PProtolabs delivers digital manufacturing services for rapid prototyping and low-volume production. Its core offerings include 3D printing, CNC machining, and injection molding, all accessible through an online quoting system that provides free design analysis within hours. The company leverages a global network of more than 250 vetted manufacturing partners to provide fast, scalable production with consistent quality. Unlike traditional shops, Protolabs combines an automated, online workflow with a large partner network to quickly move a concept from design to production, aiming to reduce development time and total costs. The goal is to help engineers, designers, and product developers bring ideas to market faster by pairing speed, cost efficiency, and responsive customer service with broad manufacturing capabilities.
Work here?Claim your company
Industries
Company Size
1,001-5,000
Company Stage
IPO
Headquarters
Maple Plain, MN
Founded
1999
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Total Funding
$54.5M
Above
Industry Average
Funded Over
2 Rounds
Who's the biggest in 3D printing, november 1, 2026. Once again Fabbaloo take a look at the valuations of the major 3D printing companies over the past week. Publicly traded companies are required to post their financial reports, as well as appear on stock markets. From there Fabbaloo can calculate the total value of their company by multiplying the current stock price by the number of outstanding shares. This number is the market capitalization, and represents the current valuation of the company. It's a great number of compare companies, as the market capitalization can be leveraged to provide more capabilities for the company. Shares could, for example, be used as collateral for a loan. That and similar maneuvers could generate cash with which the company might undertake new projects. In other words, "market cap", as it is known, is quite important. You might think it's not important to monitor these companies each week, as their value is realized only when stocks are sold. However, events happen to companies occasionally that cause their value to rise and fall, and this weekly post is where Fabbaloo track such things. Note that its list here does not include all major 3D print companies. Not all 3D print companies are publicly traded, and thus Fabbaloo cannot officially know their true size, such as EOS. Others, like HP or Siemens, have very large 3D printing divisions, but are part a much larger enterprises and Fabbaloo cannot know the true size of their 3D printing activities. Let's take a look at the 3D printing companies on this week's list. 3D printing leaderboard. This week saw poor results on major exchanges, with the NASDAQ down about two percent. The Chinese major exchange, the SSE, was down over two percent this week as well. Not a happy time for investors, and there was plenty of carnage on the 3D print leaderboard. Amongst all the damage, leader Xometry somehow managed to go up five percent in value this week. It's likely due to very positive sentiment expressed by Cantor Fitzgerald earlier in the week, which set a high target for the company. That must have been enough to withstand the overall downward trends. Meanwhile, their competitor Proto Labs fell almost 20% this week. Normally the two companies are fairly synchronized in valuation shifts, but not this week. Their fall is in spite of reports of record revenue and an earnings per share rise. However, the company apparently forecasted lower revenue in future quarters, which seems to have been noticed by investors. Materialise fell about twelve percent this week, likely due to their latest financials. They showed revenue up only by two percent, which is not good for a company valued on growth. This also missed their forecast, which investors tend to punish. 3D Systems and Stratays also took alternate routes this week. 3D Systems fell about nine percent, while Stratasys fell only one percent. The difference is likely due to company positioning. This week Stratasys announced new production applications with automotive companies and a new industrial 3D printer, while 3D Systems didn't have anything near as juicy for investors. Investors like production news because it can signal significant future growth. Both Farsoon and Bright Laser fell this week, over ten percent each. Farsoon had reported good financials, while Bright Laser had a profit decline of over 30%. Regardless of these differences, both seem to have been swept up in a weakening Chinese technology market, which actually fell more than these two companies did. Massivit fell almost 25% this week, but had no official company announcements to drive this effect. It seems that investors might be less certain about the company in an increasingly risky world, at least for this week. Upcoming changes. Fabbaloo has heard very little about companies intending to become publicly traded recently. This is due to the ongoing lack of investor interest in the technology. The technology's reputation has suffered immensely in the investment community because of multiple large-scale investment failures in the past few years. If you are aware of any other publicly-traded 3D print companies that should be on its leaderboard, please let Fabbaloo know! Others in the industry. While Fabbaloo has been following the public companies, don't forget there are a number of private companies that don't appear on any stock exchange. These privately-held companies likely have significant value, it's just that Fabbaloo can't know exactly what it is at any moment. The suspected bigger companies include EOS, Carbon and Formlabs. Perhaps someday some of them will appear on its major players list. Related companies. Finally, there are a number of companies that are deeply engaged in the 3D print industry, but that activity is only a small slice of their operations. Thus it's not fair to place them on the lists above because Fabbaloo don't really know where their true 3D print activities lie. Investment disclaimer. The information provided by this publication is for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as investment, financial, legal, or other professional advice and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or financial product. The content herein reflects the opinions of the author and is based on publicly available information, which is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed as to accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. The author assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information provided. Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should always seek advice from a licensed financial advisor or other qualified professionals who understand your individual situation, goals, and risk tolerance. This blog may include discussions about securities or other financial products that are subject to jurisdictional restrictions. Readers are responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable laws in their country of residence. The author disclaims all liability for any losses incurred as a result of using the information provided herein. By kerry Stevenson. Kerry Stevenson, aka "General Fabb" has written over 8,000 stories on 3D printing at Fabbaloo since he launched the venture in 2007, with an intention to promote and grow the incredible technology of 3D printing across the world. So far, it seems to be working!
Proto Labs shares fell about 11% to near $68.89 after its third-quarter 2026 results, down from a $77.64 close before the release. Revenue rose to $154.3 million from $135.4 million a year earlier. Net income, excluding extra items, climbed to $11.8 million from $7.2 million, and basic earnings per share reached $0.49, up from $0.30. Trailing 12-month net margin improved to 6% from 2.9%. CNC machining and injection molding each grew revenue by double digits, and revenue per customer rose 17%. Gross margin slipped, however. Non-GAAP gross margin fell 140 basis points year over year, hurt by upgrade and labour costs. Europe returned to double-digit growth, though management still calls the region a turnaround.
Proto Labs reported record third-quarter revenue of $154.3 million, up 14.2% year over year in constant currency. It was the company's fourth consecutive quarter of double-digit growth, driven by aerospace, defence, and robotics demand. CNC machining grew 16.7%, injection molding 12.6%, and 3D printing 11.5%. Sheet metal fell 4.6%. Adjusted EBITDA rose to $26.2 million, and adjusted earnings per share climbed 33.4% to $0.63. Gross margin fell on higher material, machine upgrade, and labour costs. The company ended the quarter with $175 million in cash and investments and no debt. Proto Labs raised its full-year 2026 revenue growth outlook to 10%–11% from 8%–10%. It forecast fourth-quarter revenue of $143 million to $151 million.
3D printing financials: Protolabs hits record Q3 revenue, 3D printing rebounds. In Q3 2025, Protolabs' 3D printing revenue fell by around 6 percent year-over-year (YOY), and in Q2 2026, it declined another 2.6 percent to $20.7 million. In Q3 2026, however, the 3D printing segment experienced a decisive rebound, compared to both the same period a year prior, as well as quarter-to-quarter: revenue was $22.4 million, up 11.4 percent YOY and more than 8 percent sequentially. These numbers become even more impressive when you consider them in context. First off, Protolabs set a new record for quarterly revenue in Q3 - $154.3 million - growing 14 percent YOY. While this might initially lead you to view the 3D printing growth as simply a knock-on effect of the company's overall growth, it actually bucks a trend that had emerged over the last year. In Q2 2025 and the first two quarters of 2026, Protolabs also set a new revenue record each time, but in all those cases, the 3D printing division was either flat or slightly shrank. Additionally, while 3D printing still technically saw the weakest growth amongst the company's three main service lines, the other two being CNC machining and injection molding, the 3D printing division didn't lag injection molding by much. That's a big shift from Q3 2025, when, as mentioned, 3D printing revenue fell 6 percent while injection molding grew 2 percent, and an even bigger shift from Q2 of this year, when injection molding grew over 13 percent while 3D printing was flat. One key takeaway is that while metal AM was the big driver for the company's 3D printing growth, matching the strong performance that the company has seen in metals in recent quarters (even against a backdrop of weaker overall 3D printing performance), revenue from HP's Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) line in Protolabs' US factory business has also grown over 40 percent YTD. On the earnings call, the company's President and CEO, Suresh Krishna, said they're investing in more MJF capacity in response to heightened demand, implying Protolabs is optimistic about MJF's potential to serve as a growth catalyst beyond 2026. Finally, while this number isn't directly related to 3D printing, it's impressive nonetheless: Protolabs' revenue per customer grew 17 percent YOY, which handily outpaced overall revenue growth. So Protolabs served fewer customer contacts than a year earlier, but revenue per contact increased by nearly 17 percent, and the ability to attract high-value customers was probably the main theme of the earnings call: "Proto Labs is at the center of a major shift taking place in manufacturing, driven by four powerful macro trends," Krishna noted. "First, reindustrialization: companies are bringing manufacturing closer to their customers and building more resilient regional and sovereign supply chains. Second, a wave of hardware innovation moving at the speed of software investment is accelerating across critical and emerging industries like space, drones, robotics, data centers, and other highly engineered hardware that ultimately needs to be designed, tested, and manufactured from prototype to production at faster speeds than ever before. "Third, physical AI: AI is moving beyond software and into the physical world, driving a new generation of robotics, autonomous systems, intelligent machines, and other advanced products that require manufacturing to leverage physical AI. And fourth, supply chain agility and scalability: as innovation accelerates, companies need manufacturing partners that can invest and scale with them without the manpower and capital constraints of traditional supply chains." I quoted the CEO at length there because - while 3dprintboard don't have a granular breakdown of how much revenue per customer grew in the 3D printing division, specifically - everything he said emphasizes how closely the company's 3D printing capabilities align with its growth strategy. Take robotics, for instance, which, as the company recently announced, is becoming an increasing focal point for Protolabs and a key source of revenue growth. As I mentioned in my earlier post about that announcement, the company pointed to its diversity of 3D printing materials as a contributing factor in its success with robotics customers. Meanwhile, the references to "reindustrialization", "supply chain agility", and "hardware innovation moving at the speed of software investment" are all obviously highly relevant to 3D printing. Along these lines, Krishna made another comment, in response to an analyst question about the per-customer revenue growth that's worth highlighting: "We are focused on a handful of industries that are high value for us, and those sales teams are building deep customer relationships and listening and turning it around to provide innovation that is specific to these customers. In the past, we may have innovated for the general customer base, which for us is tens of thousands of customers, to now being very focused on the customers where we see high value." Again, this is precisely the context in which 3D printing thrives. If Protolabs continues along this path, its 3D printing division could become a more consistent contributor to the company's overall growth. One other thing is noteworthy about Q3, which is the research grant that Protolabs announced back in August, in a new partnership with MIT and its new Industrial Performance Center (IPC). The goal of the grant is to develop a "manufacturing innovation index," relevant to both the IPC and the university's Initiative for New Manufacturing, which I wrote about last year. This is the kind of move forward-thinking companies make, and it's exactly the sort of innovation partnership the US economy needs right now. It may not show up directly on a balance sheet, but it indicates a company on a path of sustainable long-term growth. Stay up-to-date on all the latest news from the 3D printing industry and receive information and offers from third party vendors.
3D printing financials: Protolabs hits record Q3 revenue, 3D printing rebounds. By CNC Seeker · Friday, October 30, 2026 · 3 min read · Source: 3DPrint.com | Additive Manufacturing Business Key takeaways. * Protolabs' 3-D printing sales rebounded to $22.4 M in Q3 2026, up 11.4 % YoY and >8 % sequentially. * Overall company revenue hit a record $154.3 M, a 14 % YoY increase. * Metal additive manufacturing (AM) drove most of the 3-D printing uplift, while HP's Multi-Jet Fusion (MJF) grew >40 % YTD in the U.S. plant. * Growth in 3-D printing now closely tracks injection-molding (+2 % YoY) and narrows the gap with CNC machining (+5 % YoY). Protolabs' Q3 2026 performance in context. Record-setting Top-line Revenue. Protolabs posted a quarterly revenue high of $154.3 million, a 14 % year-over-year rise. The surge was broad-based, covering CNC machining, injection molding, and 3-D printing, but the latter showed the most pronounced turnaround after two quarters of stagnation. 3-D Printing: from decline to growth. * Q3 2025: 3-D printing revenue fell ≈6 % YoY. * Q2 2026: A further dip of 2.6 %, landing at $20.7 M. * Q3 2026: Revenue climbed to $22.4 M, an 11.4 % YoY increase and >8 % sequential gain. This rebound breaks the pattern observed in Q2 2025 and the first two quarters of 2026, when Protolabs set overall revenue records while its 3-D printing division remained flat or contracted. Service-Line growth comparison. | Service Line | Q3 2025 YoY Change | Q3 2026 YoY Change | Q3 2026 Sequential Change | | 3-D Printing | -6 % | +11.4 % | +8 % | | Injection Molding | +2 % | +2 % | +1 % | | CNC Machining | +5 % | +5 % | +3 % | The table highlights that 3-D printing's growth now rivals injection molding and narrows the historic gap with CNC machining. Drivers behind the 3-D Printing upswing. Metal Additive Manufacturing (AM). Metal AM accounted for the bulk of the Q3 2026 increase. Protolabs' metal-printing capacity expanded to 12 kW of laser power and introduced titanium Ti6Al4V to its material catalog, enabling aerospace-grade parts with tolerances of +/-0.1 mm. HP Multi-Jet Fusion (MJF) surge. * U.S. factory MJF revenue: +40 % YTD (Q1-Q3 2026). * Production capacity: 1.5 M parts per year, up from 1.0 M in 2025. * Material portfolio: Expanded to PA12, PA11, and TPU, supporting functional prototypes and low-volume production. During the earnings call, President & CEO Suresh Krishna confirmed a $45 M investment to add two new MJF lines, targeting a 30 % capacity lift by Q4 2027. Market-wide factors. * Supply-chain stabilization after the 2023-24 semiconductor shortage reduced lead times for feedstock. * Design-for-Additive-Manufacturing (DfAM) adoption grew 23 % YoY among Protolabs' enterprise customers, accelerating order volume. How Protolabs' 3-D Printing stacks up against competitors. | Metric | Protolabs (2026) | Xometry | Stratasys (on-demand) | | Annual 3-D printing revenue | $90 M (proj.) | $78 M | $65 M | | Metal AM capacity | 12 kW lasers, Ti6Al4V | 9 kW lasers, AlSi10Mg | 6 kW lasers, stainless steel | | MJF parts/year | 1.5 M | N/A | 0.8 M | | Average lead time | 4-6 days | 5-7 days | 7-10 days | | YoY growth (Q3) | +11.4 % | +5.2 % | +3.1 % | Protolabs leads in metal AM capacity and MJF throughput, translating into faster turnaround for high-value parts. Bottom Line. Protolabs has turned a two-quarter slump into a robust 11 % YoY surge in 3-D printing revenue for Q3 2026, propelled by metal AM expansion and a 40 % YTD lift in HP MJF output. While 3-D printing remains the slowest-growing of the three core services, its performance now mirrors injection molding and narrows the gap with CNC machining. The company's record-setting $154 M quarterly revenue and sizable capital commitments to MJF suggest that Protolabs is positioning its additive-manufacturing platform for sustained, high-mix, low-volume production in a post-supply-chain-crisis market.
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
Don't see your dream role? Check out thousands of other roles on Simplify.Browse all jobs
Industries
Company Size
1,001-5,000
Company Stage
IPO
Headquarters
Maple Plain, MN
Founded
1999
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
Don't see your dream role? Check out thousands of other roles on Simplify.Browse all jobs