W

Williams

Owns and operates natural gas pipelines

Environmental Specialist - I, II or III

Full-Time
No salary listed
Mid, Senior
Bachelor's
Wamsutter, WY, USA+1 moreMore locations: Green River, WY, USA
In Person
Facilities OperationsEnvironmental Health & Safety

About the job

Requirements
  • A bachelor's degree and a minimum of four years of environmental experience are required.
  • Functional and technical expertise in air, water, and/or waste is required.
  • Proficiency in Microsoft Office applications and personal computer skills is required.
  • Excellent organizational and interpersonal skills are required, with safety as the utmost priority.
Responsibilities
  • Develop, maintain, and provide guidance on environmental processes and policies, and conduct required environmental training.
  • Assess environmental risk, recommend actions to address risk, and participate in or handle the approved actions, including required regulatory documentation.
  • Participate in environmental project planning and implementation, including scheduling, cost estimating, preparation of environmental impact assessments, and reporting.
  • Prepare and submit sophisticated applications to procure environmental permits, renewals, approvals, variances, and other authorizations, and coordinate with company partners.
  • Perform environmental compliance audits and due diligence investigations as needed.
  • Develop, recommend, and implement improvements for systems and practices in air, water, waste management, and/or remediation activities for assigned areas.
  • Assist with the preparation of required compliance reports and certifications and develop and maintain environmental compliance program documentation.
  • Cultivate relationships between Williams and regulatory agencies.
  • Interpret applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and ensure compliance with them.
  • Perform other duties as assigned.

About the company

W

Williams

View
Website

Williams owns and operates energy infrastructure assets, primarily natural gas pipelines and gathering/processing facilities in the United States. Its core business is to connect natural gas supplies to markets by charging fees for the use of its pipelines and processing assets, creating a stable, fee-based revenue stream less exposed to commodity prices. The company also has a significant presence in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, where it ranks among the largest gatherers and processors of natural gas. Williams differentiates itself through a large, fixed-asset network that provides critical midstream services to utilities, local distribution companies, and industrial users, helping to move gas efficiently from supply sources to demand centers. The company’s goal is to reliably connect gas supplies to markets while maintaining steady cash flow from its pipeline and processing services and expanding its fee-based midstream footprint.

Company Size

5,001-10,000

Company Stage

IPO

Headquarters

Tulsa, Oklahoma

Founded

1908

Get referred to Williams

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • September 3, 2026 Momentum acquisition expands LNG, power, and industrial customer reach in Haynesville.
  • Q2 2026 EBITDA rose 6%; management raised 2026 EBITDA guidance to $8.3-$8.5 billion.
  • Delta Access and Shelby Connector target early 2029 and first-half 2028 in-service dates.

What critics are saying

  • September 9, 2026 Third Circuit vacated NESE’s New Jersey water permit, reopening years of delay.
  • Constitution Pipeline remains unbuilt; New York and New Jersey regulators have repeatedly rejected it.
  • Williams’ shift into power projects invites execution slippage, permitting fights, and capital strain.

What makes Williams unique

  • Williams controls Transco, the dominant East Coast gas highway, plus Haynesville-to-LNG corridors.
  • September 2026 Momentum Midstream adds 4,000 miles and 6 Bcf/d of gathering capacity.
  • Power Innovation links pipelines to data-center generation, including Socrates South and Neo projects.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

  • Health Insurance
  • Dental Insurance
  • Vision Insurance
  • Life Insurance
  • Disability Insurance
  • 401(k) Retirement Plan
  • 401(k) Company Match
  • Unlimited Paid Time Off
  • Flexible Work Hours
  • Remote Work Options
  • Paid Vacation
  • Wellness Program

Growth & Insights and Company News

6 month growth

2%

1 year growth

7%

2 year growth

8%
Wyoming Tribune Eagle
Oct 20th, 2026
State to grant $48M in 'Energy Dominance' funds, asks for public input.

State to grant $48M in 'Energy Dominance' funds, asks for public input. * Dustin Bleizeffer WyoFile.com * Oct 20, 2026 Updated Oct 20, 2026 * Comments Wyoming's top energy shop wants to grant a total $48 million from the state's new Energy Dominance Fund to three companies, and it's asking the public to weigh in on the projects during a comment period that ends Nov. 16. The Wyoming Energy Authority, which administers the grant and loan program, will forward its recommendations, along with public comments, to Gov. Mark Gordon for his approval. The three recommended grants include: * $20 million to Nucleon Fuel for its Fort Union Uranium Conversion facility in Campbell County. The Canadian-headquartered company proposes to "convert uranium concentrate into uranium hexafluoride, the feedstock for commercial uranium enrichment," according to the project summary it submitted to the state. * $15 million to Williams Companies for its Flat Top Compressor Station project in Carbon County. The Tulsa, Oklahoma-based company proposes to build a 15,000-horsepower compressor station and about 8 miles of pipeline "connecting to Williams' existing Wamsutter gathering system," according to its project summary. * $13 million to WE Soda for its Westvaco Natural Gas Upgrade project in Sweetwater County. The London-based company wants to build a "high-pressure natural gas supply connection from the Williams' MountainWest Overthrust Pipeline system," according to its project summary. The Wyoming Legislature created the Energy Dominance Fund during the most recent legislative session, authorizing up to $105 million for loans and grants to support energy projects in the state. The awards are to be used as matching funds to leverage money from other government and private entities. The pot of money is filled by severance tax revenue from energy extraction, like coal mining and oil and natural gas development. The Energy Authority is also recommending a $969,243 grant - from a separate pot of money, the Energy Matching Funds program - to Arcadia Minerals, a Riverton-based company partnered with Canadian firm Meta Critical Minerals. The grant would help support "testing" to characterize "potential saleable rare earth, titanium and zircon products" at the company's Dugout Creek Project in Washakie County, according to its project summary submitted to the state. The Energy Dominance projects. Nucleon Fuel is hoping to capitalize on a federal push to expand the nation's nuclear fuel supply chain, which relies significantly on foreign sources, as well as enrichment facilities outside the U.S. Domestic uranium production is once again on the rise, and Wyoming is poised to lead the charge with four mines currently in operation, industry leaders say. But once Wyoming mines collect uranium and concentrate it into U-3O8, or yellowcake, it must be shipped out of state for processing. The next step is to convert U-3O8 concentrate into the gas hexafluoride (UF[6]). There's only one facility in the U.S. that does that, and it's in southern Illinois. Nucleon's uranium conversion facility would bring that capability to the Fort Union Industrial Park north of Gillette. The new facility would have the capacity to convert about 15,000 tons annually, adding another link in the nuclear fuel supply chain in the state, according to the company. The plant could be in operation by 2032, it said. Demand for domestic natural gas is also on the rise, and Williams controls one of the largest gas-pipeline matrices in the nation. The company plans to increase gas production in the Wamsutter area, noting that, without expansion, "existing gathering and compression infrastructure is projected to become insufficient, potentially resulting in constrained production, reduced operational efficiency and delayed energy development," it said. Not far away, WE Soda is among a handful of trona mining and soda ash producers in southwest Wyoming hoping to expand production. To survive global market headwinds Wyoming operations need to become as efficient as possible, the company recently told WyoFile. Part of WE Soda's effort is to shift from coal to natural gas to fuel its boilers, which are used to process trona to soda ash. "The project will help maintain the competitiveness of Wyoming-produced soda ash by providing a cost-effective and reliable thermal energy source for current operations in time to replace the economical local coal which will be depleted by the end 2027," the company said. "Conversion to natural gas supports emissions reductions and creates a pathway for future facility expansions that could significantly increase soda ash and specialty products production." Let the news come to you. Get any of our free email newsletters - news headlines, sports, arts & entertainment, state legislature, CFD news, and more. WyoFile is an independent nonprofit news organization focused on Wyoming people, places and policy.

Yahoo Finance
Oct 19th, 2026
Williams' moat is permits, not steel: Transco's right of way supports a 39.54% operating margin

The Williams Companies (NYSE: WMB) owes its economic moat to permits more than steel, according to an Insider Monkey analysis. Its Transco pipeline runs from the Gulf Coast up the eastern seaboard, and rivals would need approval from every state the route crosses. Several attempts to build new pipe into the northeast have been abandoned after failing to win approvals. The business keeps 39.54% of revenue as operating profit, with return on equity at 21.50%. Revenue rose 7.80% last quarter, and borrowings equal 200.37% of equity. The stock closed at $71.28 on October 16, up 0.5% in six months. It trades at 26.81 times expected earnings and yields 2.95%. The same rules that shield Williams also limit its growth.

Insider Monkey
Oct 6th, 2026
Williams (WMB) vs Kinder Morgan (KMI): which is a better stock to buy?

Williams (WMB) vs Kinder Morgan (KMI): which is a better stock to buy? Williams earns almost the same profit from two thirds of the sales, but Kinder Morgan costs 2.20 times book against 6.77 and funds its distribution from cash rather than borrowing. Published October 6, 2026 at 3:53 pm EDT The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) was trading at around $71 on October 5, and Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE:KMI) at around $32. Both own pipelines and charge for moving gas through them. Neither produces the gas or sets its price. When two companies collect tolls on similar assets, the comparison comes down to how much they collect per dollar of revenue and what they paid for the pipe. Williams collects more on every dollar: Start with what each company keeps from a dollar of toll. Williams produced $3.07 billion of net profit from $12.32 billion of revenue. Kinder Morgan produced $3.45 billion from $17.96 billion. Almost the same profit from two-thirds of the sales. For two businesses charging for the same service, that gap has to come from which pipelines they own and what sits at either end of them. The margins put a number on it, at 39.54% operating against 30.07%. Nine points between two toll collectors is not noise. Return on equity doubles the point, at 21.50% against 10.99%, and earnings grew 51.50% last quarter against 21.30%. On every measure of how well the asset converts, Williams is the better business. Kinder Morgan costs far less for the same tolls: Then you look at what each one costs, and the ranking inverts. Williams trades at 6.77 times book value. Kinder Morgan trades at 2.20 times. For a business whose value is literally pipe in the ground, book value is the measure that matters, and Williams costs three times as much per dollar of recorded asset. The gap narrows once debt is counted, to 14.85 times enterprise value to EBITDA against 13.21 times, because Williams carries debt-to-equity of 200.37% against 98.62%. Cash flow is where it stops being about price at all. Kinder Morgan produced $1.08 billion of levered free cash flow. Williams produced negative $1.52 billion. That is the better margin funding construction rather than owners. Williams is building pipe, and the building currently costs more than the tolls bring in, which is also why it yields 2.98% against 3.80%. Both are held for the distribution, so the comparison that matters is against other payers. We ranked this year's best performers here. The valuation case: Williams traded near $71 on October 5 after rising 10.95% over twelve months. Kinder Morgan traded near $32, up 11.24%. Sustainability is identical and sits outside both. Pipelines earn while gas flows, and neither management decides how much gas there is. On price, Kinder Morgan is cheaper on book value and on enterprise value. It also pays more and funds that distribution from cash it generated. Williams answers with nine more points of margin, double the return on equity, and faster earnings growth. A PEG ratio of 2.07 at Williams against 3.19 at Kinder Morgan is the one measure pointing back the other way. Ten stocks positioned for high returns in 2026 are named here. Conclusion: Kinder Morgan is the better of the two. It costs 2.20 times book against 6.77 times for assets doing the same job, pays 3.80% against 2.98%, and funds that distribution from $1.08 billion it generated rather than from borrowing. However, Williams converts a dollar of toll into far more profit, earning nine more points of operating margin and double the return on equity. Its negative $1.52 billion is construction rather than deterioration. The number to watch at Williams is free cash flow, because it turns positive the moment the building slows. Market sentiment: The Williams Companies, Inc. was held by 79 hedge funds with a combined stake value of about $2.13 billion at the end of Q2 2026 in the Insider Monkey database. This is down from 84 hedge fund holders with a cumulative investment value of around $2.14 billion in the previous quarter. Kinder Morgan, Inc. was held by 60 hedge funds with a combined stake value of about $1.92 billion at the end of the same quarter. This is down from 62 hedge fund holders with a cumulative investment value of around $2.28 billion three months earlier.

Yahoo Finance
Sep 22nd, 2026
Williams raises $2.75B in debt as shares trade at double discount to analyst targets

Williams Companies has raised $2.75 billion through a multi-tranche senior notes offering, with maturities ranging from 2029 to 2056 and coupons between 5.000% and 6.400%. The new long-dated unsecured debt reshapes the company's funding mix and provides clearer visibility on fixed interest costs. Despite the fresh debt layer, Williams trades at a discount to both analyst targets and intrinsic estimates. The most followed narrative places fair value at $85.25 against a last close of $71.65, implying meaningful upside. Williams' connectivity to LNG export terminals positions it to capture throughput gains as US LNG exports grow. However, the company trades at a P/E of 28.5x, well above the US Oil and Gas industry average of 13.2x.

Yahoo Finance
Sep 18th, 2026
Williams Companies edges Energy Transfer in AI power race with pure natural gas play

Energy Transfer and Williams Companies, two major US midstream operators, are both positioned to benefit from surging natural gas demand driven by power-hungry data centres and AI infrastructure. According to the International Energy Agency, natural gas accounts for over 40% of grid electricity consumed by US data centres. However, Williams emerges as the stronger AI play. The company generates all its adjusted EBITDA from natural gas operations through Transco, the largest natural gas pipeline system in the US. Energy Transfer, whilst transporting roughly 30% of US natural gas production, only derives about 40% of its adjusted EBITDA from natural gas assets. Williams trades at 14 times this year's adjusted EBITDA versus Energy Transfer's 7 times. Energy Transfer offers a higher forward yield of 6.5% compared to Williams' 2.9%.