IJ is an equal opportunity employer.
Don’t meet every single requirement? Studies have shown that women and people of color are less likely to apply to jobs unless they meet every single qualification. At IJ we value a diverse workplace, so if you’re excited about this role but your past experience doesn’t align perfectly with every qualification in the job description, we encourage you to apply anyway. You may be just the right candidate for this or other roles.
To learn more about our culture and benefits, visit our Working at IJ page. No phone calls please.
#LI-Hybrid
Institute for Justice focuses on using public-interest litigation to advance individual freedoms. It wins cases and conducts training, communications, activism, and research to promote economic liberty, educational choice, private property rights, freedom of speech, and other core liberties, while restoring constitutional limits on government power. Its work is carried out through strategic lawsuits, policy advocacy, and education of law students, lawyers, and activists, aiming to help people gain greater control over their own destinies. Compared to peers, IJ emphasizes targeted, impact-focused litigation and a strong emphasis on training the next generation of public-interest advocates alongside research and outreach. The goal is to expand the practical reach of liberty by reducing government overreach and increasing individual autonomy.
Company Size
51-200
Company Stage
N/A
Total Funding
N/A
Headquarters
Arlington, Virginia
Founded
1991
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Flock Systems: San Jose police officer fired after using Flock database to track cousin's domestic violence accuser. San Jose Police Officer Fired for Misusing License-Plate Tracking System in Domestic Violence Case A San Jose police officer was terminated in April 2025 after a yearlong investigation revealed he improperly accessed the department's automated license-plate reader (ALPR) system to track a woman who had accused his cousin of domestic violence. The incident, disclosed by Police Chief Paul Joseph on Friday, highlights growing concerns over the misuse of surveillance technology by law enforcement. The officer, who had served for two years, used his personal phone to retrieve the woman's vehicle location data and shared it with his cousin, enabling the accused abuser to monitor her movements. While the cousin faced no criminal charges in the domestic violence case, the officer's actions were uncovered in February 2025 when the woman reported the harassment to police. An audit of the Flock Systems ALPR database confirmed the unauthorized access. Chief Joseph condemned the breach as a "betrayal of public trust," emphasizing that such violations would result in severe consequences, including termination. Though the officer was not criminally charged due to gaps in California law that currently exempt ALPR data from penalties for unauthorized access Joseph has referred the case to the state's police licensing commission for potential decertification, which could bar the officer from future law enforcement roles. The incident has intensified scrutiny of ALPR technology, which has proliferated across the Bay Area, with nearly 500 cameras installed in San Jose alone. Civil liberties groups, including the ACLU and Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), argue that warrantless access to ALPR data enables abuse, citing cases where officers have used the system to stalk ex-partners or track individuals seeking reproductive healthcare. The EFF, which is suing San Jose over its ALPR program, called the officer's actions a prime example of why judicial oversight is necessary. San Jose is also facing a federal lawsuit from the Institute for Justice, representing residents who oppose the city's warrantless surveillance. The case mirrors broader national concerns, including wrongful detentions due to incorrect plate reads and unauthorized cooperation with immigration authorities. While Chief Joseph defended ALPR technology as a critical crime-fighting tool crediting it with aiding homicide investigations and other arrests he acknowledged the need for stricter legal safeguards. He has endorsed state legislation to criminalize unauthorized ALPR access and issued a department-wide ban on accessing law enforcement databases from personal devices. The city has taken steps to limit data retention, reducing the storage period for plate data from one year to 30 days and restricting surveillance near houses of worship, reproductive health clinics, and consulates. However, privacy advocates argue these measures are insufficient without enforceable legal constraints, pointing to past instances where police agencies bypassed vendor-imposed restrictions. The controversy underscores the ongoing tension between law enforcement's reliance on surveillance tools and civil liberties concerns, with critics warning that unchecked access to ALPR data risks further misuse. "id": "flo1789245053", "linkid": "flock-", "type": "Vulnerability", "date": "9/2026", "severity": "60", "impact": "3", "explanation": "Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks" {'affected_entities': [{'customers_affected': '1 (domestic violence victim)', 'industry': 'Public Safety', 'location': 'San Jose, California, USA', 'name': 'San Jose Police Department', 'size': 'Large (city police department)', 'type': 'Government/Law Enforcement'}], 'attack_vector': 'Insider Threat', 'data_breach': {'data_exfiltration': 'Yes (shared with unauthorized party)', 'number_of_records_exposed': "1 (individual's plate data)", 'personally_identifiable_information': 'Vehicle location tied ' 'to individual', 'sensitivity_of_data': "High (used to track individual's " 'movements)', 'type_of_data_compromised': 'Vehicle location data'}, 'date_detected': '2025-02', 'date_publicly_disclosed': '2025-04', 'date_resolved': '2025-04', 'description': 'A San Jose police officer was terminated in April 2025 after ' 'a yearlong investigation revealed he improperly accessed the ' 'department's automated license-plate reader (ALPR) system to ' 'track a woman who had accused his cousin of domestic ' 'violence. The officer used his personal phone to retrieve the ' 'woman's vehicle location data and shared it with his cousin, ' 'enabling the accused abuser to monitor her movements.', 'impact': {'brand_reputation_impact': 'Betrayal of public trust, increased ' 'scrutiny of law enforcement ' 'surveillance practices', 'data_compromised': 'Vehicle location data', 'legal_liabilities': 'Federal lawsuit (Institute for Justice), ' 'potential state decertification', 'operational_impact': 'Department-wide policy changes and audits', 'systems_affected': 'Flock Systems ALPR database'}, 'investigation_status': 'Closed (officer terminated, case referred to ' 'licensing commission)', 'lessons_learned': 'Need for stricter legal safeguards on ALPR access, risks ' 'of insider threats in law enforcement, importance of ' 'judicial oversight for surveillance technologies, ' 'vulnerabilities in vendor-imposed restrictions', 'motivation': 'Personal (assisting family member in domestic dispute)', 'post_incident_analysis': {'corrective_actions': 'Termination of officer, ' 'policy changes (personal ' 'device ban, reduced data ' 'retention, restricted ' 'surveillance zones), ' 'endorsement of state ' 'legislation, referral to ' 'licensing commission', 'root_causes': 'Lack of legal penalties for ' 'unauthorized ALPR access, ' 'insufficient access controls and ' 'monitoring, insider threat enabled ' 'by personal device use, gaps in ' 'departmental policies'}, 'recommendations': 'Enact state legislation to criminalize unauthorized ALPR ' 'access, implement stricter access controls and auditing ' 'for surveillance systems, enforce department-wide bans on ' 'personal device use for law enforcement databases, reduce ' 'data retention periods, restrict surveillance near ' 'sensitive locations, increase transparency and public ' 'oversight', 'references': [{'source': 'San Jose Police Department (Chief Paul Joseph)'}, {'source': 'ACLU'}, {'source': 'Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)'}, {'source': 'Institute for Justice'}], 'regulatory_compliance': {'legal_actions': 'Federal lawsuit (Institute for ' 'Justice), referral to state ' 'police licensing commission', 'regulations_violated': 'Potential violation of ' 'California law (gaps in ' 'ALPR data protection), ' 'Fourth Amendment concerns ' '(warrantless ' 'surveillance)'}, 'response': {'communication_strategy': 'Public disclosure by Police Chief ' 'Paul Joseph', 'containment_measures': 'Audit of ALPR database, termination of ' 'officer', 'enhanced_monitoring': 'Stricter oversight of ALPR access', 'law_enforcement_notified': 'Internal investigation initiated ' 'after victim report', 'remediation_measures': 'Department-wide ban on accessing law ' 'enforcement databases from personal ' 'devices, reduced data retention period ' '(30 days), restricted surveillance near ' 'sensitive locations'}, 'stakeholder_advisories': 'Civil liberties groups (ACLU, EFF) advocating for ' 'judicial oversight of ALPR systems; law ' 'enforcement agencies urged to review internal ' 'policies', 'threat_actor': 'San Jose Police Officer', 'title': 'San Jose Police Officer Misuses License-Plate Tracking System in ' 'Domestic Violence Case', 'type': 'Unauthorized Access', 'vulnerability_exploited': 'Lack of access controls and monitoring for ALPR ' 'system'} Published by Revolut Discloses Sensitive Customer Data After Falling for Government Domain Spoofing Scam Revolut, the UK-based digital banking and fintech platform,... Sep 12, 2026 New Phishing Campaign Exploits Windows Utility to Target Spanish-Speaking Users A recently uncovered phishing campaign is leveraging the legitimate Windows... Sep 12, 2026 Mississippi Higher Education Network Hit by Security Breach, Universities Notified Days Later A security breach targeting the Mississippi Institutions of... Sep 11, 2026
New database tracking cancelations of license plate reader contracts. Institute for Justice: "As backlash grows against the warrantless use of automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras throughout the country, local governments are increasingly deciding to end their use of these cameras. Today, the Institute for Justice (IJ) unveiled a new database tracking local governments that have canceled or not renewed contracts with ALPR providers since the beginning of 2025. "Local governments have good reasons to want to stem the proliferation of these mass surveillance tools," said IJ Attorney Michael Soyfer. "Rather than narrowly target criminals, ALPRs collect troves of data on ordinary people's movements and compile them in a database officers can freely access on demand. That has predictably led to widespread abuse, which will continue until we implement robust safeguards like a warrant requirement." This is IJ's second database related to ALPRs. The other, published earlier this year, tracks police misuse of ALPRs for purposes including romantic stalking, wrongful stops and detentions, non-law enforcement use, and other types of misconduct. Through its Plate Privacy Project, IJ is engaged in strategic litigation, legislation, media outreach, and activism work to help everyday people push back against the warrantless use of ALPRs and other mass surveillance technologies. IJ has two active federal lawsuits challenging the warrantless use of ALPRs in Norfolk, Virginia and San Jose, California. As of August 28, 2026, 137 local governments are included in IJ's database. *Note: This list does not include jurisdictions that only paused operations of ALPRs or switched to another provider. This list only includes jurisdictions that canceled ALPR contracts.* Search the database here [Scroll down the page to locate the search feature.]
Police officer arrested after tracking ex-girlfriend on Flock camera system over 2,000 times, authorities say. A Kentucky police officer was arrested after authorities said he used the Flock Safety license plate reader camera system to track his ex-girlfriend over 2,000 times, marking the latest in a string of recent law enforcement officer resignations or arrests for alleged abuses of the controversial technology. Shively Police Department Officer Asad Zahir's alleged activity was flagged by the new AI-powered auditing tool implemented by Flock Safety after growing concerns around security and misuse by police, authorities said, in many cases involving officers accused of using the system to stalk exes or romantic interests. The audit assistance tool, now a requirement by Flock Safety, flags abnormal use by officers. The Flock Safety system has been lauded by law enforcement for its investigative capacity, while critics point to the growing list of officers charged with abusing the license plate reader as an example of its overreach and civil liberty violations. Some cities have canceled their Flock contracts - including Tempe, Arizona, on Wednesday - and some critics have gone so far as to vandalize the cameras. "The Flock camera works. When it's used properly it works. There are tons of stats that show it works," Shively Police Chief Andre Bottoms said Wednesday at a news conference announcing the arrest and promising a review of Flock protocols. "It's a very effective tool and we don't want to be judged on the poor decisions made by one officer." Investigators found Zahir had conducted 2,048 Flock searches from January into May to track two vehicles registered to the victim, his child's mother, in Kentucky and Indiana, court records show. During the period he conducted those searches, Zahir harassed the victim and made threatening comments, prompting her to file an order of protection against him, according to the court records. Investigators determined 241 Flock searches happened while that order of protection was in place, from April 17 to May 6, Bottoms said. Zahir, an officer since 2022 who was assigned to the patrol division, listed the reason for the investigation as a drug or narcotics investigation, even though the woman who was targeted was not the subject of any such investigation and has no history indicating any such violations, officials said at the news conference. The AI tool flagged the activity on Monday and by Tuesday, Zahir was in custody, charged with five counts of official misconduct in the fifth degree and five counts of unlawful access to a computer in the fourth degree, court records show. Zahir is currently suspended without pay, pending the outcome of the criminal investigation and internal review, Bottoms said. He was released on his own recognizance Tuesday and is expected to be in court for his arraignment on Friday, online court records show. It's not yet known who will be his legal representation. "Charging this officer was not pleasant. It was a gut punch for me personally," Bottoms said, adding that he had come to personally know each member of the small police department. "Accountability cannot depend on who you are and what position you hold or what badge you're wearing." Meanwhile, a full review of the procedures and directives in the use and oversight of Flock technology is underway, Bottoms said. The review will examine users' access, search requirements, supervisory oversight, auditing practices and the frequency of compliant reviews, Bottoms said. This will determine whether revisions or other safeguards should be implemented, the chief said. Critics question privacy overreach. Flock's nationwide network of automated license plate readers (ALPR) cameras - mounted along public roads - takes images of passing vehicles' plates, color and other characteristics to feed into a database. Police departments contract with the company to search the database, billed as a tool to help solve crimes. The ALPR system has come under scrutiny in recent months with critics questioning the privacy overreach. The Institute for Justice, a nonprofit public interest law firm that has filed lawsuits against Flock on Fourth Amendment grounds, has tracked at least 47 instances of officers being disciplined in some way for alleged abuse of the Flock system for stalking romantic interests. That number is believed to be much higher, according to a reporter for the institute who runs its database. "There are many reasons to think this is only the tip of the iceberg," Christopher Ingraham told CNN. "A lot of incidents just haven't been reported or haven't been detected yet." The Flock system has been used to recover hundreds of stolen vehicles, identify a missing child and even help in homicide investigations, Bottoms said, defending its responsible use. "This is what accountability looks like," Bottoms said, referring to the department's response to the officer's alleged illegal activity. "These actions send a clear message to every member of the department. If you misuse your authority, violate department policy or break the law, you will be held accountable." CNN's Lauren del Valle, Clare Duffy, Eric Levenson and Tanika Gray contributed to this report.
Flock shock rocks cop cam vendor as protests mount. posted by jelizondo on Monday August 31, @08:30AM from the person-of-interest dept. A mischief-maker in a Darth Vader suit recently endorsed Flock at a city council meeting, and it has not helped the company's fortunes. Around the US, citizens have been protesting and sometimes vandalizing the company's network of surveillance cameras. And the advocacy has caused some governments to change course. Government officials, commonly hesitant to second-guess law enforcement practices, have become concerned enough to question these mass surveillance practices. US Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) on Wednesday wrote to Flock CEO Garrett Langley to announce an investigation of "Flock Safety's collection, retention, and dissemination of data gathered by its artificial intelligence cameras." Despite "Darth Vader's" comments last week at a San Diego City Council meeting about the need to "continue utilizing Flock technologies so that we can follow and surveil the rebel scum," a growing number of local governments in the US have been cancelling or choosing not to renew their contracts with Flock and other makers of automated license plate readers (ALPRs). The Institute for Justice (IJ), a Virginia-based legal advocacy non-profit, on Wednesday published a new database that tracks the termination of local government ALPR contracts. As of Wednesday, the database documents 93 local governments that canceled ALPR contracts. The IJ, which is challenging ALPR use on Fourth Amendment grounds in Norfolk, Virginia and San Jose, California, previously published a database that documents police abuse of ALPRs, a topic addressed in Hawley's letter. Incidents include romantic stalking, wrongful traffic stops and detentions, and other forms of misconduct. "I think what's happened is that the American public has woken up to the mass surveillance that quietly arose around them," said Robert Frommer, senior attorney at IJ, in an interview with The Register. "And they don't like it. "It does seem to me that the rate of cancellations, the rate of public protest has increased over the past few months. I think that's both due to more news attention being paid to the real life abuses of this technology, as well as the Supreme Court's recent decision in the geofence case," Frommer said. In that case, SCOTUS ruled that cops need a warrant to grab location data. Frommer said that he believes the IJ's efforts to document ALPRs and associated abuses have helped focus the public's concern and have illustrated the problems with warrantless mass surveillance. ALPRs, from vendors like Flock, Motorola Solutions, and PlateSmart, among others, capture license plates whenever cars drive by, along with geodata and potentially images of people. This data can be combined with other information, effectively putting all passersby under constant surveillance without any warrant. "I think what we're seeing now is the reaction to that," said Frommer, who explained that the problem with Flock cameras is that they're accessible to anyone with login credentials, without any authorization from a supervising authority. "You don't need to go to a judge and get a warrant," Frommer explained. "You don't need anything. And when you basically give that search power to the bored officer in his cop car in the middle of a shift, it inevitably happens that they start using it and start misusing it, whether to look people up personally or whether to investigate people at political protests." These sorts of issues, Frommer said, have made people question whether SoylentNews should live in a panopticon. The IJ's litigation and its Plate Privacy Project, said Frommer, follow from the belief that there are solutions, whether they come from the courts or lawmakers. Pointing to Hawley's letter, he said that this is not just a state or local issue, but has become a federal concern. "I think what the din that you've heard over the past couple of months shows that there absolutely needs to be a change, a reckoning," he said. "And that's what we're pushing for in our litigation. We're pushing for a warrant requirement. You want to go look up somebody's past travels and see where they have been? Go to a judge, explain it, and get a warrant." Flock did not respond to a request for comment.
This morning, nonprofit public interest law firm Institute for Justice is expected to announce that it has partnered with Wildtype and UPSIDE Foods in a federal lawsuit filed against the State of Texas alleging that the state's ban on the sale of cultivated meat is itself unlawful.