
Work Here?
Work Here?
Work Here?
Vivid Seats operates an online marketplace for secondary tickets to live events, connecting buyers and sellers. Sellers list tickets on the platform; buyers browse listings, choose tickets by quantity, price, or seat location, and complete purchases. The company earns revenue by charging a service fee on each transaction paid by the buyer, and tickets are delivered electronically. It differentiates itself with a user-friendly mobile app, strong customer service, and guaranteed tickets to ensure buyers receive valid tickets on time, adding trust in a competitive market. The goal is to provide a reliable, convenient platform for buying and selling live event tickets with secure delivery and support.
Industries
Consumer Software
Entertainment
Company Size
501-1,000
Company Stage
IPO
Headquarters
Chicago, Illinois
Founded
2001
See people who can refer or advise you
Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?
Total Funding
$738.6M
Above
Industry Average
Funded Over
5 Rounds
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Vision Insurance
401(k) Company Match
Unlimited Paid Time Off
Mental Health Support
Company Equity
Performance Bonus
Hybrid Work Options
Bucks County joins lawsuit accusing Vivid Seats of hiding ticket fees from consumers. (Credit: Bucks County DA) Seven Pennsylvania district attorneys allege ticket reseller used 'drip pricing' and online tactics to conceal final costs until late in checkout. Bucks County District Attorney Joe Khan has joined prosecutors from six other Pennsylvania counties in a consumer protection lawsuit accusing online ticket reseller Vivid Seats of hiding mandatory fees until late in the purchasing process and using website features designed to pressure customers into completing transactions. The amended lawsuit, filed in Monroe County Common Pleas Court, names district attorneys from Bucks, Montgomery, Monroe, Lackawanna, Pike, Luzerne and Wyoming counties as plaintiffs on behalf of the Commonwealth. It alleges Vivid Seats Inc. and Vivid Seats LLC violated Pennsylvania's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law through what prosecutors describe as deceptive "drip pricing" and digital "dark patterns." The allegations have not been proven in court. At the heart of the case is a familiar frustration for anyone who has shopped online for concert or sports tickets: a price that looks attractive at first, only to grow as the buyer works through checkout. Prosecutors allege Vivid Seats advertises ticket prices without mandatory fees, guides customers through multiple checkout screens and then reveals additional charges only after buyers have invested time entering personal and payment information. The complaint also accuses the company of using countdown clocks and page designs that make it harder for consumers to comparison shop. "When hardworking Pennsylvanians budget their money to take their families to a concert, game, or theater performance, affordability and honest pricing matter," Khan said, in a release. "Hiding massive fees until the final second isn't just bad business. It is deceptive, it is illegal under Pennsylvania law, and it directly undermines affordability for families across our county and state." Khan said Bucks County joined the coalition to seek greater transparency from online ticket brokers. The amended complaint provides a detailed example involving two tickets advertised for the 2025 Elements Music and Arts Festival at Pocono Raceway. According to the lawsuit, Vivid Seats initially displayed general admission tickets at $332 apiece, or $664 for two, without identifying additional mandatory fees. After selecting the tickets, the customer was directed through checkout while a 10-minute countdown clock urged the buyer to "Act fast!" Prosecutors allege the true price did not appear until the final checkout page. At that point, the lawsuit says, Vivid Seats added a $133.20 service charge to each ticket, or $266.40 total, plus delivery charges. The final cost reached $945.35, or $281.35 more than the original $664 ticket price. The service charge alone represented more than 40% of the advertised ticket price. The complaint alleges the company's fees vary considerably and customers are not told how they are calculated. Prosecutors contend the service fees can exceed 40% of an advertised ticket price. The lawsuit also targets the design of Vivid Seats' website and mobile app. Prosecutors allege the company uses a series of techniques to keep customers moving toward a purchase, including countdown clocks, repeatedly displaying the lower ticket price, placing the eventual total away from the portion of the screen where customers are entering information and, on its mobile app, placing the full price behind the "Place Order" button. The complaint characterizes those techniques as digital "dark patterns," or interface designs intended to influence consumer behavior. Bucks County officials said the issue has a local impact because residents use secondary ticket markets for events at venues including the Xcite Center at Parx Casino, Bucks County Playhouse and Sellersville Theater, in addition to traveling to Philadelphia for Eagles, Phillies, Sixers and Flyers games and major concerts. The case was originally brought by Monroe County District Attorney Michael Mancuso. An amended complaint adding Khan and the other participating district attorneys was filed Aug. 24. Court documents identify Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele, Lackawanna County District Attorney Brian Gallagher, Pike County District Attorney Raymond Tonkin, Luzerne County District Attorney Samuel Sanguedolce and Wyoming County District Attorney Joseph Peters as the other prosecutors joining Mancuso and Khan. The prosecutors are seeking a permanent injunction barring the practices alleged in the complaint, along with restitution for Pennsylvania residents who paid service or transfer fees and for consumers who paid those fees on tickets to events at Pennsylvania venues, regardless of where the buyer lives. The lawsuit also seeks civil penalties of up to $1,000 per applicable transaction and as much as $3,000 when the Pennsylvania consumer is 60 or older, along with attorneys' fees and other relief. "This fleecing of consumers is exactly the circumstance where we as District Attorneys have an opportunity to protect our constituents and victims from predatory practices," Sanguedolce said. The case was spearheaded by the Monroe County District Attorney's Consumer Protection Division with assistance from consumer-rights attorneys. Vivid Seats had not been found liable for the allegations as of the filing of the amended complaint. The Aug. 24 filing states that attorneys for Vivid Seats agreed to allow the amended complaint to be docketed as the operative complaint in the case, which is not an admission to its allegations.
Vivid Seats manipulates customers into paying more for tickets, Pa. prosecutors allege in lawsuit. District attorneys for Bucks and Montgomery counties join the suit, which seeks restitution for customers who paid service or transfer fees for an event in the state. PhillyVoice Staff Max Augugliaro/USA Today via Reuters Connect Vivid Seats takes customers through multiple screens before displaying the true total price, a Pennsylvania lawsuit says. Pennsylvania officials are taking Vivid Seats to court for employing "deceptive, manipulative and unfair" business practices that pushed customers to spend more on concerts and sporting events. The lawsuit, which includes district attorneys from Bucks and Montgomery counties, describes "digital dark patterns" the ticket seller employs on its website and app. Vivid Seats often uses a tactic called "drip pricing," the litigation says, wherein a business advertises only part of the true cost of its product. The full price tag is revealed later in the checkout process. As demonstrated in screenshots of the Vivid Seats interface attached to the lawsuit, customers will move through several screens displaying a "deceptively low" cost before reaching the final "place order" page. There, service and transfer fees will be added to the total. The district attorneys argue these additional charges are not fixed or explained to the consumer in any meaningful way. They can cost up to 40% the price of the tickets. "By forcing consumers to click through at least seven screens before they see the real price, Vivid Seats puts consumers in the position of having to choose between either paying those unexpected fees or abandoning the time and effort they have expended," the suit reads. As the prosecutors argue, it's possible for Vivid Seats customers to completely miss the true price of their tickets. On the app, the full total is displayed on the final checkout page behind a "place order" button. If a user does not scroll past that button, which was static on previous screens, they will not see the total. The litigation alleges that the countdown clock Vivid Seats displays as customers move through checkout creates a "false sense of urgency," adding pressure to swallow the hidden fees. The $2.50 electronic transfer fee for mobile delivery is also "unfair and deceptive," since Vivid Seats does not actually transfer the tickets. That process is handled on a separate platform and initiated by the original buyer, as the company itself acknowledges. While seven district attorneys from eastern Pennsylvania brought the suit, they are seeking restitution for all state residents who paid service and transfer fees on Vivid Seats and anyone who paid those fees for a Pennsylvania event. They are also asking the court to bar the company from engaging in deceptive business practices, as outlined in the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, and impose civil penalties. Vivid Seats did not immediately respond to request for comment. Follow Kristin & PhillyVoice on Twitter: @kristin_hunt | @thePhillyVoice Like us on Facebook: PhillyVoice Have a news tip? Let us know.
Vivid Seats accused of deceptive pricing in Pa. ticket lawsuit. Published September 9, 2026 9:19 PM EDT The brief. * * District attorneys from seven Eastern Pennsylvania counties filed a lawsuit against Vivid Seats, Inc. accusing the company of hiding mandatory fees from ticket buyers. * The legal action aims to stop alleged deceptive pricing practices, seek restitution for consumers and force full cost transparency. * It is unknown how soon the court will rule or what refund amounts affected consumers could receive. PENNSYLVANIA - District attorneys from seven Eastern Pennsylvania counties have filed a major consumer protection lawsuit against Vivid Seats, Inc., alleging the company uses deceptive pricing schemes to hide extra "junk fees" from ticket buyers, according to a coalition announcement Wednesday. The lawsuit, brought as demand for sports and concert tickets surges across the region, claims the secondary ticketing platform systematically violates Pennsylvania's consumer protection laws with these hidden charges. District attorneys push for price transparency in ticket sales. The lawsuit was originally filed by the Monroe County District Attorney's Office in the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas. On Wednesday, Bucks County District Attorney Joe Khan joined a bipartisan coalition of DAs from seven counties in Eastern Pennsylvania as the legal action expands to target Vivid Seats' pricing practices across the state. According to the complaint, Vivid Seats advertises low ticket prices online to attract buyers, but only reveals required fees at the final stage of checkout. The platform uses tactics such as countdown timers and layout designs to create a sense of urgency, which can pressure consumers to complete purchases before realizing the true total cost. The suit highlights three major issues: drip pricing, misrepresentation of fees and hiding the true cost of tickets. Together, these undisclosed charges can push the final price up by as much as 80 percent above the advertised rate. The coalition claims this prevents buyers from comparison shopping or knowing the real cost until it is too late. Local venues like the Xcite Center at Parx Casino, Bucks County Playhouse and Sellersville Theater regularly have resale tickets offered through platforms like Vivid Seats. In addition, many residents travel to Philadelphia for concerts and sporting events and could be affected by these practices. Officials cite consumer harm and call for accountability. The other side: "When hardworking Pennsylvanians budget their money to take their families to a concert, game, or theater performance, affordability and honest pricing matter," said Bucks County District Attorney Joe Khan. "Hiding massive fees until the final second isn't just bad business. It is deceptive, it is illegal under Pennsylvania law, and it directly undermines affordability for families across our county and state. We are joining this coalition to hold online ticket brokers accountable and ensure fair transparency in the marketplace." "Families in Wyoming County deserve honest, straightforward pricing when they purchase tickets for live sporting events, concerts and shows," said Wyoming County District Attorney Joseph C. Peters. "By joining this bipartisan coalition, we are standing up for consumer rights, protecting hard-earned dollars, and ensuring ticket platforms operate with total transparency." "This fleecing of consumers is exactly the circumstance where we as District Attorneys have an opportunity to protect our constituents and victims from predatory practices," said Luzerne County District Attorney Samuel M. Sanguedolce. What's next: The lawsuit seeks an injunction to halt the pricing practices in question, as well as restitution for affected consumers, civil penalties and recovery of legal costs. The coalition is led by Monroe County District Attorney Michael Mancuso and supported by the consumer rights law firm Tycko & Zavareei LLP. It remains to be seen what the outcome will be or how quickly relief will come for Pennsylvania ticket buyers. What Fox29 don't know: The timeline for a court decision, the total dollar amount of potential refunds and how soon consumers might see changes in ticket pricing transparency are currently unknown. The Source: The information comes from statements by multiple district attorneys and the publicly filed consumer protection lawsuit led by district attorneys across Eastern Pennsylvania.
FIFA subsidiary, Ticketmaster and Vivid Seats violated B.C.'s ticketing laws, finds watchdog. World Cup organizers and major resellers allegedly failed to adhere to transparent pricing and refund rules, according to inspectors with B.C.'s consumer watchdog Jun 23, 2026 11:51 AM Inspectors with B.C.'s consumer protection authority found FIFA's Canadian subsidiary and two major ticket retailers breached the province's laws governing ticket sales. Consumer Protection BC laid out the alleged contraventions of the Ticket Sales Act in three separate undertakings released Monday. Under the B.C. law, ticket sellers must guarantee a full refund if an event is cancelled, if the ticket is invalid, counterfeit, misrepresented, or bought via "bot" software, or if entry is denied. They must also provide any other legally required guarantees. FWC26 Canada Football Ltd. was singled out for allegedly breaching that section of the act when it failed to disclose all terms and conditions on its secondary ticketing platform. The FIFA subsidiary was incorporated in Victoria, B.C., in 2021 to manage everything related to hosting the 2026 FIFA World Cup in Canada. That includes overseeing "operations in host cities like Toronto and Vancouver - from infrastructure and logistics to security and local partnerships," according to DEKOM, an audiovisual and information technology that set up the company's Toronto office. As part of the undertaking, FWC26 Canada agreed to "make necessary changes" to their ticket reselling platform by June 19. Failure to do so leaves the door open for Consumer Protection BC to initiate further enforcement actions, and could make the FIFA subsidiary liable for penalties. Major sellers found to have breached several sections of B.C.'s ticket sales law. In a second undertaking, Ticketmaster Entertainment LLC was found to have failed to ensure tickets for sale on its secondary ticketing platform disclosed the reseller's name, location and contact information. Inspectors also allege Ticketmaster contravened B.C. laws that require ticket sellers and resellers to provide an itemized list of any fees, service charges and applicable taxes. "The fees and tax information must not require additional action by the consumer to view (e.g. clicking or hovering over a field) and must be of similar prominence (including text size and colour) to other information appearing as part of the offer to sell," wrote Shahid Noorani, vice-president of Consumer Protection BC. A third ticket reseller, Vivid Seats LLC, failed to ensure offers on its ticketing platform disclosed itemized taxes and the ticket's face value. In cases where taxes and the ticket's face value were disclosed, the Chicago-based company was found to have failed to disclose the details in a "clear, prominent and comprehensible" way as required under B.C. law, claims the document. Vivid Seats also allegedly contravened B.C.'s ticket laws when it failed to ensure the tickets it re-sold: * disclosed the location of the seats; * came with guaranteed refunds should something go wrong (i.e. should the ticket be a counterfeit or fail to give the buyer access to the event); * clearly disclosed terms and conditions; * disclosed reseller's name, location and contact information; * disclosed any restrictions on the sale or transfer of the ticket by the original ticket purchaser to another person. The undertaking signed by Vivid Seats requires the company to make the necessary changes along a series of rolling deadlines ending June 26 - or face further penalties. FIFA did not immediately respond to a request for comment. An emailed statement from Ticketmaster Canada said the company was "committed to providing fans with a marketplace they can trust" and that complies with B.C.'s Ticket Sales Act. "We take Consumer Protection BC's findings seriously and are working with the regulator to quickly address them," wrote a spokesperson. A spokesperson for Vivid Seats, meanwhile, said the company has been in "ongoing dialogue with B.C. officials" to understand the province's legal requirements. "Vivid Seats has always supported and pushed for regulations that increase consumer transparency, and we are working to implement the changes required under the recent enforcement action," said the spokesperson. The statement said that the company "invests heavily" to protect its customers and maintains a nearly 100 per cent "on-time ticket fulfillment rate" for 2026 World Cup tickets sold on its platform. "Every purchase is backed by our 100 per cent buyer guarantee, ensuring tickets are accurate, valid, and delivered before the event, or customers receive their money back," Vivid Seats added. Three other ticket sellers under investigation. Consumer Protection BC spokesperson Louise Hartland said in an email that the three undertakings are not a confirmed breach of the law but act as a "voluntary but legally enforceable" commitment where a business agrees to fix an issue and prevent it from happening again. "These undertakings are about transparency and fairness - to ensure people know exactly what they're buying and can get refunds when the law requires it," Hartland said. The spokesperson said the authority's inspections did not stem from consumer complaints and was not related to the FIFA World Cup. "Consumer Protection BC is currently working with three other ticket service providers to assess their compliance; however, we do not comment on ongoing or potential investigations," Hartland added. The undertakings come amid a wave of allegations that secondary ticket sellers have broken contracts with people trying to sell tickets to the global soccer tournament. In May, a B.C. man sued StubHub, alleging the ticket reseller acted negligently when it cancelled transactions on a dozen tickets to the FIFA World Cup. The Surrey resident claims he is owed $25,000, though none of the allegations have been tested in court. Other resellers have made similar claims to Business in Vancouver from as far away as New Jersey. Kingsley Bailey, a ticket broker in Vancouver, said he is not surprised FIFA, Ticketmaster and Vivid Seats were found to have breached ticket sale laws. He said large online ticket resellers have taken over the market in a process that has effectively legalized scalping. He said FIFA's practice of only disclosing the stadium section - rather than the specific seat number - makes it easy for resellers to "sell short." "They can say, 'I'm going to get you into category one...' no specifics on location," said Bailey. "This is a joke what's going on here." The ticket broker said more than a half-dozen groups have already come to his downtown store looking for replacement tickets after flying to Vancouver and realizing they had lost their purchases. In one case, Bailey said six people who had bought and later lost tickets from StubHub said they were offered a refund. But that did little to absorb the cost of the flight tickets and hotel, according to Bailey. "There are a lot of people who have been left holding the bag," he said. "They buy tickets and they get here and there's nothing there for them." "You have a problem. Who are you going to call?" Editor's Note: The original version of this story has been updated to include statements from Consumer Protection BC, Ticketmaster and Vivid Seats. The story has been edited to clarify that findings from inspectors at Consumer Protection BC do not amount to a confirmed breach of the law. BIV's free newsletters cover daily business, real estate, B.C. politics and more. Sign up here for B.C.'s most important business news delivered directly to your inbox. This has been shared 0 times.
Housecall Pro appoints Stan Chia as Chief Executive Officer. Posted on June 15th, 2026 Housecall Pro(R), a leading AI-powered field service platform trusted by home service professionals who have served 1 in 4 American homes, today announced the appointment of Stan Chia as Chief Executive Officer. Chia succeeds Michael Beaudoin, who will assume the role of Chairman of the Board of Directors, where he will continue supporting the company's long-term strategy and mission to champion the trades. A proven technology executive with more than two decades of experience building and scaling high-growth businesses, Chia most recently served as Chief Executive Officer and Board Director of Vivid Seats (NASDAQ: SEAT), where he led the company's successful public market debut and helped scale the business through product innovation, technology investment and strategic growth initiatives. Prior to Vivid Seats, he served as Chief Operating Officer of Grubhub, helping scale the company into one of the nation's largest online food ordering and delivery marketplaces. Earlier in his career, Chia held leadership roles at Amazon, Cisco and General Electric. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Slickdeals. He holds a bachelor's degree in industrial engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, where he serves on the advisory board, and an MBA from Emory University. Chia joins Housecall Pro during a period of continued growth for both the company and the home service industry. More than 200,000 Pros across the United States and Canada use Housecall Pro to strengthen customer relationships, grow revenue and run more efficiently. As software, automation and AI continue to create new opportunities for home service businesses, Housecall Pro continues to invest in technology which helps Pros save time, improve profitability and operate with greater confidence. "Housecall Pro is an amazing company where the mission, market and opportunity all line up," said Chia. "The company was built to champion the Pro, serving the tradespeople and entrepreneurs who keep homes, businesses and communities running, with the scale, trust and product foundation to make their businesses meaningfully stronger. The opportunity ahead is enormous, and this is the moment to build on those strengths and accelerate technology and practical AI innovation across the platform to help define the next generation of Pro success." "Stan brings the combination Housecall Pro needs now," said Beaudoin. "He is a proven public-company CEO, a scaled technology and platform operator, and a leader who has successfully guided organizations through periods of significant growth, transformation and innovation. We are confident he is the right leader to build on our momentum, continue championing the Pro and guide Housecall Pro through its next chapter." Under Chia's leadership, Housecall Pro will continue expanding its platform and investing in AI-powered capabilities that help Pros spend less time on administrative work and more time serving customers, growing profitably and building stronger businesses. Media Contact Taylor D'Eliseo Walker Sands for Housecall Pro [email protected] Housecall Pro. Official corporate communications. Last Posted June, 2026 See what businesses like yours earn with Housecall Pro in 1 - 2 minutes. Helpful articles about the field service industry, the latest news about the app, and downloadable templates you can use right now.
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today
Industries
Consumer Software
Entertainment
Company Size
501-1,000
Company Stage
IPO
Headquarters
Chicago, Illinois
Founded
2001
Find jobs on Simplify and start your career today