TThe Wilderness Society works to protect America’s wild places and public lands. It pursues policy change and public campaigns to conserve land, protect wildlife, and address climate and inequity. Its projects include safeguarding large areas of wilderness and pushing for sound management of public lands. It achieves its goals by organizing members, lobbying, collaborating with Indigenous communities and Tribal Nations, and building broad coalitions to influence land-use decisions. The organization distinguishes itself by aiming for specific, measurable outcomes—protecting 30% of lands and waters by 2030, shifting public lands away from fossil-fuel development toward well-sited renewable energy, ensuring equitable access to public lands, and growing support for public-land conservation. Its goal is to create a just, healthy environment where local communities, wildlife, and climate all benefit from preserved wild places.
Work here?Claim your company
Industries
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
N/A
Total Funding
N/A
Headquarters
Washington DC, District of Columbia
Founded
N/A
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
2 conservation groups sue Bureau of Land Management over Colorado, Wyoming oil and gas leases. Lawsuit claims that the Bureau of Land Management violated procedure and federal law in leasing parcels in June that overlap with sensitive public lands and wildlife habitat. NewsNews | Sep 9, 2026 The Carbondale-based Wilderness Workshop and national nonprofit The Wilderness Society are suing the federal government, alleging that the Bureau of Land Management's June approval of oil and gas lease sales in Colorado and Wyoming violated federal law and disregarded potential harm to big game migration corridors and environmentally sensitive areas. The suit was filed by the two conservation nonprofits in the United States District Court in Denver on Tuesday, Sept. 9. It names the U.S. Department of the Interior, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, the Bureau of Land Management, Thomas Heinlein, Colorado's acting BLM director, and Kris Kirby, Wyoming's acting BLM director, as defendants. "The Bureau of Land Management's failure to follow its regulations and consider the impacts of these oil and gas lease sales on pristine public lands and wildlife violates the law," said Clay Samford, attorney with Earthjustice, which is representing the two nonprofits, in a statement. "The significance of these centuries-old big game migration corridors cannot be overstated. That the agency would ignore the potential impacts on wildlife, the hunting community, and millions of public lands users to please the fossil fuel industry is both unlawful and shortsighted." The suit alleges that the federal government ignored its regulatory criteria and violated federal laws - including the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and the Administrative Procedure Act - in offering up oil and gas parcels for sale on "environmentally sensitive public lands." Among the suit's allegations is that "although BLM's own analysis showed numerous conflicts with crucial big game habitats and migration corridors and with the preservation of pristine wilderness-quality lands, BLM's June 2026 lease sales offered hundreds of thousands of acres of public lands for lease without withholding any parcels based on the preference criteria, in violation of BLM's own regulation and [the Federal Land Policy and Management Act]." It asks the court to vacate the lease decisions and send them back to the BLM for further consideration. The Bureau of Land Management did not respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit and allegations by deadline. Feds' new era of energy development draws protests. The June oil and gas lease sales included the sale of 249 parcels covering 248,612 acres in both Colorado and Wyoming, amassing around $69.9 million. The Colorado sale generated over $35.26 million from 147 parcels covering 134,173 acres in Arapahoe, Garfield, Jackson, Mesa, Moffat, Rio Blanco, Routt and Weld counties. The lawsuit claims that the parcels overlap with antelope, mule deer and elk habitat and migration corridors in both states. It claims that oil and gas development "destroys and fragments big game habitat," and that even if habitat is not directly impacted, these species will avoid development areas, which can lead to overcrowding and impacts such as overgrazing and increased disease transmission. "The mule deer populations in Northwest Colorado have seen significant declines in recent years and additional habitat loss and fragmentation from oil and gas development will only worsen conditions for the species," said Luke Schafer, a Wilderness Workshop member, in a statement. "It is disheartening that productive public lands that are enjoyed by so many - lands that are critical to sustaining wildlife populations - could soon be carved up by well pads, pipelines, and access roads." It also alleges that the parcels sold in June overlap with "public lands with wilderness character," including two areas in Moffat County, the Crooked Wash area and BLM's Serviceberry unit. Wilderness Workshop and The Wilderness Society were among a group of 18 conservation groups that filed a complaint in May against the Bureau of Land Management's June sales in Colorado. The protest raised 22 issues spanning from policy and procedure questions to concerns about impacts to public health, wildlife, climate and more. The BLM denied all claims. In its denial, the BLM argued that it followed proper procedure and applicable laws, including the four that the lawsuit alleges it violated. In response to some of the environmental impact concerns raised, the federal agency wrote that it "has analyzed the impacts that may occur as a result of leasing," and that more site-specific environmental analysis will be conducted later on in the process when companies apply for drilling permits. The lawsuit claims that the concerns in the protest were ignored. Colorado Parks and Wildlife filed its own protest of the June lease sales, citing concerns about how several parcels overlapped with existing conservation easements and could have negative consequences for wildlife and habitat. The BLM also denied this protest, arguing that subsurface mineral rights are separate from surface ownership and conservation easements and that more specific review would occur when companies apply for drilling permits. In response to this protest, Kemba Anderson, BLM Colorado's acting deputy state director, wrote that the agency received 19 comments during its public comment period that also expressed concerns around air quality, wildlife habitat, land eligibility, policy and procedure, water resources and more. Any substantial concerns were addressed during the environmental assessment, she added. The June sales were among those occurring under a new era of energy development on federal lands under President Donald Trump. Trump has said the goal of his executive order to "unleash American energy" is to achieve energy independence, increase affordability and provide jobs by reducing red tape and reopening public lands for development. The Bureau of Land Management is required to hold quarterly oil and gas lease sales when eligible lands are available under a 1920 legislative mandate. While the Biden administration pulled away from fossil fuel development amid concerns about how BLM's oil and gas development was negatively impacting the environment and climate, the Trump administration has leaned back in, making good on his campaign promise to "drill, baby, drill." In total, BLM has offered 403 parcels in Colorado this year - a large jump from 290 leased in the previous seven years. The increased pace of leasing and the parcels being included have raised significant concerns across the state. In Routt County, commissioners recently raised concerns about a proposed federal oil and gas lease sale covering nearly 14,000 acres of national forest land north of Hayden. In Garfield County, the inclusion of several parcels on the Roan Plateau in the proposed December sale have reignited a battle to keep the development away from the plateau's untouched reaches. Sep 9, 2026 Pitkin County will be taking over operations of the Maroon Bells Scenic Area beginning in 2027 following unanimous approval from the Board of County Commissioners Wednesday to authorize a special use permit from the U.S. Forest Service and the creation of an enterprise fund for management under the permit.
Angeles National Forest gets a new boss, someone who's worked on the forest as a ranger. Jamahl Butler was recently installed as the supervisor of the Angeles, the vast, 700,000-acre wilderness that is recreation to millions. PUBLISHED: August 10, 2026 at 4:34 PM PDT UPDATED: August 10, 2026 at 4:53 PM PDT The Angeles National Forest has a new boss. Jamahl Butler, 47, began as the new supervisor of the vast Angeles National Forest on Friday, moving into the permanent spot after serving as acting supervisor since March 8, the USFS reported. Butler will be responsible for the 700,000-acre forest, as well as 452,000 acres of the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument, which is located within the Angeles. The monument, first established by President Barack Obama in 2014, was expanded in May 2024 by President Joe Biden to include closer-in areas in the western Angeles, including historic Chantry Flat north of Arcadia, the Arroyo Seco near Pasadena and forest lands near Sunland, Tujunga and Santa Clarita. "I am deeply honored to serve as Forest Supervisor of the Angeles National Forest," he said in a statement. "The Angeles has shaped much of my understanding of public service, and I look forward to building on the strong foundation created by those who have served before me." Butler is very familiar with the Angeles. From 2016 to 2023, Butler was the deputy district ranger, then the district ranger, of the Los Angeles Gateway Ranger District of the Angeles. That area included the southwestern parts of the forest that later became part of the national monument. He started as an intern on the San Gabriel River Ranger District, he said. He has worked in conservation and reforestation with the U.S. Forest Services for decades. Before that, he worked with the Utah Department of Natural Resources. Earlier in his career, he worked for the Memorial Park Conservancy in Houston, Texas, one of the largest and most heavily used parks in the country. Butler also served as deputy forest supervisor for the San Bernardino National Forest since September 2023. "I am really excited he is taking on this position. He has had a career with a strong connection to this landscape," said Daniel Rossman, executive director of One Arroyo, a nonprofit working to preserve the Arroyo Seco, in partnership with the city of Pasadena. Previously, Rossman was with The Wilderness Society and was involved in preservation of the Angeles, as well as improving recreation and the visitor experience. The 700,000-acre federal forest stretching from Santa Clarita to Upland makes the northern border of Los Angeles County, becoming the largest urban-interface forest in the United States and known as "L.A.'s Playground." The Angeles draws 3 million to 4 million visitors per year who hike, bird watch, swim in the San Gabriel River, picnic, ride off-road vehicles, mountain bike and hunt. The area provides 70% of the area's open space and 30% of its drinking water. Previously, forest supervisors were long-time bureaucrats at the end of their careers, serving as caretakers, awaiting retirement or a promotion in Washington D.C., said John Monson, long-time forest watcher, hiker and naturalist who chairs the Sierra Club Angeles Chapter's Forest Committee. "We think it is a great choice," Monson said on Monday. "He is a home-grown product," that will actually take an active role in managing the forest, he said. Roman Torres was the last supervisor. He retired last year when President Trump with Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cleared out thousands of government jobs at various departments, including many at the USFS working at the Angeles headquarters in Arcadia. Torres himself left at that time and retired. Before that, Jerry Perez, a high-ranking bureaucrat in the first Trump Administration, became forest supervisor in October 2018. At age 60, he left the post in January 2022 to take a top-level position in the U.S. Forest Service as national director of fire and aviation management. After Torres, there have been many interim or acting supervisors, which Monson described as "pretty disruptive." "From what we know, he's a pragmatist. And he's not likely to be seeking any position in D.C.," Monson said. He added many people in the Sierra Club and in other conservation and environmental groups are also pleased with the selection. Butler, in an interview late Monday, said he was humbled by the positive remarks from long-time forest watchers. "I don't have any plans of going anywhere any time soon," Butler said. "What this forest needs to be successful is someone who can embrace local partnerships," Rossman said. "And Jamahl comes from that. He's starting off miles ahead of someone who had to come in and learn all the places and the players." Butler said partnerships, with nonprofits, corporations or those who help fix trails and provide engineering help are more than important. "They are vital," he said. "For forest restoration and trail management, we have to do those things in an itegrated way. We have started to get better by coordinating with partners," Butler added. His priorities should be the forest ecology and reforestation while adapting to climate change, and ensuring the forest above Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties - only 90 minutes from close to 20 million people - remains a place millions can come to find solitude and recreation, Rossman said. Pacific Southwest Region Acting Regional Forester Jacque Buchanan praised Butler's hands-on experience and integrity. "His knowledge of the Angeles - its landscapes, communities, and complexities - positions him well to lead this forest into the future," she said in a prepared statement. "My game plan is to be of use," Butler said. "To be of value. I'd like to help move things along and establish some orders of operation that are useful to the public."
How research will shape New Mexico's Outdoor Equity Fund. Since 2019, New Mexico's Outdoor Equity Fund (OEF) has connected more than 128,000 young people to outdoor experiences across 28 counties. Now the program is expanding, and Rising Routes is partnering with The Wilderness Society to conduct the statewide research that will help shape its understanding of how those dollars can make the most impact. About the New Mexico Outdoor Equity Fund. Seven years ago, New Mexico did something no other state had done before by creating a dedicated, state-funded grant program for youth outdoor access. Administered by the Outdoor Recreation Division under the state's Economic Development Department, the fund was built with a specific purpose to reach the young people least likely to experience it: youth in low-income, rural, and underserved communities across the state. The results so far speak to what sustained, targeted investment can do. Since 2019, the OEF has awarded more than $10.5 million to programs across 28 counties, connecting more than 128,000 young people to outdoor experiences. This May, the program expanded further, opening up a new funding tier for eligible organizations to apply for grants up to $100,000 (more than doubling the previous cap of $40,000) for large-scale programming. With $4 million available in the upcoming cycle and application windows opening soon, New Mexico is scaling this model. That's a meaningful commitment, and it raises a question that every growing fund eventually has to answer: how do you make sure the funds are going where they are needed most? Using research to shape decisions. This month, Rising Routes is beginning a statewide research collaboration with The Wilderness Society and the New Mexico Outdoor Equity Fund coalition. Risingroutes is serving as the social science lead, guiding survey development, co-leading data analysis, and helping coordinate a research process that brings together Tribal leaders, youth programs, community organizations, and state partners. The work includes building a comprehensive statewide provider database, designing and testing a multilingual survey in English, Spanish, and Navajo, and working through trusted networks to make sure voices from every region are represented. Risingroutes'll also support focus groups and interviews to capture what the data alone won't show. The findings are targeted for early 2027, in time to inform the legislative session and strengthen how the OEF deploys its funding going forward. Why this approach works. Colorado gave Risingroutes a blueprint for this kind of work. Its 2025 Roadmap Report assessed 81 Colorado outdoor education and recreation providers and surfaced patterns that no single organization could see on its own. That research changed how funders and state agencies within Colorado understood the field by making invisible gaps visible and gave decision-makers something concrete to act on when making those critical funding decisions. New Mexico has the same opportunity, at a critical time while the OEF is still actively scaling. Research findings in 2026 can shape how a growing fund allocates resources for years to come. What Risingroutes is building toward. This project reflects what Rising Routes was built to do. Risingroutes put evidence at the center of outdoor access systems, so the organizations and funders working to expand access aren't operating from incomplete information. When Risingroutes know who is providing outdoor opportunities across New Mexico, where the coverage is thin, and which investments have created the most durable impact, the OEF and its partners can make decisions with clarity. Providers can see where they fit in a statewide picture. And communities that have previously been left out of the conversation can help lead what comes next. Risingroutes'll share updates from this project as it develops. If you're a provider in New Mexico and want to be part of the research process, join its provider network or email Risingroutes at [email protected]. The featured image on this page is from Tamaya Wellness Center, a program supported by New Mexico's Outdoor Equity Fund. Learn more about them. Join its mission to strengthen outdoor access and programs. Rising Routes is a registered 501(c)(3) that is dedicated to increasing outdoor access nationwide. Contribute to a growing system that shapes how outdoor providers can sustain their work, reach more people, and align coalitions across the country.
Nonprofit launches hub to help tribes navigate new eligibility for conservation grants. Published June 22, 2026 at 12:38 PM MST Coverage of tribal natural resources is supported in part by Catena Foundation The nation's 575 federally recognized tribes can now participate in a conservation grant program through the National Park Service. And a new digital tool is designed to help them navigate the bureaucracy. The Land and Water Conservation Fund has been around since 1964. President John F. Kennedy is credited for coming up with this idea to protect natural and cultural resources while guaranteeing recreational access to all Americans. Then, the bipartisan Great American Outdoors Act - signed by President Donald Trump in 2020 - made it permanently funded. "It receives about $900 million each year from offshore oil and gas royalties - not taxpayer dollars - to support conservation and outdoor recreation nationwide," said Starlyn Rose Miller, who is from the Little Shell Chippewa Tribe of Montana. "And yet, I had never heard of the program." She's senior director of Native Lands Partnership at the nonprofit Wilderness Society, which launched the online hub. The Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership program recently expanded eligibility to tribes. Native Hawaiian and urban Indian organizations are also able to apply. "Tribal governments are so busy," added Miller. "We thought if we could put a hub up - designed in partnership with Indigenous-led orgs, agencies, nonprofits - that it could be helpful." More than 56 million acres - nearly 3% of the U.S. landmass - belong to tribes. The Land and Water Conservation Fund has aided more than 47,000 projects, like parks and trails, in nearly every county nationwide. More Indigenous Affairs news
New affordable housing group exposes the lie of public land selloff | opinion. April 30, 2026 4:00 AM Gift Article The current resurgence of the public land sell-off movement began with a false promise: Give up your public land, and you will get affordable housing. "This partnership will identify underused public lands suitable for residential development and streamline the land transfer process," said Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum in a promo video released several months ago alongside Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner. "We're opening underused federal land to expand housing, support local development and get Washington, D.C., out of the way of communities that are just trying to grow," echoed Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah. Lee's interest in affordable housing was a new development. Outside of political office, the main thing Lee was known for was representing a company that wanted to import nuclear waste to his home state from Italy. Turner played football. Burgum made a fortune in software and speculation. When he was governor of North Dakota, he did appoint a board to find affordable housing solutions in his home state. The committee recommended a series of targeted investments in things like zoning reform, grants for new building and financing methods, homelessness services, financial coaching and building up the construction workforce. Nowhere on the list was anything to do with transferring public land - because actual affordable housing advocates do not view that as a serious solution. This week, actual affordable housing advocates from across the country - including organizations like the National Coalition for the Homeless, the National Low Income Housing Coalition and the National Housing Law Project - have announced a partnership called Shared Ground with public land conservation organizations - including the Wilderness Society, the Sierra Club and the Idaho Conservation League. The partnership plans to advocate for "increased funding, zoning reform, and community-based development," according to a news release - a broadly similar set of priorities to those set out by Burgum's own committee just two years ago, when his priority was affordable housing rather than public land transfer. "Protecting our public lands and ensuring every American has a safe, affordable place to call home are complementary goals," Donald Whitehead, executive director of National Coalition for the Homeless, said in a news release. "We must reject the false choice between conservation and housing. Any use of public land must come with legally enforceable requirements to ensure it serves the public interest, providing permanent affordability and equitable access for local communities." This false choice is plain to see in Idaho. You can find a few specific places in Idaho where the lack of private land contributes to insanely high real estate prices - Stanley comes to mind. But you have much the same problem in similar locations where there's tons of private farmland available to convert to subdivisions, like the Teton Valley. Open up more land in Stanley for development, you'll almost certainly just have a few more multimillion-dollar houses. Affordable workforce housing in places like Stanley and Driggs invariably involves some combination of extremely long commutes, businesses with on-site housing and heavy public subsidies. A bit more land won't change that. It wouldn't solve any problems in larger communities like Boise either. Imagine you convert some big portions of the foothills, the main portions of public land abutting the city, from trails into lots for housing. Would you expect that land to be covered in cheap apartments or expensive homes, given their prime real estate? The formation of this new partnership demonstrates the obvious: The people who really care about affordable housing do not see public land selloff as a solution. And, conversely, the people who see public land sales as a solution do not really care about affordable housing. Their real priorities are quite different: They simply do not believe that the federal government should be in the business of owning lots of land - this was the outright assertion of Utah's doomed land "disposal" lawsuit. Invoking affordable housing is a thoroughly dishonest and disingenuous ruse they have used to attempt to put a bit of shine on their deeply unpopular plans. Don't get suckered in. Bryan Clark is an opinion writer for the Idaho Statesman. Guest Opinions May 1, 2026 4:00 AM Guest Opinions April 28, 2026 4:00 AM Idaho Statesman Bryan Clark is an Idaho Statesman opinion writer based in eastern Idaho. He has been a working journalist for 14 years, the last 10 in Idaho. Support my work with a digital subscription
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
We update The Wilderness Society's jobs every few hours, so check again soon!Browse all jobs
Industries
Company Size
201-500
Company Stage
N/A
Total Funding
N/A
Headquarters
Washington DC, District of Columbia
Founded
N/A
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
We update The Wilderness Society's jobs every few hours, so check again soon!Browse all jobs