Summer 2027

Program Specialist Intern

Student Corps Program

Posted on 9/14/2026

Deadline 10/9/26
General Motors

General Motors

10,001+ employees

Automaker designing, manufacturing, and selling vehicles

No salary listed

No H1B Sponsorship

Warren, MI, USA

In Person

Full-time onsite work is required at the Global Technical Center in Warren or an assigned high school.

Bachelor's, Master's

Category
Social & Community Services (1)
Required Skills
Communications

Get referred to General Motors

See people who can refer or advise you

Requirements
  • Pursuing a bachelor's or master's degree in business, engineering, communications, psychology, technology, social work, education, or a related field.
  • Must be graduating between December 2027 and June 2029.
  • Available to work full-time, 40 hours per week, during the 12-week summer internship.
  • Demonstrated leadership through academic, extracurricular, community service, or other activities.
  • Strong interest in mentoring students and supporting community-focused work.
Responsibilities
  • Co-lead a school team with General Motors retirees and guide high school interns through community improvement projects.
  • Brainstorm, research, design, and help execute projects that improve the school or surrounding neighborhood.
  • Teach and facilitate lessons on resumes, mock interviews, professionalism, leadership, and other life skills.
  • Mentor high school students as they explore career interests, education options, and post-high-school goals.
  • Help students understand how to navigate higher education and connect their interests to potential career paths.
  • Build productive relationships with high school students, General Motors retirees, program leaders, and other partners.
  • Communicate expectations, provide encouragement, and help create an inclusive and supportive team environment.
  • Maintain the budget for the assigned school team and support accurate program administration.
  • Track and update payroll information for high school interns, as assigned.
  • Participate in workshops, training, mentorship activities, and a group project addressing a real-world business challenge.
  • Meet regularly with an assigned General Motors mentor to set goals, practice professional skills, and prepare for life after college.
  • Support other program activities and related responsibilities as assigned.
Desired Qualifications
  • Strong interpersonal and relationship-building skills, with the ability to work effectively with high school students, retirees, and program leaders.
  • Excellent verbal and written communication skills, including the ability to explain complex subjects to a broad audience.
  • Ability to work collaboratively and share knowledge in a fast-paced environment.
  • High level of integrity, initiative, accountability, and trustworthiness.
  • Ability to adapt to changing priorities and take ownership of assigned responsibilities.
  • Customer-focused and innovative approach to problem-solving.
  • Willingness and ability to participate in community improvement activities, which may include yard work, painting, and learning to use new tools.
  • Ability to drive company vehicles for work assignments, such as 15-passenger vans or pickup trucks, if required by the assignment.

General Motors designs, manufactures, and sells vehicles and vehicle parts worldwide under brands like Chevrolet, GMC, Cadillac, and Buick, and also offers financing and insurance through GM Financial. Its products include internal combustion and electric powertrains, with features such as Dynamic Fuel Management to improve efficiency, and a focus on electric and autonomous mobility. GM differentiates itself with a large brand portfolio, a substantial financing arm, and commitments to sustainability, community service, and board diversity. The company’s goal is to lead in mobility by delivering reliable vehicles and services while advancing electric and autonomous technologies and strong social and environmental responsibilities.

Company Size

10,001+

Company Stage

IPO

Headquarters

Detroit, Michigan

Founded

1908

Get referred to General Motors

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • GM raised 2026 EBIT guidance to $14-$16 billion after Q2 2026 beat.
  • China joint-venture profits nearly tripled to $591 million in first-half 2026.
  • The September 9, 2026 battery lab and June Peak Energy deal deepen energy optionality.

What critics are saying

  • GM booked $2.3 billion EV charges in Q2 2026 and still restructures factories.
  • GM cut 1,200 CAMI jobs and 350 Lansing jobs in August 2026.
  • China restructuring and an 11% sales drop expose GM to margin destruction if rivalry intensifies.

What makes General Motors unique

  • GM's Silverado, Sierra, and Corvette ZR1X still define American performance engineering.
  • GM Defense revived in 2017, now targets nearly $700 million revenue in 2026.
  • Warren battery campus, including the 2026 BCDC, attacks cell chemistry and manufacturing gaps.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

Paid Vacation

Paid Sick Leave

Paid Holidays

Parental Leave

Health Insurance

Dental Insurance

Vision Insurance

Life Insurance

401(k) Company Match

401(k) Retirement Plan

Tuition Reimbursement

Student Loan Assistance

Flexible Work Hours

Discount on GM vehicles

Company News

Yahoo Finance
Sep 12th, 2026
GM's China profits nearly triple despite 11% sales drop as carmaker trades volume for margin

General Motors sold fewer vehicles in China during the first half of 2026 but nearly tripled its profits from Chinese joint ventures. GM's wholesale shipments dropped 11% to 865,000 units, whilst net income at its joint ventures rose from $197 million to $591 million. The company's equity income more than doubled to $248 million from $116 million. GM attributes the increase to restructuring efforts that began in 2024, including closing production lines and trimming its dealer network to shed low-margin volume. The strategy comes with costs. GM recorded a $364 million impairment charge related to its electric vehicle strategic realignment in China, adding to $7.9 billion in global EV charges from 2025 and another $2.3 billion in Q2 2026.

Latitude Media
Sep 9th, 2026
Inside GM's new battery lab - and its plans to challenge Asian rivals.

Inside GM's new battery lab - and its plans to challenge Asian rivals. Outside Detroit, the automaker is building a workshop for testing new chemistries and de-risking manufacturing before scaling up. September 9, 2026 Image credit: Lisa Martine Jenkins (Photo credit: GM) For nearly a century, Detroit automakers like General Motors led the world in engine design and mass manufacturing. That helped them maintain a large share of global car sales at least through the late 1990s, even as German and Japanese automakers entered the market. Now, batteries are the competitive battleground, both for electric vehicles and storage. GM is betting that investing in next-generation technology is the best way to gain an edge, pouring $900 million into first-of-its-kind research and prototype facilities on the same campus where GM has innovated in cars for decades in the Detroit suburb of Warren, Michigan. The company has big ambitions, even as the final phase of the project is still under construction: multi-floor warehouses so large that one has its own substation, and is bustling inside with contractors, equipment suppliers, and HVAC technicians. GM aims to fill missing links in the U.S. battery supply chain that have forced the industry to rely on Asian cell makers - such as the South Korean and Japanese conglomerates LG and Panasonic, respectively, or China's CATL and BYD. Until now, North America has lacked some critical steps in the battery development pipeline that sit between the lab and churning out hundreds of thousands of full-sized battery packs per day at gigascale factories, GM officials told Latitude Media during a tour of its new campus last week. Those steps, described colloquially as "the Valley of Death," involve testing larger and larger prototypes to ensure they are manufactured with the highest performance at the lowest possible cost. It'll be challenging to catch up to Chinese manufacturers that are ahead, in terms of scaling up production lines. But GM is a frontrunner in the Western market and aims to meet growing U.S. demand for cheaper batteries for EVs and storage - especially domestic batteries that qualify for tax credits. As Mo Gallegos, head of GM's Battery Cell Development Center, put it in during the tour: "When you understand how cells are made from the ground up, you become a better buyer and a better partner, as well as influence the broader industry." The China threat. While lithium-ion batteries so far make up the bulk of the market, GM hopes that its in-house expertise will give it an advantage in the U.S. over Asian competitors for two new battery chemistries. One, known as LMR or lithium-manganese-rich, could theoretically make for cheaper EV batteries with 400 miles of range on a single charge. Meanwhile, sodium-ion has a lot of potential for storage, company officials said, even though it has lower energy density than standard lithium-ion. That's because sodium-ion batteries are more durable in a wider range of climates, from extreme heat to freezing cold. They potentially wouldn't need to be paired with costly cooling technology - currently a standard feature of "refrigerated batteries in the desert," as Andy Oury, GM's business planning manager for battery, propulsion, and sustainability, described it. Sodium-ion also burns at lower temperatures, making it easier to avoid fires. Crucially, from a geopolitical standpoint, the U.S. has an abundant amount of sodium and the technology doesn't rely on Chinese-controlled supply chains for lithium, cobalt, or nickel. All of these advantages could help keep the combined capital and operational expenditures of sodium-ion batteries 20% lower than lithium-ion over the lifetime of an asset, GM estimates. The automaker introduced LMR last year under its joint venture with LG Energy Solution, and aims to commercialize the chemistry in 2028. GM has a similar timeline for sodium-ion, although it just started prototyping sodium-ion battery cells in June. For more on GM's move into LMR batteries, listen to Kurt Kelty, GM's VP of batteries, on this episode of the Catalyst podcast: GM hosting research and development and new prototype factories all within the Warren campus is the linchpin of that plan, serving as the proving ground for new batteries before eventually scaling up to gigawatt-scale production. The company's Wallace Battery Cell Innovation Center was completed in 2022, while the Battery Cell Development Center is expected to wrap up construction this year. These capabilities are also integral to the automaker's bid to prevent the U.S. from repeating its lithium-ion market. China made well over 80% of lithium-ion batteries in 2025, according to the International Energy Agency, and even factories in the U.S. and Europe rely on imports from China for a majority of their components. China also controls much of the mineral supply chains. That imbalance led the Biden administration to enact federal tax breaks for U.S. battery makers, which Congress largely preserved in the GOP's One Big Beautiful Bill - albeit with stricter criteria for companies with ties to "foreign entities of concern," meaning countries like China and Russia. The law did eliminate consumer tax breaks for EVs, weakening sales and prompting several automakers, including GM and Ford, to repurpose their EV battery capacity for energy storage. The latter is widely seen as the more promising market, now that electricity demand is soaring thanks to the data center boom, electrification, and reshored manufacturing. China's battery leadership is unlikely to shift in the nearterm, the IEA said in February; that includes for sodium-ion batteries, given that nearly all of that manufacturing capacity announced so far was located in China. That said, technology innovation could diversify supply chains as long as the U.S. can drive down production costs. Batch-cooked batteries. That's the key reason why GM is investing in its own know-how. Oury said it's been a constant struggle to get the U.S. battery industry to focus on lowering costs rather than just maximizing energy density. And while LG is a great partner, GM hasn't been a cell manufacturer itself, and therefore didn't have the authority or expertise to make decisions about new chemistries or production processes, or to switch to more local suppliers. In short, GM wanted its own test kitchens. Throughout the tour, officials repeatedly used baking analogies for its new battery R&D capabilities. Electrode slurries made of mineral powders, binders, and solvents are swirled together in mixers resembling a Kitchen Aid. These slurries are rolled onto long sheets of aluminum and copper, which are then sliced and baked. These slices are layered into battery cells before entering "formation," the final step of manufacturing that involves charging and discharging a newly assembled battery cell for the first time to activate its internal chemistry. The finished product is like a twice-baked cake. GM officials described the formation step as the "secret sauce" of the battery industry. "Cell makers don't discuss this because it determines battery quality," Oury said. Once the BCDC is complete later this year, GM will have battery test kitchens at three different scales spread across its 700-acre campus in Warren, which first opened in the 1950s with a keynote address by President Dwight D. Eisenhower. Wallace can make about a dozen full-sized prototype battery cells per week, while the BCDC is expected to make thousands. These trial and error phases help avoid expensive missteps before moving into factories with gigawatt-hours of production capacity, and give GM greater visibility into manufacturing costs. Advances in virtual engineering, digital twins, and AI computing also allow the company to model more battery chemistries on the front end. Radu Theyyunni, director of global propulsion virtual engineering, said his department simulated hundreds of thousands of versions of LMR technologies before GM built the first prototypes. The same methodology is being applied to sodium-ion, from the atomic level all the way to the cell and battery pack. "We can tell in a matter of days how changes to the battery chemistry will affect cost, range, performance, and safety," Theyyunni said. While the action is currently taking place within the single-square-mile campus, GM plans to transfer the breakthroughs that emerge in Warren to factories with gigawatt-scale plants. The company already announced plans to make LMR batteries at sites in Ohio and Tennessee under its joint venture with LG Energy Solution. A similar site has yet to be selected for sodium-ion technology. It remains a nascent industry, especially in the U.S., but GM isn't alone in its interest. The automaker in June announced a partnership with Peak Energy, which was founded in 2023 by alumni of Tesla and Northvolt and is similarly working on lowering the cost of sodium-based, utility-scale storage. The two companies plan to collaborate on new cells, where GM will retain exclusive manufacturing rights and Peak will incorporate the technology into its storage systems. As Cameron Dales, co-founder and chief commercial officer of Peak Energy, told Latitude Media in June, partnering with a player with the manufacturing legacy of GM can be a major boon. "We're at the very early days - kind of where LFP was 10 years ago, on the steep improvement curve," Dales said. "But as a small company, we don't necessarily have the resources or the scale to fully realize all of the potential and the projects that are on our roadmap by ourselves." * Catherine Boudreau Catherine Boudreau is a senior reporter at Latitude Media. She's spent a decade covering, energy, climate and agriculture issues at the intersection of business and policy, at publications including Business Insider and Politico. Related Reading Stay ahead of energy's next frontier. Subscribe for free:

JD Supra
Sep 9th, 2026
Punitive liability through the rear window: lessons learned from a class action filing.

Punitive liability through the rear window: lessons learned from a class action filing. LinkedIn Facebook X Gonzalez v. General Motors, LLC is a class action suit filed on June 1, 2026 in the Eastern District of California, alleging General Motors knowingly sold defective trucks.[i] Specifically, the complaint alleges it sold trucks knowing the back window leaked.[ii] Despite this case involving issues with a product, this is not a products liability case, according to the causes of action, but is instead a deceptive advertising action, with a quick "cut-to-the-chase" in the second cause of action which asserts that plaintiffs can be awarded punitive damages.[iii] The Complaint The complaint lists two causes of action: 1) Violations of Business and Professions Code 17200, and 2) Violations of Consumer Legal Remedies Act.[iv] Plaintiff Filiberto Gonzalez filed the action on behalf of himself and anyone who, in California, purchased or leased any of several trucks sold by General Motors and placed into service after January 3, 2019. Mr. Gonzalez purchased his new 2019 GMC Sierra 1500 around April 2019.[v] The complaint's recital of factual allegations includes the claim that the trucks were equipped with "defective rear sliding glass windows", and this allowed water to reach the inside of the cab.[vi] The complaint alleges the windows were designed and constructed in a defective manner making them susceptible to such leaks, potentially causing mold to grow and cause damage to electrical systems in the truck, making the truck unsafe to drive.[vii] The recitation of facts also alleges General Motors was aware of the defect. Supporting this allegation, Mr. Gonzalez points to a January 2019 Technical Service Bulletin published by General Motors, saying customers may complain of water in the back of the cabs of their trucks.[viii] The recitation goes on to say General Motors has not disclosed the leak to consumers but instead has concealed this information and not made any effort to protect consumers.[ix] The recitation claims General Motors has not paid for any repairs of any leaking windows. Mr. Gonzalez had his window repaired but paid out of pocket for those repairs. The complaint states any statute of limitations on this claim is tolled by General Motors' alleged concealment of the alleged defect. Strategic Choice of Causes of Action One might instinctively consider Mr. Gonzalez's claims primarily a products defect case. Presumably, Mr. Gonzalez is suing General Motors because his truck was defective. Typically, one might expect to see a negligence argument, or strict liability, or even breach of warranty. However, none of these claims are causes of action in this case; instead, Mr. Gonzalez argues deceptive advertising and violation of a consumer protection statute. This allows him to sidestep the Economic Loss Rule, which, in a strict products liability context, requires a claim of personal injury or property damage.[x] Thus, the Consumer Legal Remedies Act provides a theory of liability which is more broad than physical defect. Just as importantly, perhaps, is that this approach provides mandatory attorney's fees to a plaintiff who prevails. Of course, this strategy puts punitive damages on the table. Defense Industry Takeaway In analyzing Mr. Gonzalez's complaint, it is hard to imagine a defendant in this position prevailing. Genuine settlement efforts would seem to be called for early in the matter, taking full advantage of The Apex(SM), such as providing a number for settlement or mediation, accepting responsibility (in this case, General Motors can easily accept responsibility for issuing the Technical Service Bulletin alerting dealers to the potential problem), personalizing the defendant, and arguing the non-economic factors of this case. The defense arguably should be able to distinguish this case from the infamous Ford Pinto cases or the more recent fatal Ford truck rollover case. Following The Apex(SM) from the earliest stages of this case can lay the groundwork to avoid juror rage and stop this case from becoming just another of many Nuclear Verdicts(R). [i] Gonzalez v. General Motors, unpublished complaint, case no. 1:26-at-02324, pg 1. [ii] Ibid, page 3. [iii] Ibid, page 14. [iv] Ibid, page 14. [v] Ibid, page 2. [vi] Ibid, page 3. [vii] Ibid, page 4. [ix] Ibid, page 5. [x] Jimenez v. Superior Ct., 29 Cal. 4th 473, 58 P.3d 450 (2002) DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising. (C) Tyson & Mendes LLP 2026 Help shape our research. Are you... * a law firm C-suite leader? * general counsel/inhouse legal? or * a recent lateral attorney hire? Share your lateral move experience in our confidential 8-minute survey.

Jalopnik
Sep 8th, 2026
The US Army was using drones way before most people realize.

The US Army was using drones way before most people realize. Add Jalopnik on Google: The collective image of drone warfare moves around, shifting between an MQ-9 Reaper firing a Hellfire missile from 20,000 feet and a DJI drone jerry-rigged with an artillery shell flying into a Russian conscript in Ukraine. While those sorts of ideas might seem relatively modern, the truth is that the U.S. Army was experimenting with armed unmanned aerial vehicles as early as World War I. For the duration of the Great War, the Entente feared that the German Empire would grind its war effort to a halt with strategic Zeppelin bombing raids and U-boat naval blockades. And that fear was inherited by the United States when the country entered the conflict. An inventor in Dayton, Ohio, seemingly had a solution for the Entente's problems: the Kettering Aerial Torpedo. The brainchild of Charles F. Kettering, nicknamed the Bug, was basically a pilotless wooden biplane with close to a 15-foot wingspan. According to the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force, the weapon was propelled by a 40-horsepower 4-cylinder engine built by the Detroit-based De Palma Manufacturing Company, founded by 1915 Indy 500 winner Ralph DePalma. For its one-way sortie, the Bug would be loaded with 180 pounds of high explosive. The weapon was then placed onto a four-wheeled dolly, where it would launch into the sky off a portable rail track. The Bug never saw combat. While the Kettering Aerial Torpedo had a range of 75 miles and could reach a top speed of 120 mph, actually guiding the plane to its target was incredibly difficult. According to the National Air and Space Museum, the Bug used a gyro to maintain stable flight and a barometer to hold level at a specific altitude. The weapon could theoretically fly in a straight line and plow into the side of a Zeppelin, like a torpedo in the sky. For surface targets, the wings could be released on a timer. Ground crew would estimate speed and distance to calculate when the Bug should plummet from above. The Bug had all the ingredients to transform combat during World War I, but it couldn't make it out of testing. During a demonstration flight in Dayton, the Aerial Torpedo flew off-course and nearly crashed into the reviewing stand filled with U.S. Army brass. Regardless, the officers were impressed enough to fund development and continue testing. The Dayton-Wright Airplane Company built fewer than 50 Bugs before the Armistice in November 1919, but none were ever used on the Western Front. The scale of aerial warfare dramatically increased during the Bug's lifespan. It's important to note that powered heavier-than-air flight was still a new concept in 1917. The Wright Flyer made its maiden flight just 14 years earlier. What would become the U.S. Air Force was still merely the Aviation Section of the U.S. Army Signal Corps. During WWI, the aerial warfare unit would evolve into the U.S. Army Air Service, a component multiple orders of magnitude larger than the old section. When the Bug's development was shelved in the 1920s, Air Service officers were already pushing Congress to create an Air Force independent of the Army. The Bug's failings didn't impact Kettering's reputation as an engineering genius, though. Before the Aerial Torpedo, he revolutionized the automotive industry by inventing the electric starter and battery ignition at Delco. General Motors acquired both Delco and Dayton-Wright in 1918 and appointed Kettering its head of research in 1920. He pioneered the use of leaded gasoline while at GM, which should have hurt his reputation, but the General Motors Institute was still renamed Kettering University in 1998 to honor him.

Yahoo Finance
Sep 8th, 2026
GM shares rise 51% in a year, outpacing consumer discretionary sector amid strong earnings and $4.5B supply chain deal

General Motors is outperforming the consumer discretionary sector, with shares up 5.5% over the past three months whilst the State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF fell 2%. Year to date, GM has gained 7.9% and surged 50.9% over the past 52 weeks, compared to the ETF's declines of 3.8% and 2.3% respectively. The automaker's second-quarter revenue reached $48.03 billion, up 1.9% year over year, beating analyst expectations. Adjusted earnings per share of $3.57 exceeded estimates by 8.5%, marking GM's fourth consecutive quarterly beat. Management raised full-year adjusted EBIT guidance to $14 billion to $16 billion and lifted earnings per share guidance to $12 to $14. GM also secured a $4.5 billion parts-purchasing facility to prevent supply chain disruptions.