Full-Time

Litigation Attorney

Institute for Justice

Institute for Justice

51-200 employees

Public-interest law firm advancing civil liberties

Compensation Overview

$150k - $160k/yr

Seattle, WA, USA + 4 more

More locations: Austin, TX, USA | Miami, FL, USA | Arlington County, Arlington, VA, USA | Phoenix, AZ, USA

Hybrid

Two days of remote work per week are offered; up to four weeks per year may be worked from anywhere with WiFi.

Category
Legal (1)
Required Skills
Public Speaking

Get referred to Institute for Justice

See people who can refer or advise you

Requirements
  • Excellent writing and communication skills.
  • A desire to create real-world impact and a willingness to push the envelope in strategizing how to win challenging cases.
  • At least 5 years of experience litigating cases in federal or state courts; litigators of other experience levels may apply if they meet the listed qualifications, except candidates with 0-2 years of litigation experience should apply for a Litigation Fellow position instead.
  • A passion for limiting the size and scope of government power to ensure that all Americans have the right to control their own destinies as free and responsible members of society.
  • Applicants for the Austin, Miami, Phoenix, and Seattle offices must be active members of the state bar where the office is located or eligible to waive in upon hire.
  • Applicants must submit a resume, cover letter, and an approximately 10-page writing sample demonstrating their best legal analysis.
Responsibilities
  • Develop individual cases and direct legal strategy through every stage of litigation, maintaining ownership of cases through the United States Supreme Court.
  • Take depositions and present oral argument.
  • Write for and appear in media, participate in public speaking and grassroots activism, and advocate directly to policymakers and legislators.
Desired Qualifications
  • Judicial clerkship experience is strongly preferred.
Institute for Justice

Institute for Justice

View

Institute for Justice focuses on using public-interest litigation to advance individual freedoms. It wins cases and conducts training, communications, activism, and research to promote economic liberty, educational choice, private property rights, freedom of speech, and other core liberties, while restoring constitutional limits on government power. Its work is carried out through strategic lawsuits, policy advocacy, and education of law students, lawyers, and activists, aiming to help people gain greater control over their own destinies. Compared to peers, IJ emphasizes targeted, impact-focused litigation and a strong emphasis on training the next generation of public-interest advocates alongside research and outreach. The goal is to expand the practical reach of liberty by reducing government overreach and increasing individual autonomy.

Company Size

51-200

Company Stage

N/A

Total Funding

N/A

Headquarters

Arlington, Virginia

Founded

1991

Get referred to Institute for Justice

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • Norfolk's ALPR case survived early dismissal pressure, and IJ appealed March 2026 dismissal.
  • San Jose sued in April 2026 over warrantless ALPR searches and long retention.
  • ProPublica's June 2025 filing showed $55.3 million revenue and $140.3 million net assets.

What critics are saying

  • Norfolk dismissed IJ's ALPR case in March 2026, weakening privacy theory before appeals.
  • San Jose kept only one-month ALPR retention after backlash, shrinking IJ's damages narrative.
  • If courts reject broad Fourth Amendment theories, IJ's surveillance platform loses donor momentum.

What makes Institute for Justice unique

  • IJ pairs constitutional litigation with media campaigns and legislative lobbying across property and speech rights.
  • Its August 28, 2026 ALPR database tracks 137 canceled contracts nationwide.
  • The Zoning Justice Project targets restrictive zoning through precedent-setting cases and reform.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

Health Insurance

Dental Insurance

Vision Insurance

Life Insurance

Disability Insurance

Health Savings Account/Flexible Spending Account

Flexible Work Hours

Remote Work Options

Hybrid Work Options

401(k) Company Match

Paid Vacation

Paid Holidays

Company News

BeSpacific
Aug 31st, 2026
New database tracking cancelations of license plate reader contracts.

New database tracking cancelations of license plate reader contracts. Institute for Justice: "As backlash grows against the warrantless use of automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras throughout the country, local governments are increasingly deciding to end their use of these cameras. Today, the Institute for Justice (IJ) unveiled a new database tracking local governments that have canceled or not renewed contracts with ALPR providers since the beginning of 2025. "Local governments have good reasons to want to stem the proliferation of these mass surveillance tools," said IJ Attorney Michael Soyfer. "Rather than narrowly target criminals, ALPRs collect troves of data on ordinary people's movements and compile them in a database officers can freely access on demand. That has predictably led to widespread abuse, which will continue until we implement robust safeguards like a warrant requirement." This is IJ's second database related to ALPRs. The other, published earlier this year, tracks police misuse of ALPRs for purposes including romantic stalking, wrongful stops and detentions, non-law enforcement use, and other types of misconduct. Through its Plate Privacy Project, IJ is engaged in strategic litigation, legislation, media outreach, and activism work to help everyday people push back against the warrantless use of ALPRs and other mass surveillance technologies. IJ has two active federal lawsuits challenging the warrantless use of ALPRs in Norfolk, Virginia and San Jose, California. As of August 28, 2026, 137 local governments are included in IJ's database. *Note: This list does not include jurisdictions that only paused operations of ALPRs or switched to another provider. This list only includes jurisdictions that canceled ALPR contracts.* Search the database here [Scroll down the page to locate the search feature.]

CNN
Aug 26th, 2026
Police officer arrested after tracking ex-girlfriend on Flock camera system over 2,000 times, authorities say.

Police officer arrested after tracking ex-girlfriend on Flock camera system over 2,000 times, authorities say. A Kentucky police officer was arrested after authorities said he used the Flock Safety license plate reader camera system to track his ex-girlfriend over 2,000 times, marking the latest in a string of recent law enforcement officer resignations or arrests for alleged abuses of the controversial technology. Shively Police Department Officer Asad Zahir's alleged activity was flagged by the new AI-powered auditing tool implemented by Flock Safety after growing concerns around security and misuse by police, authorities said, in many cases involving officers accused of using the system to stalk exes or romantic interests. The audit assistance tool, now a requirement by Flock Safety, flags abnormal use by officers. The Flock Safety system has been lauded by law enforcement for its investigative capacity, while critics point to the growing list of officers charged with abusing the license plate reader as an example of its overreach and civil liberty violations. Some cities have canceled their Flock contracts - including Tempe, Arizona, on Wednesday - and some critics have gone so far as to vandalize the cameras. "The Flock camera works. When it's used properly it works. There are tons of stats that show it works," Shively Police Chief Andre Bottoms said Wednesday at a news conference announcing the arrest and promising a review of Flock protocols. "It's a very effective tool and we don't want to be judged on the poor decisions made by one officer." Investigators found Zahir had conducted 2,048 Flock searches from January into May to track two vehicles registered to the victim, his child's mother, in Kentucky and Indiana, court records show. During the period he conducted those searches, Zahir harassed the victim and made threatening comments, prompting her to file an order of protection against him, according to the court records. Investigators determined 241 Flock searches happened while that order of protection was in place, from April 17 to May 6, Bottoms said. Zahir, an officer since 2022 who was assigned to the patrol division, listed the reason for the investigation as a drug or narcotics investigation, even though the woman who was targeted was not the subject of any such investigation and has no history indicating any such violations, officials said at the news conference. The AI tool flagged the activity on Monday and by Tuesday, Zahir was in custody, charged with five counts of official misconduct in the fifth degree and five counts of unlawful access to a computer in the fourth degree, court records show. Zahir is currently suspended without pay, pending the outcome of the criminal investigation and internal review, Bottoms said. He was released on his own recognizance Tuesday and is expected to be in court for his arraignment on Friday, online court records show. It's not yet known who will be his legal representation. "Charging this officer was not pleasant. It was a gut punch for me personally," Bottoms said, adding that he had come to personally know each member of the small police department. "Accountability cannot depend on who you are and what position you hold or what badge you're wearing." Meanwhile, a full review of the procedures and directives in the use and oversight of Flock technology is underway, Bottoms said. The review will examine users' access, search requirements, supervisory oversight, auditing practices and the frequency of compliant reviews, Bottoms said. This will determine whether revisions or other safeguards should be implemented, the chief said. Critics question privacy overreach. Flock's nationwide network of automated license plate readers (ALPR) cameras - mounted along public roads - takes images of passing vehicles' plates, color and other characteristics to feed into a database. Police departments contract with the company to search the database, billed as a tool to help solve crimes. The ALPR system has come under scrutiny in recent months with critics questioning the privacy overreach. The Institute for Justice, a nonprofit public interest law firm that has filed lawsuits against Flock on Fourth Amendment grounds, has tracked at least 47 instances of officers being disciplined in some way for alleged abuse of the Flock system for stalking romantic interests. That number is believed to be much higher, according to a reporter for the institute who runs its database. "There are many reasons to think this is only the tip of the iceberg," Christopher Ingraham told CNN. "A lot of incidents just haven't been reported or haven't been detected yet." The Flock system has been used to recover hundreds of stolen vehicles, identify a missing child and even help in homicide investigations, Bottoms said, defending its responsible use. "This is what accountability looks like," Bottoms said, referring to the department's response to the officer's alleged illegal activity. "These actions send a clear message to every member of the department. If you misuse your authority, violate department policy or break the law, you will be held accountable." CNN's Lauren del Valle, Clare Duffy, Eric Levenson and Tanika Gray contributed to this report.

SoylentNews
Aug 26th, 2026
Flock shock rocks cop cam vendor as protests mount.

Flock shock rocks cop cam vendor as protests mount. posted by jelizondo on Monday August 31, @08:30AM from the person-of-interest dept. A mischief-maker in a Darth Vader suit recently endorsed Flock at a city council meeting, and it has not helped the company's fortunes. Around the US, citizens have been protesting and sometimes vandalizing the company's network of surveillance cameras. And the advocacy has caused some governments to change course. Government officials, commonly hesitant to second-guess law enforcement practices, have become concerned enough to question these mass surveillance practices. US Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) on Wednesday wrote to Flock CEO Garrett Langley to announce an investigation of "Flock Safety's collection, retention, and dissemination of data gathered by its artificial intelligence cameras." Despite "Darth Vader's" comments last week at a San Diego City Council meeting about the need to "continue utilizing Flock technologies so that we can follow and surveil the rebel scum," a growing number of local governments in the US have been cancelling or choosing not to renew their contracts with Flock and other makers of automated license plate readers (ALPRs). The Institute for Justice (IJ), a Virginia-based legal advocacy non-profit, on Wednesday published a new database that tracks the termination of local government ALPR contracts. As of Wednesday, the database documents 93 local governments that canceled ALPR contracts. The IJ, which is challenging ALPR use on Fourth Amendment grounds in Norfolk, Virginia and San Jose, California, previously published a database that documents police abuse of ALPRs, a topic addressed in Hawley's letter. Incidents include romantic stalking, wrongful traffic stops and detentions, and other forms of misconduct. "I think what's happened is that the American public has woken up to the mass surveillance that quietly arose around them," said Robert Frommer, senior attorney at IJ, in an interview with The Register. "And they don't like it. "It does seem to me that the rate of cancellations, the rate of public protest has increased over the past few months. I think that's both due to more news attention being paid to the real life abuses of this technology, as well as the Supreme Court's recent decision in the geofence case," Frommer said. In that case, SCOTUS ruled that cops need a warrant to grab location data. Frommer said that he believes the IJ's efforts to document ALPRs and associated abuses have helped focus the public's concern and have illustrated the problems with warrantless mass surveillance. ALPRs, from vendors like Flock, Motorola Solutions, and PlateSmart, among others, capture license plates whenever cars drive by, along with geodata and potentially images of people. This data can be combined with other information, effectively putting all passersby under constant surveillance without any warrant. "I think what we're seeing now is the reaction to that," said Frommer, who explained that the problem with Flock cameras is that they're accessible to anyone with login credentials, without any authorization from a supervising authority. "You don't need to go to a judge and get a warrant," Frommer explained. "You don't need anything. And when you basically give that search power to the bored officer in his cop car in the middle of a shift, it inevitably happens that they start using it and start misusing it, whether to look people up personally or whether to investigate people at political protests." These sorts of issues, Frommer said, have made people question whether SoylentNews should live in a panopticon. The IJ's litigation and its Plate Privacy Project, said Frommer, follow from the belief that there are solutions, whether they come from the courts or lawmakers. Pointing to Hawley's letter, he said that this is not just a state or local issue, but has become a federal concern. "I think what the din that you've heard over the past couple of months shows that there absolutely needs to be a change, a reckoning," he said. "And that's what we're pushing for in our litigation. We're pushing for a warrant requirement. You want to go look up somebody's past travels and see where they have been? Go to a judge, explain it, and get a warrant." Flock did not respond to a request for comment.

Alt-Meat
Sep 2nd, 2025
Cultivated meat culture war enters a new arena

This morning, nonprofit public interest law firm Institute for Justice is expected to announce that it has partnered with Wildtype and UPSIDE Foods in a federal lawsuit filed against the State of Texas alleging that the state's ban on the sale of cultivated meat is itself unlawful.

Institute for Justice
Aug 1st, 2025
The Liberty Leaderboard: IJ One Of 2025's Social Media Standouts

IJ also placed No. 1 in views of YouTube videos (two minutes or longer) among "judicial defense and rule of law" groups.