roles on Simplify. Browse all jobs →