Ecosystem Lead

Linux Foundation launches BUILD Foundation to fund Bazel maintainers. BazelCon co-creator Helen Altshuler joins six initial members in a Linux Foundation initiative whose budget and governance remain unspecified. By RuntimeWire Staff - Published Oct 14th, 2026, 2:20pm CT - 3 MIN READ - 4 SOURCES - VIA Linux Foundation Newsroom Listen to article. 4 min 56 sec Helen Altshuler, who worked on Bazel at Google and co-created the first BazelCon in 2017, is among the industry figures backing a formal home for its shared infrastructure. The Linux Foundation launched the BUILD Foundation on October 14th at BazelCon in Amsterdam, with six initial members: ASML, Canva, Datadog, EngFlow, Figma and Spotify... RuntimeWire, Inc. get virtually zero search traffic. Please consider sharing this story. Signal check Noise Signal Where does this story land? Drag the dial. The startup A neutral, trusted hub for developers and organizations to build and scale open technology projects and ecosystems. The Linux Foundation is a 501(c)(6) nonprofit that provides a neutral home for open software, hardware, standards, and data projects. It supports project hosting, ecosystem curation, community building, developer enablement, business operations, training and certification, marketing, events, membership development, cloud-based collaboration tools, analytics, and infrastructure management. The foundation reports more than 1,300 open source projects, 4 million developers trained, 855,000 developers contributing code, 89 million lines of code added weekly, 21,000 contributing organizations, 100-plus standards and specifications, and 229-plus upcoming events. Stay on the wire. Breaking startup & AI news, funding scoops, and launches as they happen. Follow @runtimewire on Threads and LinkedIn.

Linux Foundation Analyst summit: stop counting tokens only, TCA (Total Cost of AI) is the new economics of AI. Oct 12 2026 At the October 8 Analyst Virtual Summit- The Linux Foundation's Technology Value umbrella, the Linux Foundation brought Tokenomics, FinOps, Information Technology Asset Management (ITAM), and FinOps Open Cost and Usage Specification (FOCUS) together around a bigger question: How do enterprises connect what AI costs to the business value it creates? Seven themes stood out. 1. TCA may become AI's successor to TCO. Perhaps the summit's most useful new terminology is TCA, Total Cost of AI. The key insight is that tokens represent only 10% to 25% of total AI spend once the broader cost stack is considered. TCA expands the denominator to infrastructure, energy, capital, software and licensing, labor, and other costs required to produce and consume AI. For decades, technology leaders have relied on TCO, Total Cost of Ownership. By contrast, TCA could become the more relevant construct for AI because AI is not simply an asset to own. Instead, it is a dynamic production-and-consumption system whose economics span infrastructure, intelligence, people, and outcomes. Moreover, the discussion is moving into the CFO's office. The event organizers indicated growing CFO involvement in the Tokenomics Foundation's leadership and an increased emphasis on translating technology consumption into outcomes that can be recognized financially. In addition, the Foundation highlighted an upcoming December 8 CFO executive forum operating under Chatham House Rule, creating an important venue for finance leaders to wrestle with AI cost attribution, revenue, and value. 2. Tokenomics is about Production, Consumption, and value, not tokens alone. The emerging definition of AI Tokenomics stretches from converting energy and capital into AI capabilities, through consuming that intelligence, to realizing measurable business value. Therefore, infrastructure, data centers, software, labor, and outcomes all sit inside that economic system. 3. AI has A value problem more than A cost problem. The State of Tokenomics, 2026 study encompasses 472 respondents across 11 industries and $4.6 trillion in respondent revenue. More importantly, its bigger question is whether enterprises can connect AI consumption and investment to measurable business outcomes. That changes the conversation from "How cheaply can we run AI?" to "What business value did the investment produce?" 4. Multi-Model AI makes economics an architecture decision. Enterprises no longer consume AI through one channel. In fact, the survey finds 96% use frontier models, 87% cloud providers, and 64% AI embedded within existing products, with half operating across at least four of six AI channels. As AI estates fragment, model choice, routing, architecture, performance, and economics increasingly become integral in making the right architecture decision that optimizes the initiative. 5. Model routing becomes A value lever. Model routing provides a mechanism for matching workloads with appropriate models rather than automatically sending every task to the most capable or expensive option. Accordingly, the summit materials report that 86% of companies are evaluating or using model routers. The emerging opportunity is dynamic optimization across cost, performance, risk, and value. 6. FinOps, IT Financial Management, and Tokenomics are converging. AI crosses traditional technology-management boundaries. Specifically, FinOps understands consumption and optimization; ITAM brings assets, contracts, licenses, and entitlements; Information Technology Financial Management (ITFM) connects technology economics with financial management; Tokenomics extends the lens into AI production, consumption, and value. As a result, the conversation broadens to technology value management rather than replacing one discipline with another. 7. FOCUS is emerging as AI's financial data layer. Cost and value management need normalized data. In that context, FOCUS (FinOps Open Cost and Usage Specification) is an open specification that normalizes billing datasets across AI, cloud, data center, and vendors to reduce complexity and unify technology value. It provides an important foundation for connecting cost, usage, pricing, attribution, and ultimately financial accountability. The next challenge, however, is getting that data into the language finance understands: business units, cost centers, products, allocation rules, the chart of accounts, and ultimately the general ledger. The briefing explicitly raised mapping total direct and indirect costs to the General Ledger and Chart of Accounts to reduce manual month-end allocation. The bottom line: the destination is AI Value Management. Ultimately, the summit's message is bigger than Tokenomics. Enterprises need to connect Production | Consumption | Cost | Value. TCA provides a more complete denominator. Meanwhile, FOCUS helps standardize the underlying data. FinOps, ITAM, ITFM, and Tokenomics contribute complementary disciplines. Finally, CFO engagement brings financial accountability. Therefore, the next frontier, is AI Value Management: connecting the Total Cost of AI to the measurable value AI creates. Forrester's AI Value Matrix may help enterprises measure what matters. See kevin ogunsua at: Technology & Innovation Forum East November 4-5, 2026, New York City Get trusted advice - In seconds. SAP wants its process knowledge to become the operating context for enterprise agents. CIOs should decide where to grant that authority while retaining ownership of company knowledge, agent learning, and outcome measurement. Concentration risk used to be easy to picture: one supplier, one system, or one floppy disk seller. But in the era of AI, the single point of failure has learned to hide. Different AI providers can quietly converge on the same testing firm, infrastructure, data source, or control (i.e., a shared assurance mechanism). The danger [...]