Grid Integration Engineer 2

NY, NJ sue Trump admin over deals to scrap offshore wind projects. Published Sep 22, 2026 at 2:45 p.m. ET Never miss a story We rely on your support to make local news available to all Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations New York and New Jersey have joined a multistate coalition suing the federal government over a pair of settlements that redirected more than $1.4 billion away from offshore wind development and toward fossil fuel projects. A total of eight states filed two separate lawsuits against the Trump administration and the companies Invenergy and Bluepoint Wind on Tuesday. The states argue that the deals, each struck earlier this year, are an illegal use of taxpayer dollars that have resulted in canceled projects that could have delivered badly needed electricity to the Northeast while creating thousands of jobs in the region. "These illegal backroom deals take money that should have gone toward lowering New Yorkers' bills and hand it to fossil fuel projects in other states, all while our energy demand continues to grow," New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. "At a moment when every available resource should go to keeping the lights on and prices down, this administration is choosing corruption over communities." Charlotte Taylor, a spokesperson for the U.S. Department of the Interior, said the department would not comment on litigation. But she noted that the Trump administration, which has staunchly opposed offshore wind, determined the projects posed national security risks, and that the companies voluntarily agreed to the deals, which were reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice. The administration will not "sit back and let reckless projects" create higher utility costs, a weakened energy system and unnecessary harm to the environment, Taylor said in a statement. The lawsuit challenging the Bluepoint settlement was filed in federal district court for the Eastern District of New York. Bluepoint Wind had been planned for federal waters 38 miles south of Long Island and 53 miles east of the Jersey Shore, and was designed to produce 2.4 gigawatts of electricity. That's enough to power more than 1 million homes, according to the company. The Trump administration and Bluepoint reached a settlement to cancel the project's lease in April, in a portion of the ocean that the company previously bid $765 million for. The project was still in its early stages and construction had not started. The settlement pays $765 million to the company, and that money will be spent on oil and gas development. Bluepoint plans to use that money to build a liquified natural gas facility, according to James' office. Bluepoint Wind did not respond to a request for comment. Meanwhile, the lawsuit against the Invenergy settlement was filed in federal court in Maine. Invenergy held a lease to build offshore wind 35 miles off the Jersey Shore and 69 miles south of Long Island, as well as two leases in the Gulf of Maine. Invenergy had bid a total of $653 million for all of those leases. They were canceled through a settlement with federal authorities in June, in a deal that pays the company $653 million to be reinvested in oil and gas projects. Invenergy plans to use that money to build natural gas power plants across the Midwest, according to James' office. Invenergy did not respond to a request for comment. The federal government is paying out the settlements from the Department of Justice's Judgement Fund. Gov. Kathy Hochul called the arrangement a "pay-not-to-play scheme" in a statement, adding the Trump administration's move "is an outrageous abuse of taxpayer dollars that hurts our ability to meet our energy needs, reduce emissions, create good paying jobs and help secure American energy independence." Both lawsuits seek court orders declaring the settlements unlawful and voiding the lease cancellations. The Trump administration has reached similar deals to cancel other offshore wind projects, and those deals have faced similar challenges. New York and New Jersey sued over a similar deal with TotalEnergies in June. States in the Northeast are grappling with soaring electricity prices driven by a supply crunch as demand for power, especially for new data centers, grows. Both New York and New Jersey had invested heavily in recent years to support the local offshore wind industry, but that work has largely ground to a halt since President Donald Trump returned to the White House. New York has one offshore wind facility, South Fork Wind, which began sending power to Long Island in 2023. Two more - Sunrise Wind and Empire Wind - are currently under construction, despite federal efforts to halt that work. New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill previously told WNYC that the Garden State will focus on offshore wind again in the future "if that makes sense." Sherrill has emphasized developing solar and nuclear energy in the meantime.

New company takes over Minto Road BESS project. September 3, 2026 The company behind a controversial battery energy storage project near Watsonville has changed, but plans to seek state approval for the facility - and the opposition surrounding it - remain. Chicago-based Invenergy has acquired the proposed Seahawk Energy Storage Project at 90 Minto Road from New Leaf Energy and will become its owner and lead developer, the company announced in an Aug. 26 letter to Santa Cruz County Executive Officer Nicole Coburn. New Leaf will remain involved while the project goes through the California Energy Commission's permitting process, which Invenergy expects to conclude by the end of 2027. The proposed 200-megawatt battery energy storage system, or BESS, would be built near College Lake and adjacent to PG&E's Green Valley Substation. The project has drawn fierce opposition from nearby residents and groups including Stop Lithium BESS in Santa Cruz County and Never Again Moss Landing, which have raised concerns about fire hazards, toxic emissions, emergency access and the facility's proximity to homes, farmland and College Lake. Invenergy says the project will use newer technology and meet modern fire and safety standards. The ownership change comes several months after New Leaf withdrew its application from Santa Cruz County and instead sought approval through the California Energy Commission's Opt-In Certification Program. County records show New Leaf withdrew its county application May 7. The company applied to the state May 27. Invenergy plans to continue down that path. "We recognize and respect the extensive work Santa Cruz County put into proposing a new ordinance to protect your residents," the company said in written responses to The Pajaronian. Invenergy said it supports the draft BESS ordinance presented to the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors in January, but also agrees with New Leaf's decision to pursue approval from the state. The company said it anticipates that the CEC will honor provisions of the county's proposed ordinance. That decision has been a major point of contention surrounding Seahawk. Santa Cruz County had been developing an ordinance that would establish local regulations for utility-scale battery storage facilities when New Leaf moved its application to the state. Under the opt-in process, the CEC becomes the permitting and California Environmental Quality Act review agency for the project. The CEC is currently reviewing Seahawk. Its online docket shows that the change in ownership was formally filed Aug. 27 and that residents continue to submit comments opposing the project. Invenergy says acquiring Seahawk fits into its broader push to develop energy infrastructure in California. The company says it has developed more than 230 projects totaling more than 38 gigawatts worldwide, including more than 25 energy storage projects totaling more than 1,250 megawatts. Invenergy owns or operates six projects in California and has a pipeline of prospective solar, geothermal and storage projects in the state totaling more than 1,700 megawatts. "Utility-scale battery energy storage systems like the Seahawk Energy Storage Project are critical to help meet rising energy demand and address the energy affordability crisis in California," the company told The Pajaronian. But the proposed location has made Seahawk a flashpoint. More than 150 people attended a February meeting at Pinto Lake City Park organized by Stop Lithium BESS in Santa Cruz County. Residents and speakers raised concerns about fire, environmental contamination and evacuation routes, particularly following the January 2025 fire at the Vistra battery storage facility in Moss Landing. The opposition group says the Minto Road facility would be about 500 feet from the nearest residences and uphill from College Lake, and has raised concerns about narrow roads that could complicate evacuation and emergency response. It also points to surrounding farmland and nearby wetlands as reasons the location is inappropriate. The group also disputes claims that lithium-iron-phosphate technology eliminates the danger of major fires, pointing to fires involving LFP battery systems elsewhere. Nina Audino, founder of Stop Lithium BESS in Santa Cruz County, said the change in ownership has done nothing to alleviate the group's concerns about the project. "My concerns with this technology are the same," she said. Audino said there is still too little information available about how Invenergy might change Seahawk, including what battery system will replace the one previously proposed. She said she supports moving away from fossil fuels and believes electrification will be an important part of that transition, but argues that large lithium-based battery facilities are the wrong approach. "The carbon footprint has to stop," she said. "We have to learn to live differently. And I believe electrification in part or in large part is part of the solution, but not using this technology, not with this particular kind of battery." She also said opposition to Seahawk reflects a larger debate playing out across California over where utility-scale battery facilities should be located. Audino said projects proposed near residential and agricultural communities have encountered significant opposition, while large energy developments in more remote portions of the state present a different land-use question. "It's one thing to place these facilities in half semi-desert arid areas like in Kern County or in Fresno County, miles away from residential areas," she said. "And it's another thing to try to pack them in coastal counties, in rural areas that are heavily agricultural." Invenergy, however, says Seahawk would differ significantly from the Moss Landing facility. The company said the project would use containerized batteries with greater thermal stability and a lower fire risk than the nickel-manganese-cobalt batteries used at Moss Landing. Invenergy says the batteries will be housed in separate outdoor containers rather than inside a building. "What happened at the Moss Landing battery storage facility in 2025 cannot happen at a modern energy storage site," an Invenergy spokesman said, citing changes in technology, regulations and industry standards. The company says Seahawk will comply with NFPA 855, the International Fire Code and SB 38, along with other applicable state and national requirements. Invenergy also says the project would bring more than $50 million in economic benefits to Santa Cruz County over its projected lifespan of more than 20 years. According to Invenergy, that includes more than $2 million annually in property tax revenue, more than $8 million in sales and use taxes associated with construction and equipment purchases and $150,000 for training and contributions to the local fire protection district. Invenergy estimates construction would employ as many as 50 workers at its peak and that the completed facility would support five permanent operations and maintenance jobs. It is not yet clear how the specifics of the project will change under the new ownership. Invenergy said those details will become clear in the coming months in a "transparent, community-focused transition." While New Leaf planned to use batteries supplied by China-based Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited, or CATL, Invenergy will seek another supplier because they are no longer compliant with federal regulations. "Invenergy will employ a different battery model that is proven, reliable, and complies with current rules on country of origin," Invenergy said, but did not name the replacement. "Invenergy will employ a different battery model that is proven, reliable, and complies with current rules on country of origin," he said, but stopped short of naming the model the company plans to use. Audino said changing manufacturers or battery models would not resolve the group's broader concerns about placing a large lithium-based storage facility near homes and agricultural land. She argues that the risks associated with lithium batteries are significantly different when thousands of batteries are concentrated at a utility-scale storage facility. She pointed to potential failures involving not only battery cells but also components of the battery-management system. "It is a risk that's not necessary," she said. Invenergy says it intends to continue the community outreach begun by New Leaf and meet with local leaders and residents as the CEC review proceeds. New Leaf will remain involved during that process. Opposition, meanwhile, is continuing. Recent filings in the CEC proceeding include comments raising concerns about emergency access, fire protection, battery testing, environmental impacts and the project's proximity to nearby residents. Invenergy says its lead developer for Seahawk will reach out to county and community leaders in the coming months. "We look forward to working with you to create a safe project that benefits Santa Cruz County while meeting growing energy demand and supporting the climate action goals" of the county, Central Coast Community Energy and California, Invenergy Senior Vice President Laura Miner wrote to Coburn.

North America Solar PV news snippets: Crux invests $215M in Invenergy solar project & more. UK's Aggreko plans NYSE listing; $750mn for Swift Current Energy; $50 million for Coreshell's battery plant; Qcells, Microsoft plan new energy capacity; 38 Degrees North secures EIG debt facility; Tax Capital for Aspen Power's 30 solar projects; Lightstar wins 27.3 MW New Jersey awards. Invenergy has secured $215 million in tax equity for its 240 MW Ohio solar project and broken ground on a 120 MW project in Washington. Published on: Aug 26, 2026, 12:09 am Invenergy secures $215M, breaks ground on solar. North America-based IPP Invenergy has secured $215 million in tax equity from clean energy capital platform Crux for its 240 MW Pleasant Prairie Solar Energy Center in Franklin County, Ohio. The project is under construction and is expected to begin commercial operations in 2027. Crux Capital Securities structured the investment through a Crux-managed vehicle, designed to monetize federal investment tax credits. Separately, Invenergy and Grant County Public Utility District (Grant PUD) have broken ground on the 120 MW Quincy Solar Energy Center near Moses Lake, Washington. The project marks Grant PUD's first solar project in Grant County and Invenergy's first solar project in Washington to reach construction. It is expected to begin operations in late 2027. Aggreko files for proposed US IPO. Aggreko, the UK-based mobile, modular power solutions company, has publicly filed a Form F-1 registration statement with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for a proposed initial public offering (IPO) of its ordinary shares. The company plans to list its shares on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the proposed ticker AGKO. The company has not disclosed the number of shares, offering price range, or timing, saying the offering remains subject to market conditions. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and BofA Securities are serving as joint lead bookrunning managers, with several other banks acting as bookrunners and co-managers. The registration statement has been filed but is not yet effective, said Aggreko. Swift Current secures $750 million credit facility. US renewable energy projects developer Swift Current Energy has closed a $750 million corporate credit facility to support its energy development activities across the country. The three-year, dual-tranche facility includes an option to increase the credit capacity by another $250 million, bringing the potential total to $1 billion. Swift says the facility will provide it with cash and letter-of-credit capacity as it develops, commercializes, owns, and operates large-scale energy projects. Since 2016, it claims to have commercialized 5 GW of clean energy projects, owns and operates more than 1 GW, and has more than 10 GW under development. Crédit Agricole CIB, ING Capital, and Truist Securities were among the lead arrangers for the financing, with Crédit Agricole CIB and ING Capital also serving as green loan structuring agents. Coreshell secures $50 million DOE award. Coreshell Technologies, a California-based battery technology company developing lithium-ion batteries with metallurgical silicon (MGS) anodes, has been selected by the US Department of Energy (DOE) for a $50 million award. The funding, provided under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, will support the expansion of Coreshell's manufacturing facilities and the development of a US gigafactory for lithium-ion batteries using MGS anodes instead of graphite. Coreshell and project partner AM Batteries plan to establish about 2 GWh of electrode manufacturing capacity and 1.5 GWh of cell assembly capacity. AM Batteries will provide its dry-electrode coating technology for cathode production. The project aims to reduce US dependence on imported graphite and other foreign battery supply chains for electric vehicle (EV) and defense applications. It also offers a path to energy storage that isn't 'hostage' to a foreign supply chain, said Coreshell CEO and Co-Founder Jonathan Tan. Qcells, Microsoft expand AI energy alliance. Solar PV manufacturer Qcells is expanding its alliance with tech giant Microsoft to explore ways to add new energy capacity alongside the technology company's growing AI infrastructure. Under a proposed 'bring-your-own-capacity' (BYOC) model, Qcells would develop and build new energy resources that could supply Microsoft directly or the local utility serving nearby communities. Microsoft would fund the power needed for its operations, aiming to match new data center demand with additional energy resources. The companies are also exploring virtual power plants (VPPs) that would aggregate residential and commercial batteries to provide electricity to the grid during periods of peak demand. Qcells said it plans to prioritize participation from income-qualified households. The expanded collaboration builds on an existing relationship that began in 2023 with a 2.5 GW solar module and EPC agreement and was expanded to 12 GW in 2024 (see Qcells Bags 12 GW Order For US-Made Solar PV Modules). EIG backs 38 Degrees North with new debt. 38 Degrees North (38DN), a US renewable energy platform focused on community solar and distributed generation, has secured a new debt facility from energy and infrastructure investor EIG. The financing will support 38DN's development pipeline and near-term acquisitions, and can expand as new opportunities arise. The company said the new debt brings its total growth capital raised to more than $300 million. Founded in 2015, 38DN has more than 100 projects and 500 MW under construction or in operation. It also has an advanced pipeline of more than 250 MW expected to enter construction over the next 24 months. Aspen Power gets tax commitment for 30 projects. Aspen Power, a US distributed energy platform, has secured a tax capital commitment covering investment tax credits (ITCs) from its 2026-2027 community solar portfolio. The portfolio includes up to 30 projects across multiple states. The transaction was structured through a partnership between US clean energy tax credit marketplace Basis Climate and clean energy infrastructure investment firm Excelsior Energy Capital. The partnership was formed to deploy up to $150 million in minority equity into distributed solar and battery storage projects. Aspen will own and operate the projects over the long term. The ITCs are committed for transfer under Section 6418 of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), allowing Aspen to monetize the credits generated by the projects. Lightstar selected for New Jersey solar Pilot. US solar company Lightstar Renewables says it has been selected for eight conditional awards under New Jersey's inaugural Dual-Use Solar Energy Pilot Program. The awards cover about 27.3 MW of planned solar capacity across Monmouth, Salem, Warren, and Cumberland counties. Lightstar was one of only three developers selected in the first solicitation under which the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities conditionally approved 16 projects totaling 52.06 MW statewide. Lightstar said the selected projects include farming activities involving crops such as soybeans, hay, grains, vegetables, and fruits, as well as livestock grazing. The awards remain conditional, with projects required to meet the program's requirements before moving forward.