Overview

NRDC (the Natural Resources Defense Council) works to safeguard the Earth, its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. NRDC combines the power of more than 3 million members and online activists with the expertise of some 800 policy advocates, lawyers, scientists, and communication experts to confront the climate crisis, protect nature, ensure the rights of all people to clean air, clean water, and healthy communities. As an international nonprofit environmental organization, NRDC is working to address the world’s most urgent environmental challenges, and advance innovative, science-based, and enforceable solutions.

Since our founding in 1970, NRDC has helped craft and deliver many of America’s foundational environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act. Today, we continue to lead in advancing and defending strong environmental protections at the local, state, federal and international levels, as well as through the marketplace. Our team works across the United States and around the world, from offices in Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, New York City, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C., as well as in Beijing, London, and New Delhi (a subsidiary of NRDC India Pvt. Ltd.).

Supported by our members and online activists, NRDC is driving impactful solutions that confront the climate crisis, defend nature and safeguard public health across Asia, Africa, and the Americas. At NRDC, we believe lasting change happens when people bring their talent, passion, and expertise together for a common purpose: to build a cleaner, healthier, and more resilient world. Learn more at nrdc.org.

NRDC is seeking a Nuclear Specialist to work with our Science and Climate & Energy teams in our Washington D.C. office. This is a limited term 2 year position. 

Position Summary

To support NRDC's advocacy, the Nuclear Specialist will conduct technical and policy analysis on nuclear energy issues including those related to complex reactor safety, radiation protection, and nuclear waste. Working within the Policy Analysis division in the Science Office and the Power division in Climate & Energy Department, the Nuclear Specialist will be a core staff member at NRDC for the institution’s engagement on nuclear power in the context of climate change. While NRDC prioritizes clean energy solutions including wind, solar, storage, efficiency and transmission, we recognize that nuclear power is zero-carbon generation and support its use in the right circumstances taking into account safety, community acceptance, and environmental impacts. The Specialist will contribute analysis and comments to federal and state regulatory proceedings, advise policymakers, and monitor nuclear developments to inform NRDC’s engagement.

The position you are applying for is part of the bargaining unit represented by The Washington Baltimore News Guild (WBNG / The Newsguild-CWA Local 32035).

Responsibilities

To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each essential duty satisfactorily. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable qualified individuals to expand their knowledge and familiarity with certain nuclear policy and analytical tools used for these duties as part of their work at NRDC:

Conduct technical analysis of nuclear reactor safety, radiation protection, and radiological consequence issues, such as source term characterization, atmospheric dispersion modeling, and dose methodology, producing defensible findings that can withstand scrutiny from regulators, courts, and public review.
Prepare and review comments, filings, and technical materials for federal and state regulatory proceedings, including Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing actions, license transfers, and rulemakings.
Analyze nuclear waste and spent fuel management issues, including decommissioning funding assurance, dry cask and spent fuel storage, and the long-term disposal of high-level radioactive waste.
Execute nuclear safety and radiological modeling tools such as MACCS/HYSPLIT, RESRAD and related modeling software.
Advise state and Congressional policymakers on nuclear energy policy, such as NRDC’s participation in state task forces and responses to requests for information on advanced nuclear technologies.
Monitor, assess, and synthesize ongoing nuclear developments related to energy and data centers and beyond, regulatory changes, and news to advise NRDC’s engagement across federal agencies and states.
Engage with stakeholders, coalition partners, and external experts to develop and advance NRDC’s positions in nuclear proceedings.
Develop user-friendly, tailored resources such as analyses, factsheets, presentations, and blogs to communicate nuclear policy and technical findings to NRDC advocates and the public.
Serve as project lead on nuclear analysis requests, working directly with NRDC advocates, litigators, scientists, and external partners.
Synthesize technical information and communicate findings clearly to non-expert audiences, including through written products such as NRDC blogs.
Participate in internal and external meetings and activities of the Science Office as required.

The above list of duties is not comprehensive but generally demonstrates the types of matters under this position’s responsibility. Other duties may be assigned.

Qualifications

Minimum Education & Experience

A PhD in nuclear engineering or nuclear physics; or an MS in nuclear engineering, nuclear physics, or a related scientific field combined with relevant policy experience
4-7 years of related experience in nuclear technical analysis, research, or policy, with experience in environmental policy and advocacy preferred.
And/or an equivalent combination of education and experience

Skills, Abilities, Competencies

Familiarity with core nuclear technical domains, such as nuclear reactor safety, radiation protection and health physics, nuclear waste and spent fuel management, and nuclear nonproliferation.
Understanding of NRC regulatory processes, including reactor licensing, license transfers, rulemakings, and decommissioning, preferred.
Ability to analyze technical methodologies such as source term characterization, atmospheric dispersion, and radiological dose calculation, and to translate them into policy-relevant conclusions.
Proficiency in Microsoft Office, including Word, PowerPoint, Excel, and Outlook.
Strong writing and verbal communication skills, with demonstrated ability to translate complex technical information for non-expert audiences.
Ability to work independently and on quick timelines, managing multiple workstreams from kickoff to end-product design.
Ability to work collaboratively in teams toward shared outcomes.
Working understanding of key energy and environmental policies preferred.
Ability to travel to NRDC U.S.-based offices, approximately <20% annually.
Commitment to NRDC’s mission, values, and DEI principles.

NRDC is committed to advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion, both in our work and in our workplace. We believe that celebrating and actively welcoming diverse voices and perspectives is essential to solving the planet's most pressing environmental problems, and we encourage applications from candidates whose identities have been historically under-represented in the environmental movement. 

We are an equal opportunity employer and do not discriminate in hiring or employment on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, gender identity or expression, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, citizenship, age, disability, veteran status, or any other characteristic protected by federal, state, or local law. Pursuant to the San Francisco Fair Chance Ordinance, we will consider for employment qualified applicants with arrest and conviction records.  

We offer competitive salaries, excellent benefits, and a supportive working environment. Salary is based on a nonprofit scale and is commensurate with skills and experience. Internal equity will be reviewed and considered to determine a final offer. For this position, the salary range is $117,000 to $130,000.  

NRDC operates under a hybrid work model. Employees are expected to work in-person at least 8 days per month, either by working from an NRDC office and/or conducting in-person donor meetings. 

As a science-based organization, NRDC aims to do our part to help contain the COVID-19 public health crisis. For the sake of health, safety, and equity, we ask that people be vaccinated unless they have an approved medical or religious accommodation or other exemption in accordance with state and local law. We consider a person to be vaccinated two weeks after receiving one full course of a CDC-approved vaccine. In accordance with state or local law, new hires will be asked to attest to vaccination, those wishing to do so may request medical or religious accommodations or other exemptions via NRDC Employee Relations. NRDC treats all vaccine-related data confidentially, in keeping with local, state, and federal laws. 

To apply, visit www.nrdc.org/careers and upload your résumé and cover letter. Please mention where you saw this posting and upload any additional materials that showcase your abilities. Due to the high volume of applications, we will contact only those candidates we would like to interview. Please no phone calls, emails, or in-person résumé drop-offs. 

If you experience technical problems while applying or if you are a person with a disability and need assistance applying online, please reach out to iCIMS Customer Care at 1-800-889-4422. 

For more about NRDC, visit www.nrdc.org. 

About the company

NRDC works to protect wildlife, wild places, and a safe, healthy environment by using law, science, and a large network of members and online activists. It pursues change through litigation, research, and public campaigns aimed at cutting pollution, slowing climate change, moving away from oil, protecting oceans, and restricting toxic chemicals. It distinguishes itself with a substantial legal and scientific staff, a long track record shaping environmental law, and strong donor accountability and credibility. Its goal is to safeguard ecosystems and public health by influencing laws, regulations, and practices at national and global levels.

Company Size

501-1,000

Company Stage

N/A

Total Funding

N/A

Headquarters

New York City, New York

Founded

1970

Get referred to NRDC

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

April 2026 Maharashtra launched NRDC-backed heat resilience center, expanding international policy relevance.
May 2026 ZestyAI lets NRDC analyze two million filings for insurance advocacy.
September 2026 NRDC joined EPA lawsuits, staying central as Trump loosens climate rules.

What critics are saying

September 2026 House Republicans attacked NRDC as taxpayer-funded lawfare, threatening fee recovery.
October 5, 2026 Supreme Court hears Suncor, risking NRDC-backed climate tort strategy.
Trump EPA rollbacks in September 2026 force NRDC into expensive defensive litigation.

What makes NRDC unique

NRDC blends litigation, science, and policy across climate, water, and health.
April 2026 Maharashtra CoE gives NRDC rare government-backed implementation capacity.
May 2026 ZestyAI partnership adds AI-driven insurance filing analysis at scale.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

Health Insurance
Parental Leave
Hybrid Work Options
Wellness Program
Mental Health Support

Company News

EcoTopical

Sep 9th, 2026

NRDC at Climate Week NYC 2026: meeting the moment.

NRDC at Climate Week NYC 2026: meeting the moment. * CleanTechnica By Guest ContributorSep 9, 2026, 7:47 pm58 ptsTrending The environmental community has an opportunity to galvanize action, and NRDC is proud to host a strong lineup of events this year. By Manish Bapna, President & Chief Executive Officer, NRDC Climate Week arrives at a moment of extraordinary geopolitical and economic turbulence. Energy insecurity and rising costs... Read Article Share Article * email * x.com * facebook * pocket * reddit * tumblr * linkedin * pinterest Welcome to EcoTopical Your daily eco-friendly green news aggregator. Leaf through planet Earths environmental headlines in one convenient place. Read, share and discover the latest on ecology, science and green living from the web's most popular sites.

Conservative Daily News

Aug 27th, 2026

Climate review linked to lawsuits was 'sham' shrouded in 'secrecy,' Attorneys General allege.

Climate review linked to lawsuits was 'sham' shrouded in 'secrecy,' Attorneys General allege. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine produced a biased climate report designed to bolster lawsuits against fossil fuel companies, a coalition of state attorneys general alleges in a Thursday letter obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. The attorneys general allege NASEM's July report on attributing extreme weather events to climate change was shaped by funders, researchers and legal advocates connected to climate litigation - including the landmark Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County case now before the Supreme Court. The coalition is also aiming for NASEM's handling of a separate review of its climate-related work, arguing the organization has failed to adequately address potential conflicts of interest. "However, this review appears to be a sham, as demonstrated by NASEM's secrecy around all aspects of the review process," the Republican attorneys general wrote in their 12-page letter. "A truly independent review would appoint an external panel; use reviewers who are not activists, litigation participants, or NASEM employees; publish the review process and findings; identify the review's scope; and ensure the review's scope addresses the material criticisms of the Chapter." "In July, NASEM released a biased climate-attribution report, entitled 'Attribution of Extreme Weather and Climate Events and Their Impacts 2026,' to aid climate plaintiffs, including in the pending" Suncor case, the coalition alleged. The dispute centers in part on the growing role of "attribution science," which researchers use to assess how climate change influences the likelihood or severity of individual extreme-weather events. That research has increasingly intersected with litigation seeking to hold fossil fuel companies financially responsible for alleged climate-related damages. NASEM's report itself acknowledged potential legal applications for the science, according to the letter. "Reinforcing its intended use in litigation, the Report states that attribution science 'may be relevant to policy and legal decisions pertaining to climate change and liability for losses sustained as a result of extreme weather and climate events,' may be 'useful in estimating marginal damages attributable to climate change,' and may inform 'responsibility or liability determinations,' including 'whether defendants may be held liable' in climate litigation," the attorneys general wrote. The attorneys general allege NASEM's report entered that legal battle at a particularly consequential moment. The letter comes as the Supreme Court prepares to hear oral arguments in Suncor this October. Boulder County and the City of Boulder sued Suncor Energy and ExxonMobil in 2018, seeking damages under Colorado law for alleged harms caused by climate change. The companies argue states cannot use state tort law to regulate alleged harms arising from interstate and international greenhouse-gas emissions and that such claims are governed by federal law. "The timing of the Report's release allowed plaintiffs' amici in Suncor to cite the Report, but prevented critiques from defendants' amici, whose filing deadline had passed," the coalition wrote. The letter specifically points to an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs that repeatedly cited the NASEM report after its publication. "Notably, one amicus organization supporting plaintiffs in Suncor bragged about the Report's timing, cited the Report over and over on ten of its pages, and received $100 million to 'accelerate climate action' from the Bezos Earth Fund - which also funded NASEM's Report," the attorneys general wrote. They stressed that agencies "may wish to look further into the nature of this convenient coincidence." "The National Academies took taxpayer money and used it to manufacture a scientific-sounding basis for climate lawsuits courts have already rejected, then timed a follow-up report to help plaintiffs in the Suncor case while locking out any rebuttal. Calling their own secret internal review 'independent' is a punchline," Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, told the DCNF. Exploring Travel Maps Discover more Digital Newspaper Access Advertise With Us Subscribing To Newspapers "Federal agencies shouldn't need another minute to cut off funding to an organization laundering climate activism through the National Academies' name," Isaac continued. In the letter, the coalition also singled out the organizations that financed NASEM's report. "Each of the Report's three funders is connected to climate litigation," the letter alleges. The attorneys general point first to the Bezos Earth Fund, which helped fund the NASEM report and previously announced a $100 million grant to the Natural Resources Defense Council and $15 million to the Union of Concerned Scientists. Both organizations submitted amicus briefs supporting the plaintiffs in Suncor, according to the letter. The coalition also highlights financier Robert Litterman and the Heising-Simons Foundation, alleging both have financial or organizational ties to groups involved in climate litigation. "Another Report funder, Robert Litterman, is a board member and major funder for one of the nonprofit organizations that the government plaintiffs identify as providing 'most of the legal work' in Suncor," the attorneys general wrote. Discover more Subscribing To News Newspaper Subscriptions The letter alleges similar connections involving people who contributed input to the report, including Columbia University's Michael Burger. "The Report's Acknowledgments section thanks Michael Burger, without mentioning that Burger is 'Of Counsel' for the Sher Edling law firm," the coalition wrote. Sher Edling has represented state and local governments in numerous climate lawsuits against fossil fuel companies. Burger also co-wrote an amicus brief in Suncor and worked on litigation involving Honolulu, according to the attorneys general. "In other words, the Report gave the plaintiffs' supporters exactly what they needed, exactly when they needed it, to further their litigation goals, without affording the other side an opportunity to weigh in," the attorneys general alleged. "Agencies may wish to investigate this coincidence given the heavy overlap between the Report's funding and development and the Suncor litigation." Bezos Earth Fund, the Heising-Simons Foundation, Litterman and Sher Edling each did not immediately respond to the DCNF's requests for comment. "The National Academies has a history of bias that will not be forgotten just because it's feigning an 'independent' review of the controversial climate science chapter. Climate lawfare is a critical tool for trial lawyers and woke activists to weaponize the courts to push policy through lawfare," O.H. Skinner, Executive Director of Alliance For Consumers, told the DCNF. Skinner added that the activists "have built a huge dark-money-fueled apparatus to boost and support this lawfare and they don't want to see this manual changed." "The Attorneys General are right to question NASEM's federal funding and seek a charter review. As the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in the Suncor case, neutrality needs to be restored, and the radical left-wing apparatus behind these cases questioned at every turn," he continued. "Critics have demonstrated that the Chapter materially misquotes the IPCC, directly contradicts the manual's statistics chapter, was apparently substantially ghost-written by climate plaintiffs' attorney Michael Burger, and had funders, authors, and reviewers that included climate funders, activists, and litigation participants," the attorneys general wrote in the letter. The controversy has also drawn congressional scrutiny. The House Science, Space and Technology Committee previously raised concerns about NASEM's conflict-of-interest policies. "The Congressional committee further noted that NASEM's January 2025 policy changes require NASEM committee members to merely disclose non-financial conflicts, such as professional and legal affiliations, with no protocol for mitigation," the attorneys general wrote. NASEM subsequently launched a review, but the attorneys general argue its structure and lack of publicly available information do little to address their underlying concerns. The coalition is now asking federal agencies to consider whether those alleged problems justify cutting NASEM off from federal funding. "Taxpayer money should not be funding NASEM's biased actions, which warrant suspension or debarment," the attorneys general wrote. "If NASEM continues to lend its imprimatur to litigation-driven advocacy, then Congress should find another source for objective analysis and consider revoking the 1863 charter that designates the Academies as an adviser to the federal government." Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of its original content, please contact [email protected]

The All India Disaster Mitigation Institute

Aug 18th, 2026

Urban Heat Action Plans: Progress, Gaps, and Priorities for Protecting Vulnerable Groups of India

18 Aug, 2026 Urban Heat Action Plans: progress, gaps, and priorities for protecting vulnerable groups of India. By Abhiyant Tiwari and Anshima Mishra, NRDC India India's heat governance is at an inflection point. For nearly two decades, Heat Action Plans (HAPs) have been the country's primary instrument for managing extreme heat, growing from a single city-level plan in Ahmedabad in 2013 into a sprawling policy architecture spanning 23 heat-prone states. As of June 2026, India's heat governance encompasses over 250 HAPs across various cities. The question today is no longer whether a city has a plan, but whether that plan protects the people most exposed to heat. India's heat governance has matured considerably in recent years. Following Odisha's pioneering 1999 plan, adopted after a heatwave that claimed over 2,000 lives the previous year, and Ahmedabad's globally studied 2013 plan, the National Disaster Management Authority has worked with the India Meteorological Department across 23 states to push HAPs toward becoming standing institutional mechanisms, anchored to colour-coded early-warning triggers rather than ad hoc emergency response. A newer generation of HAPs is also grounding response around heat vulnerability risk assessments and locally derived temperature thresholds for early warning, rather than a single national criterion applied uniformly across climatologically different cities. This is being matched by movement on the financing side: heatwave mitigation projects, such as cooling shelters and early warning systems, can be eligible for funding under the National and State Disaster Mitigation Funds (NDMF/SDMF), while the 16th Finance Commission has additionally recommended, that heatwave be added to India's nationally notified disasters list, which would open up the complete state and national disaster response funds (SDRF/NDRF) for relief and compensation as well. Yet progress in the number of plans has outpaced progress in their design. There is a meaningful difference between a heat-intentional measure and a heat-incidental one, and most HAPs lean heavily on the latter. Tree plantation drives, water kiosks, and shaded infrastructure often exist for other civic reasons and simply get folded into the heat narrative, rather than being designed from the ground up around who actually bears the heat burden. That burden falls unevenly. Street vendors, construction labourers, domestic workers, and small business owners remain peripheral to most plans, named in vulnerability lists but rarely designed for. So do the elderly, the chronically ill, residents of poorly ventilated informal settlements, and migrant workers who fall outside a city's data systems entirely. Most HAPs also operate at the city level, missing intra-city heat variation that can span several degrees between wards, so resources get allocated blind to where exposure actually concentrates. Few plans explicitly factor in the compounding heat exposure and unpaid care burden faced by women informal workers, even though they are among the most consistently exposed. The next phase of India's heat governance needs to be as forward-looking as the crisis itself, anticipating exposure rather than just responding to it. That starts with seeing risk more clearly: occupation and gender disaggregated heat-health data, paired with ward-level heat mapping powered by satellite and AI-based urban heat island analysis, would let cities direct resources to where risk is actually concentrated, not just where temperatures are highest on average. It also means reaching people faster. Heat alerts folded into the digital welfare and wage-payment systems millions of informal workers already use would travel further than posters and loudspeaker announcements ever could, and parametric heat insurance, paying out automatically once a temperature threshold is crossed, could offer workers and small businesses a financial cushion without the delays of conventional claims. And finally, it means building heat resilience into the city itself: treating nature-based cooling, tree cover, reflective and green roofs, revived water bodies, as core infrastructure rather than a beautification add-on. Heat and cooling are often treated as separate policy tracks, one a disaster-response issue, the other an energy and infrastructure one, even though they affect the same people for the same underlying reason: those most exposed to extreme heat are usually those with the least access to cooling. The Centre of Excellence for Heat Resilience and Sustainable Cooling, launched in April 2026 through NRDC's partnership with the Government of Maharashtra, brings the two together under one institutional mandate. Anchored eventually within Maharashtra's State Institute of Disaster Management, it offers a model for cross sectoral long-term HAP intervention at scale: research, capacity-building, and technical support that persist well beyond any single heatwave season. Extreme heat, as this issue argues, encompasses both rapidly intensifying and prolonged events, with health, environmental, and socioeconomic impacts that are unevenly distributed across populations. The next generation of Heat Action Plans must treat informality, gender, and granularity not as addenda, but as design parameters from the outset, anchoring response not just to temperature, but to who is left exposed when temperatures rise. * Press Information Bureau, "India has taken a proactive and forward-thinking approach to extreme heat risk management under leadership of Shri Narendra Modi: Dr P K Mishra", 7 June 2025: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2134746&reg=48&lang=2 * Down To Earth, "India's Deadly New Heatwaves", June 2026: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/amp/story/environment/AIDMI-survived-the-sun-for-centuries-why-is-it-killing-AIDMI-now * Down To Earth, "Heatwaves and lightning should be added to national disaster list, Finance Commission says", 2 February 2026: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/natural-disasters/heatwaves-and-lightning-should-be-added-to-national-disaster-list-finance-commission-says * Carbon Copy, "How Can India Finance its Heat Action Plans?", 16 June 2026: https://www.carboncopy.info/how-can-india-finance-its-heat-action-plans * The Print / PTI, "Fadnavis launches heat resilience centre at IIM Nagpur", 21 April 2026: https://theprint.in/india/fadnavis-launches-heat-resilience-centre-at-iim-nagpur/2910710/ Disclaimer: The views expressed in this piece are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of AIDMI. * Share this

Evergreen Action

Aug 11th, 2026

Michigan PSC releases recommendations meant to lower energy costs for families.

Michigan PSC releases recommendations meant to lower energy costs for families. Aug 11, 2026. Yesterday, the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) released a series of legislative recommendations aimed at lowering household energy prices. The recommendations focus on reducing unnecessary utility spending, ensuring large energy users like data centers pay their fair share, and creating stronger incentives for utilities to prioritize affordability and reliability. In response, Evergreen Action Midwest Director Courtney Brady released the following statement: "Michigan families shouldn't have to keep paying more for energy when there are clear solutions to bring bills down. It's time to be honest about what's actually driving these costs: utilities overspending on things that won't deliver customer savings, data centers drawing enormous amounts of power without paying their fair share, and a model that prioritizes monopoly utility profits over savings for the families paying the bills. "These recommendations cannot be treated as just suggestions - it's on the Legislature and MPSC to work together with urgency. We need to move swiftly to put in place strong data center guardrails and checks on monopoly utilities so we can deliver the affordable, reliable, clean energy system Michigan families deserve." In April, Evergreen and NRDC partnered with Synapse Energy Economics to release an independent analysis showing that requiring data centers to pay their full share, incorporating more customer-owned power like batteries and rooftop solar, and reining in excessive utility profit margins could save the average Michigan household nearly $800 by 2030. Find the full analysis here. Governor shapiro signs executive order ensuring data centers won't get free ride in pennsylvania.

FinTech Global

May 4th, 2026

NRDC taps ZestyAI to analyse climate insurance risk.

NRDC taps ZestyAI to analyse climate insurance risk. May 4, 2026 ZestyAI, an AI-driven property risk intelligence company, has revealed that the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), one of the United States' foremost environmental advocacy groups, is leveraging its ZORRO Discover(TM) product to advance climate-focused research and public policy initiatives. The organisation's FAIR Future Team is utilising ZORRO Discover(TM) to scrutinise insurance rate filings, observe shifts in regulatory policy, and strengthen climate-driven advocacy across American insurance markets. Built on agentic AI, the platform draws together more than two million property and casualty rate and form filings - spanning upwards of 200 million pages of regulatory documentation - into one unified, searchable system. NRDC plans to harness the platform to drive state-level advocacy and examine rate and risk dynamics in priority jurisdictions. The partnership arrives at a moment when climate-driven disruption is fundamentally altering property insurance markets, placing growing demands on advocates and policymakers to deliver data-backed solutions. The challenge has long been one of access: the relevant data is frequently buried across hundreds of pages per filing, dispersed among many insurers and states. ZORRO Discover(TM) seeks to close that gap, extending the kind of regulatory intelligence that insurers routinely draw upon to those working in the policy and research space - enabling a clearer picture of how insurance markets operate and develop. NRDC global financial regulations specialist Alfonso Pating said, "Insurance filings contain critical information about how risk is being priced and why - but extracting that information across dozens of companies and multiple states has traditionally required an enormous investment of time and effort." ZestyAI founder and CEO Attila Toth said, "Insurance filings contain the most detailed record of how risk is priced - but until now, they haven't been accessible or usable at scale. That changes how insurance markets can be understood. We're pleased to support NRDC's work in this area." Enjoying the stories? Investors. The following investor(s) were tagged in this article.

NRDC

Nuclear Specialist - Science and Climate & Energy

About the job