PLOS

PLOS

Nonprofit open-access science publisher

Overview

PLOS is a nonprofit publisher of scientific journals that makes research freely available to everyone. Its products are open-access journals, where scientists submit articles, researchers review them, and accepted papers are published online with freely accessible licenses. The process works through author submission, peer review, and publication, with articles funded by article processing charges paid by authors or their funders, rather than by readers through subscriptions. PLOS differs from many competitors by not charging readers and by being governed as a nonprofit that aims to make science openly accessible, often using Creative Commons licenses. Its goal is to speed up scientific discovery by removing access barriers and sharing results widely for researchers, educators, and the public.

About PLOS

Simplify's Rating
Why PLOS is rated
C+
Rated B on Competitive Edge
Rated B on Growth Potential
Rated D+ on Differentiation

Industries

Data & Analytics

Education

Company Size

501-1,000

Company Stage

N/A

Total Funding

N/A

Headquarters

null

Founded

2000

Get referred to PLOS

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • The June 2026 Gates collection attracts public-health funders and implementation researchers.
  • The September 24, 2025 Uganda meeting expands PLOS's policy and institutional relationships.
  • CLOCKSS preservation and open-science partnerships strengthen PLOS's institutional buyer case.

What critics are saying

  • PLOS still depends on foundation-funded experiments from Gates, Moore, and RWJF.
  • If APC replacement economics fail by 2027, PLOS loses publisher-scale relevance.
  • Elsevier and Springer Nature can outspend PLOS on platform, distribution, and acquisitions.

What makes PLOS unique

  • PLOS built 20-plus years of open-access credibility and editorial trust.
  • PLOS launched the Gates Foundation wastewater collection on June 12, 2026.
  • PLOS is piloting APC-free publishing models through 2024–2026 foundation grants.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

Health Insurance

Dental Insurance

Vision Insurance

Life Insurance

Disability Insurance

401(k) Company Match

Paid Vacation

Paid Sick Leave

Paid Holidays

Unlimited Paid Time Off

Remote Work Options

Hybrid Work Options

Family Planning Benefits

Wellness Program

Company News

PLOS
Jul 10th, 2026
Connection and collaboration at EACR 2026.

Connection and collaboration at EACR 2026. In June 2026, PLOS One senior editor Jenny Tucker traveled to Budapest for the European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) Congress, which brought together the global cancer research community to discuss important research topics and recent progress, including the importance of patient involvement in research, improved understanding of mechanisms underlying aberrant cellular behavior in cancer, and the role of immune cells and inflammation in driving disease progression. With over 2400 attendees from more than 70 different countries, EACR 2026 showcased scientific excellence from diverse researchers who share the goal of accelerating progress against cancer. The scientific programme included high impact keynote lectures, symposia, poster sessions, early career scientist forums and dedicated industry workshops on new technologies, alongside an engaging "Meet the Editors" panel, and an evening networking session to encourage connection between attendees. Outside of the symposia, attendees were able to browse over 1300 posters, with dedicated time to speak to the presenting researchers and build new connections. EACR 2026 also hosted an extensive exhibition from over 120 vendors, spanning from contract research organizations and biotechnology companies to gene editing and model development outsource companies, to support research and display new technologies for the advancement of scientific research. Relevant cancer research organizations and publishers were also present, to discuss the focal themes of importance with the research community and to understand how to continue supporting the dissemination of their research findings. A returning and central theme present through many sessions was the importance of the patient in cancer research, for those in pre-clinical and laboratory-based work as well as clinicians. In recent years there has been a growing dedication to patient-centric care in line with the World Cancer Day focus of the unique experiences of each individual with cancer. Marisol Soengas presented on the importance of patient involvement in cancer research, sharing her perspectives as both a cancer researcher and a patient. She is spear-heading the formation of the EACR patient involvement and outreach group to communicate science to patients, and to facilitate a forum for patient feedback, as her own experiences highlighted disparities between the clinically defined thresholds and what patients may truly consider tolerable treatment side effects. This exciting work includes a number of strategies to improve two-way communication with patient communities, and to consider how their input may influence the development of future policies. Cancer cachexia, a major challenge for patients which can directly impact quality of end of life experience was also threaded through the talks; Ayelet Erez presented work which demonstrates how early detection of patients at higher risk of developing cachexia may allow for earlier intervention, whilst Che Wei Wang demonstrated the ability of HP1α-overexpression to restore muscle function. Declaration of the return, and planned retention, of the 'bench to bedside and back' session was met with enthusiasm, as this session explores the development of translational advances, their implementation in clinical settings, and the backwards flow of their clinical success to inform future research. This session included sharing challenges in the development of successful therapies, and reminded researchers to hold onto hope, because even failures can be crucial in discovering future success. Connection and collaboration were key themes in EACR's program, with coffee breaks encouraging connectedness between attendees, and the introduction of a new EACR-Worldwide Cancer Research Collaboration Fellowships to support international research visits that grow out of connections made at the EACR Congress 2026 further supports this focus. The financial award is intended to nurture collaborations, whether the goal is to exchange skills and expertise, carry out a focused short-term project, or lay the groundwork for a joint grant. proposal. The cancer prevention symposium included strong talks from researchers reflecting on successes and ongoing challenges in preventative strategies, including the funding barriers and feasibility of precision prevention programs. Timothy Beck discussed both population and precision based approaches to cancer prevention, reflecting on some successes (eg. smoking cessation campaigns and HPV vaccination) whilst considering the challenges of precision-based strategies, due to the latency for effect, the challenge defining endpoints (ie. the absence of cancer development), and the funding issues which prevention trials face. He also discussed recent advances in technologies, such as liquid biopsies and early multicancer detection strategies such as the Pathfinder-2 and NHS Galleri trials, and the challenges balancing commercial interests with prevention goals. Paolo Vines presented on cancer prevention in the context of planetary health, with conversation focused on how planetary boundaries of health can have implications for cancer risk, and strategies which reduce these burdens may be advantageous for both the planet and its human population. Caroline Dive outlined some of the obstacles of biomarker translation from discovery into clinical application, introducing many attendees to the so called "biomarker valley of death" which sits between publications of putative biomarkers and those which are actually implemented in clinical settings. She shared three success stories in biomarker identification and implementation, highlighting how improved understanding of cancer evolution can provide new translational opportunities for therapy development. There was great diversity in the topics covered by symposia, with some themes continued from last years program, including brain tumors, genomic changes, the immune system in cancer, and cancer prevention. There were also new session themes which included novel cancer models in which there was great presentation of work across non-standard animal models, improving understanding of cancer prevention strategies across species, and comparing functions to better understand increased cancer risks. Impressive findings from sessions included novel autophagic processes which modulate micronuclei and potential chromosomal changes which may contribute to aberrant cellular processing and drive tumour formation or metastasis, generation of an organoid biobank which provides advances in ex vivo modelling from patient samples, and distinctions in cellular behaviour and physiological protective functions in young and aged populations which supports the need for personalised therapeutic approaches as cancer cell behaviour is distinct across different age groups. The speakers in all sessions were passionate, knowledgable and enthusiastic in sharing their work. Whilst some gaps in its understanding of cancer remain, this community is excited and intrigued to keep finding pieces of the puzzle, to progress its understanding of cancer and the underlying cellular mechanisms which may inform future preventative and treatment strategies. From speaking to researchers, it was also clear that the exhibitors really listen to this community, and not only wish to promote their products and services but also to understand where there are gaps in their offerings. One such example is the unmet need for cancer cell lines to support improved understanding of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer in specific ethnicities, due to limited availability of relevant cancer cell lines from a European provider. This exhibitor positively responded to requests to improve and diversify their offerings, to meet researcher needs and better serve the cancer research community. It was also very encouraging to see engagement with open science practices, including the use of pre-print servers, data repositories for data sharing and code sharing throughout the talks. As PLOS champions open science initiatives, it was encouraging to see the cancer research community value these practices to share their work.

PLOS
Jun 12th, 2026
A new Gates Foundation collection in PLOS on Wastewater & Environmental Surveillance in Low-Resource Settings.

A new Gates Foundation collection in PLOS on Wastewater & Environmental Surveillance in Low-Resource Settings. PLOS GmbH is excited to announce the publication of a new Collection across several PLOS journals in partnership with the Gates Foundation, including a range of interdisciplinary research on the topic of Wastewater & Environmental Surveillance in Low-Resource Settings. The Collection, led by Supriya Kumar (Gates Foundation, USA) and Kerrigan McCarthy (National Institute for Communicable Diseases, South Africa), features several articles covering topical areas such as methods and tools for wastewater and environmental surveillance (WES) of pathogens, modeling and frameworks for WES, implementation of WES across low-middle- income countries and low-resource settings, as well as standards for WES data collection and sharing. Wastewater & Environmental Surveillance in Low-Resource Settings collection. Kanyerezi S, Guerfali FZ, Anzaku AA, Babaleye OA, Calvert-Joshua T, Nguinkal JA, et al. (2024) Wastewater metagenomics in Africa: Opportunities and challenges. PLOS Glob Public Health 4(12): e0004044. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004044 Badizadegan K, Thompson KM (2025) Characterization of environmental and clinical surveillance inputs to support prospective integrated modeling of the polio endgame. PLOS Glob Public Health 5(2): e0004168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004168 Mvundura M, Ngwira LG, Shrestha KB, Tuladhar R, Gauld J, Kerr C, et al. (2025) Cost-effectiveness of wastewater-based environmental surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 in Blantyre, Malawi and Kathmandu, Nepal: A model-based study. PLOS Glob Public Health 5(4): e0004439. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004439 Msomi NS, Levy JI, Matteson NL, Ndlovu N, Ntuli P, Baer A, et al. (2025) Wastewater-integrated pathogen surveillance dashboards enable real-time, transparent, and interpretable public health risk assessment and dissemination. PLOS Glob Public Health 5(5): e0004443. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004443 Daroch N, Kannan SK, Srikantaiah V, Mishra R, Ishtiaq F (2025) Respiratory virus infection dynamics and genomic surveillance to detect seasonal influenza subtypes in wastewater: A longitudinal study in Bengaluru, India. PLOS Glob Public Health 5(9): e0004640. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004640 Athreya S, Ishtiaq F, Khandelwal T, Pattabiraman C, Rao L, Sundaresan R, et al. (2026) Localized wastewater surveillance showed correlation but no early warning during Bengaluru's Omicron wave. PLOS Glob Public Health 6(4): e0004684. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004684 Siko JEE, Dahmer KJ, Manoharan ZZ, Muthukumar A, Amato HK, LeBoa C, et al. (2025) Environmental surveillance of soil-transmitted helminths and other enteric pathogens in settings without networked wastewater infrastructure. PLOS Water 4(1): e0000337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000337 Yapi EAM, Mossoun AM, Zan-Bi TT, Dindé AO, Gossé LG, Vakou SN, et al. (2025) Expanding access to wastewater surveillance beyond sewered networks: Effectiveness of active and passive sampling of waste effluent streams in Côte d'Ivoire. PLOS Water 4(6): e0000290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000290 Manuel M, Amato HK, Pilotte N, Chieng B, Araka SB, Siko JEE, et al. (2024) Soil surveillance for monitoring soil-transmitted helminths: Method development and field testing in three countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 18(9): e0012416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012416 Uzzell CB, Gray E, Rigby J, Troman CM, Diness Y, Mkwanda C, et al. (2024) Environmental surveillance for Salmonella Typhi in rivers and wastewater from an informal sewage network in Blantyre, Malawi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 18(9): e0012518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012518 Abraham D, Kathiresan L, Sasikumar M, Aiemjoy K, Charles RC, Kumar D, et al. (2025) Wastewater surveillance for Salmonella Typhi and its association with seroincidence of enteric fever in Vellore, India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 19(3): e0012373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012373 Troman C, Horsfield ST, Abraham D, Mohan VR, Giri S, Nair S, et al. (2025) Determining genotype and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella Typhi in environmental samples by amplicon sequencing. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 19(7): e0013211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013211 Rigby J, Wilson CN, Zuza A, Diness Y, Mkwanda C, Tonthola K, et al. (2025) Diversity of Salmonella enterica isolates from urban river and sewage water in Blantyre, Malawi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 19(9): e0012413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012413 Impalli I, Bergland E, Saad-Roy CM, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Larsson DGJ, et al. (2025) Optimal sampling frequency and site selection for wastewater and environmental surveillance of infectious pathogens: A value of information assessment. PLoS Comput Biol 21(6): e1013190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013190 Maree G, Els F, Naidoo Y, Naidoo L, Mahamuza P, Macheke M, et al. (2025) Wastewater surveillance overcomes socio-economic limitations of laboratory-based surveillance when monitoring disease transmission: The South African experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE 20(2): e0311332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311332 Owusu M, Darko E, Akortia D, Nkrumah G, Twumasi-Ankrah S, Owusu-Ansah M, et al. (2025) Evaluation of Moore and grab sampling method for Salmonella Typhi detection in environmental samples in Ghana. PLoS ONE 20(2): e0318840. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318840

Training Centre in Communication (TCC Africa)
Mar 31st, 2026
The Role of Open Science and Science Diplomacy in AI Advancement.

The Role of Open Science and Science Diplomacy in AI Advancement. Kigali, Rwanda - 31st March, 2026 -The Training Centre in Communication (TCC Africa), and the Public Library of Science (PLOS) hosted a high-level plenary session on "The Role of Open Science and Science Diplomacy in Global and Regional AI Advancement" on Day 2 of the 4th EAC Regional STI Conference - AI4EAC 2026. Joy Owango, Executive Director of TCC Africa making the keynote presentation The plenary session was moderated by Nicole Mulaku, Program Officer at the Training Centre in Communication (TCC Africa), opened with a keynote by Joy Owango, Executive Director of TCC Africa, who emphasized that Africa must move from being a consumer of AI technologies to an active contributor. She emphasized that Africa must transition from being a consumer of AI technologies to an active contributor in shaping AI systems and governance frameworks. She highlighted the importance of open research infrastructure, collaborative frameworks, and regional partnerships as foundational elements for inclusive AI development. She further underscored TCC Africa's ongoing efforts to strengthen open research ecosystems through initiatives such as the Africa PID Alliance and HospitiumRIS, which enhance research visibility, interoperability, and equitable access to knowledge. Panel Discussion (L-R): Dr. Henry Waruhiu (ESAMI), Joy Owango (TCC Africa), Nicole Mulaku (TCC Africa), and On Screen Christian Kohl (PLOS) during the plenary session at AI4EAC 2026 in Kigali. The plenary featured a keynote presentation by Joy Owango, Executive Director of TCC Africa followed by a panel discussion with: Dr. Henry Waruhiu - Director Research and Management Consultancy. Eastern and Southern African Management Institute (ESAMI). He highlighted the importance of structured science diplomacy frameworks that ensure meaningful participation of emerging economies in global AI governance. He emphasized the need for stronger alignment between scientific expertise, policy-making, and diplomacy, alongside targeted capacity-building to support equitable participation in AI ecosystems. Mr.Christian Kohl -Director of Technology and Engineering. Public Library of Science (PLOS). He emphasized the role of publishers and knowledge platforms in enabling equitable access to scientific information. He highlighted how collaborative and open research models can strengthen knowledge exchange across institutions and regions while ensuring that local expertise is recognized and integrated into global AI conversations. Ms. Joy Owango - Executive Director. Training Centre in Communication (TCC Africa). In her panel contribution, Joy Owango focused on how open access, open data, and collaborative research models can democratize participation in AI development. She highlighted TCC Africa's work in building open research infrastructure through the Africa PID Alliance and Hospitium, stressing that such systems are essential for improving research visibility, interoperability, and inclusive participation in AI ecosystems. The discussion emphasized the importance of collaborative research, knowledge sharing, and policy alignment in fostering innovation ecosystems that support AI advancement at both regional and global levels. The session concluded with a strong call for increased regional cooperation, investment in open infrastructure, and the adoption of Open Science practices to ensure AI development is inclusive, ethical, and aligned with Africa's priorities.

PLOS
Mar 13th, 2026
The Economic Benefits of Open Science

The economic benefits of Open Science Executive Summary. March 2026 | Reading time 6 minutes Authors: Cristina Rosemberg, Aphra Murray, Alexander Holmes, Shrishti Kajaria Commissioned by PLOS Acknowledgement: We thank Rob Johnson (Research Consulting) for his constructive review of this work. Context: PLOS Redefining Publishing. This report is an output of PLOS's Redefining Publishing program, supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The program explores how scholarly communication can evolve to better support Open Science at scale, including moving beyond the article by recognizing a wider range of research contributions and identifying more sustainable financial models to support them. As part of this work, PLOS commissioned the Technopolis Group to provide an independent study on the economic benefits of Open Science to clarify where economic value is created in an Open Science ecosystem, what conditions enable it, and where structural barriers and cost pressures remain. Executive Summary. This report examines the economic implications of Open Science and what it would mean to move towards a research ecosystem in which research elements, including data, code, software, workflows, methods, and publications, are openly shared and valued. Because the Open Science ecosystem is vast and the ambition of this work is necessarily system-wide, the study focuses on the components most likely to yield actionable insight: (1) a rapid evidence assessment to bring together dispersed economic evidence into an actionable evidence base, and (2) a set of illustrative case studies to demonstrate how value is created in practice across different types of open outputs and infrastructures. The study focused on three key areas: * Understanding the impacts of migrating to an OS ecosystem in which all types of research outputs are valued. * Exploring the costs of such a transition for the scholarly communication ecosystem. * Evaluating the variety of economic impacts arising from an Open Science transition. To ensure the findings reflect the breadth of Open Science beyond publications alone, the study includes five illustrative case studies spanning digital collections, computational workflows, open-source software, an open large language model, and open training resources. These were selected to represent different pathways to value, including efficiency, innovation, and human-capital benefits, and different patterns of cost and responsibility across the ecosystem (see Section 4 and Appendix C). Findings. Open Science delivers significant economic benefits when it enables reuse at scale The most consistent and measurable benefits arise through efficiency gains Open infrastructures enable innovation and downstream spillover value Network effects mean Open Science benefits can compound over time Costs are unevenly distributed across stakeholders, creating barriers to scale The economic value of Open Science is systematically underestimated Closing summary. Taken together, the evidence assessment and case studies show that the economic case for Open Science lies in its ability to enable reuse of research outputs at scale. When Open Science is implemented in ways that support reuse through appropriate infrastructure, incentives, and coordination, the sharing of data, code, software, workflows, methods, and publications can deliver measurable efficiency gains, support innovation, and strengthen long-term economic performance. The findings in this report provide a robust evidence base that supports the value of a transition toward Open Science and helps clarify where economic value is created and where barriers remain. The full report sets out the underlying methods and case study results in detail and provides the evidence underpinning each point in this Executive Summary, supporting deeper exploration of the analysis and sources. As an output of PLOS's Redefining Publishing program, this analysis underscores the value of system-level change beyond the article and provides a strong foundation for the next phase of the program. If you'd like to stay updated about our progress, please provide your details here.

Training Centre in Communication (TCC Africa)
Nov 28th, 2025
Uganda Hosts Landmark Open Science Stakeholders' Meeting

Uganda hosts landmark Open Science Stakeholders' Meeting. The Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST), Training Centre in Communication (TCC Africa), Makerere University, and the Public Library of Science (PLOS) co-convened the Uganda Open Science Stakeholders' Meeting on 24th September 2025 at the College of Computing and Information Sciences, Makerere University. The partnership between the Training Centre in Communication (TCC Africa), the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST), and the Public Library of Science (PLOS) began in 2023 with the shared goal of advancing Open Science in Uganda through advocacy, policy engagement, and capacity building. As part of this collaboration, the partners co-developed the Uganda Open Science Stakeholder Mapping Survey, which was rolled out in July 2025 to assess the national Open Science landscape, identify key actors, and uncover existing gaps and opportunities for coordinated action. Insights from the survey informed the Uganda Open Science Stakeholders' Meeting, held on 24th September 2025. The blended meeting brought together a diverse group of representatives across Uganda's Open Science landscape - from government, academia, libraries,and international partners - all united by a shared vision: to strengthen the foundations of Open Science in Uganda. The meeting marked a critical step in advancing national efforts to build an enabling environment for Open Science. Key objectives included: * Presenting the findings of the Uganda Open Science Stakeholder Analysis. * Facilitating dialogue among stakeholders to align priorities and identify synergies. * Exploring pathways towards a National Open Science Roadmap or Policy. * Promoting knowledge exchange and collaboration across institutions and sectors. Speakers included leaders and representatives from Makerere University, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST), East Africa Science and Technology Commission(EASTECO), the Ministry of Education (Kenya), Uganda Library and Information Association (ULIA), African Institute For Capacity Development (AICAD), PLOS, Research and Education Network for Uganda (RENU), Consortium of Uganda University Libraries (CUUL). "So when we started the conversation, we realized that open science cuts across the ecosystem, whether you're talking about private sector, ministries, departments and agencies. Open science is open, It is actually in every percent of our life." Dr. Martin Ongol, Acting Executive Secretary of the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST) "These are the foundational conversations we need to have on adopting open science, such that by the time you have the policies, you have all these systems set in place that can aid in the implementation." Joy Owango, Executive Director of the Training Centre in Communication (TCC Africa) "I think that we need to have more and these collaborators need to work with libraries specifically on how to integrate libraries into the National Open Science roadmap, specifically on the policy." Dr. Fredrick Lugya, University Librarian at Busitema University and President of the Uganda Library and Information Association (ULIA) "PLOS supports the leadership shown by the Ugandan authorities and their growing efforts to engage all stakeholders in shaping open science solutions that support researchers and promote a more transparent, inclusive, and equitable scientific process" remarked Roheena Anand, Executive Director of Global Publishing Development at PLOS. The Uganda Open Science Stakeholders' Meeting concluded with a call to action: stronger collaboration, investment in infrastructure, capacity building, and national coordination are essential to advancing Uganda's Open Science movement. The outcomes of this meeting will guide the Ministry of Education and Sports in integrating Open Science principles into national policies and acts, ensuring that Uganda's researchers and institutions are well-positioned to make meaningful contributions to the global Open Science agenda. Access the meeting recording here: https://tccafrica.pubpub.org/pub/5qsggryo/release/1

Recently Posted Jobs

Sign up to get curated job recommendations

PLOS is Hiring for 4 Jobs on Simplify!

Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today

Don't see your dream role? Check out thousands of other roles on Simplify. Browse all jobs →