Year-round
Enterprise software enabling data-driven transformation
$60.58/hr
No H1B Sponsorship
Denver, CO, USA
In Person
US Top Secret Clearance Required
Bachelor's
See people who can refer or advise you
Palantir builds software that helps large organizations run their digital transformation by giving them tools to access, connect, and analyze all of their data. Its platforms pull data from many sources, clean and link it, and then let users explore dashboards, reports, and AI-powered insights to make informed decisions. Unlike many analytics tools that focus on one data source or a single function, Palantir emphasizes an integrated, enterprise-wide data foundation with governance and security to support complex environments. The goal is to turn raw data into actionable intelligence that guides strategy and operations, helping clients deploy and scale transformative programs.
Company Size
5,001-10,000
Company Stage
IPO
Headquarters
Aventura, Florida
Founded
2003
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Transparency
Take-What-You-Need Time Off Policy
Family Support
Community
Equity
Mental Health and Wellbeing
Healthcare
AppLovin achieved a triple-digit Rule of 40 score, rivalling Palantir Technologies' 155, whilst trading at a significantly lower valuation with a forward price-to-earnings ratio below 19. The adtech company differentiates itself by charging advertisers only when ads convert, using its Axon 2 models to drive growth beyond its original gaming niche. Second-quarter revenue grew 53% year-over-year, though this marked a slowdown from 59% in the first quarter due to gaming advertising weakness and model upgrade timing. Non-gaming revenue exceeded the fourth quarter by 28%. Management reports the model update is now live and third-quarter performance has started strongly. The company targets long-term compound annual revenue growth of 30% as it expands beyond gaming into broader markets.
Jacobs nabs MMSD committee backing, pledges to cut Palantir. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Updated Aug. 17, 2026, 11:15 a.m. CT An ad hoc committee recommended Jacobs Solutions as the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District's next wastewater operator, passing over the current operator, Veolia. The announcement came during a special commission meeting Aug. 17 at the sewerage district's headquarters. The competition for the 10-year, $700 million contract − which has grown contentious in its final stretch − is down to two finalists: Veolia North America and Jacobs. Veolia, a French company with North American headquarters in Boston, is vying for a third term. Jacobs, headquartered in Dallas, has recently expanded its wastewater-treatment work. As the two largest private sewerage system operators in the country, they have gone head-to-head before. Dennis Grzezinski, chair of the ad hoc committee and a former MMSD commissioner, announced that the committee unanimously recommended Jacobs for the contract, set to begin in 2028. Grzezinski said Jacobs' bid was $54 million lower than Veolia's, giving it a significant cost advantage. The committee also cited Jacobs' more systematic approach and deeper experience using real-time, data-driven tools − capabilities it said are crucial to meeting the district's goals. The announcement was met with surprise − and striking silence. No one in the room spoke as the ad hoc committee members adopted the motion, then passed around the paperwork to sign. As part of its final bid, Jacobs agreed to end its partnership with Palantir, the controversial software company that has helped ICE find and deport undocumented immigrants. Concerns about the ties - first reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - prompted a July 20 rally, where organizers with Comité Sin Fronteras, the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign and Black Leaders Organizing for Communities urged commissioners not to choose Jacobs. The partnership even garnered the attention of civil rights leader Rev. Al Sharpton, who noted it during a press conference in Madison on Aug. 14. In response to concerns, MMSD had said the operator that is chosen would not have access to private individual data, while Jacobs had said any client data would be protected by strict safeguards. However, during negotiations, Jacobs said it would choose another company for its data analysis. The scoring process weighed several factors: price, 60%; approach, 25%; staffing, training and workforce development, 10%; and community partnerships, 5%. Jacobs' proposal received a score of 96.8, compared with 84.9 for Veolia's proposal. "We are surprised and disappointed by the recommendation announced today," said Adam Lisberg, Veolia spokesperson. "Veolia is very proud of the work that we've done over the last 18... we think we've served the people of this community very well in that time," Lisberg said. A years-long process that unfolded quietly − until last spring. The high-stakes decision has grown increasingly contentious, drawing intense scrutiny to a process that was quietly unfolding for years. Tensions escalated after the advocacy group Common Ground and whistleblowers accused Jacobs' competitor, Veolia, of mismanagement and data fabrication. In April, Veolia asked MMSD to pause or cancel the bidding process, citing concerns about interference. The dispute ultimately prompted the MMSD Commission to order an independent audit of Veolia, which is underway. Grzezinski said during the Aug. 17 announcement that the audit was separate from the committee's review and recommendation. Milwaukee's sewerage district has operated one of the nation's largest publicly owned wastewater-treatment systems under private contract since 1998. The wastewater operator is in charge of the Jones Island and South Shore wastewater plants, Deep Tunnel system, Milorganite fertilizer factory and regional sewer infrastructure that serves 1.1 million people. The ad hoc committee's recommendation is the last step before the official selection in the fall. The committee of five former commissioners was appointed by the MMSD Commission to oversee the selection process, review proposals and make a recommendation. It's the Commission, though, that gets the final say. That decision is expected in September. Will MMSD follow the recommendation? Past contracts offer few clues about how much weight the MMSD Commission will give to the committee's recommendation, because the selection process has varied over the years. MMSD's first contract began in 1998, estimated at $326 million, went to New Jersey-headquartered United Water Services after a competitive bidding process involving three other companies. An advisory committee oversaw that process. Veolia won the two subsequent 10-year contracts: the first beginning in 2008 and the second beginning in 2018. In the 2008 bid, Veolia prevailed over United Water, winning a contract estimated at $400 million. The selection process was led by MMSD staff who made a recommendation to the Commission. Veolia won the second contract, worth $500 million, without having to go through a bidding process, Instead, the MMSD Commission approved a noncompetitive, staff-recommended extension of Veolia's existing contract. With such a lucrative, decade-long contract at stake, both bidders have assembled well-connected local teams. Veolia hired former Milwaukee officials Ashanti Hamilton and Ghassan Korban and consultant Michael D'Amato, who previously served as a Milwaukee aldernman. Jacobs enlisted Wisconsin political and public affairs advisers Thad Nation, Eric Petersen and Mike Tate. Audit of alleged Veolia mismanagement is underway. The process took a much different course this time, marked by its own twists and turns. Bob Connolly, co-chair of Common Ground, previously told the Journal Sentinel that it asked the commissioners to delay choosing a bidder until the Veolia audit was complete. The MMSD Commission authorized the independent audit in June, setting aside up to $100,000 for the audit and another $100,000 for related professional services. In July, commissioners selected EMA Inc., an employee-owned utility consulting firm headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota, to conduct the audit. A five-member independent advisory committee is overseeing the audit, which is examining Veolia's compliance with its contract as well as MMSD's oversight. According to the request for proposals, the audit company is expected to conduct confidential interviews, review relevant records and data, assess findings and present the issues to the Commission. The audit results are expected in September. Once the findings are available, the Commission is expected to consider EMA's recommendations, corrective action and policy improvements. Veolia has strongly defended its record and, in July, sent Common Ground a cease-and-desist letter that raised the prospect of legal action over the group's claims. MMSD Executive Director Kevin Shafer has also said he is confident Veolia is properly managing the district's wastewater-treatment plants. Lisberg, from Veolia, said he's confident the results of the audit will help towards MMSD's final decision. Connolly said Common Ground is looking forward to the results of the audit, and said it will work with the Commission on what recommendations and changes need to be made so the system is better managed moving forward. This story was updated to add more information. Mary Spicuzza and Isabella Russomanno contributed to reporting on this story. Caitlin Looby covers the Great Lakes and the environment for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Contact: [email protected]. Follow her on X @caitlooby. Caitlin is an Outrider Fellow and also receives support from the Brico Fund, Fund for Lake Michigan, Barbara K. Frank, and individual contributions to the Journal Sentinel Community-Funded Journalism Project. Journal Sentinel editors maintain full editorial control over all content. To support this work, visit jsonline.com/support. Checks can be addressed to Local Media Foundation (memo: "JS Community Journalism") and mailed to P.O. Box 85015, Chicago, IL 60689. The JS Community-Funded Journalism Project is made possible through our partnership with Local Media Foundation, tax ID #36-4427750, a Section 501(c)(3) charitable trust affiliated with Local Media Association, and EnMotive, LLC, a subsidiary of USA TODAY Co., Inc.−the parent company of this publication.
Cathie Wood's Ark Investment Management sold $11.6 million worth of Palantir Technologies shares after the stock surged over 30% in a month following strong earnings. The sales occurred on 10, 12 and 13 August, totalling 66,533 shares. Palantir reported second-quarter adjusted earnings of 41 cents per share, beating estimates of 35 cents. Revenue jumped 93% year-over-year to $1.94 billion, exceeding expectations of $1.80 billion. US commercial revenue soared 149% to $764 million. The company raised its full-year revenue guidance to between $8.15 billion and $8.16 billion, up from its previous outlook of $7.65 billion to $7.66 billion. Palantir remains the tenth-largest holding in the Ark Innovation ETF at 3.59%. Wood has actively traded the stock, increasing her position in 2024 before selling shares in 2025 as prices climbed.
Palantir's no-bid pipeline just got bigger. Stay Connected Find opportunities - and win them. By Nick Wakeman , Editor-in-Chief, Washington Technology August 12, 2026 04:11 PM ET A new $244M Pentagon memo skips the Federal Acquisition Regulation's process for sole-source justifications and urges agencies to find ways to work with the company. Palantir has secured another lucrative commitment from the Defense Department, with a pledge of up to $243.9 million in funding for the company's software between now and March 31, 2027. Deputy Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg has also directed DOD departments to identify options for more spending on Palantir products from April 1, 2027 and Dec. 28, 2028. In a memo viewed by WT, Feinberg says Palantir's software is "providing valuable support to improve efficiencies with the defense industrial base." Feinberg highlighted DOD's use of the software to flag delays in munitions and delivery-vehicle production and maintenance. Feinberg made no mention of specific contracts or vehicles. The action follows a July award of a 10-year, $10 billion Army agreement that consolidated many of Palantir's existing contracts into a single pact. The Feinberg memo appears to be part of a trend in federal contracting, where no-compete contracts are growing as a percentage of all awards. No compete contracts accounted for 14.8% of all awards in the first half of 2026, compared to 12.6% for the same period in 2025. Federal News Radio reported that DOD said it has issued similar memos involving other companies. No compete contracts are allowed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which gives agencies the process for documenting why a sole-source contract is the best use of federal funds. Reasons for a no-compete contract can include urgency, only one responsible source, critical follow-on work and national security. Feinberg's memo mentions none of those reasons for directing the spending to Palantir. Palantir's portfolio of no-compete contracts includes an Agriculture Department award for the One Farmer, One File program. Agriculture also turned to Palantir's software for the department's return-to-the-office initiative. According to GovTribe data, the company has received $3.2 billion in contract obligations since 2024 and roughly half of those dollars came through no compete contracts. In Palantir's second quarter earnings release on Aug. 3, the company reported 93% in the second quarter compared to the same quarter a year ago. Total revenue reached $1.9 billion. U.S. government revenue grew 90% year-over-year to $809 million. Palantir also is ranked No. 40 on the 2026 Washington Technology Top 100, up 22 spots from the 2025 rankings.
Palantir Technologies has gained 34.5% over the past month, though the stock remains 6.4% below its trailing twelve-month high. Trading at 68.2 times trailing sales against the S&P 500's 3.3, the company commands a premium based on rapid growth: revenue increased 92.8% year over year in its most recent quarter. The growth is heavily concentrated in the United States, which now accounts for over 81% of total revenue. US commercial revenue grew 149% year over year in the second quarter of 2026, whilst US government revenue rose 90%. International commercial revenue grew just 26% by comparison. Management has raised full-year 2026 guidance to more than $3.424 billion, representing at least 134% growth.