U

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Academic medical center and health system

AI Governance and Evaluation Executive

Program ManagementConfirmed live in the last 24 hours
Full-timeDallas, TX, USANo salary listed

About the Job

Requirements

  • A master's degree in Public Health, Biomedical Informatics, Data Science, Computer Science, Engineering, Research Administration, or a related field is required.
  • At least 8 years of progressively responsible experience in AI, digital health, healthcare operations, technology governance, clinical informatics, data analytics, research administration, compliance, or a related field is required.
  • At least 4 years leading people, programs, or complex cross-functional initiatives is required.
  • Demonstrated experience operating cross-functional governance, evaluation, assurance, or enterprise programs is required.
  • Demonstrated experience implementing enterprise roadmaps, operating models, or new capabilities and translating priorities into measurable outcomes is required.
  • Ability to translate enterprise direction into priorities, tradeoffs, repeatable workflows, and measurable program performance.
  • Ability to move work across matrixed organizations without relying on command-and-control authority.
  • Ability to work comfortably with AI scientists, engineers, clinicians, researchers, and vendors.
  • Ability to recognize when deeper evaluation or stronger controls are warranted.
  • Ability to treat governance stakeholders as partners and design timely, usable experiences.
  • Ability to evolve governance as models, agents, regulations, and institutional use cases change.
  • Strong project and program management and organizational leadership skills.
  • Ability to translate complex technical, clinical, regulatory, and ethical issues into practical workflows and decisions.
  • Communication, facilitation, negotiation, and stakeholder-management skills.
  • The position requires talking and is conducted in an office setting.

Responsibilities

  • Independently run the day-to-day enterprise Responsible AI Governance and Evaluation program on behalf of the CAIO.
  • Translate program strategy into an annual operating roadmap, including priorities, dependencies, resource needs, adoption activities, and measurable program outcomes.
  • Operationalize AI policies, standards, workflows, decision rights, review pathways, and documentation requirements.
  • Coordinate governance across institutional and domain-specific structures, including work with UTSW executives and senior leadership.
  • Prioritize work based on institutional value, risk, dependencies, and capacity, and surface tradeoffs for decision.
  • Ensure governance is risk-proportionate, timely, consistent, and designed to enable responsible innovation.
  • Identify complex, novel, or high-consequence cases requiring escalation to the CAIO or an appropriate governance body.
  • Operate overall intake, triage, AI risk classification, evaluation, multidisciplinary review, decision, deployment conditions, monitoring, and reassessment workflows.
  • Coordinate enterprise governance committee agendas, case materials, decisions, action items, and follow-up.
  • Maintain authoritative records of approvals, conditions, exceptions, reassessments, and governance precedents.
  • Develop expedited and standardized pathways for low-risk or well-understood AI uses.
  • Create and maintain reusable review patterns, templates, evidence packages, evaluation assets, and precedents that improve consistency and reduce duplicate work.
  • Provide guidance, consultation, education, and stakeholder support to promote early and ongoing engagement and adoption of governance requirements.
  • Track service levels, bottlenecks, and outstanding governance actions and drive closure.
  • Implement evaluation requirements proportionate to AI risk, intended use, and deployment context.
  • Coordinate assessment of performance, reliability, safety, bias, security considerations, and unintended consequences as applicable.
  • Coordinate independent evaluation of consequential AI systems as appropriate.
  • Assess vendor evidence and claims and identify when supplemental local testing or independent evaluation is required.
  • Facilitate prospective validation, simulation, and other assurance activities as warranted.
  • Translate evaluation findings into governance conditions, remediation actions, monitoring requirements, and escalation.
  • Connect evaluation plans and findings to measurable outcomes where appropriate.
  • Apply governance and evaluation practices to foundation models, large language models, multimodal models, and agentic AI.
  • Coordinate review of tool and data access, identity and authorization, human oversight, autonomous actions, memory, agent-to-agent interactions, observability, guardrails, testing, and fail-safe mechanisms.
  • Maintain practical governance approaches across commercial frontier models, institutionally hosted models, open-weight models, and internally developed AI.
  • Convert emerging model and agent capabilities, research, and standards into practical review criteria, test protocols, and playbooks.
  • Maintain enterprise visibility of AI systems, vendors, accountable owners, intended uses, risk classifications, evaluation status, and monitoring obligations.
  • Coordinate vendor due diligence and evidence collection with Procurement, Legal, Compliance, Information Security, IT, Data, and domain teams, supporting build-buy-partner decisions without assuming ownership of procurement or technical architecture.
  • Track portfolio priorities, review readiness, dependencies, decisions, and open conditions, and prepare concise materials for decision forums.
  • Drive continuous adoption through training, guidance, communications, and integration of governance requirements into business, research, clinical, and technology workflows.
  • Promote common methods, reusable evidence, and standard controls to reduce duplication and improve enterprise consistency.
  • Work with Compliance and Information Security to identify and assess AI-related risks and incorporate AI considerations into established enterprise risk-management processes.
  • Coordinate AI governance requirements, evidence, mitigations, and escalation with risk-owning functions and other control partners.
  • Partner with senior leaders to translate risk findings into governance decisions, deployment conditions, monitoring requirements, remediation plans, and reassessment triggers.
  • Stay current on emerging AI regulatory requirements, standards, and professional guidance relevant to UTSW.
  • Serve as a central operating leadership partner to domain leaders and governance groups.
  • Engage stakeholders early so governance and evaluation requirements are built into planning, procurement, research, development, implementation, and operations.
  • Support health-system governance for clinical and operational AI, patient-facing tools, predictive models, generative AI, ambient AI, and autonomous workflows.
  • Support research and academic governance for basic, translational, and clinical research AI, research data, scientific AI, external models, AI-enabled experimentation, and biomedical education.
  • Support administrative and business governance for workforce productivity, finance, human resources, revenue cycle, procurement, communications, operations, and automation.
  • Lead and oversee AI Governance Stewards and other governance staff supporting enterprise and domain workflows; define roles, structure, decision rights, and ways of working.
  • Develop practical expertise in AI governance, evaluation operations, assurance, and responsible AI.
  • Create reusable playbooks, templates, review criteria, and operating procedures.
  • Manage assigned budgets, governance and evaluation tooling, contracts, and external resources within approved plans.
  • Maintain a balanced program scorecard covering governance cycle time; enterprise portfolio coverage; adoption of standard pathways; reuse of evaluation assets; use-case volume and risk distribution; evaluation and vendor-review completion; backlog and dependency status; closure of conditions and mitigations; monitoring findings; incidents and near misses; measurable outcomes; and stakeholder experience.
  • Use relevant data to improve throughput, consistency, adoption, and institutional confidence.
  • Advise the CAIO on governance operations, evaluation findings, emerging issues, and institutional AI governance maturity.
  • Represent the Office of the CAIO in designated governance forums and working groups.
  • Facilitate multidisciplinary and organizational decisions and resolve operational barriers to responsible deployment.
  • Escalate significant or unresolved governance concerns and risk findings to the CAIO and applicable risk-owning functions.
  • Recommend additional evaluation, mitigation, monitoring, conditions, or reassessment when warranted.
  • Prepare executive-level reporting on priorities, performance, dependencies, unresolved issues, resource needs, and decisions required.
  • Explain complex AI, governance, and evaluation concepts clearly to technical and nontechnical audiences.

Desired Qualifications

  • A PhD or additional advanced degree in a related field is preferred.
  • Experience in an academic medical center, integrated health system, life sciences organization, or similarly complex regulated environment.
  • Experience with AI/ML evaluation, deployment, governance, responsible AI, or assurance.
  • Experience evaluating AI vendors and coordinating due diligence.
  • Technical fluency across large language model ecosystems, MLOps, retrieval and vector technologies, AI APIs and integrations, lifecycle monitoring, and incident-response interfaces sufficient to engage technical teams and assess governance evidence.
  • Experience building or scaling a new team or function and managing tools, vendors, contracts, or external resources.
  • Familiarity with generative AI, large language models, multimodal models, foundation models, and agentic AI.
  • Working knowledge of healthcare AI evaluation and lifecycle monitoring, including quantitative methods and model cards.
  • Familiarity with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, ISO/IEC 42001, and related responsible AI frameworks or standards.

About the Company

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Academic medical center and health system

UT Southwestern Medical Center is an academic medical center in Dallas, Texas, integrating patient care, biomedical research, and medical education. It operates a main campus and regional medical centers alongside four schools, including a medical school and graduate programs in health professions and public health. What sets UT Southwestern apart is research output ranked No. 1 worldwide by the Nature Index, backed by Nobel laureates on faculty. The goal is to advance medical discovery into better treatments and compassionate patient care.

Company size
Not listed
Company stage
Grant
Total funding
$18M
Headquarters
Dallas, TX
Founded
Not listed

Recently Posted Jobs

Explore more opportunities at UT Southwestern Medical Center

See more jobs