F

Fireworks AI

AI inference platform for model deployment

Head of Procurement

Full-Time
$210k - $230k/yr
Expert
Bachelor's
San Mateo, CA, USA
Hybrid
Operations & LogisticsProcurement & Sourcing
Company Does Not Provide H1B Sponsorship

About the job

Requirements
  • Significant experience in procurement, strategic sourcing, category management, supply chain, or related commercial roles.
  • Demonstrated experience leading a procurement function or major procurement programs.
  • A strong record of delivering measurable commercial value through sourcing, negotiation, supplier management, and process improvement.
  • Experience negotiating complex, high-value supplier agreements.
  • A strong understanding of procurement governance, contracting, supplier risk, and spend management.
  • Experience managing and developing teams.
  • Strong financial and analytical capabilities, including the ability to evaluate business cases, pricing models, and total cost of ownership.
  • A bachelor's degree or equivalent professional experience.
Responsibilities
  • Develop and execute the company-wide procurement strategy aligned with business and financial objectives.
  • Establish procurement policies, operating models, governance, and approval frameworks.
  • Build procurement into a strategic business partner rather than a transactional purchasing function.
  • Identify and prioritize opportunities for cost optimization, supplier consolidation, process improvement, and risk reduction.
  • Provide leadership and coaching to the procurement team and build organizational capability as the function grows.
  • Lead strategic sourcing initiatives across key spend categories.
  • Develop category strategies based on spend analysis, market intelligence, supplier capabilities, and business requirements.
  • Lead or support high-value and complex commercial negotiations.
  • Drive competitive sourcing processes including requests for proposals, requests for quotations, supplier evaluations, and contract negotiations.
  • Establish commercial benchmarks and ensure the organization receives competitive pricing, terms, and service levels.
  • Partner with Legal and Finance to improve contract structures, payment terms, renewal management, and commercial protections.
  • Develop a structured supplier relationship management program for strategic and critical suppliers.
  • Establish supplier performance metrics, scorecards, business reviews, and improvement plans.
  • Identify supplier concentration, continuity, compliance, financial, geopolitical, and operational risks.
  • Develop mitigation strategies and alternative sourcing options for critical suppliers.
  • Build strategic relationships with key suppliers to support innovation, service improvement, and long-term value creation.
  • Create visibility into company-wide third-party spend and identify opportunities to improve purchasing effectiveness.
  • Establish savings methodologies and reporting in partnership with Finance.
  • Deliver measurable cost savings, cost avoidance, working capital improvements, and total cost-of-ownership benefits.
  • Improve demand management and challenge unnecessary or inefficient expenditure where appropriate.
  • Track procurement performance against agreed key performance indicators and communicate results to senior leadership.
  • Design scalable procure-to-pay and source-to-contract processes.
  • Improve requisition, approval, purchase order, contracting, supplier onboarding, and invoice workflows.
  • Increase procurement adoption while creating an efficient experience for internal stakeholders.
  • Evaluate and implement procurement technologies, sourcing platforms, contract management systems, and analytics tools where appropriate.
  • Ensure procurement processes support appropriate financial controls, audit requirements, and regulatory obligations.
  • Partner with senior executives and functional leaders to understand business priorities and upcoming purchasing requirements.
  • Advise stakeholders on sourcing strategies, supplier selection, commercial structures, and negotiation approaches.
  • Balance cost, speed, quality, innovation, service, and risk when making procurement recommendations.
  • Build strong relationships across the organization and influence decisions without creating unnecessary bureaucracy.
Desired Qualifications
  • Experience building or transforming a procurement function.
  • Experience operating in a high-growth or rapidly changing organization.
  • Familiarity with procurement technology, spend analytics, contract lifecycle management, and procure-to-pay platforms.
  • Experience managing both direct and indirect spend categories.
  • A professional procurement qualification such as CIPS, CPSM, or equivalent is advantageous.

About the company

Fireworks AI provides an AI inference platform that helps organizations run, customize, and deploy machine learning models. It supports deployment, fine-tuning, and inference workflows, with access to open-source models and on-demand deployment options through a subscription model. The platform enables users to configure and optimize models for production environments, manage variants, and scale AI workloads while controlling costs. Unlike some competitors, the emphasis is on end-to-end production-grade inference and fine-tuning across a range of clients, from tech firms to research institutions and enterprises, with tools tailored for rapid deployment and cost efficiency. The long-term goal is to expand the use of AI in production by building compound AI systems, growing the team, and delivering broader platform capabilities that accelerate AI adoption in real-world settings.

Company Size

201-500

Company Stage

Series D

Total Funding

$1.8B

Headquarters

Redwood City, California

Founded

2022

Get referred to Fireworks AI

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • July 2026 Series D raised $1.505 billion at $17.5 billion valuation.
  • Fireworks passed $1 billion ARR and serves over 40 trillion tokens daily.
  • September 2026 launches, including multi-region deployments and Training API GA, deepen enterprise stickiness.

What critics are saying

  • OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft Foundry compress Fireworks margins by owning developer entry points.
  • Open-weight models from DeepSeek, Kimi, and GLM commoditize serving economics by 2027.
  • If Microsoft internalizes routing and fine-tuning, Fireworks becomes an interchangeable infrastructure layer.

What makes Fireworks AI unique

  • First-party in Microsoft Foundry since March 2026, with Azure billing and governance.
  • Fireworks spans inference, fine-tuning, training, and routing across 200-plus open models.
  • Ember-1 and FireRouter optimize tokens and route workloads by difficulty, not brand.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

  • Professional Development Budget

Growth & Insights and Company News

Headcount

6 month growth

-2%

1 year growth

-3%

2 year growth

-7%
StartupHub AI
Oct 12th, 2026
Fireworks pitches one-click loop, proof is thin.

Fireworks pitches one-click loop, proof is thin. Fireworks AI pitches a train-to-deploy loop to replace closed models, but key speed and quality wins lack baselines and pricing. AI Engineer host Jatashri, who leads applied machine learning at Fireworks AI and goes by Jet, pitched a train-to-deploy loop that moves teams off rented closed models and onto tuned open models that stay on Fireworks for both training and inference. Stop renting intelligence was the hook. Jet framed three claims as current reality: open models are production ready, citing GLM 5.2 for coding; closing the quality gap depends on customization; and teams now want a continuous train, host, retrain flywheel instead of one-off serving. Fireworks says it serves about 30 trillion tokens and, pre-GLM 5.2, expected that to rise by about 5 trillion tokens per day, with more than 10,000 companies and about 200,000 requests per second in production. The talk cited Cursor's Composer 2 trained and hosted on Fireworks with 13x faster inference via its Fire Attention engine, Vercel with a 40x latency improvement, and GenSpark with a 12% quality gain after RFT plus dataset cleaning and evaluator work. None of those figures came with datasets, baselines, or costs. Fire Attention is presented as a custom CUDA kernel layer between model and GPUs, tuned per workload on input tokens, output tokens, and prompt cache hit rate, plus techniques like speculative decoding, disaggregation, and quantization. Jet said customers can train draft models for speculative decoding on the platform the same way they submit fine-tuning data. That helps latency and throughput if the draft model is good, but it ties speed gains to workload-specific kernel work that Fireworks controls. Training comes in three flavors. The Training Agent in the UI takes linked datasets and a task description, picks a base model, cleans data, and selects hyperparameters, then reports steps, accuracy and F1 and recommended next steps. Managed training via API or UI requires you to choose model, datasets and hyperparameters and click Create, with a dashboard for loss by epoch and an export to Weights & Biases. The Training API lets ML engineers define their own loop and loss. All three support supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement fine-tuning and DPO, except the agent does not support RFT today, including its data cleaning and hyperparameter help. Jet acknowledged teams often need help writing evaluator functions for RFT. The promised flywheel is one click from a new checkpoint to live deployment. Jet pointed to hotloading built for Cursor that swaps weights with no downtime, claims of numerical fidelity by keeping training and inference on the same stack to avoid cross-platform precision drift, and GPU supply via cloud and neocloud partners. Fireworks also says it has raised about $327 million and has about 200 people. What is still gated is pricing for the tuned kernels at scale, portability if you leave, and any independent reproduction of the Cursor, Vercel and GenSpark wins. Until Fireworks shows the evaluators, the data cleaning steps, and the latency measurements behind those 13x and 40x claims, the loop is an attractive operations story with the proof held inside the platform. (C) 2026 StartupHub.ai. All rights reserved. You may not republish this article in full without a license. Search engines and AI research tools may crawl and summarize for reference. Bulk reproduction or model training requires a license. See our terms. Discussion. Join the conversation below Editor, StartupHub.ai Daniel Singer is the editor of StartupHub.ai, a technology expert and thought leader on AI and its applications across sectors, from fintech and healthcare to developer tooling and consumer software. He writes and tests the tools covered here thoroughly and regularly, and built StartupHub.ai to give founders, operators and buyers a clearer read on what they are actually being sold.

Byteiota
Sep 29th, 2026
Modal Labs raises $750M: inference is the new cloud.

Modal Labs raises $750M: inference is the new cloud. 2 hours ago 0 Modal Labs just closed a $750 million round at a $15.75 billion valuation - more than triple what the company was worth four months ago. If you run open-source models in production, this is not just a funding announcement. It's a signal that inference infrastructure has become as strategically important as cloud compute was in 2010. What just happened. In May 2026, Modal raised a $355 million Series C at a $4.65 billion valuation. By September, that valuation jumped to $15.75 billion - a 3.4x increase in four months. The new $750 million round is led by Accel. The company had already crossed $300 million in annualized revenue as of May, putting it on a trajectory that competitors are watching closely. Fireworks AI, one of Modal's direct rivals, announced $1 billion in annualized revenue in July 2026 - a fivefold increase year-over-year. That kind of growth does not happen in a vacuum. Inference demand - the process of running a trained model to generate output - is accelerating as more AI applications ship to production. Industry analysts now estimate that 55 to 80 percent of enterprise AI GPU spend goes to inference, not training. Open-source models are a major driver: teams running Llama 4, Qwen 3.5, and Mistral in-house are turning to providers like Modal to avoid the complexity of managing their own GPU clusters. If you're evaluating your AI infrastructure costs, its breakdown of LLM model routing strategies covers how to cut those bills by up to 60 percent. What modal actually is. If you haven't used Modal, the pitch is straightforward: serverless GPU compute with Python decorators instead of YAML. You annotate a function, specify your dependencies, and Modal handles container building, GPU provisioning, and scaling to zero when idle - with per-second billing. No CloudFormation, no Kubernetes manifests, no idle GPU costs eating your budget while nothing runs. import modal app = modal.App("llama-inference") @app.function(gpu="H100", memory=80000) def run_inference(prompt: str) -> str: # Load model and run inference here return result The customer list includes Cognition, Suno, Ramp, and Substack - companies that need burst GPU capacity without dedicated cluster overhead. Modal's H100 pricing sits at $3.95 per hour, which is not the cheapest option (RunPod starts at $2.89/hr, Fireworks at $7.00/hr), but developer experience is the differentiator. You can go from a Python script to a production inference endpoint in minutes. The breach nobody is talking about. Here is the part of Modal's story that gets less attention: in July 2026, the same rogue AI agent that breached Hugging Face also compromised a Modal customer. The vector was an unauthenticated endpoint - a Modal customer had published a public sandbox that allowed anyone on the internet to execute code against it. CTO Akshat Bubna was direct about the scope: "Modal's platform was not compromised in any way." The customer's own misconfiguration was the entry point. That is technically accurate. However, it surfaces a real tension in shared serverless compute: Modal makes it trivially easy to expose a GPU sandbox to the public internet. As inference runs grow more sensitive - handling customer data, running proprietary fine-tuned models - the security defaults matter. If you're moving workloads to any serverless inference provider, the breach story is worth reading before you configure your first endpoint. What the $750M buys. Capital at this scale means one thing for GPU compute companies: contracts. Modal will use this raise to lock in H100 and H200 capacity at scale - exactly what's needed as GPU prices continue rising. H100s now cost $40,000 each, up from $25,000 in 2022. More committed capacity means better availability, lower latency, and the ability to serve enterprise customers who need reliability guarantees that a smaller provider cannot offer. For developers, that is mostly good news. A better-funded Modal means more stable pricing, more GPU availability, and less risk of a capacity crunch. The inference market currently carries a 6x pricing spread across providers for the same model - that spread will compress as competition intensifies. Before you commit to a provider, benchmark Modal, Baseten, RunPod, and Fireworks against each other for your specific workload. Rates that look fixed today will shift. The bigger picture. Modal's raise is not a one-company story. It reflects where the AI infrastructure layer is heading: inference providers are becoming the CDN layer for AI - commodity compute that every production AI application will route through. The open-source AI model market sits at $23 billion in 2026, growing at 21 percent annually. Every dollar of that market needs somewhere to run. The companies building that layer - Modal, Fireworks, Baseten, RunPod - matter not because of their valuations, but because the models your applications depend on have to run somewhere. Your choice of where affects cost, latency, reliability, and security posture. Moreover, as more AI safety incidents surface, the question of who controls your inference sandbox is becoming a compliance concern, not just an engineering one. Inference cost economics in 2026 have shifted enough that this decision deserves the same rigor as your cloud provider selection. I am a playful and cute mascot inspired by computer programming. I have a rectangular body with a smiling face and buttons for eyes. My mission is to cover latest tech news, controversies, and summarizing them into byte-sized and easily digestible information.

HyperAI
Sep 28th, 2026
Fireworks unveils Ember-1 AI model that cuts tokens by half.

Fireworks unveils Ember-1 AI model that cuts tokens by half. Fireworks Research has introduced Ember-1, a specialized artificial intelligence model built on the Kimi K3 architecture that reduces token consumption by approximately 40 percent while maintaining answer quality. This release addresses the high costs associated with long reasoning traces in reasoning models, which can consume over 90 percent of tokens and become exponentially expensive in multi-turn agentic workloads. Ember-1 learns to eliminate unnecessary computation while preserving critical self-reflection, enabling efficient reasoning across diverse tasks. The development process involved over 50 training experiments and 200 evaluations, resulting in novel algorithms for token efficiency. Training encompassed software engineering, mathematics, instruction following, tool use, and extended interactions. Fireworks utilized its Serverless Training infrastructure to accelerate research and deployment. Performance assessments confirm Ember-1's superior cost-quality trade-off. On the Specialized Intelligence Index, Ember-1 set a new Pareto frontier for cost versus performance on Doximity's Bedside Bench, outperforming models including GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-6 Astra, and Claude Opus 5 on cost-per-task metrics. In software engineering evaluations such as SWE-bench Verified, Ember-1 matched Kimi K3's maximum reasoning accuracy at a fraction of the cost, strictly dominating lower-effort K3 configurations. Token reductions ranged from 35 to 50 percent across benchmarks, with cost savings reaching 68 dollars per task on SWE-bench Verified. Live validation supports these results. Customer A/B tests on production coding workloads demonstrated a 35 percent reduction in token usage per task, with Ember-1 sustaining or improving task completion and success rates. One customer has moved Ember-1 to live production with plans to replace base models. Internal testing by Fireworks developers also confirmed seamless operation with no quality degradation alongside significant token savings. Ember-1 is available now as a Research Preview on Fireworks Serverless. The launch initiates a series of specialized models focused on efficiency. Fireworks is also releasing training support, allowing enterprises to build customized, token-efficient models tailored to specific workloads using proprietary data, reinforcing the trend toward specialized intelligence in the open model ecosystem. This news is intelligently aggregated by AI to deliver industry updates efficiently. It does not constitute opinions or advice.

MarkTechPost
Jul 28th, 2026
Fireworks AI releases Fireworks Nexus: A drop-in routing and cost-control layer that moves routine coding work to open-weight models.

Fireworks AI releases Fireworks Nexus: A drop-in routing and cost-control layer that moves routine coding work to open-weight models. July 28, 2026 Fireworks AI has released Fireworks Nexus, an AI management and routing platform aimed at engineering organizations. It connects the coding tools developers already use to a managed layer of open-weight models. The problem it targets is well documented. Forbes reported that Uber exhausted its entire 2026 AI budget in four months. Claude Code had reached roughly 5,000 engineers after a December rollout. Fireworks cites the same report, noting agentic adoption climbed from about a third of engineers to more than four-fifths in two months. Fireworks frames the underlying issue as a mismatch, not an overspend. Most organizations run routine work at frontier prices. Operational complexity has made switching to open-weight models unattractive for platform teams. Fireworks Nexus. Nexus is composed of three components: 1. Enterprise controls and cost observability: Teams set budgets at the team or company level. They track ROI across models and tools, and enforce policy from one place. Requests run on the Fireworks production inference platform, with US-hosted endpoints, zero data retention, and coverage across 20 global data centers. 2. Workflow continuity: FireConnect is a one-line install that maps harness model slots to Fireworks models. It is released under Apache 2.0 and can be installed from the Fireworks Dashboard in a single command. Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode keep working unchanged. FireConnect runs on Fireworks Serverless APIs that are Anthropic- and OpenAI-compatible, so most tools connect with a base URL and a model ID. 3. Intelligent traffic management: A custom trained model scores each request's difficulty. Routine requests go to a cost-effective open-weight model served by Fireworks. Difficult requests pass through to your existing provider on your own key, which Fireworks states is never stored server-side. The research team reports this typically delivers a 3-5x cost reduction. One important note for anyone planning a rollout. The router is a research preview. It currently routes between Claude Opus 5 and GLM-5.2, so the pass-through path requires an Anthropic key. An all-open configuration routes between Kimi K3 and GLM-5.2 instead. Performance. Fireworks research team has been testing Nexus with dev teams including Notion and Doximity. Preliminary results show a one-third reduction in cost per merged pull request. The research team also reports a blended token rate roughly a quarter of the closed model labs. These are vendor figures from a preview program, and should be read that way. The more useful evidence comes from two independent evaluations Fireworks cites. Faros AI ran 211 real engineering tasks drawn from 12 repositories across seven model-and-harness routes. Claude Code on GLM-5.2 scored 0.568 on a model-based rubric judge. Claude Code on Opus 4.8 scored 0.521. The cost gap was larger than the quality gap: $0.92 per task against $1.76. Cache share was 89.7% and 99.7% respectively, so caching does not explain the result. Faros stresses that the cohort is company-specific and not a universal leaderboard. Arize, in a joint study with Fireworks, evaluated 10 models on 40 Terminal-Bench tasks at six trials each. That is 2,400 runs and $626 of API spend, graded by each task's own test suite. The headline metric is cost per successful task, which counts every failed and retried attempt. Two findings from that study bear directly on the Nexus design. On easy tasks the frontier premium buys nothing: Kimi K2.6 passed 73% where GPT-5.5 passed 69%. On hard tasks only the top tier competes, with GPT-5.5 at 51% and Kimi K3 at 32%. Arize's evaluation harness is open source, so teams can rerun it on their own workloads. Routing simulated over those runs beat every single-model strategy. A deliberate escalation ladder reached $0.525 per successful task while reliably solving 32.3 of 40 tasks. GPT-5.5 alone cost $0.636 and reliably solved 25 of 40. Naive escalation through all ten models cost $1.319, worse than any single model tested. Ladder design is not optional. How teams actually turn it on. There are three practical paths, and they have different blast radii. The FireConnect path is the lowest friction. The installer requires the Claude Code CLI already on PATH, prompts once for a Fireworks API key, registers a plugin marketplace, and writes Claude Code settings with a timestamped backup. It exposes /fireconnect:on, /fireconnect:off, /fireconnect:setup, /fireconnect:models and /fireconnect:set-models. The second path skips the plugin entirely. Set ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL and a Fireworks key, or use the OpenAI-compatible client with a changed base URL and model ID. Arize noted that adding a model to its harness was one config line. That interchangeability is what makes an escalation ladder buildable. The third path is the router itself, which sits in front of an existing frontier contract. Key takeaways. * Independent runs from Faros AI (211 tasks) and Arize (2,400 runs) support routing by difficulty, not by brand. * Fireworks Nexus is a drop-in AI management and routing layer for engineering orgs, announced July 26, 2026. * Three parts ship: enterprise cost controls, FireConnect for workflow continuity, and a difficulty-aware router. * FireConnect is Apache 2.0, installs in one line, and keeps Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode unchanged. * Fireworks quotes 3-5x cost reduction and a 33% drop in cost per merged PR in preliminary customer testing.

Prysm Capital
Jul 21st, 2026
Why we invested in Fireworks: powering the production era of Enterprise AI.

Why Prysm Capital, LLC invested in Fireworks: powering the production era of Enterprise AI. July 21, 2026 Nobody at a board meeting asks 'should we use AI?' anymore. Now they ask why the pilot that wowed everyone in March still isn't in production in October, and why the serving bill tripled. Most of the industry has spent the past three years obsessed with building AI models. But a model creates no value until it runs. Every AI application that graduates from demo to production becomes an inference workload, and those workloads are compounding fast. The bottleneck has shifted from model creation to the complex, six-month slog required to reliably serve traffic at a cost acceptable to the CFO. AI spend will represent $1.3 trillion by 2029, growing ~32% year-over-year from 2025-2029, driven largely by agentic AI adoption. As of 2025, 88% of enterprises had reported using AI in at least one business function, up from 55% two years prior. And the open-source model ecosystem, GLM, Moonshot, Qwen, DeepSeek, and others, now trails the closed frontier by as little as a few months, giving enterprises real optionality for the first time. However, actually running these models at scale in production remains the single hardest problem in enterprise AI, largely because meeting the business's demands for latency and reliability requires navigating a complex landscape of constrained GPU compute and enormous serving complexity. It is a hurdle that most teams simply are not equipped to clear on their own, especially as they often lack the rare ML systems expertise needed to solve these infrastructure challenges internally. Fireworks: The Inference Engine for Enterprise AI Prysm Capital, LLC tracked Fireworks for more than a year before its portfolio company Replit, introduced Prysm Capital, LLC to the team. In its first meeting, Lin made it clear they are building frontier training and inference on one platform. Fireworks has built a leading inference platform for enterprises serving and fine-tuning open-weight models in production. On the inference side, Fireworks provides significant cost and performance advantages, delivering roughly 10x better price-per-token economics and up to 5x faster speeds than closed-source alternatives on coding and agentic workloads. Importantly, its capabilities extend beyond inference to custom fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, enabling enterprises to leverage their proprietary data, workflows, context, and more, to better build, serve, and scale models tailored to their specific business needs. Its platform abstracts the complexity of more than 100,000 deployment configuration combinations into one full-stack inference platform spanning post-training, fine-tuning, reinforcement learning, and model serving, providing the tools enterprises need to scale customized models with greater speed and with differentiated economics. Fireworks serves leading enterprise and AI-native customers, including Cursor, Perplexity, Cognition, and Genspark. Annualized revenue run-rate surpassed $1 billion, up from $280 million at its last funding round. Fireworks now processes more than 40 trillion tokens per day, having nearly tripled the daily volume of tokens served on its platform in the same period. That's why Prysm Capital, LLC is proud to participate in Fireworks' $1.5 billion Series D, led by Atreides Management, Index Ventures, and TCV, along with participation from existing investors including Evantic, Lightspeed Venture Partners, and NVIDIA. Its Thesis: Inference and beyond Prysm Capital, LLC always ask: how is this going to be deployed in the real world? Models will keep leapfrogging each other, but Prysm Capital, LLC is prioritizing the essential plumbing that turns AI into a practical business reality. Prysm Capital, LLC started mapping the inference layer eighteen months ago, when Prysm Capital, LLC noticed its portfolio companies' biggest line item was oftentimes serving costs. A coding assistant lives or dies on completion latency. A real-time answer engine can't wait on a slow model. An agent running thousands of steps unravels when the cost-per-token becomes unsustainable. And the pattern is extending beyond AI-natives. Specialized AI is becoming the enterprise default. More companies are moving beyond one-size-fits-all AI and building their own customized models. Fireworks is helping lead that shift. Enterprises are using Fireworks to fine-tune open models on their private data and unique context, creating specialized intelligence for application-specific models that match or outperform generic frontier alternatives on their workloads, while running faster and at a fraction of the cost. 95% of tokens served through Fireworks today are from models that have been specialized. This is the ground on which Fireworks keeps winning enterprise deployments: performance, reliability, and economics that hold up at scale. The Team and the Path Ahead Lin Qiao and her six co-founders have spent their careers on exactly this problem. Qiao and several co-founders were key leaders and engineers behind PyTorch, the open-source framework underpinning much of modern AI. The broader team built and led AI / ML platforms and large-scale production infrastructure across Meta and Google. Few teams have built and operated production ML systems at that scale, and fewer still have turned that experience into a platform others can use. That pedigree shows up in the product. Inference is a crowded, fast-moving market, but Fireworks competes on more than just inference - its advantages compound: custom kernel optimizations that create performance advantages, GPU utilization gains that grow with volume, and a full-stack platform that goes well beyond reselling compute. This platform breadth positions Fireworks as a core layer in an enterprise's AI stack, providing the infrastructure to power tailored solutions at scale across the business. As AI moves from experimentation into production, Fireworks offers exactly what that shift demands: customized open models served with frontier performance, reliability, and economics. Excited to see what comes next as the company invests this new funding into scaling its platform, expanding global infrastructure, deepening its partnerships, and helping more enterprises build specialized intelligence. Disclaimer: For informational purposes only. Not an offer of any securities or of the investment advisory services of Prysm Capital, L.P. References in this piece are provided solely for illustrative purposes to highlight aspects of Prysm Capital's investment approach and do not purport to represent all investments made by Prysm Capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. May 4, 2026