Silverback Strategies

Silverback Strategies

Performance marketing agency driving growth

Overview

Silverback Strategies helps growth-focused teams move fast and prove impact through performance marketing. The company offers paid search, paid social, SEO, content, and measurement services that work together to drive growth. It runs 500+ experiments each year to test ideas quickly, learn what works, and scale successful approaches. With more than $500 million in managed media spend and over 1,000 marketing tests executed annually, it emphasizes results that boost revenue and clear, trust-building reporting. The team is recognized for its strategy-led approach and credible reporting, backed by a workplace culture that has earned national accolades. Overall, the goal is to deliver measurable, revenue-producing digital marketing outcomes for clients.

About Silverback Strategies

Simplify's Rating
Why Silverback Strategies is rated
C+
Rated C on Competitive Edge
Rated B on Growth Potential
Rated C on Differentiation

Industries

Company Size

11-50

Company Stage

N/A

Total Funding

N/A

Headquarters

Alexandria, Virginia

Founded

2007

Get referred to Silverback Strategies

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • August 2026 content tracks Google Display retirement and Demand Gen migration.
  • Silverback hired Ben Johnson on May 22, 2026 to expand SEO leadership.
  • June 2026 SLEC coverage strengthened its senior living niche and credibility.

What critics are saying

  • Google and Meta can erase Silverback’s edge by commoditizing optimization work.
  • Performance Max and AI search punish agencies without proprietary data pipelines.
  • If Google and Meta absorb measurement, Silverback becomes replaceable overnight.

What makes Silverback Strategies unique

  • Silverback pairs paid media, SEO, creative, and measurement under one Leesburg agency.
  • Its 2026 positioning emphasizes incrementality testing, MMM, and CRM-integrated optimization.
  • Neil Welsh publicly challenges platform-reported ROAS with client-level incrementality data.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

Unlimited Paid Time Off

Health Insurance

Dental Insurance

Vision Insurance

Parental Leave

401(k) Company Match

Remote Work Options

Company News

DesignRush
Jun 2nd, 2026
Silverback Strategies CEO shares how AI ad platforms ruin budgets at SLEC 2026.

Silverback Strategies CEO shares how AI ad platforms ruin budgets at SLEC 2026. Silverback Strategies CEO Neil Welsh shares why AI campaigns are stalling occupancy growth and what operators can do about it. [Source: DesignRush] Published Jun 02 2026 Updated Jun 02 2026 On May 18, Silverback Strategies CEO Neil Welsh spoke at Senior Living Executive Conference (SLEC) 2026, sharing insights on how AI ad platforms were draining senior living marketing budgets. In his keynote, Welsh revealed that senior living operators were spending more on paid media without seeing proportional movement in occupancy. His argument was that AI ad platforms were actively redirecting budget away from the conversions that matter. His presentation is timely as marketing leaders face immense pressure and stagnant budgets in 2026. According to The CMO Survey 2026, 58.8% of CMOs feel increasing pressure from their CEO to prove marketing's value, and 55.5% report the same from their CFO. Under that pressure, 70.6% say they shift focus to short-term impact over long-run gains. How AI ad platforms are redirecting budget. Google Smart Bidding, Meta Advantage+, and Google Performance Max have steadily handed targeting, bidding, and budget decisions to the platforms. Meta's latest AI ad products go further, requiring no creative, targeting, or measurement input from the advertiser. At first, this sounds efficient. However, data compiled by Silverback Strategies painted a different picture. In senior living, the cheapest conversions are usually people already on the path to move in. Performance Max captures them through branded search and remarketing, then takes credit for conversions that would have happened regardless. "The platform reports look great. But we're wasting money on customers that would have converted without the ad cost," Welsh told SLEC attendees. Although Welsh focused on senior living operators in his talk, he stressed that the problems this industry is facing affect nearly every industry to some degree. Specifically, he pointed toward three specific patterns driving this waste across marketing budgets simultaneously: 1. Bot traffic and fake conversions. AI ad campaigns learn from conversion data, including conversions that are not real. Juniper Research estimates $84 billion in digital ad spend was lost to fraud in 2023, with projections reaching $172 billion by 2028. When platforms optimize toward fake signals, they pull budget toward the sources generating those signals, compounding the waste with every campaign cycle. 2. Non-Incremental branded search. Welsh told SLEC attendees that an average of 32% of Performance Max budgets is spent on branded search terms that competitors do not even bid on. These are searches from people already looking for a specific community and likely to convert without the branded search ad. Instead, the platform counts those conversions. The operator pays for them. 3. Bad signals Drive bad optimization. When platforms only see clicks and form fills, they optimize for form fills. In senior living, form fills are not move-ins. A platform optimized for low-cost form fills will find them through bot traffic, branded queries, and remarketing audiences already in the pipeline. So, the reports may look strong on paper, but a deeper dive will reveal that the numbers that actually matter didn't move in a meaningful way. The real numbers behind platform reports. Welsh shared data from one of his agency's clients that illustrates how far platform reporting can diverge from reality. Silverback Strategies found that the client's branded search showed a reported cost per acquisition of $212. The real incremental cost, measured through incrementality testing, was $1,059. That was 5x higher than reported. However, the same client's Demand Gen campaign reported $579 per acquisition, expensive enough that the team was considering cutting it. The real incremental cost was $157, nearly four times lower. "They were one quarterly review from killing the channel that was working and scaling the one that wasn't," Welsh said. A 30-day fix to run now. Fortunately, most of the waste Welsh describes is fixable. In particular, he outlined three changes brands and agencies can implement immediately: * Eliminate waste. Add brand exclusions to Performance Max, turn off search partners, and install bot detection. * Activate the algorithm. Implement Conversion API, offline conversion tracking, and CRM integration, so platforms optimize toward move-ins instead of form fills. * Drive incremental growth. Run incrementality testing and media mix modeling to separate campaigns creating demand from those claiming credit. These three steps only require redirecting what is already being spent toward signals the algorithm can use. Why teams can't afford to get this wrong. AI ad platforms are becoming increasingly autonomous. But Welsh's keynote at SLEC 2026 is a sobering reminder that autonomy doesn't automatically lead to accuracy. Algorithms optimize for the signals they receive, whether those signals reflect meaningful business outcomes or not. This means brands and agencies alike need to practice better discipline over the signals they set, as well as constantly perform incrementality testing to ensure AI doesn't drift. Otherwise, they risk scaling the channels that hurt long-term growth and wasting even what little marketing budget they have left. Journalist Marta brings over two decades of experience across journalism, marketing, and SEO content. A former photo reporter turned SEO ghostwriter, at DesignRush she covers the latest in marketing, design, technology, eCommerce, and AI. When she's not writing, she's either painting or behind a microphone singing.

Associated Press
May 28th, 2026
Silverback Strategies names Ben Johnson associate director of SEO after decade at Spinutech

Silverback Strategies, a digital marketing agency based in Leesburg, Virginia, has appointed Ben Johnson as Associate Director of SEO. Johnson will lead SEO strategy for the agency's mid-market B2C clients. Johnson joins from Spinutech, where he spent nearly a decade advancing from SEO Strategist to Associate Director. He delivered triple-digit organic growth for enterprise clients whilst helping smaller businesses compete in crowded markets. His expertise includes taxonomy development, Core Web Vitals optimisation, on-page strategy and AI search optimisation. The appointment comes as agencies adapt SEO strategies in response to generative AI, zero-click search and shifting user behaviour. Johnson will work directly with clients to translate these changes into measurable organic revenue.

Recently Posted Jobs

Sign up to get curated job recommendations

Silverback Strategies is Hiring for 3 Jobs on Simplify!

Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today

Don't see your dream role? Check out thousands of other roles on Simplify. Browse all jobs →