Main Purpose:
We are looking for a Territory Manager to grow the agricultural segment of our wholesale diesel business, managing distributors and commercial policies while tracking the key performance indicators of the business. The role is responsible for developing Puma Energy Agro's sales channels in the assigned region, securing the company's market positioning, product quality, image at the point of sale and overall brand value.
Key Responsibilities:
Knowledge and abilities:
Trafigura is a global commodities trading firm that connects producers and buyers of minerals, metals, and energy. It buys in large quantities, stores, transports, and sells through its logistics network to industrial clients and utilities, including LNG supply for energy providers. It differentiates itself with its extensive global logistics capabilities, large-scale trading operations, and active role in the energy transition by supplying metals and minerals essential for renewable energy technologies and electric vehicles. Its goal is to efficiently link resource-producing regions with consuming markets worldwide, supporting reliable energy and material supply while helping shift toward a low-carbon economy.
Company Size
5,001-10,000
Company Stage
Debt Financing
Total Funding
$24.8B
Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
1993
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
EXCLUSIVE: The cross-border line both governments wanted. 16th October, 2026 Speaking to ENN, Gridworks Chief Executive Chris Flavin explains what made a privately financed transmission line between Kalumbila in Zambia and Kolwezi in the DRC workable, and what its 700MW of capacity will open up for Zambian power producers and traders once it carries electricity into the DRC's Copperbelt. Under a Strategic Framework Agreement signed in Kinshasa on 6 October, the DRC's Strategic Investment Fund (FIS-RDC), the Congolese developer and power trader EnPower, Trafigura and Gridworks Development Partners will jointly finance and operate a 200km high-voltage transmission line they plan to build from Kalumbila in Zambia to Kolwezi in the DRC. Construction of the Kalumbila-Kolwezi Interconnector Project (KKIP) is estimated at $300 million, and the project is the first investment FIS-RDC has announced since the fund was created in October 2025. With a thermal capacity of 700MW, the line is designed to carry up to 550MW into the Copperbelt mining region of the DRC and will strengthen the country's connection to the Southern African Power Pool. Gridworks, which is owned and funded by British International Investment, is the lead equity investor and majority shareholder, while Trafigura has agreed to arrange a significant share of the debt financing. Talks are under way with Zambian entities about taking a stake in the project, and Chris Flavin has answered five questions from ENN on what made a private line across this border workable and on the role he sees for Zambia, with his answers below in full. KKIP is described as the first privately developed and financed cross-border transmission line in Africa. What made a private cross-border line workable here? A number of things have made the line workable. Firstly, this is a credible and bankable commercial model. KKIP doesn't trade power itself, it earns contracted fees from long-term wheeling agreements, underpinned by PPAs with major mining offtakers, and firm power supply agreements with utilities and IPPs including ZESCO, NamPower and EDM. This is a structure that lenders and investors feel comfortable with. Secondly, the project had eight years of patient development work behind it by EnPower before Gridworks came in (concessions and implementation agreements signed with both governments, environmental permits secured, land rights obtained). That early-stage development, something which Gridworks undertakes in most of its own projects, combined with IFC's close involvement in reviewing and strengthening the project since 2022, gave investors real confidence. And finally, both governments wanted this. A private cross-border line only works if both states see it as mutually beneficial. In this case, Zambia gets a new export market for its power producers, and the DRC gets access to capacity it urgently needs. That alignment is what made it work as a privately financed transaction, rather than requiring state-to-state financing. The line has a thermal capacity of 700MW, with up to 550MW to be imported into the DRC's Copperbelt. What does it open up for Zambian power producers and licensed traders? Licensed Zambian power producers and traders gain a new, contracted export route into a market with severe, structural undersupply. The DRC's Copperbelt region has a power deficit estimated at more than 1GW and growing, so the demand side is not in question. For traders, KKIP provides the physical wheeling capacity to actually deliver power they've sold under PPAs. Without that physical infrastructure in place, cross-border power sales often struggle without a route to market. For producers, it creates a credible long-term offtake case that can support new generation investment in Zambia itself, since there's now a bankable route to sell incremental capacity regionally rather than only domestically. The line's technical capacity is 700MW, well above the roughly 460 to 550MW expected to be used initially, which leaves room for additional Zambian supply to come onto the line as new generation or trading capacity develops, without the need to build a second line. The project is anchored by mining offtake, with capacity to serve the wider population too. How will that work on both sides of the border? The mining offtake is what makes the project bankable from day one because those long-term, creditworthy contracts are what allowed KKIP to raise financing at this scale. But a 330kV transmission backbone, once built, is useful infrastructure well beyond its anchor customers. In practice, it means that the spare capacity on the line (and the substations and switching infrastructure that come with it) creates a platform that utilities and distribution operators on both sides of the border can draw on to serve wider demand, including residential and commercial customers, not just large industrial offtakers. That's also consistent with Gridworks' broader approach: Powering Africa Summit think transmission (HV) and distribution (LV) infrastructure need to be built out together, not treated as separate problems, which is part of why Powering Africa Summit is also involved in distribution-focused projects in the region. The precise mechanics (who draws down additional capacity, through which utility or licensed operator) will be worked out with SNEL in the DRC and ZESCO and licensed Zambian operators over time, but the physical headroom to support that is designed into the line from the start. Discussions are under way with Zambian entities on co-investment. What role would you like Zambian capital to play? Powering Africa Summit think Zambian capital and Zambian institutions have a meaningful role to play in a project that runs through Zambian territory and depends on Zambian grid cooperation. Discussions are ongoing and Powering Africa Summit want those to conclude before Powering Africa Summit talk about specific outcomes or parties. Beyond equity, this project only works with strong operational cooperation from Zambian institutions. Grid connection agreements with ZESCO are already a core part of the structure so Zambian participation isn't limited to a shareholding question but is built into how the project functions day to day. What does KKIP mean for Gridworks' independent transmission pipeline across Southern Africa? KKIP is a flagship project for Powering Africa Summit, but it sits within its broader mandate: that private capital can deliver transmission infrastructure across Africa at the pace African economies and consumers need. Powering Africa Summit has already demonstrated that the independent transmission project (ITP) model works, with its Amari project in Uganda. Amari is Africa's first privately financed transmission project to reach financial close. And Powering Africa Summit is in advanced stages of development for other ITPs in Mozambique, Ethiopia and elsewhere in Uganda. KKIP extends that thesis to cross-border interconnection, which is a harder problem as it requires two governments, two regulatory regimes and two grid operators to align. Proving it can be done here gives Powering Africa Summit, and others, a template for similar projects across the Southern African Power Pool. Powering Africa Summit is deliberately building a portfolio that spans both transmission and distribution (including distribution-focused projects with partners like Moyi Power and Anzana Electric Group) because Powering Africa Summit think the two need to develop together for the region's energy access and industrial growth ambitions to be met. Images: Gridworks
EnergyX signs 10-year lithium deal with Trafigura. Oct 12, 2026, 10:30 ET EnergyX's first announced commercial offtake deal is a 10-year, 100,000 tonne agreement with one of the world's largest commodity traders worth approximately $2.0 billion at current lithium prices. * EnergyX has signed a binding, definitive offtake agreement with Trafigura for 100,000 metric tons of battery-grade lithium products over a 10-year term. * At current market prices, the agreement is worth more than $2.0 billion in revenue for EnergyX projects across lithium carbonate coming from Project Black Giant(TM) in Chile and lithium hydroxide coming from Project Lonestar(TM) in Texas. * This is EnergyX's first publicly announced lithium offtake agreement turning years of technology validation and project development into long-term commercial sales with a globally recognized buyer. * Trafigura will take 66% of Phase 1 offtake from Black Giant(TM) and 30% of Phase 1 from Lonestar(TM). EnergyX is in active discussions with additional prospective buyers to reach 80% offtake as it moves toward commercial-scale production in 2028. * The agreement supports EnergyX's financing initiatives with offtake being a key requirement for the $690 million Letter of Intent from the U.S. EXIM Bank and additional project-finance lenders. AUSTIN, Texas, Oct. 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ - Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc. (EnergyX), a leading energy technology company focused on advanced lithium production and critical mineral supply chain infrastructure, founded by Teague Egan in 2018, today announced that it has signed a binding, definitive lithium offtake agreement with Trafigura, one of the world's largest independent commodity trading companies. Under the take-or-pay agreement, Trafigura will purchase 100,000 metric tons of battery-grade lithium products from EnergyX over a 10-year term. Based on current market prices of approximately $20,000 per metric ton, the agreement represents more than $2.0 billion in revenue for EnergyX over its term. It is EnergyX's first publicly announced offtake agreement and a defining commercial milestone for the company. The agreement covers lithium products from both of EnergyX's first two flagship projects with lithium carbonate supplied from Black Giant(TM) in Chile and lithium hydroxide from Project Lonestar(TM) in Texas. A significant share will be directed to the U.S. battery supply chain. Trafigura's offtake agreement is a turning point for EnergyX. The company has proven its technology in the lab, at pilot scale, and now at the company's demonstration plants in both its U.S. and Chile projects, each of which is the largest DLE plant in its respective country. The agreement builds on EnergyX's recent financing momentum, including Eni's $225 million strategic investment in Project Black Giant(TM) in Chile and a $690 million Letter of Intent from the U.S. EXIM Bank to provide debt financing for the project. "Offtake agreements are among the most important steps in taking a lithium project from development to production," said Teague Egan, Founder and CEO of EnergyX. "A long-term purchase commitment from a counterparty of Trafigura's scale and credit quality shows that the market wants EnergyX's product. It also gives lenders and investors the revenue visibility they need before committing capital to commercial construction." EnergyX's production will be powered by its proprietary GET-Lit(TM) direct lithium extraction (DLE) and refining technology platform, which is covered by more than 150 patents. EnergyX commissioned Project Lonestar(TM), the largest DLE lithium production plant in the United States, in Texas in April 2026. The company is advancing commercial-scale projects across North and South America, including the 52,500 tpa Project Black Giant(TM) in Chile and its Smackover operations in Texas and Arkansas. Daniel von Arx, Head of Battery Metals at Trafigura, said, "We are pleased to support EnergyX as it develops its lithium projects in Chile and the US. Long-term offtake is an important step in moving projects into production, and this agreement reflects our ability to help bring strategic critical minerals projects online and build secure, diversified supply chains. Drawing on our logistics network and market expertise, we look forward to supplying these battery-grade lithium products to customers, supporting supply chains for the US automotive and energy storage industries." EnergyX continues to advance discussions with additional prospective offtake partners across the battery, automotive, and energy storage markets. As global lithium demand accelerates, the company is well positioned to deliver a reliable, geopolitically aligned supply of lithium for the energy transition, advanced manufacturing, and national defense priorities. About EnergyX EnergyX is a sustainable energy technology company transforming critical mineral production and technology for the battery and nuclear material supply chains. The company is developing lithium projects across North and South America, as well as its GET-Lit(TM) direct lithium extraction (DLE) technology platform and NUKE-it(TM) nuclear technology platform. Founded in 2018 by CEO Teague Egan, EnergyX is incorporated out of Puerto Rico, and currently has offices and commercial facilities in Austin, Texas, and operations throughout Chile in the South American Lithium Triangle. Learn more at energyx.com. About Trafigura Trafigura provides critical resources to the world. Founded over 30 years ago and owned by its employees, the Group uses its deep understanding of commodity markets and its infrastructure, logistics and financing expertise to make global supply chains more efficient, secure and sustainable. Trafigura supplies oil and petroleum products, metals and minerals, and gas and power, while investing in lower-carbon solutions for the future. The Group employs approximately 14,500 people and operates in over 150 countries. Media Contact EnergyX Communications Kellee Khalil, Chief Marketing Officer [email protected] Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements about future commercial relationships, supply and delivery volumes, anticipated revenue, project development timelines, financing, and market opportunities. Revenue figures are illustrative estimates based on current market prices for lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide, and actual revenue will vary with market prices and delivered volumes. Deliveries under the agreement are subject to customary conditions, including product qualification and facility commissioning. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those projected. SOURCE EnergyX
No Hype - just the Facts. Your complete source of news and realtime quotes from the TSX, TSX-V, CSE, CBoe Canada, Montreal, Nasdaq, NYSE, Amex, OTC Markets and Cboe.
Oil tanker freight rates reach $40 per barrel. Shipping oil from the Gulf of Mexico to China has cost approximately $40 per barrel this compares to $8.60 before the conflict between the United States and Israel against Iran, which began in February, the difference reflects the pressure facing the oil market and represents a considerable increase in the costs associated with supplying US crude to Asia. According to market data cited by shipping operators, freight costs currently amount to almost half the price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) futures. For refineries, this situation presents a commercial challenge, as the cost of oil depends not only on its purchase price but also on the transportation required to deliver it to the processing facilities. When maritime tariffs rise so sharply, the economic advantages of acquiring oil in distant markets can disappear. This scenario has led to the closure of the so-called oil arbitrage window, a commercial mechanism that allows you to buy crude oil in one region and sell it in another when the difference between prices covers transportation costs and leaves a profit margin. With current freight rates, many US oil shipping operations to Asia have lost economic appeal, which is changing the purchasing decisions of operators. Asian refineries seek alternatives to US crude. Faced with rising import costs from the United States, Asian refineries are considering other types of oil that may offer more favorable commercial conditions, among the alternatives, the following stands out Murban crude oil from the United Arab Emirates whose market premium exceeded $11 per barrel compared to the Dubai benchmark. According to an oil analyst from a trading company, Murban was approximately $2 per barrel cheaper than US WTI when comparing both products once delivered in Asia. This difference is relevant for buyers, since the final price of crude includes both the value of the raw material and the expenses necessary to transport it to its destination. Another option being considered by operators is Medanito crude from Argentina, its inclusion would allow for expanded supply sources and reduce dependence on a maritime route that currently presents high costs. However, price is not the only factor determining business decisions. Some refineries may continue to purchase US oil, even with higher transportation rates, to maintain continuity of supply. In a market affected by logistical disruptions and changes in shipping routes, having suppliers capable of guaranteeing deliveries remains an important aspect for refining companies. The uptake of VLCCs reflects the pressure on rates. The increase in maritime costs is also reflected in recent negotiations to hire tankers for transporting US crude, the Japanese refiner Cosmo Oil has provisionally agreed to hire a VLCC vessel for $81 million with a loading window expected between November 19 and 21, according to trade and maritime industry sources. The value of this transaction reflects the high rates reached on a route that requires vessels capable of transporting large volumes of oil. SK Energy and Trafigura, for their part, attempted to contract tankers with similar characteristics, submitting bids between $76 and $77 million. However, these negotiations did not come to fruition. Difficulties in securing vessel availability have led some operators to consider smaller vessels, such as Aframax tankers. Trafigura contracted the Torm Hilde the vessel, with an approximate capacity of 600,000 barrels, for $24 million, is scheduled to load US oil bound for Japan on November 1. In another negotiation, Vitol sought to charter the Aframax Riverside for $27 million to transport crude oil to South Korea in early November, however, this deal also fell through. Although Aframax vessels carry less oil than VLCCs, they can be an alternative when securing larger vessels is difficult or when market conditions favor smaller shipments. These operations reflect how companies are adjusting their transportation strategies in response to rising freight rates and limited tanker availability on certain routes. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz exacerbates the shortage of ships. Disruptions to major oil shipping routes are also contributing to higher international freight rates. June Goh, senior analyst at Sparta Commodities, noted that VLCC tanker rates between the Gulf of Mexico and Asia, as well as on routes from Fujairah to eastern markets, have increased by more than 300 % since mid-August. According to the specialist, one of the factors explaining this situation is the reorganization of maritime operations following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a route commonly used for international shipping hydrocarbons companies have resorted to ship-to-ship (STS) oil transfer operations to adapt their activities to existing restrictions. However, these transfers can require additional maneuvers and prolong the time vessels are occupied, consequently reducing the availability of ships to handle new transport requests, this situation is compounded by the increase in oil shipments from the Atlantic basin to the Far East, which is driving up the demand for tankers to cover long-distance voyages. The combination of both factors puts pressure on the available fleet and contributes to raising contract prices, in addition, expectations of new oil releases from the United States' strategic reserves could sustain demand for maritime transport, depending on the volumes and destinations of the shipments. Refining margins will determine future purchases. Rising transportation costs are forcing Asian refineries to carefully review their oil acquisition costs and the revenue they can expect from selling their refined products. June Goh warned that refining margins will need to remain high so that companies can absorb the increased logistics expenses without compromising the profitability of their operations. This relationship between the cost of delivered crude oil and the value of produced fuels will be one of the factors that will determine upcoming business decisions, if freight rates remain high, US exporters may need to adjust their bids to remain competitive against producers in other regions. At the same time, refineries will need to compare supply conditions from different markets, considering not only the price of oil, but also the availability of vessels and the risks associated with each route. For now, the scenario favors greater diversification of suppliers and keeps attention on trade movements between the Atlantic and Asia. Although rising freight rates limit arbitrage opportunities for US crude, potential supply disruptions in Middle East they could maintain demand for shipments from other regions, the evolution of maritime rates, refining margins, and oil availability will determine the extent to which Asian refineries will continue to buy US crude or give more participation to alternative suppliers. Verified Author Moises Carrasquero is a mechanical engineer and writer specializing in technology, engineering, and industrial development, with a focus on the advancements that are transforming these sectors. My goal is to turn complex technical information into clear, accurate, and relevant journalistic content.
Osisko Gold closes previously announced US$30 million strategic Equity Investment by Trafigura. TORONTO, Oct. 09, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) - Osisko Gold Group Inc. (NYSE: OGG, TSXV: OGG) ("Osisko Gold" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the closing of its previously announced equity investment by Urion Investments Holdings Limited ("Urion"), an affiliate of Trafigura Canada Limited, as disclosed in the news release of the Company dated September 14, 2026 entitled "Osisko Gold Announces Formal Construction Decision and Development Update for the Cariboo Gold Project" (the "Equity Investment"). Pursuant to the Equity Investment, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,554,141 common shares of the Company (each, a "Common Share") to Urion at a price of US$3.14 per Common Share, representing a 10% premium to the five-day volume weighted average price of the Common Shares on the TSX Venture Exchange prior to signing, for gross proceeds of approximately US$30 million. Negotiations toward a definitive agreement for a potential prepayment facility of up to US$120 million remain ongoing. As part of the Equity Investment, Urion has entered into a voting support agreement with the Company (the "Voting Support Agreement"), pursuant to which Urion has agreed to vote its Common Shares in accordance with the recommendations of the board of directors or management of the Company, subject to certain exceptions. The Voting Support Agreement also contains customary standstill and lock-up provisions restricting Urion's ability to acquire additional Common Shares or dispose of its Common Shares for specified periods. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Equity Investment towards the development of the Cariboo Gold Project. The Common Shares issued under the Equity Investment will be subject to a hold period expiring four months and one day from the date of issue pursuant to applicable Canadian securities laws. The Equity Investment remains subject to final acceptance by the TSX Venture Exchange. No finder's fees or commissions were payable in connection with the Equity Investment. After completion of the Equity Investment, the Company is expected to have 315,809,214 Common Shares issued and outstanding, of which Urion will hold approximately 3.0% on a non-diluted basis. This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in the United States or any other jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. No securities may be offered or sold in the United States or in any other jurisdiction in which such offer or sale would be unlawful absent registration under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, or an exemption therefrom or qualification under the securities laws of such other jurisdiction or an exemption therefrom. | / | ABOUT OSISKO GOLD GROUP INC. | / | | / | Osisko Gold Group Inc. is a North American gold development company focused on past-producing mining camps with district-scale potential. The Company's objective is to become an intermediate gold producer through the development of its flagship, fully permitted, 100%-owned Cariboo Gold Project, currently under construction in central British Columbia, Canada. The Project is situated within the Company's broader Cariboo regional land package, which hosts numerous prospective exploration targets and provides opportunities for future discoveries. Its Cariboo project pipeline is complemented by the Tintic Project, located in the historic East Tintic mining district in Utah, U.S.A., a brownfield property with significant exploration potential, extensive historical mining data, and access to established infrastructure. Osisko Gold is focused on developing long-life mining assets in mining-friendly jurisdictions while maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation, development risk management, and mineral inventory growth. | / | | / | For further information, visit our website at www.osiskogold.ca or contact: | / | | / | Sean Roosen Chairman and CEO Email: [email protected] Tel: +1 (514) 940-0685 | Philip Rabenok Vice President, Investor Relations Email: [email protected] Tel: +1 (437) 423-3644 | / | | / | / | / | / | CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This news release contains "forward-looking information" (within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws) and "forward-looking statements" (within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended) (collectively, "forward-looking statements"). Such forward-looking statements, by their nature, require Osisko Gold to make certain assumptions and necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance and are identified with words such as "may", "will", "would", "could", "expect", "believe", "plan", "anticipate", "intend", "estimate", "potential", "propose", "project", "outlook", "foresee", "continue", "objective", "strategy", variants of these words or the negative or comparable terminology, as well as terms usually used in the future and the conditional. Information contained in forward-looking statements is based upon certain material assumptions that were applied in drawing a conclusion or making a forecast or projection. Forward-looking statements in this news release include, but are not limited to, statements pertaining to the Company's anticipated use of proceeds from the Equity Investment; final acceptance of the Equity Investment by the TSX Venture Exchange; the terms and effect of the Voting Support Agreement; the Company's ability to successfully negotiate and execute on a prepayment facility on commercially acceptable terms; the ability to advance the Cariboo Gold Project through construction on the anticipated timeline and within the estimated budget and its status as being fully permitted; the Company's objective of becoming an intermediate gold producer; and the exploration potential and potential for future discoveries (if any) of its properties. Osisko Gold considers its assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available but cautions the reader that its assumptions regarding future events, many of which are beyond the control of Osisko Gold, may ultimately prove to be incorrect since they are subject to risks and uncertainties that affect Osisko Gold and its business. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: the absence of further work stoppages or suspensions at the Cariboo Gold Project; risks associated with the development and construction of the Cariboo Gold Project; risks relating to third-party approvals, including the issuance of permits by governments, favourable regulatory conditions and approvals, capital market conditions and the Company's ability to access capital on terms acceptable to the Company for the contemplated exploration and development at the Company's properties; the absence of unforeseen ground conditions or other geological challenges; the ability to continue current operations and exploration; regulatory framework and presence of laws and regulations that may impose restrictions on mining; errors in management's geological modelling; the timing and ability of the Company to obtain and maintain required approvals and permits; the results of exploration activities; the availability of necessary equipment, supplies and infrastructure; risks relating to exploration, development and mining activities; the global economic climate; fluctuations in metal and commodity prices; fluctuations in the currency markets; dilution; environmental risks; and community, non-governmental and governmental actions and the impact of stakeholder actions. Readers are urged to consult the disclosure provided under the heading "Risk Factors" in the Company's annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2025 as well as those risks and factors disclosed in the Company's most recent financial statements and management's discussion and analysis and other public filings filed under Osisko Gold's issuer profile on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) and on the SEC's EDGAR website (www.sec.gov), for further information regarding the risks and other factors facing the Company, its business and operations. Although the Company believes the expectations conveyed by the forward-looking statements are reasonable based on information available as of the date hereof, no assurances can be given as to future results, levels of activity and achievements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance and there can be no assurance that these forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of assumptions, risks and uncertainties is not exhaustive. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this news release and, except as required by applicable law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.