Engineering Operations Lead
About the job
- At least 5 years of experience in business operations, engineering operations, or a similar function, ideally in a financial technology company, high-growth technology startup, or Web3 environment.
- Deep understanding of engineering organization operations, including operating-model design, prioritization frameworks, operating cadence, and execution systems.
- Proven ability to build and improve operational processes from the ground up, including standard operating procedures, automation, and cross-functional workflows.
- Strong analytical skills with experience building dashboards, performance reports, and data-driven recommendations.
- Excellent cross-functional communication across Engineering, Business Development, Finance, Legal, Product, and Marketing.
- Ability to operate proactively, with strong organization and a high degree of ownership and comfort with ambiguity.
- Hands-on familiarity with Linear or a comparable execution and issue-tracking system, as well as modern operational tooling.
- Serve as a strategic advisor to the Chief Technology Officer, Engineering Leadership, and Product Leads on internal process design, team operating-model design, data insights, and day-to-day operational decision-making.
- Deliver analysis to inform team performance, productivity metrics, weekly readouts, and optimization opportunities.
- Build and maintain prioritization frameworks that help Engineering focus capacity on high-impact initiatives and make defensible trade-offs.
- Oversee and track Engineering objectives and key results, surface trends, flag risks, and keep priorities aligned with company strategy.
- Run the Engineering organization’s operating rhythm, including planning cycles, milestone and dependency tracking, and delivery visibility.
- Build and maintain dashboards that make goals, progress, and delivery health visible to leadership and teams.
- Manage day-to-day Engineering operations, including Linear initiatives and projects, deadline management, and project prioritization; own Linear as the organization’s work-management system.
- Identify and close operational gaps across the delivery lifecycle through improved workflows and automation, building scalable processes from the ground up.
- Coordinate with other Operations leads and serve as the operational bridge between Engineering and cross-functional partners.
- Develop and run training sessions for the Engineering team on the tools and processes needed to succeed.
- Experience supporting or partnering closely with executive leadership.
About the company
LayerZero Labs builds a cross-chain interoperability protocol that connects more than 50 blockchains, enabling omnichain applications, tokens, and experiences. Its product runs on immutable on-chain endpoints with a configurable Security Stack and a permissionless set of Executors that carry censorship-resistant messages between chains. Developers and blockchain organizations use LayerZero to define their own security and efficiency configurations, making it possible to transfer assets and governance data across networks (for example, Curve’s token transfers between Ethereum and Fantom, and Uniswap governance messages on Avalanche). The platform differentiates itself by offering direct, configurable cross-chain messaging and asset transfer through a unified protocol rather than relying on third-party bridges. LayerZero’s goal is to provide seamless, scalable interoperability for building multi-chain applications and ecosystems.
Company Size
51-200
Company Stage
Late Stage VC
Total Funding
$318M
Headquarters
Vancouver, Canada
Founded
2021
Get referred to LayerZero Labs
See people who can refer or advise you
Simplify's Take
What believers are saying
- September 24, 2026 TACEO's Merces integration adds private cross-chain transfers.
- September 23, 2026 formal verification artifacts improve LayerZero's developer trust story.
- September 2026 hiring across Vancouver, New York, and Hong Kong shows ongoing expansion.
What critics are saying
- September 24, 2026 Evercrest sued LayerZero over the $292 million rsETH exploit.
- Wyoming's FRNT migration to Chainlink CCIP signals institutional buyers distrust LayerZero security.
- December 15, 2026 V1 relayer shutdown and testnet cuts shrink legacy usage.
What makes LayerZero Labs unique
- September 23, 2026 Jolt formal verification strengthens LayerZero's technical credibility.
- September 15, 2026 Stargate integration gives LayerZero control over messaging and asset routing.
- LayerZero still supports 50-plus chains, giving builders broad multichain distribution.
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Benefits
Company Equity
Growth & Insights and Company News
6 month growth
↑ 0%1 year growth
↑ 0%2 year growth
↑ 6%LayerZero security model challenged in $292M rsETH lawsuit as users exit. Alphid Team · September 28, 2026 * KelpDAO filed a civil claim against LayerZero Labs and CEO Bryan Pellegrino on September 24, 2026, in British Columbia over the rsETH bridge exploit. * The suit alleges negligence and defamation tied to the April incident that drained 116500 rsETH worth $292 million. * Nearly $15 billion has exited LayerZero-linked protocols as users question cross-chain security practices. KelpDAO sued LayerZero Labs and CEO Bryan Pellegrino. They filed the civil claim in British Columbia on September 24, 2026. The suit accuses both of negligence and defamation over the rsETH bridge exploit. KelpDAO says LayerZero reviewed and endorsed the bridge setup that later got hacked. This marks the first formal legal action from the April incident that drained 116500 rsETH. The lawsuit arrives as nearly $15 billion flows out of LayerZero-powered bridges and apps. Users doubt the security of cross-chain setups after the exploit. Those claims have not been proven in court. Context. Attackers drained funds from the restaking protocol in April. They hit it through a compromised bridge setup. KelpDAO had used LayerZero's messaging layer for cross-chain transfers. LayerZero calls itself a secure omnichain solution. The April loss ranked among the bigger hits in restaking and sparked quick questions about bridge configs and audits. Details. KelpDAO accuses LayerZero and Pellegrino of failing to stop the config flaw in the British Columbia filing. The complaint adds defamation claims over public statements after the event. Approved sources confirm the suit names both the company and its chief executive. LayerZero's security model uses decentralized verification and endpoint configs chosen by each protocol. The lawsuit claims LayerZero reviewed and endorsed KelpDAO's specific setup. That claim could push other projects to check their own LayerZero setups if it holds up. The rsETH exploit fits a pattern of cross-chain failures. Those have cost users billions in recent years. No technical details have confirmed yet whether code flaws, operational errors, or both caused the breach. "Kelp DAO sued LayerZero and co-founder Bryan Pellegrino over the $292M rsETH bridge exploit, alleging negligence and defamation." , Source shattered.io Reaction. Market data shows accelerated outflows from LayerZero ecosystems since the April exploit. The $15 billion exit figure reflects user moves to other bridges or on-chain withdrawals. No major protocol has announced a full migration away from LayerZero, but volume shifts show caution. Community talks center on what this means for cross-chain security. Developers still debate whether current verification methods protect funds well during big transfers. The suit stays in early stages with no court rulings yet. LayerZero has not released a detailed public response to the British Columbia claim. The next milestones to watch include any response filing from LayerZero Labs, potential discovery of additional technical evidence, and whether other affected protocols pursue similar actions.
LayerZero faces $292M lawsuit as billions exit the network. Reading Time: 3 mins read A $292 million exploit is now heading to court, and the case puts the security model behind one of crypto's busiest interoperability layers on trial. The company behind KelpDAO has sued LayerZero Labs, its Canadian affiliate, and its CEO over April's rsETH exploit, alleging negligent misrepresentation, negligence, and defamation while seeking aggravated and punitive damages. The LayerZero lawsuit matters to traders because it arrives alongside reports that nearly $15 billion is moving off the network - a reminder that in DeFi, confidence is collateral, and lawsuits erode it. What happened. The claim, filed in British Columbia, ties the plaintiff's losses to the roughly $292 million rsETH exploit earlier in the year. It alleges the defendants misrepresented aspects of the system, were negligent in how risks were handled, and made defamatory statements afterward. The filing states that Kelp users have withdrawn more than $650 million since the attack, and the CEO named in the suit has publicly pushed back on the characterization. Set against that legal fight is the capital movement: reports of close to $15 billion shifting away from the network. Whether that outflow is direct fallout, routine rebalancing, or a mix, the optics of a large lawsuit and large withdrawals landing together are hard for any protocol to shrug off. What it means for traders. Interoperability layers are infrastructure, and infrastructure risk is systemic risk. If you hold assets that route through, wrap around, or depend on cross-chain messaging, the health of that layer is part of your position whether you think about it daily or not. A high-profile suit alleging the security model was misrepresented forces exactly that question: how much of your exposure quietly assumes a bridge or messaging layer will behave. The near-term trader signal is liquidity and confidence, not a verdict. Litigation moves slowly; capital moves fast. Watch for widening spreads on assets tied to the protocol, thinner depth on venues that lean on it, and any staking or restaking product whose yield depends on the contested infrastructure. This is a case where the legal outcome may take years while the market repricing takes days. The pattern rhymes with earlier incidents such as the Ethereum bridge hacks that drained $31.7 million and halted a third protocol. The bigger picture. The novel element here is accountability moving into a courtroom. DeFi has historically absorbed exploits as protocol risk - losses socialized, teams patch, users move on. A negligence-and-misrepresentation claim against a labs entity and a named executive tests whether off-chain legal liability can attach to on-chain failures. If courts prove willing to entertain that, the risk calculus for protocol teams and their disclosures changes across the sector. It also feeds the broader debate about where DeFi's real vulnerabilities live. Many losses happen in the seams - integrations, dependencies, and assumptions that sit just outside what audits cover - a gap CoinFractal detailed in DeFi's $885M blind spot, where attacks land outside audit scope, and a driver of the same migration dynamic seen when Chainlink pulled $7 billion on-chain as bridge hacks fueled migration. Conclusion. For traders, the immediate story is not who wins the lawsuit but how the market prices uncertainty around a core piece of cross-chain plumbing while the fight plays out. Track the outflows, the liquidity on dependent assets, and any protocol responses. The deeper story - whether courts start holding builders legally accountable for exploited security models - is the one that could reshape how DeFi discloses risk for years.
KelpDAO developer sues LayerZero, CEO over $292 million exploit and blame-shifting. News Fri, 25 Sep 2026 11:30:47 UTC 1 hour ago The lawsuit highlights the critical need for robust security measures and transparent communication in decentralized finance to prevent massive financial losses. This content is automatically aggregated. Full credit goes to the original publisher (cryptobriefing.com).
Crypto News Today: Bitcoin inflow, KelpDAO Sues LayerZero, Bitget gets hacked. Crypto News Today: Bitcoin ETFs Attract USD 191 Million, KelpDAO Sues LayerZero Over USD 292 Million Exploit and Bitget Loses USD 350 Million Published on: 25 Sep 2026, 7:15 am Updated on: 25 Sep 2026, 7:15 am Overview: * Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded USD 191 million in daily net inflows, led by BlackRock's IBIT with USD 163 million. * KelpDAO filed a lawsuit against LayerZero and co-founder Bryan Pellegrino. * Hyperliquid Strategies added 494,200 HYPE worth USD 45.8 million. The crypto market saw major developments as spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded USD 191 million in net inflows, while KelpDAO sued LayerZero over a USD 292 million exploit in April and Bitget suffered an exploit that drained USD 350 million. Also, Hyperliquid strategies bought USD 45 million in HYPE. Bitcoin witnessed USD 191 Million in inflows. According to SoSoValue, yesterday the total net inflow of spot Bitcoin ETFs was USD 191 million. The spot Bitcoin ETF with the highest single-day net inflow yesterday was BlackRock's ETF IBIT, with a single-day net inflow of USD 163 million, bringing IBIT's cumulative historical net inflow to USD 65.18 billion. Second was Fidelity's ETF FBTC, with a single-day net inflow of USD 12.86 million, and FBTC's cumulative historical net inflow now stands at USD 11.01 billion. The spot Bitcoin ETF with the largest single-day net outflow was WisdomTree's ETF BTCW, with a single-day net outflow of USD 4.016 million. The total net asset value of spot Bitcoin ETFs is USD 108.91 billion, with the ETF net asset ratio reaching 6.43%, and the cumulative historical net inflow has reached USD 57.41 billion. KelpDAO Sues LayerZero. KelpDAO has taken its dispute with LayerZero into court, filing a lawsuit against the universal bridge protocol and co-founder Bryan Pellegrino over the USD 292 million exploit that hit the liquid staking project. The dispute stems from an April 22 attack that KelpDAO said involved its cross-chain bridge. A North Korean hacking group allegedly drained 116,500 rsETH worth roughly USD 292 million. In its complaint, Kelp accused LayerZero of failing to disclose weaknesses and risks within its technology. The protocol also claimed LayerZero failed to prevent attackers from infiltrating its security infrastructure, creating conditions that allowed alleged weaknesses in the universal bridge to be exploited. KelpDAO said LayerZero and Pellegrino had blamed the protocol for their own failures instead of accepting responsibility. Bitget Loses USD 350 Million in exploit. Cryptocurrency exchange Bitget suffered an exploit that drained at least USD 350 million in digital assets from its hot wallets. Platform CEO Gracy Chen confirmed the security breach following the detection of unauthorized transfers across multiple blockchain networks to an unidentified address, impacting funds in ETH, USDT, USDC, AVAX, and BNB. This latest attack raised alarms across the market after on-chain analysts observed accelerated swaps on DEXs such as UniswapX and 1inch Fusion, executed at premiums of up to 5% over market prices. Chen assured that cold wallets remain completely intact and that user losses are covered in full by the Bitget Protection Fund, currently valued at over USD 464 million. Hyperliquid Strategies bought USD 45 million in HYPE. Hyperliquid Strategies has bought another 494,200 HYPE worth USD 45.8 million as the company continues to build its treasury while large holders move millions of dollars worth of the token toward potential sale. Lookonchain reported on September 25 that wallet 0x6436, which it linked to Hyperliquid Strategies, made the latest purchases over 16 hours. The address has now accumulated 5.51 million HYPE worth roughly USD 476 million over the past month. Purchases during the period averaged 183,574 HYPE, or USD 15.86 million, per day. Hyperliquid Strategies currently holds around 35.1 million HYPE valued at approximately USD 3.2 billion. Bitcoin privacy proposal. Researchers at Alloc Init have proposed, in a September 24 paper, private Bitcoin transfers using zero-knowledge proofs without requiring a soft fork. Alloc Init's researchers Clara Shikhelman, Mikhail Komarov and Aleksei Moskvin published Shielded Bitcoin as a metaprotocol that uses Bitcoin to publish and order encrypted transaction data. Bitcoin nodes would not need to understand or enforce the privacy system's rules. Called Shielded Bitcoin, the proposed system borrows core ideas from Zcash, including encrypted notes, nullifiers and zero-knowledge proofs. It would conceal shielded senders, receivers, transferred amounts and links to earlier notes while leaving Bitcoin's existing consensus rules unchanged. FAQs: 1. How much money flowed into spot Bitcoin ETFs? Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded USD 191 million in daily net inflows. BlackRock's IBIT led with USD 163 million, followed by Fidelity's FBTC with USD 12.86 million. 2. Why has KelpDAO sued LayerZero? KelpDAO alleges that LayerZero failed to adequately disclose and address security risks connected to the technology involved in the April exploit. The lawsuit concerns an attack involving approximately 116,500 rsETH worth USD 292 million; the allegations remain subject to litigation. 3. How much was reportedly lost in the Bitget exploit? The reported breach involved at least USD 350 million in assets transferred from hot wallets. The affected assets reportedly included ETH, USDT, USDC, AVAX and BNB. 4. How much HYPE has Hyperliquid Strategies accumulated? A wallet linked by Lookonchain to Hyperliquid Strategies reportedly accumulated 5.51 million HYPE worth around USD 476 million over the past month. Its latest purchase involved 494,200 HYPE worth USD 45.8 million. 5. What is the Shielded Bitcoin proposal? Shielded Bitcoin is a proposed metaprotocol using zero-knowledge proofs to enable more private Bitcoin transfers. It aims to conceal transaction details without requiring a Bitcoin soft fork or changing existing consensus rules. Disclaimer: Analytics Insight does not provide financial advice or guidance on cryptocurrencies and stocks. Also note that the cryptocurrencies mentioned/listed on the website could potentially be risky, i.e. designed to induce you to invest financial resources that may be lost forever and not be recoverable once investments are made. This article is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice. You are responsible for conducting your own research (DYOR) before making any investments. Read more about the financial risks involved here.
KelpDAO sues LayerZero over $292M exploit. The Main Takeaways * KelpDAO has filed a $292 million lawsuit against LayerZero Labs over a significant exploit that drained rsETH due to alleged security failures. * LayerZero's Decentralized Verifier Network was compromised, allowing a forged message to facilitate the exploit without proper verification. * Following the incident, KelpDAO has transitioned its cross-chain transfers from LayerZero to Chainlink CCIP to enhance security. Evercrest Technologies Inc., the entity behind KelpDAO, has filed a civil claim in British Columbia against LayerZero Labs and co-founder Bryan Pellegrino over the April 18 exploit that drained 116,500 rsETH worth about $292 million. The loss is one the largest reported crypto exploits of 2026. Kelp alleges LayerZero failed to adequately disclose risks in its technology and failed to prevent attackers from penetrating infrastructure used to secure the rsETH bridge. It also says LayerZero had reviewed and endorsed Kelp's deployment and configuration in writing before the attack. Pellegrino has rejected the claim as meritless and said he will defend himself and LayerZero in Vancouver. Compromised verifier approved a forged message. LayerZero's incident report said the breach began in March when an attacker socially engineered a LayerZero developer, obtained session credentials and gained access to the company's RPC environment. During the April attack, compromised internal RPC nodes supplied false blockchain data while an external RPC provider was hit by a denial-of-service attack. LayerZero's Decentralized Verifier Network then produced a valid attestation for a cross-chain transaction that had never occurred. Kelp's rsETH bridge was configured to use the LayerZero Labs DVN as its only required verifier. With no second independent verifier needed, the forged message was accepted and 116,500 rsETH was released without a corresponding burn on the source chain. Chainalysis' analysis similarly found that the attack targeted off-chain verification infrastructure rather than a vulnerability in Kelp's token contracts. Lawsuit puts configuration dispute at the center. The case now turns in part on responsibility for the single-verifier setup. LayerZero initially said Kelp had selected a configuration that went against its recommendations, while Kelp disputes that account and argues LayerZero had approved the deployment. LayerZero later acknowledged that allowing its DVN to act as the sole verifier for high-value transactions was a mistake. Since the exploit, LayerZero has stopped its DVN from servicing 1-of-1 configurations, while Kelp has moved rsETH cross-chain transfers away from LayerZero and toward Chainlink CCIP. Mandy Williams is a full-time cryptocurrency reporter. Having entered the blockchain space in early 2017, she leverages a diverse background in multi-niche writing and content strategy to cover the evolving digital asset market. Mandy is dedicated to breaking down complex Web3 concepts and spreading mainstream awareness of blockchain technology.