Software Engineer – Early Career

Adyen has entered a definitive agreement to acquire enterprise billing platform Orb for $335 million in cash through a reverse triangular merger. Upon closing, Orb will become a wholly owned subsidiary managed under an incubator model, with its co-founders reinvesting a meaningful portion of proceeds into newly issued Adyen shares. Founded in 2021, San Francisco-based Orb provides infrastructure that tracks real-time usage data and translates complex pricing contracts for enterprises. The company raised $44 million in total funding and serves clients including Vercel, Glean and Replit. The acquisition addresses growing complexity in monetisation and billing for digital companies, particularly as AI drives adoption of usage-based pricing models. Adyen expects both this acquisition and its purchase of Talon.One to close on 1 July 2026, pending regulatory approvals.

Best billing systems for AI startups in 2026: what actually matters beyond metering. Mar 27, 2026 Arnon shimoni. In 2026 just like before - the default advice for AI billing goes like this: pick a metering layer, plug it into Stripe for payments and you're done done. This made sense in 2024 but as of 2026 it's incomplete. Stripe acquired Metronome for ~$1B in January 2026. That means the "standard stack" of Metronome + Stripe is now just Stripe. Orb only integrates with Stripe. Amberflo is primarily Stripe. If you followed the consensus advice, your entire billing infrastructure now depends on one payments company's roadmap. Meanwhile, AI billing got harder. Credits became the dominant pricing mechanism. Hybrid models (subscription + usage + enterprise contracts) became the norm, not the exception. And the question changed from "can we meter tokens?" to "is this customer profitable?". Here's what really makes the difference when choosing AI billing infrastructure in 2026. But first... Why the old criteria are wrong. Most comparisons rank billing platforms on metering throughput: events per second, ingestion speed, real-time aggregation. Those metrics matter, but they're table stakes. Every serious billing platform handles metering now. The criteria that actually determine whether your billing system works at $3M, $10M, and $50M ARR are different: The best AI billing systems, ranked by what matters. Tier 1: built for AI billing complexity. These platforms were designed for the specific problems AI companies face: credits, tokens, hybrid pricing, and margin visibility. Solvimon. Built by Kim Verkooij (ex-VP Product, Adyen) and Etienne Gerts (ex-SVP Technology, Adyen), who built and operated Adyen's internal billing engine at €970B+ in annual payment volume. Why it ranks here: Solvimon treats credits and tokens as first-class financial primitives. Credit wallets carry full ledger logic (rollover, expiry, pooled or per-user allocation, tiered exchange rates per model). Multi-dimensional rate cards map different token types across different models without collapsing them into abstract units. Hybrid billing runs subscriptions, credits, token metering, and enterprise custom contracts in one system with one ledger. Revenue-per-customer sits next to cost-per-customer in real time. PSP-agnostic: works with Stripe, Adyen, Checkout.com. Your payments stack can evolve independently of your billing architecture. Best for: AI-native companies where billing complexity is the core infrastructure problem. Particularly strong for companies running credits + subscriptions + enterprise contracts simultaneously, or companies that need PSP flexibility. What to know: newer platform. Not designed for simple subscription-only businesses. The depth is the point, so if you're pre-PMF with a flat $49/month plan, this is more infrastructure than you need today. Orb. A usage-based billing engine with strong engineering tooling. Ingests 250K+ events/sec. Billable metrics defined via SQL. Pricing compiler handles complex multi-dimensional logic. Credit system uses block-based architecture with individual expiry dates. Why it ranks here: Orb gives engineering teams maximum control over how usage maps to charges. The pricing simulation feature lets you model changes against historical data before going live. For teams that want to own the pricing logic precisely, Orb is the most flexible tool available. Pricing: custom (contact sales). Starts around $599/month. Best for: engineering-heavy AI startups that want deep control over pricing logic and are already committed to Stripe. What to know: Stripe-only for payments. That's a hard constraint if you need multi-PSP support, operate in regions where Stripe coverage is limited, or want optionality as your payments stack evolves. Requires significant engineering integration time. Tier 2: strong for specific use cases. Amberflo. Decoupled metering cloud and billing cloud that scale independently. Purpose-built for LLM and AI workloads with multi-model cost attribution, unified pricing tables across 100+ AI models, and an AI gateway with load balancing. Why it's here: fastest time-to-value for AI-specific metering. Native credit system with real-time deduction. If you're routing requests across multiple LLM providers, Amberflo meters and bills across all of them. Pricing: $8/10K LLM requests/month. Free trial (1M requests/30 days). Best for: AI startups that need LLM-specific billing fast. Less suited for complex hybrid models combining subscription + usage + enterprise. What to know: Stripe-focused for payments. Smaller customer base means fewer proof points at enterprise scale. Lago. Open-source billing engine. Self-hostable or cloud-hosted. Ships pre-built pricing templates for OpenAI and Mistral models. Mistral AI uses Lago, generating 32,000+ invoices monthly with per-token billing. Why it's here: only open-source option with native multi-PSP support (Stripe, Adyen, GoCardless, Cashfree). Wallet system supports up to 5 wallets per customer with metric-specific scoping. Flat-fee pricing means costs don't scale with your billing volume. Pricing: open-source (free). Cloud from ~$99/month. Best for: technical teams that want full control, need multi-PSP support, or are at a scale where percentage-based billing platform fees get expensive. What to know: self-hosted requires Postgres, Redis, ClickHouse. No built-in dunning. Steep learning curve for non-technical teams. You're trading platform cost for engineering cost. Metronome (now part of Stripe). Before its acquisition, Metronome powered metering for OpenAI, Anthropic, Databricks, and NVIDIA. Processes billions of usage events daily on streaming infrastructure built on Apache Kafka. Separates metering, pricing, and contract management into distinct layers. Why it's here and not Tier 1: Stripe acquired Metronome in January 2026. The product is strong, but the roadmap is now Stripe's roadmap. If you choose Metronome, you're choosing Stripe's ecosystem for billing and payments permanently. For companies that need PSP flexibility or want vendor independence, that's a structural constraint that didn't exist a year ago. Pricing: custom (contact sales). Best for: enterprise AI companies already deep in the Stripe ecosystem with dedicated billing engineering teams. What to know: heavy implementation (weeks of configuration, SQL knowledge, data pipeline setup). No historical data backfilling. No native invoicing. The acquisition means evaluating Metronome now requires evaluating Stripe's long-term billing strategy. Tier 3: best for subscription-first companies adding AI. Chargebee. The most mature subscription billing platform in this comparison. 200+ integrations, deep accounting software connectivity (Salesforce, NetSuite, QuickBooks), enterprise-grade dunning and revenue recognition. Why it's here: if your business is subscription-first and you're adding AI features that generate token usage on the side, Chargebee is the path of least disruption. You don't rip out your billing system for a feature. Pricing: from $599/month. Best for: mid-market SaaS with mature subscription billing adding AI features at the margin. What to know: token metering isn't real-time. Credit ledger depth is limited. Adding serious AI billing on top of Chargebee typically requires the same custom engineering you were trying to avoid. Stripe billing (with LLM token billing). Stripe launched LLM token billing in private preview. Auto-syncs token prices for OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google models. Markup-based pricing through the Stripe AI Gateway. Why it's here: still fastest path to basic token billing if you're already on Stripe. The new feature directly solves the multi-meter problem that forced companies to collapse token types into abstract billing units. Pricing: 0.7% of billing volume + Stripe processing fees (total often ~1.5%). Best for: early-stage AI startups already on Stripe with simple pricing. What to know: still private preview. Percentage-based pricing compounds at scale. Credit systems are limited. And you're locked to Stripe. If you're going to build on Stripe's billing anyway, evaluate whether Metronome (now part of Stripe) or the native token billing feature is the better path. Comparison table at a glance. How to choose. Three questions determine your choice: * Are credits a core part of your pricing? If you sell credit packs with rollover, expiry, team pooling, and model-specific exchange rates, you need a platform where credits are a financial primitive. Solvimon and Orb handle this natively. Chargebee and Stripe don't. Lago sits in between with flexible wallets but more engineering required. * Do you need billing and payments from different vendors? If yes, your options are Solvimon (Stripe, Adyen, Checkout.com), Lago (Stripe, Adyen, GoCardless, Cashfree), or Chargebee. Every other platform on this list locks you to Stripe. * How fast does your pricing change? AI companies change pricing more frequently than any other software category. New models, new token types, competitive pressure, enterprise negotiations. If a pricing change requires an engineering sprint, you're losing weeks of margin every time the market moves. Evaluate how each platform handles rate card updates and whether your team can make changes without code. The AI billing market consolidated around Stripe in early 2026. That's worth understanding before you build your stack. If Stripe is the right long-term payments partner for your business, the ecosystem is strong. If you want optionality, the platforms that offer it are Solvimon, Lago, and Chargebee, each at different levels of AI billing depth.

Why search for a Chargebee alternative? Searching for a Chargebee alternative can be crucial for businesses aiming to optimize their subscription management processes. While Chargebee offers various advanced features, some organizations may find that their specific business needs align better with other subscription billing platforms. A comprehensive billing solution should facilitate effective billing and revenue management, especially for B2B companies dealing with recurring payments. Exploring best chargebee competitors can help companies identify solutions that offer more flexible pricing plans and diverse payment methods, which can significantly reduce churn rates and improve customer satisfaction. In 2026, businesses of all sizes are increasingly looking for the best 5 Chargebee alternatives that provide robust subscription management solutions and effective revenue management. Comparing Chargebee integration capabilities with those of its competitors might reveal platforms that offer superior automation features or customization options. Many alternatives also provide the option for a free trial, allowing businesses to test functionalities like usage-based billing and CRM integration, ensuring they find the best subscription and revenue management software that fits their unique requirements. Ultimately, the right management and revenue automation tool can empower a company to effectively manage subscriptions and implement tailored pricing strategies that drive growth. NOWPayments - The best overall Chargebee competitor. When it comes to subscription management software, NOWPayments stands out as the best overall Chargebee competitor. This billing management platform is designed to meet various subscription management needs, making it easy for businesses to streamline their billing and revenue operations. Compared to Chargebee, which is primarily a subscription billing software, NOWPayments provides robust features and functionalities that cater to diverse industries. Additionally, it serves as one of the top Chargebee alternatives in 2026, offering an intuitive interface for recurring billing. For businesses looking for best alternatives to Chargebee, NOWPayments shines with its seamless integration with API, Plugins, Widget, Donation Link. As more companies seek solutions apart from Chargebee, NOWPayments emerges as a prime choice for businesses aiming to enhance their subscription billing and revenue processes, while also competing effectively with other competitors of Chargebee. Orb - The most user friendly Chargebee competitor. When it comes to choosing a subscription management platform, Orb stands out as the most user-friendly competitor to Chargebee. While Chargebee is a subscription billing solution that offers robust features, Orb simplifies the process, making it easier for businesses to manage their invoices and recurring billing. This is especially beneficial for companies that prioritize a seamless user experience, much like Salesforce does in the CRM space. Utilizing recurring billing software provided by Stripe, Orb seamlessly integrates payment processing, ensuring that transactions are smooth and efficient. While Chargebee might offer many features, Orb focuses on ease of use, allowing users to navigate the system without complications. For businesses that require effective subscription management and billing, Orb is a compelling choice, especially for those who may find themselves overwhelmed by the complexities of Chargebee. Stripe - The most popular Chargebee competitor. When it comes to subscription billing and management, using Chargebee can be a great choice for many businesses. However, like Chargebee, there are other platforms that offer robust solutions, and one of the most popular competitors is Stripe. Stripe is a payment processing platform that not only facilitates transactions but also provides tools for managing subscriptions, invoicing, and even fraud prevention. This versatility makes it an appealing alternative for companies looking to streamline their payment processes. While Chargebee specializes in subscription management, Stripe's comprehensive suite of services allows businesses to customize their payment experiences. This makes Stripe a formidable contender in the realm of payment processing and subscription management. Ultimately, both platforms have unique strengths, and businesses must assess their specific needs when choosing between using Chargebee or like Chargebee, opting for Stripe as a viable solution. Recurly - The developer-friendly Chargebee competitor. Recurly stands out as a developer-friendly alternative to Chargebee, offering a seamless integration experience for businesses looking to streamline their subscription billing processes. With a robust set of APIs, Recurly enables developers to customize and manage billing operations efficiently, ensuring a smooth workflow that aligns with the unique requirements of each organization. Its extensive documentation and support resources empower teams to implement and scale their subscription models with ease. One of the key advantages of Recurly lies in its flexibility, allowing for various pricing strategies, including tiered, usage-based, and promotional pricing. This adaptability is crucial for companies aiming to optimize revenue and enhance customer satisfaction. Additionally, Recurly offers advanced analytics and reporting features, providing actionable insights that help businesses make informed decisions about their subscription offerings. Ultimately, Recurly not only simplifies the billing process but also empowers developers to create tailored experiences that drive growth and foster customer loyalty, making it a compelling choice in the competitive landscape of subscription management solutions. Sage Intacct - The financial-focused Chargebee alternative. Sage Intacct has emerged as a robust alternative to Chargebee, particularly for businesses seeking a financial-focused solution. With its comprehensive suite of financial management tools, Sage Intacct caters to organizations that require advanced accounting capabilities, making it an ideal choice for finance teams. Its cloud-based platform offers real-time visibility into financial performance, enabling companies to make informed decisions swiftly. One of the standout features of Sage Intacct is its ability to automate complex financial processes, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. The software supports multi-entity and multi-currency transactions, making it suitable for global enterprises. Additionally, Sage Intacct integrates seamlessly with various operational systems, providing a holistic view of business performance. In contrast to Chargebee, which primarily focuses on subscription billing and revenue management, Sage Intacct prioritizes financial integrity and compliance. This makes it an excellent choice for organizations that need a strong financial backbone to support their growth. In the competitive landscape of subscription billing and payment gateways, NOWPayments emerges as the best alternative to Chargebee by offering unmatched flexibility, cost-efficiency, and innovative features tailored to modern business needs. While Chargebee and its competitors like Stripe, Recurly, and Sage Intacct excel in specific areas, NOWPayments provides a comprehensive and forward-thinking solution that sets it apart. Why NOWPayments is the Best Crypto Payment Gateway: 1. Extensive Cryptocurrency Support: Unlike Chargebee and most competitors, NOWPayments allows businesses to accept payments in over 300 cryptocurrencies, catering to the growing demand for decentralized financial solutions. This capability empowers businesses to expand their global reach and appeal to a tech-savvy audience. 2. Low Transaction Fees and Cost-Effectiveness: NOWPayments offers highly competitive transaction fees, ensuring that businesses retain more of their revenue. This cost-effectiveness makes it ideal for startups, small businesses, and enterprises seeking to optimize their payment operations without incurring high overheads. 3. Seamless Integration and Flexibility: With features like APIs, plugins, widgets, and donation links, NOWPayments integrates effortlessly into various platforms and business models. Its user-friendly tools enable businesses to implement recurring billing and payment systems efficiently, all while maintaining complete control over their operations. By addressing the limitations of traditional payment gateways and embracing the future of digital transactions, NOWPayments stands out as a versatile and innovative solution. For businesses looking to enhance their subscription billing and revenue management, NOWPayments is undoubtedly the best choice in 2026.