Simplify Logo
Zillow

Zillow

Online real estate platform with valuations

Machine Learning Engineer

Full-Time
No salary listed
Junior, Mid
Remote in Germany
Remote

Remote within Germany.

About the job

Requirements
  • 1-3 years professional experience building and shipping machine learning models or ML-powered systems in production
  • Strong hands-on proficiency in Python and at least one modern machine learning framework, such as PyTorch, JAX or TensorFlow
  • Hands-on experience with cloud platforms (AWS, GCP) and container orchestration (Kubernetes)
  • Experience with data engineering tools and building robust data pipelines (e.g., Spark, Airflow, streaming systems)
  • Experience using backend code languages such as TypeScript or Go to fully implement ML-powered systems end-to-end
  • Experience building and operating end-to-end machine learning workflows, including data pipelines, model training, evaluation, deployment, and monitoring
  • Strong foundation in machine learning fundamentals such as representation learning, structured prediction, computer vision, optimization, and failure analysis
  • Comfortable debugging model and system behavior in real-world environments and using metrics, logs, and experiments to improve outcomes
  • Collaborate effectively with applied scientists, software engineers, and product partners in ambiguous, cross-functional settings
  • Strong engineering judgment and know how to balance experimentation with reliability, speed, and long-term maintainability
  • Communicate technical ideas clearly and can influence decisions across disciplines
Responsibilities
  • Productionalization: Owning the transition from research code to production-ready and optimized models. Establishing CI/CD pipelines that allow scientists to deploy models in short iteration cycles. Innovating upon our existing monitoring systems that make our services reliable and give scientists insight into the performance of their models in production. Designing services to expose ML models to Zillow’s end customers
  • Data: Good data is key to many SOTA ML methods. You will own our team’s datasets, lead and support data engineering projects, understand datasets from other teams, and collaborate with scientists and other teams to prepare them for model training
  • Training & Experimentation: Owning projects and supporting scientists in running large-scale training and data processing by collaborating with them on specific projects, establishing generalized best practices, and sharing expertise around performance and software engineering principles, while leveraging AI coding and productivity tools
  • Modeling: Staying on top of cutting-edge research (for example, on platforms like Arxiv, X, and Papers With Code) and modifying its methods for our use cases in innovative ways to enable new product experiences or improve existing ones
  • Dev & MLOps: Establishing best practices around code quality, testing, and ownership that allow us to move fast without compromising reliability (and sleep). Participating in our existing on-call rotation
Desired Qualifications
  • Experience in computer vision, spatial data, 3D, AR/VR, or related domains is a plus

About the company

Zillow runs a real estate platform that helps people buy, sell, rent, and finance homes. It combines property listings with mortgage services and advertising, earning revenue from ads, leads for real estate agents, and mortgage origination. Its core product uses technology and the Zestimate to estimate home values and connect users with agents, lenders, and listings through an integrated online experience. Unlike services that focus on a single part of the market, Zillow offers a broad ecosystem that spans listings, valuations, and financing in one place, supported by data and network effects from a large user base. The company’s goal is to make moving to a new home easier by simplifying transactions and enabling users to complete more steps online, from search to financing to closing.

Company Size

10,001+

Company Stage

IPO

Headquarters

Seattle, Washington

Founded

2005

Get referred to Zillow

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • Q2 2026 revenue rose 18% to $772 million, with adjusted EBITDA of $176 million.
  • Rentals revenue grew 31% in Q2 2026, driven by 42% multifamily growth.
  • Mortgage revenue jumped 75% in Q2 2026 as purchase originations hit $2.2 billion.

What critics are saying

  • FTC's August 24, 2026 order forces Redfin rentals reentry within six months, reviving competition.
  • Kenneth Brantley's August 2026 Colorado suit adds discrimination and retaliation exposure after his termination.
  • If housing transactions stay frozen, Zillow's lead-generation engine and mortgage attach rates weaken sharply.

What makes Zillow unique

  • Zillow controls consumer demand, agent software, rentals, and mortgages across one housing funnel.
  • Zillow AI mode reached 20% of signed-in users by August 2026, driving deeper engagement.
  • Zestimate and marketplace traffic create unmatched homeowner data, strengthening pricing and lead generation.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

Health Insurance

Dental Insurance

Vision Insurance

Life Insurance

Disability Insurance

Parental Leave

Family Planning Benefits

401(k) Retirement Plan

Paid Vacation

Remote Work Options

Growth & Insights and Company News

Headcount

6 month growth

0%

1 year growth

0%

2 year growth

0%
Realty Wire
Sep 15th, 2026
Zillow, Realtor.com and NAHB join forces on a housing supply campaign.

Zillow, Realtor.com and NAHB join forces on a housing supply campaign. A group of competing real estate companies and trade groups launched Let America Build on Sept. 15, a national awareness campaign aimed at local zoning, permitting and land-use rules. No budget was disclosed. Two listing portals that compete for the same agents, rival brokerage brands, the homebuilders' lobby and Habitat for Humanity put their names on the same document Sept. 15, launching a national campaign built on a single argument: if the country wants more homes, local governments have to let people build them. The campaign is called Let America Build. Realtor.com announced it from Austin, Texas, and the founding participants named in the announcement include Realtor.com, Zillow, T3 Sixty, eXp Realty and NextHome, the National Association of Home Builders, Veterans United Home Loans, Habitat for Humanity, ICON, Land Use Labs, HomeServices of America, the Asian Real Estate Association of America, the LGBTQ+ Real Estate Alliance and the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals. No budget was disclosed. The campaign describes itself as a public awareness effort rather than a lobbying operation, and the announcement states plainly that it "does not endorse or oppose candidates, political parties or ballot measures." The three numbers the campaign is built on. The participants anchored their case in research each of them owns. Realtor.com's housing supply gap analysis puts the shortfall at 4.03 million homes. NAHB's work on regulatory cost holds that government regulation, taxes, fees and related costs add more than 26% to the price of an average new single-family home. And Zillow research found that putting one home on each of the more than 300,000 small vacant lots currently listed for sale would close 6.3% of the national deficit. Those figures point at the same target: not federal money, but the local rules that govern what can be built, where, and how long approval takes. What the campaign is asking for. The campaign site hosts explainers on land use, permitting, housing types and construction methods, plus a toolkit aimed at residents who want to raise the issue with local officials. The pitch is that the decisive fights are municipal. "If you want to go fast go alone, if you want to go far, go together, and with a problem as big as America's home shortage, it is time we go together," said Damian Eales, CEO of Realtor.com. "Earlier this year, I challenged the industry to come together and unify. Let America Build is a result of that call." Zillow CEO Jeremy Wacksman was more specific about the asks. "We know what's driving it and we know what will fix it: streamlining permitting, modernizing zoning and unlocking land that's already there," he said. NAHB CEO Jim Tobin framed the effort as aimed at "removing inefficient zoning rules, unnecessary regulations, permitting delays and other barriers that keep builders from delivering more affordable, attainable homes." Sara Bronin, CEO of Land Use Labs, brought the group's most concrete claim about scale. "Our team - which has sifted through 1.4 million pages of zoning codes - sees the consequences of red tape up close, day in and day out," she said. Other participants tied it to their own constituencies. Nathan Long, CEO of Veterans United Home Loans, said that for many veterans and military families "the challenge today isn't the desire to own a home - it's simply finding one they can afford." Chris Kelly, president and CEO of HomeServices of America, said the supply problem "has been years in the making." Alex Cruz, executive director of the LGBTQ+ Real Estate Alliance, said expanding supply is part of removing barriers his members' clients face. Leo Pareja, CEO of eXp Realty and NextHome, called for "more options, fewer barriers, faster paths from plan to reality" at the local level. Timed to a new federal law. The launch follows the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, the bipartisan law that ties federal housing grants to local home construction and gives states and localities new tools and incentives. The campaign's framing is that the law shifted the action downward - Washington has set terms, and what happens next depends on city councils, county boards and planning commissions. Let America Build grows out of an earlier Realtor.com campaign introduced at SXSW in 2025, now widened into an industry-wide effort under its own banner. Why this one is unusual. Awareness campaigns are cheap to announce and hard to measure, and this one arrives without a stated budget, a legislative agenda or a target list of jurisdictions. What makes it worth noting is the roster: Zillow and Realtor.com compete directly, eXp and HomeServices compete for the same agents, and builders and brokerages do not always line up the same way on local land-use questions. Getting that group to sign one statement about zoning is itself the news. Whether it moves anything is a separate question, and the answer will show up in permit counts rather than press releases. Recent local action has cut both ways: San Jose, Calif., has moved to quadruple allowable density in single-family neighborhoods, while affordability has kept deteriorating nationally, with NAHB's own cost-of-housing index worsening in the second quarter as higher rates bit.

Indochina Discovery
Sep 10th, 2026
AI strategy must match corporate reality.

AI strategy must match corporate reality. Companies often invest heavily in artificial intelligence hoping for tangible business value, yet many initiatives stall before delivering results. According to recent surveys, 42% of companies abandoned the majority of their AI initiatives in 2025, up from 17% in 2024, and on average, 46% of proof-of-concepts were scrapped before reaching production. This disconnect frequently stems from a misalignment between ambitious innovation goals and a company's underlying value chains, operating models, and technology stacks rather than limitations in the technology itself. S&P Global Market Intelligence found that only one-third of organizations achieve significant ROI from their AI investments, even though 73% spend more than $1 million annually on the technology. Two key dimensions for success. Research indicates that AI success depends on where a company falls along two key dimensions: value-chain control and technological breadth. Value-chain control refers to the degree of influence a firm has over the journey from idea to market. Companies with high control can test, iterate, and scale innovations quickly because they own or strongly influence product design, manufacturing, distribution, and customer engagement. Samsung, for example, can roll out AI-powered display or camera improvements across its entire product portfolio because it controls everything from chip fabrication to global retail outlets. At the other end of the spectrum are companies with low control, such as tier-two suppliers in the automotive sector or brand licensors, which must rely on others to validate or distribute innovations. The second dimension, technological breadth, refers to the range and interdependence of the technologies a company must integrate to compete. High-breadth sectors, such as semiconductors, autonomous vehicles, and life sciences, require AI to be woven into a fast-moving web of other technologies like sensors, robotics, materials science, and cloud architecture. Low-breadth industries, such as food processing, building materials, and basic logistics, tend to operate with more stable technology stacks, where AI is used to refine existing processes rather than redefine the environment. These dimensions are dynamic forces that evolve across functions, geographies, and time, meaning a company may have high technological breadth in R&D but low breadth in customer engagement, or exert strong value-chain control in one region while depending heavily on intermediaries in another. It is common for organizations to assume that a single, overarching AI strategy will apply uniformly across all functions. However, the reality is often more fragmented, with different parts of a company operating in different quadrants of this framework. A global consumer goods company might apply focused differentiation strategies in its supply chain while simultaneously engaging in platform leadership for its digital products. This complexity requires leaders to recognize that strategy may begin in one quadrant, but success is built through a system that adapts to the specific constraints and opportunities of each area. Four strategies for realizing AI potential. Four strategic approaches for companies. Four distinct approaches emerge from this framework, each suited to a specific organizational position. The first, focused differentiation, applies to companies with limited value-chain control and low technological breadth. These firms operate in mature industries and use AI to fine-tune and optimize products or processes within a defined domain rather than redesigning the system. The global spice manufacturer McCormick & Company narrowed its focus to flavor development. In 2019, the company partnered with IBM to build SAGE, an AI system trained on decades of sensory data, recipes, and consumer insights. The tool has since become central to McCormick's product development process, helping the company accelerate innovation. The chief risk for companies in this quadrant is an excess of ambition; Zillow's home-flipping initiative, which relied on its AI-derived pricing model, spectacularly failed to scale, resulting in a $304 million inventory write-down and the cancellation of the entire Zillow Offers business. The second strategy, vertical integration, suits companies with strong value-chain control but relatively limited technological breadth. These organizations embed AI into the processes they already own, linking insights across internal systems to reveal synergies and efficiencies. JD.com, the Chinese e-commerce giant, embedded AI across its logistics network, using real-time data to optimize warehouse inventory, delivery routing, and labor scheduling. During the pandemic lockdowns, JD.com's intelligent system rerouted deliveries based on containment zones and dynamically reassigned inventory to match regional surges in demand, maintaining uninterrupted service while competitors struggled. In the energy sector, ExxonMobil used AI to interpret seismic data and optimize drilling paths in Guyana, cutting average well-drilling time by 15% and saving millions per site. GE, however, sought to become the Microsoft of industrial AI with its Predix platform but scaled back its ambitions after spending more than $4 billion due to siloed data, internal resistance, and shifting leadership. Thriving in complex ecosystems. The third approach, collaborative ecosystem, applies to companies operating in technologically complex ecosystems but lacking control over how solutions reach the market. Success here comes from partnering strategically rather than going it alone. Novartis and Microsoft created an AI innovation lab aimed at accelerating drug discovery, with tools that helped identify new biomarker combinations for oncology trials, cutting trial design time by more than 30%. BMW Group's alliance with Intel and Mobileye contributed distinct capabilities - processing power, computer vision, and vehicle integration - to develop autonomous driving solutions. Pfizer's collaboration with BioNTech during the Covid-19 pandemic saw BioNTech's AI models screen more than 10,000 mRNA candidates in days, selecting the formulation that became the vaccine, while Pfizer's global regulatory and manufacturing capabilities accelerated production. IBM's high-profile collaboration with the cancer center MD Anderson aimed to transform cancer care with its Watson-powered Oncology Expert Advisor, but the project struggled with organizational and integration challenges and never moved beyond the pilot phase. The final strategy, platform leadership, applies to companies at the apex of both dimensions - high technological breadth and broad value-chain control. These organizations create infrastructure and ecosystems as well as build products, focusing on setting standards and opening APIs. Bloomberg's launch of BloombergGPT, a finance-specific large language model trained on more than 700 billion tokens, was a strategic move to define the next generation of financial AI. Siemens Healthineers has achieved a similar position in medical imaging with its AI-Rad Companion suite, which integrates directly with hospital systems to analyze X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs. Microsoft's platform approach combines infrastructure, tooling, and ecosystem orchestration, with GitHub Copilot contributing up to 40% of code written in supported languages and Azure OpenAI Service serving as the enterprise backbone for generative AI. Google's foray into healthcare AI through its DeepMind Health, however, faced setbacks when the team accessed millions of NHS records without proper consent, leading to public backlash and the absorption of the initiative into Google Health. The human factor in AI adoption. A survey of 1,600 enterprise leaders and employees by the AI firm Writer found that 31% of employees admitted to actively pushing back on their company's AI initiatives - often because they feared being replaced. One in 10 went even further, saying they had tampered with performance metrics or intentionally generated low-quality outputs to undermine adoption efforts. When Rent a Mac, an Apple device rental company, launched an AI-driven inventory management system, it triggered anxiety across its workforce, leading to a seven-week delay in implementation and a loss of about $85,000 in expected efficiency savings. However, by appointing AI champions to demonstrate real use cases, the company saw engagement levels triple from 31% to 89% in just a few months. Colgate-Palmolive recognized the importance of employee engagement when it launched its internal AI Hub that empowered employees to develop their own assistants, thousands of them, without coding experience, resulting in better workflows and buy-in. The role of the manager is shifting in AI-powered organizations. Beyond coordinating people, managers must help teams learn to collaborate with algorithms, interpreting machine insights, redesigning workflows, and translating technical progress into human progress. This often requires a cultural shift: creating space to experiment, to fail fast, and to learn in real time. The most successful organizations treat AI not as an answer but as a question: How can Indochina Discovery work smarter, together? This approach ensures that AI is used to enhance human capabilities rather than replace them.

ASI
Sep 8th, 2026
Former Zillow VP Matt Gilliland joins ASI as chief product officer.

Former Zillow VP Matt Gilliland joins ASI as chief product officer. Gilliland will be tasked with helping shape the future of the ESP+ platform and accelerating development of new AI-powered tools. Key Takeaways - ASI has hired former Zillow VP of Product Matt Gilliland as chief product officer. - Gilliland will lead product strategy, oversee ESP+ and drive development of new AI-powered tools for distributors and suppliers. - The appointment creates separate leadership for product and technology at ASI, with Gilliland focusing on product innovation and CTO Ryan Hutchison concentrating on the company's technology infrastructure. Matt Gilliland has found a new home at ASI. The former vice president of product at Zillow is taking on a new role as chief product officer at ASI, the company announced today. In the position, Gilliland will lead the company's product organization, help shape the future of the ESP+ platform and drive development of new AI-powered tools for distributors and suppliers. Matt Gilliland will start his role as chief product officer at ASI on Sept. 14. "ASI has spent decades building something technology alone can't create: deep industry expertise, trusted relationships and a thriving community of distributors and suppliers," said Gilliland, who will begin his role on Sept. 14. "I'm excited about the opportunity to combine that foundation with modern technology that takes work off our members' plates, amplifies what they're capable of and lets them spend more of their time on relationships, creativity and their customers." Gilliland joins the technology, marketing and information provider with more than 18 years of product and tech experience. He began working at Zillow in 2014 and moved up the ladder to director and senior director, before eventually landing the position of vice president of product. Before Zillow, Gilliland held roles at Blizzard Entertainment, Microsoft, ADP Dealer Services and Holland America Line. Gilliland will report to ASI CEO Ashish Mittal and join the company's executive team. "Promo is moving too fast for incremental thinking," said Mittal, who became ASI's CEO in April. "Matt knows how to take complex technology and turn it into products people want to use every day. His experience at Zillow is especially relevant to ASI because both businesses sit at the center of large, fast-moving, two-sided marketplaces. We're building the technology our members will need next - and Matt is exactly the kind of leader who can help us get there faster." ESP+ gives distributors access to more than 1.2 million promotional products from more than 3,000 suppliers, with search tools to quickly narrow results. Distributors can then turn product ideas into branded presentations, quotes and orders and manage client relationships within the same platform. In July, ASI introduced the AI-powered Inspire Design Studio, allowing distributors to create realistic lifestyle images, find company logos and generate original visual assets without jumping between multiple AI tools, design programs and websites. With the hiring of Gilliland, ASI's Ryan Hutchison will now focus solely on technology as chief technology officer, leading the infrastructure and technology behind ASI. The company says the new structure gives ASI dedicated leadership across both product and technology, helping the company move faster as it develops tools that make it easier for distributors to sell, create and run their businesses.

Austin Law Firm LLC
Sep 6th, 2026
CTA's beneficial ownership reporting requirements for community association board members ended; over 80% of Americans living in community associations are highly satisfied; and more in Our Social ...

CTA's beneficial ownership reporting requirements for community association board members ended; over 80% of Americans living in community associations are highly satisfied; and more in Our Social Media Posts This Week, Aug. 31 - Sept. 5, 2026. Below is a review of the posts on Facebook and LinkedIn from the past week. You can check out the full posts by clicking on the links. NOTE: remember that we now post every other day. The posts on Monday 8/31/2026, here and here, noted: 'You're too old to know this': Zillow faces bias claim from White man. How easy that statement made it for an age discrimination claim. A lawsuit filed against Zillow on August 4 in federal court in Colorado alleges violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act. Brantley, a 43-year-old White man, worked in several sales-related roles at Zillow from 2018 to 2025 and contributed to a high-achieving team that gained various accolades. But in contrast with his performance, Brantley was allegedly denied promotion opportunities which were given to less-qualified candidates outside his protected class. He also alleges "age-based mockery". Brantley took medical leave in September 2025 after a panic attack allegedly prompted by receiving a sudden job-in-jeopardy notice. Right before Brantley returned to work, he filed an official complaint of retaliation, hostile work environment and discrimination. And then he was fired the next day. Let's take a closer look at the background and suit that (of course) followed. Brantley's complaint alleges a series of vivid, age-based acts of mockery. For example, his supervisor would play a song at the start of team meetings and ask team members to identify the song. When Brantley's turn came, his supervisor would allegedly state, "Ah, you're too old to know this." How often Brantley alleges this occurred is noted in the post. There were also incidents involving hairstyles and comments Brantley's supervisor would make - see the post. Brantley then posted an article about appearance-based harassment in Slack; how he characterized that in his complaint is described in the post. There was also an incident where the team wore shirts with Brantley on them, reading "and Brantley." What the shirt referred to, and when they were worn, is all in the post. Brantley's complaint alleges that this was part of the harassment related to his hairstyle and age. What his supervisor said when Brantley complained is in the post. The situation came to head when Brantley allegedly issued a complaint regarding potential retaliation occurring against one of his team members taking leave. What Brantley's supervisor allegedly told him to do is noted in the post. And similarly, shortly after the complaint was made, Brantley received an email from the supervisor citing performance concerns, with a follow-up email presenting a job-in-jeopardy notice. A few days later, Brantley went out on a 90-day medical leave (on the basis detailed in the post). Zillow issued a comment related to Brantley's suit - at least part of it is in the post. You should know that inclusion for older workers is a matter of legal compliance under the ADEA, but there is more. Workers over age 55 comprise about a quarter of the workforce according to a report noted in the post; the percentage of workers over age 65 has increased too since 2014 - see the post for the exact number. Despite comprising such a large portion of the workforce, 90% of workers over age 50 report experiencing age discrimination (the post has a link to the source). Employers also could be subject to big payments for violations. In one example, HCL America interviewed but refused to hire a candidate because he was "too old" for the position (see the link in the post for more details). This past April, a court ordered HCL to pay the former candidate $495,000 to settle the age and national origin discrimination lawsuit. TAKEAWAY: As the working population ages, employers must ensure they continue to be integrated into the business - and that no adverse action is taken against them by virtue of their age (or any other protected characteristic). The posts on Wednesday 9/2/2026, here and here, were an alert: US Dept. of Treasury and FinCEN issue Final Rule ending Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) beneficial ownership reporting requirements for community association board members. This has been a long time coming... On Aug. 11, the U.S. Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a final rule (linked in the post) removing requirements for U.S. companies and U.S. persons, including community association board members, to report beneficial ownership information to FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act. The final rule will be effective once published in the Federal Register. And there's more - FinCEN also said that will delete previously reported information by U.S. persons, including community association board members, who had disclosed personal information (which under the Final Rule is now exempt from reporting requirements) from its beneficial ownership information database. (Whether that really happens, and where the deleted information goes or can still be found, remains to be seen.) The Final Rule is a follow-up to the interim final rule (linked in the post) issued by FinCEN last year. As one of the entities heavily invested in this, the Community Associations Institute (CAI) has advocated for community association board members to be exempt from the CTA's reporting requirements for the reasons noted in the post. As part of its multi-year effort, CAI engaged with federal policymakers and FinCEN and took the other actions listed in the post. And in September 2024, CAI filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Treasury Department challenging the application of the CTA to community associations. The suit remains pending since the law is still on the books. The Final Rule is only a regulatory interpretation and exemptions under the CTA, but there is no repeal of the CTA until Congress acts. But that too is under way - the post details pending legislation, co-sponsorship status, and where it stands on the approval path. To continue that movement, CAI needs everyone to contact their representative and urge them to support the legislation to remove the CTA from federal law. You can get more information on how to do that with the ink in the post. TAKEAWAY: While the Final Rule is a good step for community association board members, it could be repealed at a later date, leaving the CTA as valid law to be enforced. Act to help CAI get the CTA repealed. The posts on Friday 9/4/2026, here and here, explained a survey finds more than 8 in 10 Americans living in community associations (condominium, HOA and real estate co-op) highly satisfied. The source for that statistic is the 2026 Homeowner Satisfaction Survey released by the Foundation for Community Association Research (which is linked in the post). The survey is the 11th edition of the Foundation's flagship longitudinal study tracking resident perspectives since 2005. Who was contacted for responses is noted in the post. The report is noteworthy given that community associations represent a significant and growing share of the American housing market. Approximately 78.1 million Americans live in more than 373,000 associations, accounting for more than 35% of the nation's housing stock. And more than 80% of homes sold in recent years are located in community associations, a number that is not expected to decrease. Key findings include: - 82% say their elected board members strive to serve the best interests of the community. - 77% report getting along well with their neighbors. - 75% say their community manager provides value and support. - 88% of residents say they always or usually vote in national elections. - and the other things detailed in the post. A statement from Dawn M. Bauman, CAE, chief executive officer of CAI, is in the post. A link to the complete report and interactive dashboard is in the post. TAKEAWAY: The survey findings point to a model of community governance that is working and resonating across the country in community associations. That is good news - and a sign of stability and market value - for current and future residents of those communities.

Inman
Sep 2nd, 2026
Suit alleges Zillow bias against 'white men' in promotions.

Suit alleges Zillow bias against 'white men' in promotions. Kenneth Brantley alleges Zillow discriminated against him by age, race and gender Today, September 02, 2026 A former Zillow employee has filed a discrimination lawsuit against the portal, accusing managers of age, race and gender discrimination and of retaliatory termination after he returned from his Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave. The employee, 43-year-old Kenneth Brantley, said he worked for Zillow from 2018 to 2025, starting as a sales executive and moving up the ranks to team lead, business consultant team lead, and field enablement manager from 2020 to 2022, and then to national sales manager of acquisitions, later retitled to manager, acquisitions, agent software and advertising, in 2023. Brantley said the promotions came with raises, stock awards and positive performance reviews recognizing his team's productivity. The issues began in 2020, when Brantley started interviewing for higher-level managerial roles. Court documents said Brantley applied and was interviewed nine times for those roles between 2020 and 2023; however, other candidates were chosen. Brantley said a colleague told him that Small Medium Business Acquisitions Director Jonathan Ney was "actively blocking" his attempts to move to another role. The former employee also pointed to the company's Engagement and Belonging program as another reason for his struggle, noting that in a 2024 leadership meeting, Senior Director of Enterprise Sales Travis Roberts said he was focused on diversifying his team, which only had "white males." "[Roberts'] statement was made in or around the time period of promotion decisions from which Mr. Brantley was excluded," the complaint read, reflecting his assertion that he was more qualified than the promoted applicants, all of whom were ethnic minorities. Brantley said his relationship with Ney further soured in 2025, with Ney allegedly pressuring him to give a subordinate, who'd just returned from FMLA leave, lower-quality accounts so they'd quit. Brantley said he refused and reported Ney's alleged actions to Zillow's HR team. He said Ney also facilitated age-based discrimination within the team, with Ney playing songs before team meetings and allegedly telling Brantley he was "too old to know this." He also claimed Ney made jokes about his baldness, asking Brantley if he wished "he could do that" when colleagues changed their hairstyles. He also said several of his colleagues wore T-shirts with a caricature of his face and the words "and Kenn..." to a Zoom meeting. The phrase, Brantley said, was a reference to the fact that Ney excluded him from announcements about the team's achievements. Brantley said Ney increasingly criticized his performance, sending an email on June 5, 2025, that detailed several concerns. The next day, Ney filed a formal Job-in-Jeopardy warning, which Brantley said he'd never received before. Brantley claimed an unnamed senior manager told him that Ney had been told to "lower headcount without conducting a formal reduction-in-force, explaining the coordinated nature of the simultaneous write-ups." On June 7, Brantley had a severe panic attack, leading him to apply for and be granted a 90-day FMLA leave. He alleged Ney contacted him during the leave about work matters, leading Brantley to file a formal HR complaint against Ney on Sept. 8, the day before he was set to return to the office. The complaint detailed the alleged retaliation and discrimination Brantley saw and suffered, and claimed that Ney had created a hostile work environment. On the day he returned, Brantley said he had a phone meeting with Ney and HR representative Josh Angles. Brantley said he asked to exclude Ney from the call; however, HR refused. Brantley said the call "ended abruptly" while providing evidence of the alleged discrimination, and that later that day, he was fired. A Zillow spokesperson said the company is aware of Brantley's complaint, but declined to "discuss personnel details." "We take any allegation regarding our work environment very seriously," the spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "The claims alleged in the complaint are inconsistent with Zillow's culture and values. One of our highest priorities at Zillow is and always has been creating an environment where people do great work and treat each other with dignity and respect." Brantley is requesting back and front pay, compensatory and punitive damages, the latter of which is capped at $300,000 under Title VII. He also wants Zillow to reimburse what he's spent on out-of-pocket medical expenses for therapy, medications, and related mental health treatment and any other damages the court deems appropriate. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. Read the full lawsuit below: