Full-Time
AI research startup pursuing continual adaptation
No salary listed
San Francisco, CA, USA
Hybrid
Hybrid work in the San Francisco Bay Area is indicated.
See people who can refer or advise you
Adaption Labs builds AI systems that learn from real-world interactions instead of relying on ever-larger language models. Their products aim for continual, real-time adaptation so AI can improve while being cost-efficient and secure, without full retraining. The company works toward flexible, personalized, and accessible AI that can adapt to specific enterprise workflows, reducing the need for massive data centers and helping more organizations participate in AI development. Unlike models that depend mainly on scaling compute, Adaption Labs focuses on efficient learning from experience to provide practical, enterprise-ready AI that evolves over time.
Company Size
11-50
Company Stage
Seed
Total Funding
$50M
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Founded
2025
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Health Insurance
Paid Vacation
Flexible Work Hours
Adaption Labs introduces 'Invent a Dataset': training data generated from a task description, not a seed corpus. September 4, 2026 This week, Adaption Labs released Invent a Dataset. The feature generates a structured, training-ready dataset from a description of the behavior you want a model to learn. You do not arrive with a seed corpus, a predefined schema, or a labeling guide. Is it deployable? Yes, with one caveat. Invent a Dataset is live now in the Adaption app and through the Python SDK and REST API. Generated rows download as JSONL, JSON, CSV, or Parquet, so the artifact is a portable file you own and can train on anywhere. Generation itself runs on Adaption's hosted platform and consumes credits. No self-hosted generation path is documented. The problem being targeted. Most dataset workflows begin with data that already exists. Teams then spend weeks labeling, filtering, and reshaping it to approximate the target task. Adaption's argument is that this caps model quality at how closely the available data matches the intended behavior. For proprietary and specialized tasks, the relevant signal usually sits in internal systems, unstructured text, or workflow logs. It rarely converts cleanly into a focused training set. The research team also draws a line against existing synthetic-data tooling. Those tools automate generation after a human has already defined the schema, task distribution, and generation strategy. Invent a Dataset starts one level earlier, at the behavior itself. How the API works. The mechanics are documented and concrete. A single call to datasets.invent creates the dataset and starts generation, returning immediately with status running. You then poll datasets.get until the status reads succeeded or failed, and download the rows. Domain codes are the primary control. You fetch current codes with datasets.invent_domains rather than hardcoding them. You then pass values such as medical, optionally narrowed by qualified subdomain codes such as medical.symptoms_diagnosis. At least one domain or subdomain is required. Multiple domains contribute to the same run. A domain passed without subdomains draws from its full scope. Two output formats are supported. instruction_dataset is the default and produces prompt-completion pairs for supervised fine-tuning. preference_pairs produces chosen and rejected completions for preference-based training such as DPO. Three parameters matter for production use. estimate=True prices the exact request and returns estimated versus available credits without creating or charging anything. prompt accepts up to 10,000 characters to steer what the rows are actually about. idempotency_key accepts up to 255 characters and makes network retries safe by returning the original dataset instead of launching a second run. Row counts are subject to a per-launch limit set by your plan. Language and locale expansion. language_expansion runs in two modes. translate produces a new row variant for each target language. localize produces a variant for each country and language pair, using locale-specific wording rather than direct translation. A sample_rate between 0.01 and 1 controls what fraction of invented rows gets expanded, and credits are billed on the expanded output row count, not the original. Unsupported codes return a 400 with a sample of valid values. The zero-data loop. Invent a Dataset is the first half of a loop. The dataset ID passes directly to autoscientist.create, which co-optimizes the data and the training recipe against your objective. AutoScientist launched in May 2026 and is the training-side counterpart to the Adaptive Data pillar. Adaption reports that AutoScientist beats training configured by its own research staff, by an average of 35%. Win rates moved from 48% to 64%. Those figures come from in-house domain-specialized evaluations across eight verticals. Dataset sizes ranged from 5,000 to 100,000 rows, on architectures offered for fine-tuning by Together AI. Key takeaways. * Invent a Dataset generates training rows from a task description, with no seed corpus, schema, or labels. * One datasets.invent call sets domains, row count, format, and language expansion; generation is async. * Output is instruction pairs or preference pairs, downloadable as JSONL, JSON, CSV, or Parquet. * Dataset IDs feed straight into AutoScientist, closing an intent-to-trained-model loop. Need to partner with Marktechpost LLC. for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.? Connect with Marktechpost LLC. Michal Sutter is a data science professional with a Master of Science in Data Science from the University of Padova. With a solid foundation in statistical analysis, machine learning, and data engineering, Michal excels at transforming complex datasets into actionable insights.
Adaption and AI Singapore pilot to improve model training efficiency in Southeast Asia. Aug 04, 2026 Why frontier AI models underperform in Southeast Asian languages. Southeast Asia is home to more than 700 million people, over 1,200 languages, and 11 countries. Frontier language models, trained overwhelmingly on Western, English-centric data, perform inconsistently on Southeast Asian languages and often miss the region's cultural context. Adaption collaborated with AI Singapore (AISG) to enhance dataset quality and expand training dataset size via localization across five low-resource Southeast Asian languages. Adaption's AutoScientist was able to save 56 engineering hours' worth of manual optimization of model training hyperparameters for AISG. AISG is a national initiative driven by the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI), the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA), and the National Research Foundation, Singapore (NRF). AISG brings together Singapore-based research institutions and the broader ecosystem of AI start-ups and companies to support use-inspired research, grow knowledge, create tools, and develop the talent to power Singapore's AI efforts. Among AISG's flagship products is SEA-LION (Southeast Asian Languages In One Network), Southeast Asia's first family of open-source large language models, built to understand the region's languages, cultures, and context. SEA-LION is trained to cover 11 national Southeast Asian languages and a number of major regional dialects. Since its first release in December 2023, SEA-LION has seen over 900,000 model downloads and more than 6.5 million API calls, across an ecosystem spanning over 70 community partners. Frontier language models, trained overwhelmingly on Western, English-centric data, perform inconsistently on Southeast Asian languages and often miss the region's cultural context. Targeting this gap means AISG's team has to address two connected problems at once: the quality and coverage of the training data, and the speed of the cycle that turns that data into an evaluated model. The data problem. Southeast Asian training data is scarce relative to demand, quality is inconsistent across sources, and much of what exists misses the local dialects, nuance, and cultural context that separate a merely multilingual model from a genuinely regional one. The training problem. Techniques proven in English text don't automatically transfer to Southeast Asian languages, and the field moves fast enough that confirming what works, and what needs adjusting, is a constant race against the clock. How Adaptive Data expanded SEA-LION's training set to 1.75 million samples. Adaption partnered with AISG for a pilot using Adaptive Data, Adaption's data enhancement and localization engine, to overcome both gaps at once: raise the quality of existing training data, and extend coverage into low-resource SEA languages, on a timeline that a fully manual approach couldn't match. Based on a sample of 1,050,000 rows from AISG's SEA-Instruct-2602, spanning domains including writing, math, science, and education, across seven Southeast Asian languages, Adaption's data engine delivered the following within one month: * Enhanced the 1 million data samples, applying Adaptive Data to improve the overall quality score through reasoning traces in the language of the sample. * Generated approximately 750,000 new samples by further localizing the existing 1 million samples, adding additional native-quality coverage in five additional languages and regional variants: Singapore Tamil, Singapore Malay, Burmese, Khmer, and Lao. What data enhancement changes in a Thai training sample. Enhancement here means more than cleanup. Take a Thai prompt asking for "10 words describing the benefits of renewable energy." The instruction is ambiguous in the original: it could mean a single ten-word sentence or ten separate sentences, and the original completion resolves it with one vague line. The enhanced version specifies the structure explicitly, a numbered list of ten sentences in Thai, and the completion delivers ten distinct, substantive points. Ambiguous quantity instructions produce unpredictable outputs. Fixing them creates consistent, measurable training signals. Why localizing training data is not the same as translating it. Localization goes further because moving a sample between languages is not translation. A Thai prompt asking for an asteroid joke relies on Thai wordplay that has no equivalent in Tamil. Rather than translating the joke and losing it, Adaptive Data reoriented the sample to Singapore Tamil and produced a two-asteroid dialogue in colloquial register, using the natural spoken markers of Singapore Tamil casual speech rather than textbook Tamil. The result teaches the model to adapt creative tasks to cultural and linguistic context, not just to swap vocabulary. How long manual data localization takes by comparison. The scale of what Adaption automates becomes clearer against the manual alternative: localizing and validating training data by hand takes significant time and specialized expertise. For example, three evaluation sets would typically take two visiting scholars two full working weeks to localize and validate: SEA-IFEval (105 rows), SEA-MTBench (58 x 2 rows), and a 1,000-row translation set. With Adaptive Data, 750,000 localized samples across five languages were processed in under a month. What AutoScientist changes for enterprises. By automating the parts of model training that once required specialized engineering skills, Adaption's platform opens the research loop to more of AISG's team and shortens the path from idea to evaluated model. What the team no longer builds by hand: data pipelines, failure handling as datasets grow, and hyperparameter exploration. Adaptive Data enriches and localizes seed data automatically, while AutoScientist abstracts the experimentation that previously demanded specialized tuning expertise. Where the team focuses instead: the judgment calls that drive the science. AISG's team sources seed data, designs evaluation criteria, reviews intermediate and final outcomes, and adjusts the training recipe based on what they learn. What runs in the background: AutoScientist manages the infrastructure behind long-running training and evaluation jobs and adds data to mitigate issues like catastrophic forgetting or lack of diversity, without researchers monitoring each run. Build sovereign AI with Adaption. The pattern behind this project is not specific to national AI programs. It applies to any organization with proprietary data and requirements that general-purpose models don't meet, whether those requirements are a language, a regulatory environment, or a domain vocabulary. Adaption provides enterprises, early-stage startups, communities, and sovereign initiatives with ownership of their intelligence, building continual learning systems that let organizations shape, train, and own their AI. Three pillars make this possible: Adaptive Data for shaping training data, Adaptive Intelligence for models built for any industry or language, and Adaptive Interfaces for reimagining how people interact with AI. The full case study includes side-by-side samples of enhanced and localized data in Thai and Tamil, with commentary on why each change matters for dataset quality. Read the full case study.
Hugo Larochelle joins Adaption as Scientific Lead. Jul 02, 2026 Adaption is proud to welcome Hugo Larochelle, Ph.D., as Scientific Lead. Hugo is one of the most influential figures in AI research. Trained under Yoshua Bengio and Geoffrey Hinton, two of the field's founding architects, he spent nearly a decade leading AI research at Google Brain and DeepMind before taking on his current role as Scientific Director of Mila, the world's largest academic research center in deep learning. His research has shaped foundational ideas across generative models, representation learning, and zero-shot learning, several of which underpin how AI systems are built today. Hugo joins Adaption in an advisory capacity, while continuing his work as Scientific Director of Mila. Part of the work he is energized by: supporting Mila alumni as they work at the frontier of AI. Adaption sits at the intersection of frontier research and infrastructure. The territory where academic rigor and applied science operate together. Hugo's perspective, shaped across both environments, makes him the right person to help shape Adaption's scientific direction. "How AI systems learn is one of the most consequential questions facing the AI field. Adaption is approaching that question with the depth of research it deserves, and I'm excited to be part of that mission." Hugo Larochelle, Scientific Lead, Adaption Adaption builds Adaptive AI systems that learn continuously and move beyond the constraints of static training. Hugo's arrival marks a deepening of that commitment, scientific foundations built to tackle the hardest problems at the frontier of AI. "Hugo has spent his career asking the hardest questions in AI research and building the institutions that take those questions seriously. Having him engaged with Adaption's scientific direction provides a perspective that will shape how we build for years to come." Sara Hooker, Co-founder, Adaption
Adaption's AutoScientist automates model fine-tuning with closed-loop training outperforming human-designed configurations. Published: May 14, 2026 at 8:18 am Updated: May 14, 2026 at 8:18 am Edited and fact-checked: May 14, 2026 at 8:18 am Adaption unveils AutoScientist, a system that automatically customises AI models by optimising both training data and learning processes for specific tasks. Adaption, an AI startup founded by former Cohere Vice President of Research Sara Hooker, has introduced a new system called AutoScientist, designed to automate the process of tailoring AI models to specific tasks by jointly optimising both training data and learning configurations. The system is positioned as a step toward automating AI research and development workflows, with the aim of reducing the manual effort typically required in model fine-tuning and experimentation. AutoScientist is described as an end-to-end framework that co-optimises datasets and training recipes simultaneously, iterating through a closed loop in which both data selection and model training parameters are continuously adjusted. The process is intended to continue until performance stabilises around a defined objective, effectively allowing the system to refine both what the model learns from and how it learns it without constant human intervention. According to the company, the tool is intended to reduce the time required to move from an initial concept to a deployed, customised model, potentially compressing development cycles from weeks to hours. It is also presented as a mechanism that broadens access to model customisation beyond machine learning specialists, enabling users without deep technical expertise to influence not only prompts but also the underlying behaviour of trained systems. The approach is framed as particularly relevant for organisations seeking to fine-tune models for domain-specific language, structured outputs, or efficiency constraints such as latency and cost, while leveraging proprietary datasets more effectively within AI systems. Internal evaluations referenced by the company suggest that AutoScientist demonstrates improved performance compared with baseline models across a range of dataset sizes between 5,000 and 100,000 examples, as well as across multiple model architectures available for fine-tuning. Reported results indicate consistent gains regardless of domain, with performance measured using in-house evaluations tailored to specific vertical applications. Further comparisons presented in the evaluation framework indicate that AutoScientist achieved higher average performance than configurations designed by human researchers, including experienced AI engineering staff. In these tests, human experts selected training setups based on their knowledge of model architecture, dataset characteristics, and domain requirements, while AutoScientist was given the same inputs along with the ability to iteratively refine its own configurations using historical run data. Under these conditions, aggregate outcomes reportedly improved from 48 percent to 64 percent when using the automated system, with an average performance uplift of approximately 35 percent across experiments. AutoScientist shows cross-domain stability while aiming to democratise frontier model fine-tuning. Additional benchmarking across multiple application areas suggests that the system is not strongly sensitive to specific domains, with gains observed across eight different verticals. The company reports that this consistency is notable given that many traditional fine-tuning approaches tend to underperform outside narrow or highly curated settings, whereas AutoScientist reportedly delivers more stable improvements across varied tasks and datasets. The system is positioned as part of a broader effort to automate model development processes, particularly in areas involving long-horizon reasoning, which remains a persistent challenge in AI reliability. The developers indicate that AutoScientist represents an early step toward reducing the need for manual intervention in model training pipelines, with future research directions focused on enabling more immediate forms of adaptation that may not require traditional training cycles. Alongside its technical objectives, the release is also framed as an effort to broaden access to model customisation, allowing a wider range of users to shape AI systems for specific applications. The tool is being made available free of charge for an initial 30-day period. The broader aim, according to the framing provided, is to reduce barriers to AI model development and expand the ability to create tailored systems beyond a small group of specialised researchers concentrated in major laboratories. A key contextual argument highlighted in the announcement is that only a small number of people globally possess the expertise required to properly train and fine-tune frontier AI models, with most of this knowledge concentrated within a limited number of major research laboratories. It is suggested that if a system such as AutoScientist is able to successfully automate aspects of this expertise, the process of building customised models for individual organisations and specific use cases could become more accessible and practically achievable. Disclaimer. In line with the Trust Project guidelines, please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, Mpost Media Group suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in crypto, AI, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance. Alisa Davidson Hot Stories by Alisa Davidson May 15, 2026 by Alisa Davidson May 15, 2026 by Alisa Davidson May 15, 2026 by Alisa Davidson May 15, 2026 by Alisa Davidson May 15, 2026 by Alisa Davidson May 15, 2026 by Alisa Davidson May 15, 2026 by Alisa Davidson May 15, 2026
Adaption. Expand Your World Apr 14, 2026 Today, Adaption Labs, Inc. is announcing a new feature in Adaptive Data that is called: Expand Your World. Most datasets are built for a narrow slice of the world. Not due to intent, because building data is hard, slow, and expensive. Teams make pragmatic choices. They start with the languages they know, the markets they're already in, the users already at their door. What gets left out tends to stay left out. The result is AI that works well for some and barely at all for others. Not because the problems are harder in those communities. The data never showed up. The World Doesn't Speak One Language. Your Data Shouldn't Either. A dataset built on ten languages may feel comprehensive, but the world speaks far more than ten. Adaptive Data supports 242 languages and localizations, giving your dataset a reach that most teams couldn't build on their own. The problem isn't just coverage, it's depth. Within a single language, regional dialects and cultural variation shape meaning in ways that matter. A model trained on one variant of a language will often fail users who speak another. Language diversity in your dataset isn't a nice-to-have, it's foundational. The data you train on defines the boundaries of what your model can understand, represent, and get right. If that data skews toward a handful of languages, your model inherits those blind spots. No amount of fine-tuning later fully closes the gap. Getting language coverage right at the data stage is the only way to build models that are capable across the communities they serve. The standard solution to this has been to hire more annotators and build more pipelines. Brute force doesn't scale to the whole world. Adaptive Data does. The Fastest Way to Global Coverage Expand Your World takes what you already have and multiplies its reach. Starting from as few as 10 examples in a single language, Adaptive Data generates up to 2,420 diverse, high-quality examples across all 242 languages and localizations. The workflow requires no extra pipelines, no annotation overhead, and no additional lift from your team. This is not a late-stage consideration or a bolt-on step. It is a fundamental expansion of what your dataset can cover, built into the data layer from the start. Expand Your World is available to all Adaptive Data users today. Its Research Grant Program provides platform access for teams exploring Adaptive Data systems and global language coverage. Priority is given to applications focused on advancing open science or positively shaping the public good. Early-stage teams can also explore Adaption for Startups, a program designed to help startups build with Adaptive Data from the ground up.