Software Engineer 1

Rokos Capital Management LLP raises holdings in STUB $STUB. July 28, 2026 Key points. * Rokos Capital Management increased its STUB holdings by 40.4% in the first quarter, adding 616,892 shares to own 2.14 million shares valued at approximately $13.4 million. * STUB reported quarterly EPS of $0.06, beating the consensus estimate of a $0.01 loss, while revenue rose 12.2% year over year to $446.1 million. * Analyst sentiment remains mixed, with an overall "Hold" rating and an average price target of $11.50; insiders have sold 413,647 shares worth about $4.4 million over the past 90 days. * MarketBeat previews top five stocks to own in August. Rokos Capital Management LLP grew its holdings in STUB (NYSE:STUB - Free Report) by 40.4% in the 1st quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The firm owned 2,143,423 shares of the company's stock after buying an additional 616,892 shares during the quarter. Rokos Capital Management LLP owned about 0.60% of STUB worth $13,375,000 at the end of the most recent quarter. A number of other institutional investors have also recently modified their holdings of STUB. Pittenger & Anderson Inc. acquired a new position in STUB during the first quarter worth $34,000. Lido Advisors LLC purchased a new stake in shares of STUB during the 1st quarter worth $69,000. Garner Asset Management Corp purchased a new stake in shares of STUB during the 4th quarter worth $92,000. The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company acquired a new position in shares of STUB during the 4th quarter worth $143,000. Finally, International Assets Investment Management LLC acquired a new position in shares of STUB during the 4th quarter worth $149,000. STUB stock performance. STUB stock opened at $8.40 on Tuesday. STUB has a fifty-two week low of $5.74 and a fifty-two week high of $27.89. The firm has a market capitalization of $3.15 billion and a price-to-earnings ratio of -14.00. The firm has a fifty day moving average price of $10.66. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.96, a current ratio of 1.10 and a quick ratio of 1.10. STUB (NYSE:STUB - Get Free Report) last released its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, May 13th. The company reported $0.06 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of ($0.01) by $0.07. The firm had revenue of $446.05 million for the quarter. STUB's quarterly revenue was up 12.2% on a year-over-year basis. As a group, sell-side analysts forecast that STUB will post 0.56 EPS for the current fiscal year. Insider activity. In other STUB news, insider Mark Streams sold 232,567 shares of the company's stock in a transaction dated Thursday, May 14th. The shares were sold at an average price of $9.04, for a total value of $2,102,405.68. Following the sale, the insider owned 1,114,001 shares of the company's stock, valued at $10,070,569.04. This represents a 17.27% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through the SEC website. Also, insider Nayaab Islam sold 54,801 shares of the company's stock in a transaction dated Monday, July 6th. The shares were sold at an average price of $13.03, for a total transaction of $714,057.03. Following the completion of the sale, the insider directly owned 8,454,764 shares in the company, valued at $110,165,574.92. This trade represents a 0.64% decrease in their position. The SEC filing for this sale provides additional information. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Insiders have sold a total of 413,647 shares of company stock valued at $4,401,046 over the last 90 days. 30.97% of the stock is currently owned by insiders. Wall Street Analyst weigh in. Several analysts recently commented on the stock. Morgan Stanley raised their price objective on shares of STUB from $8.75 to $10.00 and gave the company an "equal weight" rating in a research note on Wednesday, June 10th. BMO Capital Markets lowered shares of STUB from an "outperform" rating to a "market perform" rating in a research report on Tuesday, May 19th. Sanford C. Bernstein upgraded shares of STUB to an "outperform" rating in a research report on Tuesday, May 19th. Weiss Ratings raised shares of STUB from a "sell (e+)" rating to a "sell (d-)" rating in a report on Tuesday, July 7th. Finally, Citigroup reiterated a "neutral" rating on shares of STUB in a research report on Wednesday, July 15th. Four research analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating, seven have given a Hold rating and one has issued a Sell rating to the company. According to data from MarketBeat, the company currently has an average rating of "Hold" and an average price target of $11.50. Discover more Stock Market News STUB company profile. Stubhub Holdings Inc, through its subsidiaries, provides an online marketplace to buy and sell tickets for sports, concerts, theater, festivals and other live events. Stubhub Holdings Inc is based in NEW YORK. Want to see what other hedge funds are holding STUB? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for STUB (NYSE:STUB - Free Report). This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. Before you consider STUB, you'll want to hear this. MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and STUB wasn't on the list. While STUB currently has a Hold rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys. Robotics and automation are rapidly becoming essential infrastructure across healthcare, manufacturing, logistics, and many other industries. "Physical AI" is coming to the United States, and there are four ways that investors can gain exposure to this new robotics revolution. Plus, learn which seven companies are most positioned to benefit as intelligent robots enter the workforce.

StubHub faces congressional investigation over its 'apparently unethical business relationships' - federal lawmaker demands internal emails, documents, and more. StubHub faces congressional investigation over its 'apparently unethical business relationships' - federal lawmaker demands internal emails, documents, and more dylan smith july 24, 2026. One mass-scalping revelation later, the StubHub regulatory scrutiny is intensifying. Now, the company is facing a congressional investigation centering on CEO Eric Baker's alleged stake in and involvement with a fund dealing in resale tickets. Representative Robert Garcia, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform's ranking member, formally initiated that investigation in a letter to Baker today. Far from coming out of left field, the probe - as well as a class action lawsuit - closely follows and revolves around the above-noted scalping revelation. DMN previously broke down the multifaceted subject in detail. But the short version is that SEC filings pointed to the exec's doubling as a part owner in and the managing director of Andro Capital. And that entity has allegedly benefited from "preferential treatment" en route to selling millions of dollars' worth of tickets through StubHub, which claims to specialize in "fair and transparent ticketing." Meanwhile, an Andro affiliate called Colloquy Capital also reportedly has a referral agreement in place with StubHub. For the ticketing business, there isn't really a good time for information of this nature to surface. But the details have taken center stage at a particularly inopportune moment. Just in passing, several states are adopting laws targeting scalping; multiple state AGs are pushing for a Live Nation-Ticketmaster split; BOTS Act cases are ongoing; and would-be World Cup attendees are justifiably irked after spending sizable sums on tickets that never came through. Enter Rep. Garcia's letter, which begins by reiterating the state of ticket resale and the StubHub-Andro connection before describing "ethical concerns" about the arrangement. "Your alleged collusion with these funds also raises serious concerns about whether you have engaged in market manipulation and self dealing at the expense of consumers," the lawmaker wrote. Baker now has until August 6th to respond to nine questions and information requests, the first seeking details pertaining to the "listing, pricing, and fulfillment practices StubHub has utilized to sell tickets on behalf of Andro Capital, including any way in which such practices may differ from the services StubHub provides to other ticket resellers." "What are StubHub's policies regarding employees, including executives, using the platform to resell tickets not only as consumers but as brokers? In what ways have those policies changed over time?" one especially interesting question reads. In terms of what might be the most noteworthy of the information requests, the representative called on Baker to turn over "all emails, correspondence, and records between" him "and StubHub Inc. employees that reference 'Andro,' 'Colloquy,' or other related party transactions as well as any emails" exchanged with Andro or Colloquy personnel. From here, it'll be worth keeping an eye out for the CEO's answers and, in the bigger picture, seeing whether the investigation fuels concrete regulatory action. More immediately, the possible impact of largescale operational scrutiny on executive-level retention doesn't necessarily receive a ton of attention. Previously, Ticketmaster's London-based CTO exited the company two days before the Live Nation antitrust trial kicked off, for instance. And StubHub is apparently taking steps to retain its own CTO, Artem Yegorov. In late June, Yegorov scored a once-off $4 million retention bonus paid upfront but technically becoming his in its entirety four years from now, an SEC filing shows.

Class action lawsuit against StubHub for World Cup tickets filed in B.C. court. Published 1:35 pm Tuesday, July 21, 2026 StubHub's website shown here on July 21, 2026. A Vancouver man has filed a proposed national class action lawsuit against StubHub after World Cup tickets he bought never materialized. (Lauren Collins/Black Press Media) A Vancouver man has filed a proposed national class action lawsuit against StubHub after World Cup tickets he bought never materialized. Vancouver-based Westpoint Law Group announced the proposed class action against StubHub on Friday (July 17). The defendants are Delaware-based StubHub Inc., StubHub Canada Ltd., Delaware-based viagogo Entertainment Inc. and Switzerland-based viagogo GmbH. They're all subsidiaries of StubHub Holdings, Inc. Mark Gallagher, on March 7, 2026, purchased two sets of tickets to the June 18 Canada vs. Qatar match in Vancouver for $11,407.11 and $2,011.28. That included fees of $2,442.51 and $441.01, respectively. The same day, he also paid $5,765.15 for two tickets to the June 24 Canada vs. Switzerland match in Vancouver. That included a fee of $1,240.36. None of the purchase confirmations included exact seat numbers. The two Qatar tickets that cost $2,011.28 were listed as "Category 2" without specifying a section, row or seat number, while the other two Qatar tickets specified section 244 and row 1, but not the seat number. The Switzerland tickets only specified a section and row. Gallagher was notified on June 14 that the two Qatar tickets that cost $11,407.11 were ready for delivery with instructions on how to obtain them. However, when he followed the instructions, he was unable to obtain them. He contacted StubHub's helpline and he was told they would be available the next day with instructions once again. They weren't available the next day despite following the instructions. He contacted the help line via phone and chat multiple times in the days leading up to the match and was told by staff in locations in Mexico, India and other countries that his file had been "escalated" and would be available the "next day." In the day before the event, he was told his tickets would be available within "two to three hours." Gallagher stayed online until about 4 a.m. the day of the Qatar match, but the tickets never materialized. Shortly before the match started, StubHub help line staff said there were no tickets as promised. The lawsuit claims that StubHub didn't provide alternative seats comparable to the tickets Gallagher purchased "despite there being comparable tickets available." The lawsuit alleges that the defendants "implemented a scheme to sell event tickets they either knew did not exist when advertised, or were procured in breach of the laws of the respective place where an event would occur," according to the news release from Westpoint Law Group. It also claims that the defendants "provided a guarantee, at least parts of which they knew would not or could not be honoured." The suit also alleges that the defendants knowingly advertised tickets for sale "that they knew, or ought to have known," were acquired through software that is "designed to circumvent equitable ticket buying processes." Gallagher, the lawsuit says, "reasonably relied" on StubHub's guarantee "but was not provided with comparable tickets, despite those being available and advertised as such on the defendants' websites and apps." It adds that if Gallagher knew that StubHub didn't have possession or control of the tickets, or was unable to deliver them, then he wouldn't have bought the tickets. The lawsuit says that StubHub charges "significant fees to buyers and sellers of tickets," but its 'FanProtect Guarantee' promises consumers "You will get your tickets in time for the event" or "Your tickets will be valid for entry." But the lawsuit adds that despite the assurances, StubHub "regularly declines to honour the Guarantee." The suit adds that StubHub should know that "at least some" of the tickets it offers on its website did not exist when made available to purchase. It claims StubHub advertised and allowed speculative 2026 FIFA World Cup tickets before any were actually released. Gallagher is seeking a declaration from StubHub that they have contravened the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act and the Ticket Sales Act, and that class members are entitled to monetary damages and/or restitution. He's also seeking general and special damages, among other relief. When the purchased tickets are unavailable, StubHub "does not provide comparable or better tickets" and instead "knowingly provides inferior tickets and/or refuses to offer refunds." Proposed class action members are people who purchased a resale ticket for an event held in B.C., Alberta, Saskatchewan, Quebec or Ontario and whose ticket never materialized through any of the defendants or who were provided with a different ticket than the one purchased since March 31, 2025. The lawsuit was filed in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver on July 15. StubHub has not yet filed a response. Responses must be filed within 21 days if the defendants live in Canada or 49 days if they reside elsewhere. The allegations have not yet been proven in court.